Re: Fix to "All wake-up devices are disabled after suspend-to disk" isn't yet included in mainline
On Wednesday 17 October 2007 05:48:02 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:39:30 +0200 Maxim Levitsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > A while ago I asked on LKML about the problem of loosing all wake device > > capabilities, after a suspend to disk > > (eg: I can't wake the system from keyboard if I suspend to disk and then to > > ram) > > > > I was provided with the patch that fixes this problem completely. > > The merge window is open, but I still don't see it in the kernel. > > Due to changes it doesn't anymore apply to latest git. > > > > Was it missed? > > No, it's in Len's git tree. > > Len's git-pull request from a few days ago didn't work, perhaps because I > wanted to know if a recent -mm regression had been fixed and that hasn't > been answered yet. I assume that Len is offline. Other acpi developers > could presumably have answered that question but for some reason chose not to. > > I'm presently holding off 20-odd power management patches due to their > dependency upon an acpi merge... > Thanks a lot. Best regards, Maxim Levitsky - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: Fix to "All wake-up devices are disabled after suspend-to disk" isn't yet included in mainline
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:39:30 +0200 Maxim Levitsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A while ago I asked on LKML about the problem of loosing all wake device > capabilities, after a suspend to disk > (eg: I can't wake the system from keyboard if I suspend to disk and then to > ram) > > I was provided with the patch that fixes this problem completely. > The merge window is open, but I still don't see it in the kernel. > Due to changes it doesn't anymore apply to latest git. > > Was it missed? No, it's in Len's git tree. Len's git-pull request from a few days ago didn't work, perhaps because I wanted to know if a recent -mm regression had been fixed and that hasn't been answered yet. I assume that Len is offline. Other acpi developers could presumably have answered that question but for some reason chose not to. I'm presently holding off 20-odd power management patches due to their dependency upon an acpi merge... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html