Re: [PATCH-2.2.18] compile on Alpha - loops_per_jiffy
> following patch. It only replaces loops_per_sec with > loops_per_jiffy*HZ. It works for me, although I'm not > totally sure this is quite correct. loops_per_jiffy*HZ overflows at 2GHz for an int. If the alpha is using ulong for this I guess it works fine at 64bits. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH-2.2.18] compile on Alpha - loops_per_jiffy
Hi Alan, 2.2.18pre14 compiles and runs on Alpha with the following patch. It only replaces loops_per_sec with loops_per_jiffy*HZ. It works for me, although I'm not totally sure this is quite correct. BTW, I had to remove nvram and drm to compile. Will see later why (unknown references to LOCK_PREFIX and CHECK_DRIVER_INIT). The loops_per_jiffy patch is attached. Willy. ___ Do You Yahoo!? -- Pour dialoguer en direct avec vos amis, Yahoo! Messenger : http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com 2.2.18pre14-alpha.diff.gz
[PATCH-2.2.18] compile on Alpha - loops_per_jiffy
Hi Alan, 2.2.18pre14 compiles and runs on Alpha with the following patch. It only replaces loops_per_sec with loops_per_jiffy*HZ. It works for me, although I'm not totally sure this is quite correct. BTW, I had to remove nvram and drm to compile. Will see later why (unknown references to LOCK_PREFIX and CHECK_DRIVER_INIT). The loops_per_jiffy patch is attached. Willy. ___ Do You Yahoo!? -- Pour dialoguer en direct avec vos amis, Yahoo! Messenger : http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com 2.2.18pre14-alpha.diff.gz
Re: [PATCH-2.2.18] compile on Alpha - loops_per_jiffy
following patch. It only replaces loops_per_sec with loops_per_jiffy*HZ. It works for me, although I'm not totally sure this is quite correct. loops_per_jiffy*HZ overflows at 2GHz for an int. If the alpha is using ulong for this I guess it works fine at 64bits. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/