Re: GoldenAge Font

2015-02-18 Thread tisimst
It is absolutely possible to make the chord text font heavier! I should be able 
to publish the GoldenAge font family soon. 

- Abraham

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 18, 2015, at 9:34 PM, MarcM [via Lilypond] 
>  wrote:
> 
> i was thinking of using the JazzLilly font for some lead sheet i am typing 
> but now I want the Golden Age. 
> It is such a nice and balanced font. Is it possible to make the chord font 
> heavier? 
> 
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion 
> below:
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/GoldenAge-Font-tp171849p172068.html
> To start a new topic under User, email ml-node+s1069038n...@n5.nabble.com 
> To unsubscribe from Lilypond, click here.
> NAML




--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/GoldenAge-Font-tp171849p172070.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: GoldenAge Font

2015-02-18 Thread MarcM
i was thinking of using the JazzLilly font for some lead sheet i am typing
but now I want the Golden Age.
It is such a nice and balanced font. Is it possible to make the chord font
heavier?



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/GoldenAge-Font-tp171849p172068.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: [OT] Translation request

2015-02-18 Thread Urs Liska


Am 19.02.2015 um 01:51 schrieb Thomas Morley:

Am 19. Februar 2015 um 01:26 schrieb Urs Liska :

Am 19.02.2015 um 00:57 schrieb Thomas Morley:

Hi all,

I've an excerpt (one sentence) of
Michel Corette,
Methode Pour Apprendre Aisement a Jouer de La Flute Traversiere
(png attached)
Can someone translate it into english (or german)?

Any help would be highly appreciated,
   Harm


Früher bediente man sich der zwei Silben "tu", "ru", um die Zungenschläge
auszudrücken. Aber die gegenwärtigen Virtuosen zeigen [wörtlich, ich finde,
das passt nicht] sie nicht mehr durch "tu", "ru" und betrachten diese als
eine absurde Sache, die nur dazu dient, den Schüler zu blamieren [bzw. Verb
für "peinlich"].

HTH
Urs

Hi Urs,

thanks a lot!
   Harm


It's quite literally translated, I wouldn't want to publish it like 
that. But I supposed that's the better approach as I don't really know 
what you need the translation for.


Urs


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: [OT] Translation request

2015-02-18 Thread Thomas Morley
Am 19. Februar 2015 um 01:26 schrieb Urs Liska :
>
> Am 19.02.2015 um 00:57 schrieb Thomas Morley:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've an excerpt (one sentence) of
> Michel Corette,
> Methode Pour Apprendre Aisement a Jouer de La Flute Traversiere
> (png attached)
> Can someone translate it into english (or german)?
>
> Any help would be highly appreciated,
>   Harm
>
>
> Früher bediente man sich der zwei Silben "tu", "ru", um die Zungenschläge
> auszudrücken. Aber die gegenwärtigen Virtuosen zeigen [wörtlich, ich finde,
> das passt nicht] sie nicht mehr durch "tu", "ru" und betrachten diese als
> eine absurde Sache, die nur dazu dient, den Schüler zu blamieren [bzw. Verb
> für "peinlich"].
>
> HTH
> Urs

Hi Urs,

thanks a lot!
  Harm

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: GoldenAge Font

2015-02-18 Thread Urs Liska


Am 18.02.2015 um 17:56 schrieb tisimst:

Urs Liska wrote

Am 18.02.2015 um 14:47 schrieb tisimst:

So, I take it no one has any experience with this font? It looks very
nice and clean.

Just looked at the .gif, and I agree it looks nice and clean.
But is that really significantly different from Improviso?

Urs

Urs,

Well, I think they are quite different, but guess you'll have to tell me :)
Here's a sample:

GoldenAge 
Improviso 
LilyJAZZ 

- Abraham


OK, seeing these in context it becomes clear that they are different. 
And I think that it _is_ a very useful and beautiful font.


Urs




--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/GoldenAge-Font-tp171849p172038.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: [OT] Translation request

2015-02-18 Thread Urs Liska


Am 19.02.2015 um 00:57 schrieb Thomas Morley:

Hi all,

I've an excerpt (one sentence) of
Michel Corette,
Methode Pour Apprendre Aisement a Jouer de La Flute Traversiere
(png attached)
Can someone translate it into english (or german)?

