Re: Bug status
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On Saturday 25 September 2004 20.36, Graham Percival wrote: > > On 24-Sep-04, at 2:31 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > >> Add boxed-rehearsal-mark to this. It is now worse than in 2.2, the > > >> bottom line > > >> is way off. see attachment. > > > > > > There is something very fishy with this one. The -f ps version is > > > perfect, as is the -f tex. Only when used through lilypond-book, it is > > > wrong. > > > > Is this the problem that's in the manual section on Rehearsal marks? > > > > http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.3/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/ > > Rehearsal-marks.html > > Yes, it's exactly the same. Take a look at the regression test for part combining. Hopefully that makes it clear what part combining should look like. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Bug status
On Saturday 25 September 2004 20.36, Graham Percival wrote: > On 24-Sep-04, at 2:31 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> Add boxed-rehearsal-mark to this. It is now worse than in 2.2, the > >> bottom line > >> is way off. see attachment. > > > > There is something very fishy with this one. The -f ps version is > > perfect, as is the -f tex. Only when used through lilypond-book, it is > > wrong. > > Is this the problem that's in the manual section on Rehearsal marks? > > http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.3/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/ > Rehearsal-marks.html Yes, it's exactly the same. Erik ___ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Bug status
On 24-Sep-04, at 2:31 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Add boxed-rehearsal-mark to this. It is now worse than in 2.2, the bottom line is way off. see attachment. There is something very fishy with this one. The -f ps version is perfect, as is the -f tex. Only when used through lilypond-book, it is wrong. Is this the problem that's in the manual section on Rehearsal marks? http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.3/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/ Rehearsal-marks.html (if not, consider this another bug report. :) HTH, - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Bug status
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On Tuesday 21 September 2004 00.27, Erik Sandberg wrote: > > I checked through the bugs quickly, and I only found one bug that makes 2.3 > > strictly worse than 2.2, and hence prevent 3.0. That's titling-piece.ly. > > Add boxed-rehearsal-mark to this. It is now worse than in 2.2, the bottom line > is way off. see attachment. > There is something very fishy with this one. The -f ps version is perfect, as is the -f tex. Only when used through lilypond-book, it is wrong. Hmm... > Erik -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Bug status
On Tuesday 21 September 2004 00.27, Erik Sandberg wrote: > I checked through the bugs quickly, and I only found one bug that makes 2.3 > strictly worse than 2.2, and hence prevent 3.0. That's titling-piece.ly. Add boxed-rehearsal-mark to this. It is now worse than in 2.2, the bottom line is way off. see attachment. Erik <>___ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Bug status
Has anyone tried lilypond-book with LaTeX recently? We have often had bugs there in the major releases. /Mats Erik Sandberg wrote: I checked through the bugs quickly, and I only found one bug that makes 2.3 strictly worse than 2.2, and hence prevent 3.0. That's titling-piece.ly. Erik ___ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = ___ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Bug status
I checked through the bugs quickly, and I only found one bug that makes 2.3 strictly worse than 2.2, and hence prevent 3.0. That's titling-piece.ly. Erik ___ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
2.3.17 bug status
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > [updating bug database] Good! The bugs document now looks considerably shorter. Incidentally, the slur-staccato is also fixed (for good, hopefully). > And Han-Wen: Beware, for I have a list of 30 unhandled email messages > reporting about possible bugs. So new bug reports may soon pop up (i don't > have more time today for that though). I'll return soon. Yes, you're right, but if 3.0 is better than 2.2, then nobody is served by delaying the release, so I propose that we proceed, carefully. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
2.3.17 bug status
Hi, Finally I have checked through the list of active bugs. The following bugs have been fixed recently, and have been moved to fixed/: ambitus-accent.ly autobeaming-end.ly chordChanges-alternative.ly hideNotes-accidental.ly octaviation-dot.ly ottava-clef.ly progerror-round-filled-box.ly slur-bow.ly slur-fermata.ly slur-tenuto.ly tuplet-overwrite.ly The following bugs have improved a bit, but are not yet completely fixed: slur-staccato slur-tie The following bug has gotten even worse now: boxed-rehearsal-marks.ly I have CC:ed this mail to everyone who has reported any of these bugs. Many thanks to you all, you have been added to the lilypond THANKS file if you weren't already there. And Han-Wen: Beware, for I have a list of 30 unhandled email messages reporting about possible bugs. So new bug reports may soon pop up (i don't have more time today for that though). I'll return soon. Erik ___ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
