half-dot

2010-03-26 Thread David Bobroff
Some time ago I posted a query/suggestion/observation regarding a 
notation convention I saw in a piece we were performing in our 
orchestra.  Following a notehead, in the position of a dot, there was a 
small '×'.  Upon examination it became clear that it was, in effect, a 
'half-dot'.  It added one-quarter of the note's value rather than 
one-half.  I thought at the time that the LilyPond developers might be 
interested in supporting this notation.  I recall that Han-Wen seemed 
uninterested in supporting what appeared to be a  one-off, 
non-standard notation quirk.  Fair enough.


Now, however, this notation convention has appeared again in another 
piece by a different composer.  An example can bee seen here:


http://centrum.is/~bobroff/lilypond/half-dot.png

The piece is the Concerto for clarinet and Orchestra by Finnish 
composer Kalevi Aho.  This tiny excerpt is from the Euphonium part.  As 
a musician who has to read this, I find that having, in this instance, 
groups of five 16th notes in a beat makes this notation convenient to 
read.  I just wonder why the half-dot wasn't also used on the rests in 
the second 15/16 bar in the above example.


So, I offer this again.  Does the development team want to add this 
feature?  I'm not sure that this is important enough to me, personally, 
to make it a feature request.  On the other hand, if this notation 
convention is going to become used more it may well become accepted 
and eventually standard practice.  LilyPond already does many things 
you don't see in pre-20th century music (feathered beams, cluster 
notation, shaped notehead etc)


-David


___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel


Re: half-dot

2010-03-26 Thread Francisco Vila
2010/3/26 David Bobroff bobr...@centrum.is:
 Now, however, this notation convention has appeared again in another piece
 by a different composer.  An example can bee seen here:

 http://centrum.is/~bobroff/lilypond/half-dot.png

As a first step, you can do the following to make quarter+16th to
appear as plain quarter notes. Then, possibly add a cosmethic 'x' to
it is easier from here.

\relative c' {
\time 15/16

c4~c16
c4~c16
c4~c16

c4*5/4
c4*5/4
c4*5/4 |
}

-- 
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com


___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel


Re: Enhancement request: Termination message for lilypond compilations

2010-03-26 Thread Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)




   (lilypond $*  echo Success) || echo Failed
1. Lilypond is a multi-OS application, it doesn't just run under bash 
on a Linux-derived OS (e.g cmd on Windows, running from detached gui 
environment from JEdit or Frescobaldi - btw JEdit could also be 
running under Windows).
Doesn't LilyPond correctly return an error code upon exit? Then the GUI 
apps could easily show this message.


Bert



___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel


Re: half-dot

2010-03-26 Thread Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)




Francisco Vila wrote:

  2010/3/26 David Bobroff bobr...@centrum.is:
  
  
Now, however, this notation convention has appeared again in another piece
by a different composer. An example can bee seen here:

http://centrum.is/~bobroff/lilypond/half-dot.png

  
  
As a first step, you can do the following to make quarter+16th to
appear as plain quarter notes. Then, possibly add a cosmethic 'x' to
it is easier from here.

\relative c' {
	\time 15/16
	
	c4~c16
	c4~c16
	c4~c16
	
	c4*5/4
	c4*5/4
	c4*5/4 |
  



My favorite tweak helps here, overriding the stencil with text
interface.

\relative c' {
 \time 15/16
 
 c4~c16
 c4~c16
 c4~c16

\override Dots #'stencil = #ly:text-interface::print 
\override Dots #'text = \markup { "" }
\override Dots #'extra-offset = #'(0.2 . -1)

 c4.*5/6
 c4.*5/6
 c4.*5/6 |
}




___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel


Re: half-dot

2010-03-26 Thread David Bobroff




On 3/26/2010 1:22 PM, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:

  
Francisco Vila wrote:
  
2010/3/26 David Bobroff bobr...@centrum.is:
  

  Now, however, this notation convention has appeared again in another piece
by a different composer. An example can bee seen here:

http://centrum.is/~bobroff/lilypond/half-dot.png



As a first step, you can do the following to make quarter+16th to
appear as plain quarter notes. Then, possibly add a cosmethic 'x' to
it is easier from here.

\relative c' {
	\time 15/16
	
	c4~c16
	c4~c16
	c4~c16
	
	c4*5/4
	c4*5/4
	c4*5/4 |
  
  
  
  
My favorite tweak helps here, overriding the stencil with text
interface.
  
\relative c' {
 \time 15/16
 
 c4~c16
 c4~c16
 c4~c16
  
\override Dots #'stencil = #ly:text-interface::print 
\override Dots #'text = \markup { "" }
\override Dots #'extra-offset = #'(0.2 . -1)
  
 c4.*5/6
 c4.*5/6
 c4.*5/6 |
}
  
  


Now that's cool! Thanks! Won't necessarily need it any time soon but
it's a neat thing to have in my pocket.

-David


___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel


Re: all must do a new clone - new git repository with fixed history

2010-03-26 Thread Francisco Vila
2010/3/25 Jan Nieuwenhuizen janneke-l...@xs4all.nl:
 Hi,

 The git repository at savannah has been updated, everyone
 should do a fresh clone.

