Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix crash of starting balance

2013-01-15 Thread Liu Bo
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 06:59:04PM +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:47:57PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> > We will crash on BUG_ON(ret == -EEXIST) when we do not resume the existing
> > balance but attempt to start a new one.
> > 
> > The steps can be:
> > 1. start balance
> > 2. pause balance
> > 3. start balance
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Liu Bo 
> > ---
> >  fs/btrfs/volumes.c |7 ++-
> >  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> > index 5cce6aa..3901654 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> > @@ -3100,7 +3100,12 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_balance_control *bctl,
> > goto out;
> >  
> > if (!(bctl->flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_RESUME)) {
> > -   BUG_ON(ret == -EEXIST);
> > +   /*
> > +* This can happen when we do not resume the existing balance
> > +* but try to start a new one instead.
> > +*/
> > +   if (ret == -EEXIST)
> > +   goto out;
> > set_balance_control(bctl);
> > } else {
> > BUG_ON(ret != -EEXIST);
> 
> OK, it seems balance pause/resume logic got broken by dev-replace code
> (5ac00addc7ac09110995fe967071d191b5981cc1), which went into v3.8-rc1.
> This is most certainly not the right way to fix it, that BUG_ON is there
> for a reason.  I'll send a fix in a couple of days.

Okay, right here waiting for test ;)

thanks,
liubo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix crash of starting balance

2013-01-15 Thread Ilya Dryomov
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:47:57PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> We will crash on BUG_ON(ret == -EEXIST) when we do not resume the existing
> balance but attempt to start a new one.
> 
> The steps can be:
> 1. start balance
> 2. pause balance
> 3. start balance
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo 
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/volumes.c |7 ++-
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 5cce6aa..3901654 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -3100,7 +3100,12 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_balance_control *bctl,
>   goto out;
>  
>   if (!(bctl->flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_RESUME)) {
> - BUG_ON(ret == -EEXIST);
> + /*
> +  * This can happen when we do not resume the existing balance
> +  * but try to start a new one instead.
> +  */
> + if (ret == -EEXIST)
> + goto out;
>   set_balance_control(bctl);
>   } else {
>   BUG_ON(ret != -EEXIST);

OK, it seems balance pause/resume logic got broken by dev-replace code
(5ac00addc7ac09110995fe967071d191b5981cc1), which went into v3.8-rc1.
This is most certainly not the right way to fix it, that BUG_ON is there
for a reason.  I'll send a fix in a couple of days.

Thanks,

Ilya

> -- 
> 1.7.7.6
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[PATCH] Btrfs: fix crash of starting balance

2013-01-15 Thread Liu Bo
We will crash on BUG_ON(ret == -EEXIST) when we do not resume the existing
balance but attempt to start a new one.

The steps can be:
1. start balance
2. pause balance
3. start balance

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo 
---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c |7 ++-
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 5cce6aa..3901654 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -3100,7 +3100,12 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_balance_control *bctl,
goto out;
 
if (!(bctl->flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_RESUME)) {
-   BUG_ON(ret == -EEXIST);
+   /*
+* This can happen when we do not resume the existing balance
+* but try to start a new one instead.
+*/
+   if (ret == -EEXIST)
+   goto out;
set_balance_control(bctl);
} else {
BUG_ON(ret != -EEXIST);
-- 
1.7.7.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html