Re: FYI: ksh88 quote.test fix (was: branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes)
Hi Tim, * Tim Rice wrote on Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 07:19:59PM CET: > On Sun, 13 Nov 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * tests/quote.test: Do not fail on harmless shell bug present > > in some ksh88 versions. > > Actually ksh88 was the one that would pass the quote test before the > patch. It was ksh Version M-12/28/93e-SCO that gave me trouble here. OK, I'll fix the ChangeLog entry on next commit. Thanks, Ralf
Re: FYI: ksh88 quote.test fix (was: branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes)
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Tim, [snip] > * tests/quote.test: Do not fail on harmless shell bug present > in some ksh88 versions. Actually ksh88 was the one that would pass the quote test before the patch. It was ksh Version M-12/28/93e-SCO that gave me trouble here. > Reported by Tim Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others. > -- Tim RiceMultitalents(707) 887-1469 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FYI: ksh88 quote.test fix (was: branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes)
Hi Tim,
* Tim Rice wrote on Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:23:54AM CET:
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > Does the test pass even with ksh88, after this patch is applied
> > (CVS HEAD)?
>
> Tests pass on both ksh and ksh88.
> Good work.
Thanks for confirmation. Applied to HEAD and branch-1-5, the latter
shown below.
Cheers,
Ralf
* tests/quote.test: Do not fail on harmless shell bug present
in some ksh88 versions.
Reported by Tim Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others.
Index: tests/quote.test
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/libtool/libtool/tests/quote.test,v
retrieving revision 1.6.2.2
diff -u -r1.6.2.2 quote.test
--- tests/quote.test3 Feb 2005 10:03:51 - 1.6.2.2
+++ tests/quote.test13 Nov 2005 15:13:28 -
@@ -114,9 +114,13 @@
$echo "= trying: \\$mchar quoting"
result=`$libtool -n --mode=$mode $preargs
${preflag}"${flag}${mchar}test${mchar}" $postargs` || status=1
match="${match_preflag}${flag}\\${mchar}test\\${mchar} "
+alt_match="${match_preflag}\"${flag}\\${mchar}test\\${mchar}\" "
case "$result" in
*"$match"*)
$echo "= passed: $result"
+ ;;
+*"$alt_match"*)
+ $echo "= passed (harmless ksh bug): $result"
;;
*)
$echo "= failed: $result"
Re: branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Tim, > > Quite some time ago: > > * Tim Rice wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 08:41:21PM CEST: > > On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > : * Tim Rice wrote on Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:05:21PM CEST: > > [snip] > > : > I re-ran the tests using ksh88 and all tests passed. > > : > Must be a ksh bug. > > : > Version M-11/16/88h passes quote test > > : > Version M-12/28/93e-SCO fails quote test > > > : make check TESTS=quote.test VERBOSE=x > > > = trying: \\ quoting > > = failed: mkdir .libs > > cc -c "-DVAR=\\test\\" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o > > cc -c "-DVAR=\\test\\" foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1 > > = trying: \" quoting > *snip* > > FAIL: quote.test > > Does the test pass even with ksh88, after this patch is applied > (CVS HEAD)? Tests pass on both ksh and ksh88. Good work. > > Thank you, > Ralf > -- Tim RiceMultitalents(707) 887-1469 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes
Hi Tim,
Quite some time ago:
* Tim Rice wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 08:41:21PM CEST:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> : * Tim Rice wrote on Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:05:21PM CEST:
> [snip]
> : > I re-ran the tests using ksh88 and all tests passed.
> : > Must be a ksh bug.
> : > Version M-11/16/88h passes quote test
> : > Version M-12/28/93e-SCO fails quote test
> : make check TESTS=quote.test VERBOSE=x
> = trying: \\ quoting
> = failed: mkdir .libs
> cc -c "-DVAR=\\test\\" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o
> cc -c "-DVAR=\\test\\" foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1
> = trying: \" quoting
*snip*
> FAIL: quote.test
Does the test pass even with ksh88, after this patch is applied
(CVS HEAD)?
Thank you,
Ralf
* tests/quote.test: Do not fail on harmless shell bug present
in some ksh88 versions.
Reported by Tim Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others.
Index: tests/quote.test
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/libtool/libtool/tests/quote.test,v
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -r1.19 quote.test
--- tests/quote.test22 Apr 2005 10:10:30 - 1.19
+++ tests/quote.test12 Nov 2005 16:23:46 -
@@ -97,9 +97,13 @@
$ECHO "= trying: \\$mchar quoting"
result=`$LIBTOOL -n --mode=$mode $preargs
${preflag}"${flag}${mchar}test${mchar}" $postargs` || status=$EXIT_FAILURE
match="${match_preflag}${flag}\\${mchar}test\\${mchar} "
+alt_match="${match_preflag}\"${flag}\\${mchar}test\\${mchar}\" "
case "$result" in
*"$match"*)
$ECHO "= passed: $result"
+ ;;
+*"$alt_match"*)
+ $ECHO "= passed (harmless sh bug): $result"
;;
*)
$ECHO "= failed: $result"
FYI: branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes
Hi Tim, * Tim Rice wrote on Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 01:13:36AM CEST: > On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > Could you -- in light of this -- repost your patch, so we can apply it? > > (Or test CVS HEAD first and then repost; whatever suits you best.) > > A ChangeLog entry would be nice, but I'll happily write one for you, > > too. :) > > Ok, here it is including an attempt at a ChangeLog entry. Thank you very much. I have applied the patch to CVS branch-1-5, with the slightly adjusted ChangeLog entry below. Cheers, Ralf 2005-09-27 Tim Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * libtool.m4 (AC_DEPLIBS_CHECK_METHOD) (AC_LIBTOOL_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER, AC_LIBTOOL_LANG_CXX_CONFIG) (AC_LIBTOOL_PROG_COMPILER_PIC, AC_LIBTOOL_PROG_LD_SHLIBS) * ltdl.m4 (AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS) [ unixware7* | sysv5* ]: Get UnixWare 7.1.[34] and OpenServer 6 fully working. Improve other UnixWare versions a little.