Any help would be highly appreciated,
   Harm


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Früher bediente man sich der zwei Silben "tu", "ru", um die 
Zungenschläge auszudrücken. Aber die gegenwärtigen Virtuosen zeigen 
[wörtlich, ich finde, das passt nicht] sie nicht mehr durch "tu", "ru" 
und betrachten diese als eine absurde Sache, die nur dazu dient, den 
Schüler zu blamieren [bzw. Verb für "peinlich"].


HTH
Urs
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


[OT] Translation request

2015-02-18 Thread Thomas Morley
Hi all,

I've an excerpt (one sentence) of
Michel Corette,
Methode Pour Apprendre Aisement a Jouer de La Flute Traversiere
(png attached)
Can someone translate it into english (or german)?

Any help would be highly appreciated,
  Harm
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: GoldenAge Font

2015-02-18 Thread tisimst
I agree about the chord symbols, but I can remedy that by thickening up the
text font. I've almost got a method for optical music font variants under
my belt, which I hope to apply to ALL the currently available music fonts.
Stay tuned!

- Abraham

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Flaming Hakama by Elaine [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n17206...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:

>
> Well, I think they are quite different, but guess you'll have to tell me :)
>> Here's a sample:
>>
>> GoldenAge 
>> Improviso 
>> LilyJAZZ 
>>
>> - Abraham
>>
>
>
> I agree that they are quite different, and I am digging the GoldenAge
> font!  A nice balance between "handwritten" and legible, with a good amount
> of contrast (although the chord symbols seem light).
>
>
>
> David Elaine Alt
> 415 . 341 .4954   "*Confusion is
> highly underrated*"
> [hidden email] 
> self-immolation.info
> skype: flaming_hakama
> Producer ~ Composer ~ Instrumentalist
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> [hidden email] 
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
> --
>  If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/GoldenAge-Font-tp171849p172061.html
>  To start a new topic under User, email ml-node+s1069038n...@n5.nabble.com
> To unsubscribe from Lilypond, click here
> 
> .
> NAML
> 
>




--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/GoldenAge-Font-tp171849p172062.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: GoldenAge Font

2015-02-18 Thread Flaming Hakama by Elaine
> Well, I think they are quite different, but guess you'll have to tell me :)
> Here's a sample:
>
> GoldenAge 
> Improviso 
> LilyJAZZ 
>
> - Abraham
>


I agree that they are quite different, and I am digging the GoldenAge
font!  A nice balance between "handwritten" and legible, with a good amount
of contrast (although the chord symbols seem light).



David Elaine Alt
415 . 341 .4954   "*Confusion is
highly underrated*"
ela...@flaminghakama.com
self-immolation.info
skype: flaming_hakama
Producer ~ Composer ~ Instrumentalist
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: "rit." in Midi - was: Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 137, Issue 62

2015-02-18 Thread H. S. Teoh
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 12:14:19PM +, David Sumbler wrote:
> > > From: Patrick Karl 
> > > Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:18:49 -0600
> > > 
> > > I think the most disturbiing thing is that \articulate is
> > > interpreting "rit." to mean "ritenuto" rather than "ritardando",
> > > which I think is the most common interpretation of "rit.".  It
> > > would be great if the tempo would ramp down gradually to "4=36" at
> > > the end.
> 
> It's true that articulate.ly does not handle gradual tempo changes as
> one would expect.
> 
> I get around this, and simultaneously give myself control over the
> contour of the rit. or accel. by writing another "invisible" stave
> just for the midi, and containing nothing but rests and tempo
> markings.
[...]

You can also write the tempo markings in the same place as the music but
use \omit to make them invisible in the printed score.

OTOH, it would be nice if we could come up with a clever Scheme function
that automates ramping the tempo down/up; it's rather tedious to insert
all those \tempo markings by hand.


T

-- 
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. 
-- Donald Knuth

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Indenting arbitrary lines

2015-02-18 Thread David Bellows
> Then you probably need to use explicit X-offset adjustments — see 
> 
>  for more details.

Thanks for this. I went through the example and tried my best to
incorporate it into my software and resultant Lilypond files but since
I wasn't really sure what it/I was doing I couldn't get the results I
wanted.

For now I'm just coloring the "spine notes" red. It's not perfect but
I think it gets the job done pretty well.

