Re: stem fix 2
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 19:12:48 Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > What do you mean? > > #'merge-differently-dotted does the opposite of what we need - > > effectively ruining my hack. > > Please post full example if you have some smart way of typesetting > a > WITHOUT merging the noteheads. > > Yes. Simply add some code to note-collision.cc. > > :) /usr/share/doc/lilypond/examples/input/test/force-hshift.fly /usr/share/doc/lilypond/examples/input/test/force-hshift.ly /usr/share/doc/lilypond/examples/input/test/hshift.fly /usr/share/doc/lilypond/examples/input/test/hshift.ly /usr/share/doc/lilypond/examples/input/test/note-shift.ly /usr/share/doc/lilypond/examples/input/test/note-shift.sly I hope this isn't gone. DaveA ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: stem fix 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > What do you mean? > #'merge-differently-dotted does the opposite of what we need - > effectively ruining my hack. > Please post full example if you have some smart way of typesetting a > WITHOUT merging the noteheads. Yes. Simply add some code to note-collision.cc. :) -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: stem fix 2
Mats Bengtsson wrote: > > Why not use the official solution: > > \property Staff.NoteCollision \set #'merge-differently-dotted = ##t ?!?!?! What do you mean? #'merge-differently-dotted does the opposite of what we need - effectively ruining my hack. Please post full example if you have some smart way of typesetting WITHOUT merging the noteheads. -Rune ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: stem fix 2
Why not use the official solution: \property Staff.NoteCollision \set #'merge-differently-dotted = ##t /Mats > Rune Zedeler wrote: > > > < a4 \\ \once \property Voice.Dots \override #'transparent = ##t a4.*2/3 > > > > > It probably even ruins the spacing because it adds space for an > > invisible dot. > > Ofcourse the solution to this is to replace the property-setting with > > \once \property Voice.Dots \override #'molecule-callback = \turnOff > > Sorry for not thinking late at night :-) > > Good night! > > -Rune ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: stem fix 2
Rune Zedeler wrote: > < a4 \\ \once \property Voice.Dots \override #'transparent = ##t a4.*2/3 > > > It probably even ruins the spacing because it adds space for an > invisible dot. Ofcourse the solution to this is to replace the property-setting with \once \property Voice.Dots \override #'molecule-callback = \turnOff Sorry for not thinking late at night :-) Good night! -Rune ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: stem fix 2
David Bobroff wrote: > How would I get the two noteheads with > stems? Sorry but I can only come up with this very ugly hack: < a4 \\ \once \property Voice.Dots \override #'transparent = ##t a4.*2/3 > It probably even ruins the spacing because it adds space for an invisible dot. -Rune ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: stem fix 2
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 08:06:44 Graham Percival wrote: > On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 07:54:07 + > David Bobroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > David Raleigh Arnold wrote: > > >Now, since you have two notes really sounding, you should have > > >two noteheads. If you had two instruments your notation > > >would be ok. For solo, it isn't. Sorry. > > > > Ok. I'll mention this to the person whose manuscript I'm working from and > > see how he wants it to appear. > > Sometimes a solo voice _will_ have a single notehead with two stems -- right > now I'm looking at the fourth movement of a Telemann concerto for viola in > G major, which uses a single notehead with two stems to denote a double > stop between an open A string and playing that same note on the D string. > Printed by International Music Company, New York. I don't deny that it is done. The problem is that the interpretation "a due" is not in doubt, but a solo instrument presents ambiguity, because as you know, double stems also are used to indicate legato and sostenuto. Wiser to have two heads or not according to whether there are actually two strings sounding or not. Of course that does not apply to keyboard music, or, apparently, to Telemann. If it's post-Baroque, do it. If it's Baroque, do it anyway. > > > How would I get the two noteheads with stems? I hope \shiftOn and \shiftOff still work. I haven't needed them since my last upgrade. DaveA ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: stem fix 2
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 07:54:07 + David Bobroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Raleigh Arnold wrote: > >Now, since you have two notes really sounding, you should have > >two noteheads. If you had two instruments your notation > >would be ok. For solo, it isn't. Sorry. > > Ok. I'll mention this to the person whose manuscript I'm working from and > see how he wants it to appear. Sometimes a solo voice _will_ have a single notehead with two stems -- right now I'm looking at the fourth movement of a Telemann concerto for viola in G major, which uses a single notehead with two stems to denote a double stop between an open A string and playing that same note on the D string. Printed by International Music Company, New York. > How would I get the two noteheads with stems? Can't help you there, I'm afraid. Cheers, - Graham ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