Re: branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> * Tim Rice wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 10:45:29PM CEST:
> > On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > * Tim Rice wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 08:41:21PM CEST:
>
> > > > All UnixWare 2.x versions (and 1.x) are sysv4.2, so the sysv4*uw2 entry
> > > > becomes redundant.
> > >
> > > Well, I _was_ cheating a bit:
> > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2005-09/msg00013.html
> > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2005-09/msg00036.html
> > > (be sure to look through both threads -- I installed a bogus patch first,
> > > stumbling over this exact same issue ;-)
> >
> > And I made the same mistake (sysv4*uw2/sysv4.2*uw2) in
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-10/msg00012.html
> >
> > OK, so we don't need to worry about sysv4*uw2 as all UnixWare 2 are
> > sysv4.2
>
> Good thing we got that sorted out. ;-)
>
> Could you -- in light of this -- repost your patch, so we can apply it?
> (Or test CVS HEAD first and then repost; whatever suits you best.)
> A ChangeLog entry would be nice, but I'll happily write one for you,
> too. :)
Ok, here it is including an attempt at a ChangeLog entry.
>
> Thank you,
> Ralf
>
>
>
>
--
Tim RiceMultitalents(707) 887-1469
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- libtool-1.5/ChangeLog.old 2005-09-25 09:00:18.0 -0700
+++ libtool-1.5/ChangeLog 2005-09-26 15:54:26.944777219 -0700
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+2005-09-26 Tim Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ * libtool.m4 (AC_DEPLIBS_CHECK_METHOD, AC_LIBTOOL_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER)
+ (AC_LIBTOOL_LANG_CXX_CONFIG, AC_LIBTOOL_PROG_COMPILER_PIC)
+ (AC_LIBTOOL_PROG_LD_SHLIBS):
+ * ltdl.m4 (AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS):
+ Get UnixWare 7.1.[34] and OpenServer 6 fully working.
+ Improve other UnixWare versions a little.
+
2005-09-25 Alan W. Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- libtool-1.5/libtool.m4.old 2005-09-22 16:59:00.0 -0700
+++ libtool-1.5/libtool.m4 2005-09-26 15:31:57.164617030 -0700
@@ -1655,7 +1655,7 @@
need_version=yes
;;
-sysv4 | sysv4.2uw2* | sysv4.3* | sysv5*)
+sysv4 | sysv4.2uw2* | sysv4.3*)
version_type=linux
library_names_spec='${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$versuffix
${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$major $libname${shared_ext}'
soname_spec='${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$major'
@@ -1688,6 +1688,19 @@
fi
;;
+sysv5*)
+ version_type=linux
+ need_lib_prefix=no
+ need_version=no
+ library_names_spec='${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$versuffix
${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$major $libname${shared_ext}'
+ soname_spec='${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$major'
+ shlibpath_var=LD_LIBRARY_PATH
+ shlibpath_overrides_runpath=yes
+ hardcode_into_libs=yes
+ sys_lib_search_path_spec='/usr/ccs/lib /usr/lib'
+ sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec="$sys_lib_search_path_spec"
+ ;;
+
uts4*)
version_type=linux
library_names_spec='${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$versuffix
${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$major $libname${shared_ext}'
@@ -2314,11 +2327,7 @@
lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all
;;
-sysv5OpenUNIX8* | sysv5UnixWare7* | sysv5uw[[78]]*)
- lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all
- ;;
-
-sysv4 | sysv4.2uw2* | sysv4.3* | sysv5*)
+sysv4 | sysv4.2uw2* | sysv4.3*)
case $host_vendor in
motorola)
lt_cv_deplibs_check_method='file_magic ELF [[0-9]][[0-9]]*-bit [[ML]]SB
(shared object|dynamic lib) M[[0-9]][[0-9]]* Version [[0-9]]'
@@ -2339,10 +2348,13 @@
siemens)
lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all
;;
+ pc)
+lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all
+;;
esac
;;
-sysv4*uw2* | unixware7*)
+unixware7* | sysv5*)
lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all
;;
esac
@@ -3559,8 +3571,29 @@
;;
esac
;;
- sysv5OpenUNIX8* | sysv5UnixWare7* | sysv5uw[[78]]* | unixware7*)
-_LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds_need_lc, $1)=no
+ sysv5OpenUNIX8* | sysv5UnixWare7.[[01]].[[01]]* | sysv5uw[[78]]* |
unixware7*)
+case $cc_basename in
+ CC*)
+ _LT_AC_TAGVAR(no_undefined_flag, $1)='${wl}-z ${wl}text'
+ _LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds, $1)='$CC -G ${wl}-h ${wl}$soname -o $lib
$libobjs $deplibs $compiler_flags'
+ _LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds_need_lc, $1)=no
+ runpath_var='LD_RUN_PATH'
+ _LT_AC_TAGVAR(hardcode_shlibpath_var, $1)=no
+ ;;
+esac
+;;
+ sysv5*)
+case $cc_basename in
+ CC*)
+ _LT_AC_TAGVAR(no_undefined_flag, $1)='${wl}-z ${wl}text'
+ _LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds, $1)='$CC -G ${wl}-h ${wl}$soname -o $lib
$libobjs $deplibs $compiler_flags'
+ _LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds_need_lc, $1)=no
+ _LT_AC_TAGVAR(hardcode_libdir_flag_spec, $1)='-R$libdir'
+ _LT_AC_TAGVAR(hardcode_libdir_separator, $1)=':'
+ runpath_var='LD_RUN_PATH'
+ _LT_AC_TAGVAR(hardcode_shlibpath_var, $1)=no
+ ;;
+esac
;;
tandem*)
case $cc_basename
Re: branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes
Hi Tim, * Tim Rice wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 10:45:29PM CEST: > On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Tim Rice wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 08:41:21PM CEST: > > > All UnixWare 2.x versions (and 1.x) are sysv4.2, so the sysv4*uw2 entry > > > becomes redundant. > > > > Well, I _was_ cheating a bit: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2005-09/msg00013.html > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2005-09/msg00036.html > > (be sure to look through both threads -- I installed a bogus patch first, > > stumbling over this exact same issue ;-) > > And I made the same mistake (sysv4*uw2/sysv4.2*uw2) in > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-10/msg00012.html > > OK, so we don't need to worry about sysv4*uw2 as all UnixWare 2 are > sysv4.2 Good thing we got that sorted out. ;-) Could you -- in light of this -- repost your patch, so we can apply it? (Or test CVS HEAD first and then repost; whatever suits you best.) A ChangeLog entry would be nice, but I'll happily write one for you, too. :) Thank you, Ralf