Thanks,
Dave

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Kieren MacMillan
 wrote:
> Hi David,
>
>> I think if I were doing this manually that would probably work.
>> Unfortunately changing my software to generate multiple score blocks
>> would require a lot of work that I'm not sure is justified for just
>> this one thing. I was lucky that I was able to insert the basic
>> acrostic idea without having to rewrite any of the infrastructure.
>
> Then you probably need to use explicit X-offset adjustments — see 
> 
>  for more details.
>
> Hope this helps!
> Kieren.
> ___
>
> Kieren MacMillan, composer
> www:  
> email:  i...@kierenmacmillan.info
>

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: GoldenAge Font

2015-02-18 Thread tisimst
Urs Liska wrote
> Am 18.02.2015 um 14:47 schrieb tisimst:
>> So, I take it no one has any experience with this font? It looks very
>> nice and clean.
> 
> Just looked at the .gif, and I agree it looks nice and clean.
> But is that really significantly different from Improviso?
> 
> Urs

Urs,

Well, I think they are quite different, but guess you'll have to tell me :)
Here's a sample:

GoldenAge   
Improviso   
LilyJAZZ   

- Abraham



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/GoldenAge-Font-tp171849p172038.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


RE:How to increase the distance between systems?

2015-02-18 Thread Stephen MacNeil
 Do mean like this ?


\version "2.18.2"


\paper {

system-system-spacing #'basic-distance = #25


}

\score { << \new StaffGroup

<< \new Staff { c'1 e'1

\break g'1 b'1 }

 \new Staff { d'1 f'1 \break a'1 c''1 } >>

 >> \layout {

indent = #0 ragged-right = ##t %\override Staff.VerticalAxisGroup

#'staff-staff-spacing = #'((basic-distance . 15)) } } |
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: How to increase the distance between systems?

2015-02-18 Thread Simon Albrecht

Hello Kaj,

you'd want to search the notation reference for "Flexible vertical 
spacing between systems". It's the \paper variable system-system-spacing 
that needs to be adjusted.


HTH, Simon

Am 18.02.2015 15:34, schrieb Kaj:
I have tried to find in the manuals180 how to increase the distance 
between systems in the same score. I have found how to control the 
distance between individual staves inside the system, but not between 
systems. In my real task I want to fill the page. I see there is 
plenty of room below the last system, but I cannot find out how to get 
the score to expand. I also want to use the tagline at the bottom, but 
this should not have any impact.


Here is a simple example:

|\version "2.18.2" \score { << \new StaffGroup << \new Staff { c'1 e'1 
\break g'1 b'1 } \new Staff { d'1 f'1 \break a'1 c''1 } >> >> \layout 
{ indent = #0 ragged-right = ##t %\override Staff.VerticalAxisGroup 
#'staff-staff-spacing = #'((basic-distance . 15)) } } |





If you remove the comment sign (%) from the "\override" sentence at 
the end of the code, the space between the staves increases, but what 
to write to make the same happen between the two systems? Reading the 
manual make me think, that possibly "staffgroup-staff-spacing" could 
be the solution, but I have had no success so far. I have tried, I 
think, all combinations of contexts and grobs, but none has been 
successful.


By the way, I also found a discrepancy between the manual and the real 
life. According to the manual (e.g. chapter 4.4.1 in the Notation 
Reference) the override sentence could also be written like:


|\override Staff.VerticalAxisGroup #'staff-staff-spacing 
#'basic-distance = #15 |


but this did not succeed for me. I did also test the modern way of 
writing with dots between the keywords, but with no effect.


Kaj



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Peer review

2015-02-18 Thread Craig Dabelstein
Hi all,

Thanks so much for your feedback. As I suspected there were issues you
raised that I never would have picked up on my own. I really appreciate
your time and expertise.

