Re: Woodwind diagrams: Recorder
On 11/01/17 17:54, Francisco Vila wrote: > Before starting, I have a question just in case anyone can answer: > Should I create a Recorder entry into the tin-whistle family in > scm/display-woodwinds-diagrams.scm, or better create a new Recorder > family? My reaction is that the recorder actually belongs to the flute family, so it would make sense to give it its own family. My other reaction is that there's a whole bunch of recorders, so again, grouping them on their own makes sense. If there's a whole bunch of common code, you could note at the start that the recorder is similar to and calls out to the tin-whistle family, or you could just try factoring it out. Not being a wind player, I get the impression that flute, clarinet and sax fingerings are all very similar, and are they all bunched together into one family? Cheers, Wol ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Woodwind diagrams: Recorder
Hello, I'd like to create recorder key diagrams like other woodwind instruments have (thanks to the impressive work Mike Solomon did in 2010). Recorder diagrams are very simple and the nearest existent instrument is tin-whistle, just recorders have seven holes, the seventh being usually drawn with an offset to the left, plus an Octave hole at top right. Before starting, I have a question just in case anyone can answer: Should I create a Recorder entry into the tin-whistle family in scm/display-woodwinds-diagrams.scm, or better create a new Recorder family? Should I first try making a stand-alone file with uses the existent functions, or is better to directly modify display-woodwinds-diagrams.scm? Thanks. I wonder what is the IDE of choice when developing such complex Scheme code. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