Re: branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Tim, > > * Tim Rice wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 08:41:21PM CEST: > > On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > : * Tim Rice wrote on Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:05:21PM CEST: > [snip] > > : > : Content-Description: branch-1-5-uw.patch > *snip* > > : > : > > > : > : > -sysv4*uw2* | unixware7*) > > : > : > +unixware7*) > > : > : > > : > : Now, this macro doesn't have a match for sysv4*uw2* any more. Is this > > : > : intentional? > > : > > > : > Quite intentional. Look at the case above, it already had sysv4*uw2* so > > : > the one I removed would never have been used anyway. Adding the "pc)" > > : > case to the $host_vendor part did what the other case was supposed to > > do. > > : > > : Erm, it had sysv4.2uw2* but not sysv4*uw2*. If both should be treated > > : similarly here, then you should replace the former with the latter (in > > : the line where sysv4 is also matched) > > > > Remind me never to take a proof reading job. I guess my brain was focusing > > in the uw2 part. > > All UnixWare 2.x versions (and 1.x) are sysv4.2, so the sysv4*uw2 entry > > becomes redundant. > > Well, I _was_ cheating a bit: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2005-09/msg00013.html > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2005-09/msg00036.html > (be sure to look through both threads -- I installed a bogus patch first, > stumbling over this exact same issue ;-) And I made the same mistake (sysv4*uw2/sysv4.2*uw2) in http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-10/msg00012.html OK, so we don't need to worry about sysv4*uw2 as all UnixWare 2 are sysv4.2 > > > : > It could be cleanded up further by having "sysv5* | unixware7*)". > > : > (UnixWare 7 is sysv5) > > : > > : Hmm, then both of those should be treated similarly, I guess? > > > > Yes. > > OK. > > Cheers, > Ralf > -- Tim RiceMultitalents(707) 887-1469 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes
Hi Tim, * Tim Rice wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 08:41:21PM CEST: > On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > : * Tim Rice wrote on Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:05:21PM CEST: > : > I re-ran the tests using ksh88 and all tests passed. > : > Must be a ksh bug. > : > Version M-11/16/88h passes quote test > : > Version M-12/28/93e-SCO fails quote test > : > : Please post the failing output of > : make check TESTS=quote.test VERBOSE=x > : > : Thank you. > > ---< begin "make check TESTS=quote.test VERBOSE=x" > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 14% gmake check TESTS=quote.test VERBOSE=x > === Running quote.test > == compile mode > = trying: \\ quoting > = failed: mkdir .libs > cc -c "-DVAR=\\test\\" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o > cc -c "-DVAR=\\test\\" foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1 > = trying: \" quoting > = failed: mkdir .libs > cc -c "-DVAR=\"test\"" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o > cc -c "-DVAR=\"test\"" foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1 > = trying: \` quoting > = failed: mkdir .libs > cc -c "-DVAR=\`test\`" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o > cc -c "-DVAR=\`test\`" foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1 > = trying: \$ quoting > = failed: mkdir .libs > cc -c "-DVAR=\$test\$" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o > cc -c "-DVAR=\$test\$" foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1 *snip* > FAIL: quote.test OK. This is mostly harmless, and we should eventually adjust quote.test. I tried to fix this in CVS HEAD with a patch on 2004-12-28 but had to throw that back out on 2005-06-05 because that broke on other systems' shells. Thanks for posting. > : *snip* > : > : Content-Description: branch-1-5-uw.patch *snip* > : > : > > : > : > -sysv4*uw2* | unixware7*) > : > : > +unixware7*) > : > : > : > : Now, this macro doesn't have a match for sysv4*uw2* any more. Is this > : > : intentional? > : > > : > Quite intentional. Look at the case above, it already had sysv4*uw2* so > : > the one I removed would never have been used anyway. Adding the "pc)" > : > case to the $host_vendor part did what the other case was supposed to do. > : > : Erm, it had sysv4.2uw2* but not sysv4*uw2*. If both should be treated > : similarly here, then you should replace the former with the latter (in > : the line where sysv4 is also matched) > > Remind me never to take a proof reading job. I guess my brain was focusing > in the uw2 part. > All UnixWare 2.x versions (and 1.x) are sysv4.2, so the sysv4*uw2 entry > becomes redundant. Well, I _was_ cheating a bit: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2005-09/msg00013.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2005-09/msg00036.html (be sure to look through both threads -- I installed a bogus patch first, stumbling over this exact same issue ;-) > : > It could be cleanded up further by having "sysv5* | unixware7*)". > : > (UnixWare 7 is sysv5) > : > : Hmm, then both of those should be treated similarly, I guess? > > Yes. OK. Cheers, Ralf
Re: branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
: Hi Tim,
:
: * Tim Rice wrote on Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:05:21PM CEST:
: > On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
: > : * Tim Rice wrote on Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 10:20:29PM CEST:
[snip]
: > I re-ran the tests using ksh88 and all tests passed.
