Re: [PATCH] of: unittest: Remove error printing on OOM

2019-05-02 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 7:45 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
 wrote:
>
> There is no need to print a backtrace or other error message if
> kzalloc(), kmemdup(), or devm_kzalloc() fails, as the memory allocation
> core already takes care of that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
> ---
>  drivers/of/unittest.c | 13 -
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Applied both patches.

Rob


[PATCH] of: unittest: Remove error printing on OOM

2019-05-02 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
There is no need to print a backtrace or other error message if
kzalloc(), kmemdup(), or devm_kzalloc() fails, as the memory allocation
core already takes care of that.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
---
 drivers/of/unittest.c | 13 -
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c
index 2f8e43876c3da70c..a3d31103962b7dd9 100644
--- a/drivers/of/unittest.c
+++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c
@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static void __init of_unittest_check_phandles(void)
}
 
nh = kzalloc(sizeof(*nh), GFP_KERNEL);
-   if (WARN_ON(!nh))
+   if (!nh)
return;
 
nh->np = np;
@@ -1199,12 +1199,9 @@ static int __init unittest_data_add(void)
 
/* creating copy */
unittest_data = kmemdup(__dtb_testcases_begin, size, GFP_KERNEL);
-
-   if (!unittest_data) {
-   pr_warn("%s: Failed to allocate memory for unittest_data; "
-   "not running tests\n", __func__);
+   if (!unittest_data)
return -ENOMEM;
-   }
+
of_fdt_unflatten_tree(unittest_data, NULL, _data_node);
if (!unittest_data_node) {
pr_warn("%s: No tree to attach; not running tests\n", __func__);
@@ -1845,10 +1842,8 @@ static int unittest_i2c_bus_probe(struct platform_device 
*pdev)
dev_dbg(dev, "%s for node @%pOF\n", __func__, np);
 
std = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*std), GFP_KERNEL);
-   if (!std) {
-   dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate unittest i2c data\n");
+   if (!std)
return -ENOMEM;
-   }
 
/* link them together */
std->pdev = pdev;
-- 
2.17.1