I am trying to merge master into lilypond/translation.
From your last commit (which you have commited into master branch)
some conflicts result. Where did you take
5eb98733e6102cca2eaf2cf56ec9d576ddb4638e from? It does not exist
AFAICT

-- 
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com


___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel


Re: all must do a new clone - new git repository with fixed history

2010-03-26 Thread Francisco Vila
2010/3/26 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com:
 2010/3/25 Jan Nieuwenhuizen janneke-l...@xs4all.nl:
 Hi,

 The git repository at savannah has been updated, everyone
 should do a fresh clone.

 I am trying to merge master into lilypond/translation.
 From your last commit (which you have commited into master branch)
 some conflicts result. Where did you take
 5eb98733e6102cca2eaf2cf56ec9d576ddb4638e from? It does not exist
 AFAICT

To be more precise: I've still haven't found any of the new
translation markers which doesn't give bad object error.

$ git branch
  lilypond/translation
* master

$ git show 342effa46c75df8486095f0f6e50207ca7543512 | head -n 19
commit 342effa46c75df8486095f0f6e50207ca7543512
Author: Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org
Date:   Thu Mar 25 12:11:11 2010 +0100

lily.git: Rewrite translation markers.

diff --git a/Documentation/de/dedication.itely
b/Documentation/de/dedication.itely
index f92cc11..47cc74f 100644
--- a/Documentation/de/dedication.itely
+++ b/Documentation/de/dedication.itely
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 @c -*- coding: utf-8; mode: texinfo; documentlanguage: de -*-

 @ignore
-Translation of GIT committish: 7b70644b95f383b4281e9ffa146d315d2ada11d3
+Translation of GIT committish: e06e8e778727a791d97d78ffb2c4906ceb0d9f24

 When revising a translation, copy the HEAD committish of the
 version that you are working on.  For details, see the Contributors'

$ git show e06e8e778727a791d97d78ffb2c4906ceb0d9f24
fatal: bad object e06e8e778727a791d97d78ffb2c4906ceb0d9f24

$_

Any ideas? I could be doing something bad here. Thanks,
-- 
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com


___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel


Re: all must do a new clone - new git repository with fixed history

2010-03-26 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Op vrijdag 26-03-2010 om 18:40 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Francisco
Vila:
 2010/3/26 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com:
  2010/3/25 Jan Nieuwenhuizen janneke-l...@xs4all.nl:

 To be more precise: I've still haven't found any of the new
 translation markers which doesn't give bad object error.

Oops.  Hold still, I'll have a look.

It looks like the rewrite was done using an out-of-date
translation list.

I'll see if I can revert that last commit and push
a fixed one.

Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyOfSource.com | Avatar®  http://AvatarAcademy.nl  




___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel


Re: half-dot

2010-03-26 Thread Carl Sorensen

On 3/26/10 8:43 AM, David Bobroff bobr...@centrum.is wrote:

 On 3/26/2010 1:22 PM, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
  Francisco Vila wrote:
  
 2010/3/26 David Bobroff bobr...@centrum.is mailto:bobr...@centrum.is :
   
  
  
  
 My favorite tweak helps here, overriding the stencil with text interface.
  
 \relative c' {
 \time 15/16
 
 c4~c16
 c4~c16
 c4~c16
  
 \override Dots #'stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
 \override Dots #'text = \markup { × }
 \override Dots #'extra-offset = #'(0.2 . -1)
  
 c4.*5/6
 c4.*5/6
 c4.*5/6 |
 }
  
  
 
 Now that's cool!  Thanks!  Won't necessarily need it any time soon but it's a
 neat thing to have in my pocket.

It would be nice to have this turned into an LSR snippet

Carl




___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel


AGAIN: all must do a new clone - new git repository with fixed history

2010-03-26 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Op vrijdag 26-03-2010 om 20:01 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Jan
Nieuwenhuizen:
 Op vrijdag 26-03-2010 om 18:40 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Francisco
 Vila:
  2010/3/26 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com:
   2010/3/25 Jan Nieuwenhuizen janneke-l...@xs4all.nl:
 
  To be more precise: I've still haven't found any of the new
  translation markers which doesn't give bad object error.
 
 Oops.  Hold still, I'll have a look.

Okay.  Now that I added author rewriting of the GIT era,
the committishes change -- and the fixup needed to be done
later.  On the missing objects - no idea, I had an utterly
broken git archive over here.

So, if you already pulled, pull again.  All should be fine
now.

Greetings,
Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyOfSource.com | Avatar®  http://AvatarAcademy.nl  




___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel


Re: AGAIN: all must do a new clone - new git repository with fixed history

2010-03-26 Thread Patrick McCarty
On 2010-03-27, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
 
 So, if you already pulled, pull again.  All should be fine
 now.

One further note: also make sure to pull with the `-r' flag:

  git pull -r

If you don't, then you'll see a million warnings fly down the
terminal.  :-)  It's pretty simple to clean up though:

  git reset --hard
  git pull -r


Thanks,
Patrick


___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel