[PATCH] nvme-pci: cancel nvme device request before disabling
This patch addresses an irq free warning and null pointer dereference error problem when nvme devices got timeout error during initialization. This problem happens when nvme_timeout() function is called while nvme_reset_work() is still in execution. This patch fixed the problem by setting flag of the problematic request to NVME_REQ_CANCELLED before calling nvme_dev_disable() to make sure __nvme_submit_sync_cmd() returns an error code and let nvme_submit_sync_cmd() fail gracefully. The following is console output. [ 62.472097] nvme nvme0: I/O 13 QID 0 timeout, disable controller [ 62.488796] nvme nvme0: could not set timestamp (881) [ 62.494888] [ cut here ] [ 62.495142] Trying to free already-free IRQ 11 [ 62.495366] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 7 at kernel/irq/manage.c:1751 free_irq+0x1f7/0x370 [ 62.495742] Modules linked in: [ 62.495902] CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/u4:0 Not tainted 5.8.0+ #8 [ 62.496206] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-48-gd9c812dda519-p4 [ 62.496772] Workqueue: nvme-reset-wq nvme_reset_work [ 62.497019] RIP: 0010:free_irq+0x1f7/0x370 [ 62.497223] Code: e8 ce 49 11 00 48 83 c4 08 4c 89 e0 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f c3 44 89 f6 48 c70 [ 62.498133] RSP: :a96800043d40 EFLAGS: 00010086 [ 62.498391] RAX: RBX: 9b87fc458400 RCX: [ 62.498741] RDX: 0001 RSI: 0096 RDI: 9693d72c [ 62.499091] RBP: 9b87fd4c8f60 R08: a96800043bfd R09: 0163 [ 62.499440] R10: a96800043bf8 R11: a96800043bfd R12: 9b87fd4c8e00 [ 62.499790] R13: 9b87fd4c8ea4 R14: 000b R15: 9b87fd76b000 [ 62.500140] FS: () GS:9b87fdc0() knlGS: [ 62.500534] CS: 0010 DS: ES: CR0: 80050033 [ 62.500816] CR2: CR3: 3aa0a000 CR4: 06f0 [ 62.501165] DR0: DR1: DR2: [ 62.501515] DR3: DR6: fffe0ff0 DR7: 0400 [ 62.501864] Call Trace: [ 62.501993] pci_free_irq+0x13/0x20 [ 62.502167] nvme_reset_work+0x5d0/0x12a0 [ 62.502369] ? update_load_avg+0x59/0x580 [ 62.502569] ? ttwu_queue_wakelist+0xa8/0xc0 [ 62.502780] ? try_to_wake_up+0x1a2/0x450 [ 62.502979] process_one_work+0x1d2/0x390 [ 62.503179] worker_thread+0x45/0x3b0 [ 62.503361] ? process_one_work+0x390/0x390 [ 62.503568] kthread+0xf9/0x130 [ 62.503726] ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 [ 62.503911] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 62.504090] ---[ end trace de9ed4a70f8d71e2 ]--- [ 123.912275] nvme nvme0: I/O 12 QID 0 timeout, disable controller [ 123.914670] nvme nvme0: 1/0/0 default/read/poll queues [ 123.916310] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: [ 123.917469] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode [ 123.917725] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page [ 123.917976] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 123.918109] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP PTI [ 123.918283] CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/u4:0 Tainted: GW 5.8.0+ #8 [ 123.918650] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-48-gd9c812dda519-p4 [ 123.919219] Workqueue: nvme-reset-wq nvme_reset_work [ 123.919469] RIP: 0010:__blk_mq_alloc_map_and_request+0x21/0x80 [ 123.919757] Code: 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 41 55 41 54 55 48 63 ee 53 48 8b 47 68 89 ee 48 89 fb 8b4 [ 123.920657] RSP: :a96800043d40 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 123.920912] RAX: 9b87fc4fee40 RBX: 9b87fc8cb008 RCX: [ 123.921258] RDX: RSI: RDI: 9b87fc618000 [ 123.921602] RBP: R08: 9b87fdc2c4a0 R09: 9b87fc616000 [ 123.921949] R10: R11: 9b87fffd1500 R12: [ 123.922295] R13: R14: 9b87fc8cb200 R15: 9b87fc8cb000 [ 123.922641] FS: () GS:9b87fdc0() knlGS: [ 123.923032] CS: 0010 DS: ES: CR0: 80050033 [ 123.923312] CR2: CR3: 3aa0a000 CR4: 06f0 [ 123.923660] DR0: DR1: DR2: [ 123.924007] DR3: DR6: fffe0ff0 DR7: 0400 [ 123.924353] Call Trace: [ 123.924479] blk_mq_alloc_tag_set+0x137/0x2a0 [ 123.924694] nvme_reset_work+0xed6/0x12a0 [ 123.924898] process_one_work+0x1d2/0x390 [ 123.925099] worker_thread+0x45/0x3b0 [ 123.925280] ? process_one_work+0x390/0x390 [ 123.925486] kthread+0xf9/0x130 [ 123.925642] ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 [ 123.925825] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 123.926004] Modules linked in: [ 123.926158] CR2: [ 123.926322] ---[ end trace de9ed4a70f
Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: cancel nvme device request before disabling
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 12:11:56PM -0400, Tong Zhang wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 11:42 AM Keith Busch wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 03:14:31AM -0400, Tong Zhang wrote: > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c > > > > > index ba725ae47305..c4f1ce0ee1e3 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c > > > > > @@ -1249,8 +1249,8 @@ static enum blk_eh_timer_return > > > > > nvme_timeout(struct request *req, bool reserved) > > > > > dev_warn_ratelimited(dev->ctrl.device, > > > > >"I/O %d QID %d timeout, disable controller\n", > > > > >req->tag, nvmeq->qid); > > > > > - nvme_dev_disable(dev, true); > > > > > nvme_req(req)->flags |= NVME_REQ_CANCELLED; > > > > > + nvme_dev_disable(dev, true); > > > > > return BLK_EH_DONE; > > > anymore. The driver is not reporting non-response back for all > > cancelled requests, and that is probably not what we should be doing. > > OK, thanks for the explanation. I think the bottom line here is to let the > probe function know and stop proceeding when there's an error. > I also don't see an obvious reason to set NVME_REQ_CANCELLED > after nvme_dev_disable(dev, true). The flag was set after disabling when it didn't happen to matter: the block layer had a complicated timeout scheme that didn't actually complete the request until the timeout handler returned, so the flag set where it is was 'ok'. That's clearly not the case anymore, so yes, I think we do need your patch. There is one case you are missing, though: --- @@ -1267,10 +1267,10 @@ static enum blk_eh_timer_return nvme_timeout(struct request *req, bool reserved) dev_warn(dev->ctrl.device, "I/O %d QID %d timeout, reset controller\n", req->tag, nvmeq->qid); + nvme_req(req)->flags |= NVME_REQ_CANCELLED; nvme_dev_disable(dev, false); nvme_reset_ctrl(&dev->ctrl); - nvme_req(req)->flags |= NVME_REQ_CANCELLED; return BLK_EH_DONE; } --
Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: cancel nvme device request before disabling
Hi Keith, Thanks for the confirmation. I will send another revision according to your comments. Best, - Tong On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 11:01 AM Keith Busch wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 12:11:56PM -0400, Tong Zhang wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 11:42 AM Keith Busch wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 03:14:31AM -0400, Tong Zhang wrote: > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c > > > > > > index ba725ae47305..c4f1ce0ee1e3 100644 > > > > > > --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c > > > > > > @@ -1249,8 +1249,8 @@ static enum blk_eh_timer_return > > > > > > nvme_timeout(struct request *req, bool reserved) > > > > > > dev_warn_ratelimited(dev->ctrl.device, > > > > > >"I/O %d QID %d timeout, disable > > > > > > controller\n", > > > > > >req->tag, nvmeq->qid); > > > > > > - nvme_dev_disable(dev, true); > > > > > > nvme_req(req)->flags |= NVME_REQ_CANCELLED; > > > > > > + nvme_dev_disable(dev, true); > > > > > > return BLK_EH_DONE; > > > > > anymore. The driver is not reporting non-response back for all > > > cancelled requests, and that is probably not what we should be doing. > > > > OK, thanks for the explanation. I think the bottom