: > Must be a ksh bug.
: > Version M-11/16/88h passes quote test
: > Version M-12/28/93e-SCO fails quote test
:
: Please post the failing output of
: make check TESTS=quote.test VERBOSE=x
:
: Thank you.
---< begin "make check TESTS=quote.test VERBOSE=x" >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 14% gmake check TESTS=quote.test VERBOSE=x
Making check in .
gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/gnu/libtool-1.5/build'
gmake[1]: Nothing to be done for `check-am'.
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/gnu/libtool-1.5/build'
Making check in libltdl
gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/gnu/libtool-1.5/build/libltdl'
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/gnu/libtool-1.5/build/libltdl'
Making check in doc
gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/gnu/libtool-1.5/build/doc'
gmake[1]: Nothing to be done for `check'.
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/gnu/libtool-1.5/build/doc'
Making check in tests
gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/gnu/libtool-1.5/build/tests'
gmake check-TESTS
gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/gnu/libtool-1.5/build/tests'
=== Running quote.test
== compile mode
= trying: no quoting
= passed: mkdir .libs
cc -c -DVAR=test foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o
cc -c -DVAR=test foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1
= trying: \\ quoting
= failed: mkdir .libs
cc -c "-DVAR=\\test\\" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o
cc -c "-DVAR=\\test\\" foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1
= trying: \" quoting
= failed: mkdir .libs
cc -c "-DVAR=\"test\"" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o
cc -c "-DVAR=\"test\"" foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1
= trying: \` quoting
= failed: mkdir .libs
cc -c "-DVAR=\`test\`" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o
cc -c "-DVAR=\`test\`" foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1
= trying: \$ quoting
= failed: mkdir .libs
cc -c "-DVAR=\$test\$" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o
cc -c "-DVAR=\$test\$" foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1
= trying: "[" quoting
= passed: mkdir .libs
cc -c "-DVAR=[test[" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o
cc -c "-DVAR=[test[" foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1
= trying: "]" quoting
= passed: mkdir .libs
cc -c "-DVAR=]test]" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o
cc -c "-DVAR=]test]" foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1
= trying: "~" quoting
= passed: mkdir .libs
cc -c "-DVAR=~test~" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o
cc -c "-DVAR=~test~" foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1
= trying: "#" quoting
= passed: mkdir .libs
cc -c "-DVAR=#test#" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o
cc -c "-DVAR=#test#" foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1
= trying: "^" quoting
= passed: mkdir .libs
cc -c "-DVAR=^test^" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o
cc -c "-DVAR=^test^" foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1
= trying: "&" quoting
= passed: mkdir .libs
cc -c "-DVAR=&test&" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o
cc -c "-DVAR=&test&" foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1
= trying: "*" quoting
= passed: mkdir .libs
cc -c "-DVAR=*test*" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o
cc -c "-DVAR=*test*" foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1
= trying: "(" quoting
= passed: mkdir .libs
cc -c "-DVAR=(test(" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o
cc -c "-DVAR=(test(" foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1
= trying: ")" quoting
= passed: mkdir .libs
cc -c "-DVAR=)test)" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o
cc -c "-DVAR=)test)" foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1
= trying: "{" quoting
= passed: mkdir .libs
cc -c "-DVAR={test{" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o
cc -c "-DVAR={test{" foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1
= trying: "}" quoting
= passed: mkdir .libs
cc -c "-DVAR=}test}" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o
cc -c "-DVAR=}test}" foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1
= trying: "|" quoting
= passed: mkdir .libs
cc -c "-DVAR=|test|" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o
cc -c "-DVAR=|test|" foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1
= trying: ";" quoting
= passed: mkdir .libs
cc -c "-DVAR=;test;" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o
cc -c "-DVAR=;test;" foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1
= trying: "<" quoting
= passed: mkdir .libs
cc -c "-DVAR=/dev/null 2>&1
= trying: ">" quoting
= passed: mkdir .libs
cc -c "-DVAR=>test>" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o
cc -c "-DVAR=>test>" foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1
= trying: "?" quoting
= passed: mkdir .libs
cc -c "-DVAR=?test?" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o
cc -c "-DVAR=?test?" foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1
= trying: "'" quoting
= passed: mkdir .libs
cc -c "-DVAR='test'" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o
cc -c "-DVAR='test'" foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1
= trying: " " quoting
= passed: mkdir .libs