Craig


On Wed Feb 18 2015 at 8:45:05 PM Urs Liska  wrote:

> Am 18.02.2015 um 03:30 schrieb Craig Dabelstein:
> > Hi Lilyponders,
> >
> > I'm not sure if this is an appropriate request for the group, but I was
> > wondering if anybody had the time to look at a sample part I have
> > typeset and make any comments regarding the typesetting. There may be
> > many things here that an experienced typesetter may see that need
> > improvement, but my eyes don't pick up.
> >
> > Here is the link:
> > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/614749/Berlioz-02-piccolo.pdf
> >
> > I do think the part looks a little bit compressed, but I have used the
> > page turn engraver (which I think is one of the greatest inventions of
> > the modern world!) for instrumental parts such as these.
> >
> > Many thanks,
> >
> > Craig
> >
>
> Hi Craig, there's one (minor) issue for readability that I notice. It's
> not your fault but LilyPond's but you may search for a way to improve it
> nevertheless.
>
> When tuplet number happen to fall into a staff they are not clearly
> readable. Probably it doesn't matter too much because you don't actually
> _read_ them anyway but just notice that they are there.
> Especially problematic is when they fall exactly in a staff space as in
> m. 134ff. where the extenders of the number coincide with the staff lines.
>
> I'm not sure about the best treat, however. Some ideas:
>
> - moving the numbers
> - using whiteout
> - selecting a heavier font face
>
> I don't see a real treat for it, but you may take it as some input.
>
> HTH
> Urs
>
> >
> > ___
> > lilypond-user mailing list
> > lilypond-user@gnu.org
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> >
>
>
> --
> Urs Liska
> www.openlilylib.org
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Controlling systems spacing with \vspace

2015-02-18 Thread Menu Jacques
Hello Folks,

I’ve been struggling with this for some time, got help from this list, and 
finally came up with the following (probably partial) observation:
\vspace is taken into account only in \column* blocks, and needs to 
have some space (" ") before and/or after it.

Hence this kind of things in complex situations where a mark, a name and a 
tempo indications are needed at the same time, see the attached file:

  \tempo \markup{
\column {
  " " \vspace #2
  \line {
\raise #-2.0 {\box\bold\fontsize #3 "I"}
" "
\column {
  "\"Death Of A Soldier\""
  \concat {
"Adagio "
\concat {
  (
  \smaller \general-align #Y #DOWN \note #"4" #1
  " = "
  76
  )
}
  }
}
  }
}
  }

Any hint to do better or simpler is welcome!

JM



ControllingSystemsSpacingWithVspace.ly
Description: Binary data


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: How to increase the distance between systems? (new try)

2015-02-18 Thread Noeck
Hi Kaj,

what you need is a system-system-spacing not a staff-staff-spacing,
which is placed in a paper block as documented here:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/flexible-vertical-spacing-paper-variables#list-of-flexible-vertical-spacing-paper-variables

 \paper {
system-system-spacing.basic-distance = #25
  }

For the staff-staff distance, I think you should set the
default-staff-staff-spacing instead (if you want to adjust that):
\override
Staff.VerticalAxisGroup.default-staff-staff-spacing.basic-distance = #15

HTH,
Joram

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


How to increase the distance between systems? (new try)

2015-02-18 Thread Kaj
Sorry, the code example became totally distorted in the previous try, so 
here it is again:

---
I have tried to find in the manuals180 how to increase the distance 
between systems in the same score. I have found how to control the 
distance between individual staves inside the system, but not between 
systems. In my real task I want to fill the page. I see there is plenty 
of room below the last system, but I cannot find out how to get the 
score to expand. I also want to use the tagline at the bottom, but this 
should not have any impact.


Here is a simple example:

\version "2.18.2"

\score {
  <<
\new StaffGroup
<<
  \new Staff
  { c'1 e'1 \break g'1 b'1 }
  \new Staff
  { d'1 f'1 \break a'1 c''1 }
>>
  >>

  \layout {
indent = #0
ragged-right = ##t
%\override Staff.VerticalAxisGroup #'staff-staff-spacing = 
#'((basic-distance . 15))

  }
}

||




If you remove the comment sign (%) from the "\override" sentence at the 
end of the code, the space between the staves increases, but what to 
write to make the same happen between the two systems? Reading the 
manual make me think, that possibly "staffgroup-staff-spacing" could be 
the solution, but I have had no success so far. I have tried, I think, 
all combinations of contexts and grobs, but none has been successful.


By the way, I also found a discrepancy between the manual and the real 
life. According to the manual (e.g. chapter 4.4.1 in the Notation 
Reference) the override sentence could also be written like:


|\override Staff.VerticalAxisGroup #'staff-staff-spacing 
#'basic-distance = #15 |


but this did not succeed for me. I did also test the modern way of 
writing with dots between the keywords, but with no effect.


