Re: Again: Questions about Stem #'length
Robin Bannister schrieb: Marc Hohl asked: why lilypond still (at least sometimes) displays stems You probably haven't enabled no-stem-extend Cheers, Robin Ah, yes - thanks for the hint; I did't know that there is such a property. Now it works like a charm. Marc ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Again: Questions about Stem #'length
Marc Hohl asked: why lilypond still (at least sometimes) displays stems You probably haven't enabled no-stem-extend Cheers, Robin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Again: Questions about Stem #'length
Despite of the answers that were given (and which normally are sufficient enough for a workaround): can someone explain to me why lilypond still (at least sometimes) displays stems when I \override Stem #'length = #0? Thanks in advance Marc \version "2.13.4" test = \relative c' { c4 d e f g a b c \stemUp c, d e f g a b c \stemDown c, d e f g a b c } \score { \new Voice { \test \break \override Voice.Stem #'length = #0 \test } } ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user