cc -c "-DVAR= test " foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o
cc -c "-DVAR= test " foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1
= trying: " " quoting
= passed: mkdir .libs
cc -c "-DVAR= test" foo.c -KPIC -DPIC -o
Re: branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes
Hi Tim, * Tim Rice wrote on Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:05:21PM CEST: > On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > : * Tim Rice wrote on Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 10:20:29PM CEST: > : > > : > I did some work on branch-1-5 to try and get libtool fully functional > : > on UnixWare 7.1.4. I was mostly successful, only the quote test fails. > : > Probably a ksh bug. > : > : Which of the quote test lines fail? Did you run the test in a new build > : tree or did you ever re-configure (there is a bug in branch-1-5 wrt. > > Always a fresh build tree. OK. > : setting $SHELL correctly on a config.status-induced configure rerun. If > : in doubt retry with a new build tree) > > I re-ran the tests using ksh88 and all tests passed. > Must be a ksh bug. > Version M-11/16/88h passes quote test > Version M-12/28/93e-SCO fails quote test Please post the failing output of make check TESTS=quote.test VERBOSE=x Thank you. *snip* > : Content-Description: branch-1-5-uw.patch > [snip] > : > @@ -2314,11 +2327,11 @@ > : >lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all > : >;; > : > > : > -sysv5OpenUNIX8* | sysv5UnixWare7* | sysv5uw[[78]]*) > : > +sysv5*) > : >lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all > : >;; > : > > : > -sysv4 | sysv4.2uw2* | sysv4.3* | sysv5*) > : > +sysv4 | sysv4.2uw2* | sysv4.3*) > : >case $host_vendor in > : >motorola) > : > lt_cv_deplibs_check_method='file_magic ELF [[0-9]][[0-9]]*-bit > [[ML]]SB (shared object|dynamic lib) M[[0-9]][[0-9]]* Version [[0-9]]' > : > @@ -2339,10 +2352,13 @@ > : >siemens) > : > lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all > : > ;; > : > + pc) > : > +lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all > : > +;; > : >esac > : >;; > : > > : > -sysv4*uw2* | unixware7*) > : > +unixware7*) > : > : Now, this macro doesn't have a match for sysv4*uw2* any more. Is this > : intentional? > > Quite intentional. Look at the case above, it already had sysv4*uw2* so > the one I removed would never have been used anyway. Adding the "pc)" > case to the $host_vendor part did what the other case was supposed to do. Erm, it had sysv4.2uw2* but not sysv4*uw2*. If both should be treated similarly here, then you should replace the former with the latter (in the line where sysv4 is also matched) > It could be cleanded up further by having "sysv5* | unixware7*)". > (UnixWare 7 is sysv5) Hmm, then both of those should be treated similarly, I guess? > I assume that unixware7* is in there for backward compatibility for > some old config.guess. I have no idea, really. > : > : >lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all > : >;; > : > esac > [snip] > : > @@ -5404,7 +5448,7 @@ > : >fi > : >;; > : > > : > -solaris* | sysv5*) > : > +solaris*) > : > : Any reason for this change? > > Oops, that's one of the things I tried that didn't make any difference. > Best to leave that in for now. OK. *snip large hunk* > : > : You removed setting of archive_expsym_cmds here. Was this intentional? > : Did it not work? > > Yes intentional, tests fail with it in. OK, fine then. Cheers, and thanks again, Ralf
Re: branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
: Hi Tim,
:
: * Tim Rice wrote on Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 10:20:29PM CEST:
: >
: > I did some work on branch-1-5 to try and get libtool fully functional
: > on UnixWare 7.1.4. I was mostly successful, only the quote test fails.
: > Probably a ksh bug.
:
: Which of the quote test lines fail? Did you run the test in a new build
: tree or did you ever re-configure (there is a bug in branch-1-5 wrt.
Always a fresh build tree.
: setting $SHELL correctly on a config.status-induced configure rerun. If
: in doubt retry with a new build tree)
I re-ran the tests using ksh88 and all tests passed.
Must be a ksh bug.
Version M-11/16/88h passes quote test
Version M-12/28/93e-SCO fails quote test
:
: > As a side effect, OpenServer 6 (also SVR5) passes all tests. While I
: > was at it I cleaned up the earlier UnixWare releases a little bit.
:
: Hmm. While the improvements look really good, and I know virtually
: nothing about the systems in question, I still have a couple of
: comments. It would be nice if you could take a look, see below.
:
: Thanks!
: Ralf
:
: Content-Description: branch-1-5-uw.patch
[snip]
: > @@ -2314,11 +2327,11 @@
: >lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all
: >;;
: >
: > -sysv5OpenUNIX8* | sysv5UnixWare7* | sysv5uw[[78]]*)
: > +sysv5*)
: >lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all
: >;;
: >
: > -sysv4 | sysv4.2uw2* | sysv4.3* | sysv5*)
: > +sysv4 | sysv4.2uw2* | sysv4.3*)
: >case $host_vendor in
: >motorola)
: > lt_cv_deplibs_check_method='file_magic ELF [[0-9]][[0-9]]*-bit
[[ML]]SB (shared object|dynamic lib) M[[0-9]][[0-9]]* Version [[0-9]]'
: > @@ -2339,10 +2352,13 @@
: >siemens)
: > lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all
: > ;;
: > + pc)
: > +lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all
: > +;;
: >esac
: >;;
: >
: > -sysv4*uw2* | unixware7*)
: > +unixware7*)
:
: Now, this macro doesn't have a match for sysv4*uw2* any more. Is this
: intentional?