Kaj

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


How to increase the distance between systems?

2015-02-18 Thread Kaj
I have tried to find in the manuals180 how to increase the distance 
between systems in the same score. I have found how to control the 
distance between individual staves inside the system, but not between 
systems. In my real task I want to fill the page. I see there is plenty 
of room below the last system, but I cannot find out how to get the 
score to expand. I also want to use the tagline at the bottom, but this 
should not have any impact.


Here is a simple example:

|\version "2.18.2" \score { << \new StaffGroup << \new Staff { c'1 e'1 
\break g'1 b'1 } \new Staff { d'1 f'1 \break a'1 c''1 } >> >> \layout { 
indent = #0 ragged-right = ##t %\override Staff.VerticalAxisGroup 
#'staff-staff-spacing = #'((basic-distance . 15)) } } |





If you remove the comment sign (%) from the "\override" sentence at the 
end of the code, the space between the staves increases, but what to 
write to make the same happen between the two systems? Reading the 
manual make me think, that possibly "staffgroup-staff-spacing" could be 
the solution, but I have had no success so far. I have tried, I think, 
all combinations of contexts and grobs, but none has been successful.


By the way, I also found a discrepancy between the manual and the real 
life. According to the manual (e.g. chapter 4.4.1 in the Notation 
Reference) the override sentence could also be written like:


|\override Staff.VerticalAxisGroup #'staff-staff-spacing 
#'basic-distance = #15 |


but this did not succeed for me. I did also test the modern way of 
writing with dots between the keywords, but with no effect.


Kaj

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: GoldenAge Font

2015-02-18 Thread Urs Liska

Am 18.02.2015 um 14:47 schrieb tisimst:

So, I take it no one has any experience with this font? It looks very
nice and clean.


Just looked at the .gif, and I agree it looks nice and clean.
But is that really significantly different from Improviso?

Urs



- Abraham

On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 9:53 AM, tisimst [via Lilypond] <[hidden email]
> wrote:


Omer Katzir wrote
found this reference but link is  broken

http://www.mail-archive.com/[hidden email]
/msg24838.html

Here's an image: http://www.cellardweller.com/score/images/goldenage.gif

-Abraham


If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
discussion below:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/GoldenAge-Font-tp171849p171887.html
To start a new topic under User, email [hidden email]

To unsubscribe from Lilypond, click here.
NAML





View this message in context: Re: GoldenAge Font

Sent from the User mailing list archive
 at Nabble.com.


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user




--
Urs Liska
www.openlilylib.org

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: GoldenAge Font

2015-02-18 Thread tisimst
So, I take it no one has any experience with this font? It looks very 
nice and clean.

- Abraham

On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 9:53 AM, tisimst [via Lilypond] 
 wrote:
>> Omer Katzir wrote
>> found this reference but link is  broken 
>> 
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[hidden email]/msg24838.html
> Here's an image: 
> http://www.cellardweller.com/score/images/goldenage.gif
> 
> -Abraham 
> 
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the 
> discussion below:
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/GoldenAge-Font-tp171849p171887.html
> To start a new topic under User, email 
> ml-node+s1069038n...@n5.nabble.com 
> To unsubscribe from Lilypond, click here.
> NAML




--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/GoldenAge-Font-tp171849p172029.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Peer review

2015-02-18 Thread Urs Liska

Am 18.02.2015 um 03:30 schrieb Craig Dabelstein:

Hi Lilyponders,

I'm not sure if this is an appropriate request for the group, but I was
wondering if anybody had the time to look at a sample part I have
typeset and make any comments regarding the typesetting. There may be
many things here that an experienced typesetter may see that need
improvement, but my eyes don't pick up.

Here is the link:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/614749/Berlioz-02-piccolo.pdf

I do think the part looks a little bit compressed, but I have used the
page turn engraver (which I think is one of the greatest inventions of
the modern world!) for instrumental parts such as these.

Many thanks,

Craig



Hi Craig, there's one (minor) issue for readability that I notice. It's 
not your fault but LilyPond's but you may search for a way to improve it 
nevertheless.