Quite intentional. Look at the case above, it already had sysv4*uw2* so
the one I removed would never have been used anyway. Adding the "pc)"
case to the $host_vendor part did what the other case was supposed to do.
It could be cleanded up further by having "sysv5* | unixware7*)".
(UnixWare 7 is sysv5)
I assume that unixware7* is in there for backward compatibility for
some old config.guess.
:
: >lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all
: >;;
: > esac
[snip]
: > @@ -5404,7 +5448,7 @@
: >fi
: >;;
: >
: > -solaris* | sysv5*)
: > +solaris*)
:
: Any reason for this change?
Oops, that's one of the things I tried that didn't make any difference.
Best to leave that in for now.
:
: >if $LD -v 2>&1 | grep 'BFD 2\.8' > /dev/null; then
: > _LT_AC_TAGVAR(ld_shlibs, $1)=no
: > cat <&2
: > @@ -5966,27 +6010,30 @@
: >runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH
: >;;
: >
: > - sysv5OpenUNIX8* | sysv5UnixWare7* | sysv5uw[[78]]* | unixware7*)
: > +sysv5OpenUNIX8* | sysv5UnixWare7.[[01]].[[10]]* | sysv5uw[[78]]* |
unixware7*)
: >_LT_AC_TAGVAR(no_undefined_flag, $1)='${wl}-z ${wl}text'
: >if test "$GCC" = yes; then
: > _LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds, $1)='$CC -shared ${wl}-h ${wl}$soname -o
$lib $libobjs $deplibs $compiler_flags'
: >else
: > _LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds, $1)='$CC -G ${wl}-h ${wl}$soname -o $lib
$libobjs $deplibs $compiler_flags'
: >fi
: > + _LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds_need_lc, $1)=no
: >runpath_var='LD_RUN_PATH'
: >_LT_AC_TAGVAR(hardcode_shlibpath_var, $1)=no
: >;;
: >
: > sysv5*)
: > - _LT_AC_TAGVAR(no_undefined_flag, $1)=' -z text'
: > - # $CC -shared without GNU ld will not create a library from C++
: > - # object files and a static libstdc++, better avoid it by now
: > - _LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds, $1)='$LD -G${allow_undefined_flag} -h
$soname -o $lib $libobjs $deplibs $linker_flags'
: > - _LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_expsym_cmds, $1)='$echo "{ global:" >
$lib.exp~cat $export_symbols | $SED -e "s/\(.*\)/\1;/" >> $lib.exp~$echo
"local: *; };" >> $lib.exp~
: > - $LD -G${allow_undefined_flag} -M $lib.exp -h $soname -o $lib
$libobjs $deplibs $linker_flags~$rm $lib.exp'
: > - _LT_AC_TAGVAR(hardcode_libdir_flag_spec, $1)=
: > - _LT_AC_TAGVAR(hardcode_shlibpath_var, $1)=no
: > + _LT_AC_TAGVAR(no_undefined_flag, $1)='${wl}-z ${wl}text'
: > + if test "$GCC" = yes; then
: > + _LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds, $1)='$CC -shared ${wl}-h ${wl}$soname -o
$lib $libobjs $deplibs $compiler_flags'
: > + else
: > + _LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds, $1)='$CC -G ${wl}-h ${wl}$soname -o $lib
$libobjs $deplibs $compiler_flags'
: > + fi
: > + _LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds_need_lc, $1)=no
: > + _LT_AC_TAGVAR(hardcode_libdir_flag_spec, $1)='-R$libdir'
: > + _LT_AC_TAGVAR(hardcode_libdir_separator, $1)=':'
: >runpath_var='LD_RUN_PATH'
: > + _LT_AC_TAGV
Re: branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes
Hi Tim,
* Tim Rice wrote on Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 10:20:29PM CEST:
>
> I did some work on branch-1-5 to try and get libtool fully functional
> on UnixWare 7.1.4. I was mostly successful, only the quote test fails.
> Probably a ksh bug.
Which of the quote test lines fail? Did you run the test in a new build
tree or did you ever re-configure (there is a bug in branch-1-5 wrt.
setting $SHELL correctly on a config.status-induced configure rerun. If
in doubt retry with a new build tree)
> As a side effect, OpenServer 6 (also SVR5) passes all tests. While I
> was at it I cleaned up the earlier UnixWare releases a little bit.
Hmm. While the improvements look really good, and I know virtually
nothing about the systems in question, I still have a couple of
comments. It would be nice if you could take a look, see below.
Thanks!
Ralf
Content-Description: branch-1-5-uw.patch
> --- libtool-1.5/libtool.m4.old2005-09-09 08:56:16.0 -0700
> +++ libtool-1.5/libtool.m42005-09-23 10:53:24.163558381 -0700
> @@ -1655,7 +1655,7 @@
>need_version=yes
>;;
>
> -sysv4 | sysv4.2uw2* | sysv4.3* | sysv5*)
> +sysv4 | sysv4.2uw2* | sysv4.3*)
>version_type=linux
>library_names_spec='${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$versuffix
> ${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$major $libname${shared_ext}'
>soname_spec='${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$major'
> @@ -1688,6 +1688,19 @@
>fi
>;;
>
> +sysv5*)
> + version_type=linux
> + need_lib_prefix=no
> + need_version=no
> + library_names_spec='${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$versuffix
> ${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$major $libname${shared_ext}'
> + soname_spec='${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$major'
> + shlibpath_var=LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> + shlibpath_overrides_runpath=yes
> + hardcode_into_libs=yes
> + sys_lib_search_path_spec='/usr/ccs/lib /usr/lib'
> + sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec="$sys_lib_search_path_spec"
> + ;;
> +
> uts4*)
>version_type=linux
>library_names_spec='${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$versuffix
> ${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$major $libname${shared_ext}'
> @@ -2314,11 +2327,11 @@
>lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all
>;;
>
> -sysv5OpenUNIX8* | sysv5UnixWare7* | sysv5uw[[78]]*)
> +sysv5*)
>lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all
>;;
>
> -sysv4 | sysv4.2uw2* | sysv4.3* | sysv5*)
> +sysv4 | sysv4.2uw2* | sysv4.3*)
>case $host_vendor in
>motorola)
> lt_cv_deplibs_check_method='file_magic ELF [[0-9]][[0-9]]*-bit [[ML]]SB
> (shared object|dynamic lib) M[[0-9]][[0-9]]* Version [[0-9]]'
> @@ -2339,10 +2352,13 @@
>siemens)
> lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all
> ;;
> + pc)
> +lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all
> +;;
>esac
>;;
>
> -sysv4*uw2* | unixware7*)
> +unixware7*)
Now, this macro doesn't have a match for sysv4*uw2* any more. Is this
intentional?
>lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all
>;;
> esac
> @@ -3559,8 +3575,29 @@
> ;;
> esac
> ;;
> - sysv5OpenUNIX8* | sysv5UnixWare7* | sysv5uw[[78]]* | unixware7*)
> -_LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds_need_lc, $1)=no
> + sysv5OpenUNIX8* | sysv5UnixWare7.[[01]].[[01]]* | sysv5uw[[78]]* |
> unixware7*)
> +case $cc_basename in
> + CC*)
> + _LT_AC_TAGVAR(no_undefined_flag, $1)='${wl}-z ${wl}text'
> + _LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds, $1)='$CC -G ${wl}-h ${wl}$soname -o $lib
> $libobjs $deplibs $compiler_flags'
> + _LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds_need_lc, $1)=no
> + runpath_var='LD_RUN_PATH'
> + _LT_AC_TAGVAR(hardcode_shlibpath_var, $1)=no
> + ;;
> +esac
> +;;
> + sysv5*)
> +case $cc_basename in
> + CC*)
> + _LT_AC_TAGVAR(no_undefined_flag, $1)='${wl}-z ${wl}text'
> + _LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds, $1)='$CC -G ${wl}-h ${wl}$soname -o $lib
> $libobjs $deplibs $compiler_flags'
> + _LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds_need_lc, $1)=no
> + _LT_AC_TAGVAR(hardcode_libdir_flag_spec, $1)='-R$libdir'
> + _LT_AC_TAGVAR(hardcode_libdir_separator, $1)=':'
> + runpath_var='LD_RUN_PATH'
> + _LT_AC_TAGVAR(hardcode_shlibpath_var, $1)=no
> + ;;
> +esac
> ;;
>tandem*)
> case $cc_basename in
> @@ -4949,7 +4986,14 @@
> ;;
> esac
> ;;
> - unixware*)
> + unixware* | sysv5*)
> + case $cc_basename in
> + CC*)
> + _LT_AC_TAGVAR(lt_prog_compiler_wl, $1)='-Wl,'
> + _LT_AC_TAGVAR(lt_prog_compiler_pic, $1)='-KPIC'
> + _LT_AC_TAGVAR(lt_prog_compiler_static, $1)='-Bstatic'
> + ;;
> + esac
> ;;
>vxworks*)
> ;;
> @@ -5404,7 +5448,7 @@
>fi
>;;
>
> -solaris* | sysv5*)
> +solaris*)
Any reason for this change?
>if $LD -v 2>&1 | grep 'BFD 2\.8' > /dev/null; then
> _LT_AC_TAGVAR(ld_shlibs, $1)=no
> cat <&2
> @@ -5966,27 +6010,30 @@
>runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH
>;;
>
> - sysv5OpenUNIX8* | sysv5UnixWare7* | sysv5uw[[78]]* | unixware7*)
> +sysv5OpenUNIX8* | sysv5UnixWare7.[[01]].[[
Re: branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes
Hi Tim, Peter, * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 12:54:05AM CEST: > Tim Rice wrote: > | I'll look at forwared porting to CVS HEAD if I can figure out > | why configure zeros out libltdl/config/ltmain.sh > | > > Good work! Yes, really! > On HEAD you need to look at ltmain.m4sh, which I think lives in > libltdl/config. Just so you don't miss it in case you didn't know: run the new test suite with make check TESTS= or possibly also with TESTSUITE_FLAGS='-v -d', or other args, --list gives some pointers. Feel free to post (maybe packed) tests output of failures; the new testsuite leaves $top_builddir/tests/testsuite.log $top_builddir/tests/testsuite.dir/NN/testsuite.log with NN the test number(s). Cheers, Ralf
Re: branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim Rice wrote: | I'll look at forwared porting to CVS HEAD if I can figure out | why configure zeros out libltdl/config/ltmain.sh | Good work! On HEAD you need to look at ltmain.m4sh, which I think lives in libltdl/config. Peter -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBQzSHjbiDAg3OZTLPAQLKCAP/ZMpty7iKRYuU5KIBkhHtuHiuVmwYm+TI zDm9prxL5TGgUV8QK1UazppoGm1l+hOENdSk8uhUaoSvQWuk0qnpzLWSpRzfC6vn hEr8PGNP9B+Oaqbo5D3/ZN4xOoAaf0f9kzovtXR7OglFM12O/alTut96ONXGbu0f tZrORGazBzU= =VEt8 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes
I did some work on branch-1-5 to try and get libtool fully functional
on UnixWare 7.1.4. I was mostly successful, only the quote test fails.