When tuplet number happen to fall into a staff they are not clearly 
readable. Probably it doesn't matter too much because you don't actually 
_read_ them anyway but just notice that they are there.
Especially problematic is when they fall exactly in a staff space as in 
m. 134ff. where the extenders of the number coincide with the staff lines.


I'm not sure about the best treat, however. Some ideas:

- moving the numbers
- using whiteout
- selecting a heavier font face

I don't see a real treat for it, but you may take it as some input.

HTH
Urs



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user




--
Urs Liska
www.openlilylib.org

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: OooLilyPond

2015-02-18 Thread Francisco Vila
2015-02-12 0:40 GMT+01:00 Martin Tarenskeen :
>
> Has anyone used OooLilyPond recently?
> Today I tried it again and was getting an error that didn't happen to me
> when I last used it (quite some time ago).
>
> The macro fails if I select "png" output in the the OooLilyPond config
> dialog. If I switch to "eps" it works again.
>
> I am using Libre Office 4.3.5.2, LilyPond 2.19.15, OooLilyPond 0.4.0

Jus tested with LibreOffice 4.3.3.2, LilyPond 2.19.16 and OooLilyPond
0.4.0 , works well with png output.

-- 
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Peer review

2015-02-18 Thread Hans Aberg

> On 18 Feb 2015, at 09:18, Rutger Hofman  wrote:
> 
> On 02/18/2015 03:30 AM, Craig Dabelstein wrote:

>> Here is the link:
>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/614749/Berlioz-02-piccolo.pdf

> At letter [P] in mvt III: a top c# for the piccolo: I don't remember ever 
> having had to play that (and I hope it will be a long time before I meet it).

There are a couple of measures missing, and it should be one octave lower [1].

1. 
http://imslp.org/wiki/Grande_symphonie_fun%C3%A8bre_et_triomphale,_H_80_%28Berlioz,_Hector%29



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Peer review

2015-02-18 Thread Klaus Blum
Hi Craig, 

I've noticed that you've changed the color of the staff lines from black to
grey. I think this is a good way to increase readability. 
However, in some lines of your score, the black bar lines are printed behind
the grey staff lines. I think this is because they are located in the same
layer, thus it's not predictable in what order they will be printed.
It could be helpful to put the staff lines in a layer below zero: 

\layout {
\context { 
  \Staff 
  \override StaffSymbol.layer = #-1 
}
  }

Cheers, 
Klaus



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Peer-review-tp172016p172024.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Peer review

2015-02-18 Thread Rutger Hofman

On 02/18/2015 03:30 AM, Craig Dabelstein wrote:

Hi Lilyponders,

I'm not sure if this is an appropriate request for the group, but I was
wondering if anybody had the time to look at a sample part I have
typeset and make any comments regarding the typesetting. There may be
many things here that an experienced typesetter may see that need
improvement, but my eyes don't pick up.

Here is the link:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/614749/Berlioz-02-piccolo.pdf

I do think the part looks a little bit compressed, but I have used the
page turn engraver (which I think is one of the greatest inventions of
the modern world!) for instrumental parts such as these.

Many thanks,

Craig


Beautiful. Some off-the-cuff remarks.

I agree with Jay Andersen about cautionary accidentals. I always use the 
modern-cautionary style -- it implies least confusion.


I do hope you intend to add cue notes to the final product!

I think the typesetting is the opposite of cramped; only 10..11 systems 
per page. I often have 13 or even 14 on an A4 page (2.19.15, the 
Lilypond version makes a difference), although with narrower margins. 
However, the first system of mvt II. is indeed cramped. You might 
consider widening the first system (e.g. by judiciously inserting a page 
break into (just) the part).


Is your part intended to start with an external blank page? Else, the 
page turns are at the wrong side of the page pairs...


Regarding page turns: for the player, it is *far* preferable to have 
easy page turns than to have few pages. I don't know about the publisher 
who must pay the printing costs...


At letter [P] in mvt III: a top c# for the piccolo: I don't remember 
ever having had to play that (and I hope it will be a long time before I 
meet it).


A matter of preference: if the movements are clearly separated by piece 
titles and ample vertical white space, I don't indent the first system 
of the movement.


In Mvt III., from [C]: I think the tuplet spanners are a bit tiring to 
the eye. How does it look without the spanner lines?


Rutger Hofman
Amsterdam


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user