Probably a ksh bug. As a side effect, OpenServer 6 (also SVR5) passes
all tests. While I was at it I cleaned up the earlier UnixWare releases
a little bit.
I'll look at forwared porting to CVS HEAD if I can figure out
why configure zeros out libltdl/config/ltmain.sh
Here are the before and after stats.
pre patch post patch
UnixWare 2.03 UnixWare 2.03
4 of 98 tests failed4 of 100 tests failed
(5 tests were not run) (3 tests were not run)
Please report to bug-libtool@gnu.orgPlease report to bug-libtool@gnu.org
UnixWare 7.1.1 UnixWare 7.1.1
7 of 94 tests failed6 of 96 tests failed
(9 tests were not run) (7 tests were not run)
Please report to bug-libtool@gnu.orgPlease report to bug-libtool@gnu.org
UnixWare 7.1.4 UnixWare 7.1.4
6 of 96 tests failed1 of 103 tests failed
(7 tests were not run) Please report to bug-libtool@gnu.org
Please report to bug-libtool@gnu.org
OpenServer 6OpenServer 6
13 of 101 tests failed All 103 tests passed
(2 tests were not run)
Please report to bug-libtool@gnu.org
--
Tim RiceMultitalents(707) 887-1469
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- libtool-1.5/libtool.m4.old 2005-09-09 08:56:16.0 -0700
+++ libtool-1.5/libtool.m4 2005-09-23 10:53:24.163558381 -0700
@@ -1655,7 +1655,7 @@
need_version=yes
;;
-sysv4 | sysv4.2uw2* | sysv4.3* | sysv5*)
+sysv4 | sysv4.2uw2* | sysv4.3*)
version_type=linux
library_names_spec='${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$versuffix
${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$major $libname${shared_ext}'
soname_spec='${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$major'
@@ -1688,6 +1688,19 @@
fi
;;
+sysv5*)
+ version_type=linux
+ need_lib_prefix=no
+ need_version=no
+ library_names_spec='${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$versuffix
${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$major $libname${shared_ext}'
+ soname_spec='${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$major'
+ shlibpath_var=LD_LIBRARY_PATH
+ shlibpath_overrides_runpath=yes
+ hardcode_into_libs=yes
+ sys_lib_search_path_spec='/usr/ccs/lib /usr/lib'
+ sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec="$sys_lib_search_path_spec"
+ ;;
+
uts4*)
version_type=linux
library_names_spec='${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$versuffix
${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$major $libname${shared_ext}'
@@ -2314,11 +2327,11 @@
lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all
;;
-sysv5OpenUNIX8* | sysv5UnixWare7* | sysv5uw[[78]]*)
+sysv5*)
lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all
;;
-sysv4 | sysv4.2uw2* | sysv4.3* | sysv5*)
+sysv4 | sysv4.2uw2* | sysv4.3*)
case $host_vendor in
motorola)
lt_cv_deplibs_check_method='file_magic ELF [[0-9]][[0-9]]*-bit [[ML]]SB
(shared object|dynamic lib) M[[0-9]][[0-9]]* Version [[0-9]]'
@@ -2339,10 +2352,13 @@
siemens)
lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all
;;
+ pc)
+lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all
+;;
esac
;;
-sysv4*uw2* | unixware7*)
+unixware7*)
lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all
;;
esac
@@ -3559,8 +3575,29 @@
;;
esac
;;
- sysv5OpenUNIX8* | sysv5UnixWare7* | sysv5uw[[78]]* | unixware7*)
-_LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds_need_lc, $1)=no
+ sysv5OpenUNIX8* | sysv5UnixWare7.[[01]].[[01]]* | sysv5uw[[78]]* |
unixware7*)
+case $cc_basename in
+ CC*)
+ _LT_AC_TAGVAR(no_undefined_flag, $1)='${wl}-z ${wl}text'
+ _LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds, $1)='$CC -G ${wl}-h ${wl}$soname -o $lib
$libobjs $deplibs $compiler_flags'
+ _LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds_need_lc, $1)=no
+ runpath_var='LD_RUN_PATH'
+ _LT_AC_TAGVAR(hardcode_shlibpath_var, $1)=no
+ ;;
+esac
+;;
+ sysv5*)
+case $cc_basename in
+ CC*)
+ _LT_AC_TAGVAR(no_undefined_flag, $1)='${wl}-z ${wl}text'
+ _LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds, $1)='$CC -G ${wl}-h ${wl}$soname -o $lib
$libobjs $deplibs $compiler_flags'
+ _LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds_need_lc, $1)=no
+ _LT_AC_TAGVAR(hardcode_libdir_flag_spec, $1)='-R$libdir'
+ _LT_AC_TAGVAR(hardcode_libdir_separator, $1)=':'
+ runpath_var