line here is to let the > > probe function know and stop proceeding when there's an error. > > I also don't see an obvious reason to set NVME_REQ_CANCELLED > > after nvme_dev_disable(dev, true). > > The flag was set after disabling when it didn't happen to matter: the > block layer had a complicated timeout scheme that didn't actually > complete the request until the timeout handler returned, so the flag set > where it is was 'ok'. That's clearly not the case anymore, so yes, I > think we do need your patch. > > There is one case you are missing, though: > > --- > @@ -1267,10 +1267,10 @@ static enum blk_eh_timer_return nvme_timeout(struct > request *req, bool reserved) > dev_warn(dev->ctrl.device, > "I/O %d QID %d timeout, reset controller\n", > req->tag, nvmeq->qid); > + nvme_req(req)->flags |= NVME_REQ_CANCELLED; > nvme_dev_disable(dev, false); > nvme_reset_ctrl(&dev->ctrl); > > - nvme_req(req)->flags |= NVME_REQ_CANCELLED; > return BLK_EH_DONE; > } > --
Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: cancel nvme device request before disabling
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 03:14:31AM -0400, Tong Zhang wrote: > This patch addresses an irq free warning and null pointer dereference > error problem when nvme devices got timeout error during initialization. > This problem happens when nvme_timeout() function is called while > nvme_reset_work() is still in execution. This patch fixed the problem by > setting flag of the problematic request to NVME_REQ_CANCELLED before > calling nvme_dev_disable() to make sure __nvme_submit_sync_cmd() returns > an error code and let nvme_submit_sync_cmd() fail gracefully. > The following is console output. The commit log looks a little weird due to the extra indentation. The patch itself looks good, though: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: cancel nvme device request before disabling
Oops sorry for the duplicated email -- I forgot to turn off HTML when sending the previous one. Thanks Christoph, I did a couple of fixes on the commit log, please see v2 patch. Thanks! -- Tong On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 4:16 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 03:14:31AM -0400, Tong Zhang wrote: > > This patch addresses an irq free warning and null pointer dereference > > error problem when nvme devices got timeout error during initialization. > > This problem happens when nvme_timeout() function is called while > > nvme_reset_work() is still in execution. This patch fixed the problem by > > setting flag of the problematic request to NVME_REQ_CANCELLED before > > calling nvme_dev_disable() to make sure __nvme_submit_sync_cmd() returns > > an error code and let nvme_submit_sync_cmd() fail gracefully. > > The following is console output. > > The commit log looks a little weird due to the extra indentation. > > The patch itself looks good, though: > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: cancel nvme device request before disabling
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 03:14:31AM -0400, Tong Zhang wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c > index ba725ae47305..c4f1ce0ee1e3 100644 > --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c > @@ -1249,8 +1249,8 @@ static enum blk_eh_timer_return nvme_timeout(struct > request *req, bool reserved) > dev_warn_ratelimited(dev->ctrl.device, >"I/O %d QID %d timeout, disable controller\n", >req->tag, nvmeq->qid); > - nvme_dev_disable(dev, true); > nvme_req(req)->flags |= NVME_REQ_CANCELLED; > + nvme_dev_disable(dev, true); > return BLK_EH_DONE; Shouldn't this flag have been set in nvme_cancel_request()? It's not like the timeout out command is the only command to have been cancelled by this action, nor is it guaranteed that getting here will mean the request was in fact cancelled. The controller could still provide a real completion.
Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: cancel nvme device request before disabling
Hi Keith, On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 11:04 AM Keith Busch wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 03:14:31AM -0400, Tong Zhang wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c > > index ba725ae47305..c4f1ce0ee1e3 100644 > > --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c > > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c > > @@ -1249,8 +1249,8 @@ static enum blk_eh_timer_return nvme_timeout(struct > > request *req, bool reserved) > > dev_warn_ratelimited(dev->ctrl.device, > >"I/O %d QID %d timeout, disable controller\n", > >req->tag, nvmeq->qid); > > - nvme_dev_disable(dev, true); > > nvme_req(req)->flags |= NVME_REQ_CANCELLED; > > + nvme_dev_disable(dev, true); > > return BLK_EH_DONE; > > Shouldn't this flag have been set in nvme_cancel_request()? nvme_cancel_request() is not setting this flag to cancelled and this is causing __nvme_submit_sync_cmd() to return a positive number and eventually this will allow nvme_init_identify() proceed with a timeout error where the problematic nvme device has already been disabled by nvme_dev_disable(dev,true). The reset of the logic in nvme_init_identify() is not going to check those already released resources. -- in fact this is UAF -- > like the timeout out command is the only command to have been cancelled > by this action, nor is it guaranteed that getting here will mean the > request was in fact cancelled. The controller could still provide a real > completion. what would you like to suggest here?
Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: cancel nvme device request before disabling
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 11:37:20AM -0400, Tong Zhang wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 11:04 AM Keith Busch wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 03:14:31AM -0400, Tong Zhang wrote: > > > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c > > > index ba725ae47305..c4f1ce0ee1e3 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c > > > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c > > > @@ -1249,8 +1249,8 @@ static enum blk_eh_timer_return nvme_timeout(struct > > > request *req, bool reserved) > > > dev_warn_ratelimited(dev->ctrl.device, > > >"I/O %d QID %d timeout, disable controller\n", > > >req->tag, nvmeq->qid); > > > - nvme_dev_disable(dev, true); > > > nvme_req(req)->flags |= NVME_REQ_CANCELLED; > > > + nvme_dev_disable(dev, true); > > > return BLK_EH_DONE; > > > > Shouldn't this flag have been set in nvme_cancel_request()? > > nvme_cancel_request() is not setting this flag to cancelled and this is > causing Right, I see that it doesn't, but I'm saying that it should. We used to do something like that, and I'm struggling to recall why we're not anymore. The driver is not reporting non-response back for all cancelled requests, and that is probably not what we should be doing.
Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: cancel nvme device request before disabling
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 11:42 AM Keith Busch wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 03:14:31AM -0400, Tong Zhang wrote: > > > > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c > > > > index ba725ae47305..c4f1ce0ee1e3 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c > > > > @@ -1249,8 +1249,8 @@ static enum blk_eh_timer_return > > > > nvme_timeout(struct request *req, bool reserved) > > > > dev_warn_ratelimited(dev->ctrl.device, > > > >"I/O %d QID %d timeout, disable controller\n", > > > >req->tag, nvmeq->qid); > > > > - nvme_dev_disable(dev, true); > > > > nvme_req(req)->flags |= NVME_REQ_CANCELLED; > > > > + nvme_dev_disable(dev, true); > > > > return BLK_EH_DONE; > anymore. The driver is not reporting non-response back for all > cancelled requests, and that is probably not what we should be doing. OK, thanks for the explanation. I think the bottom line here is to let the probe function know and stop proceeding when there's an error. I also don't see an obvious reason to set NVME_REQ_CANCELLED after nvme_dev_disable(dev, true).
Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: cancel nvme device request before disabling
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c index ba725ae47305..c4f1ce0ee1e3 100644 --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c @@ -1249,8 +1249,8 @@ static enum blk_eh_timer_return nvme_timeout(struct request *req, bool reserved) dev_warn_ratelimited(dev->ctrl.device, "I/O %d QID %d timeout, disable controller\n", req->tag, nvmeq->qid); - nvme_dev_disable(dev, true); nvme_req(req)->flags |= NVME_REQ_CANCELLED; + nvme_dev_disable(dev, true); return BLK_EH_DONE; Shouldn't this flag have been set in nvme_cancel_request()? nvme_cancel_request() is not setting this flag to cancelled and this is causing Right, I see that it doesn't, but I'm saying that it should. We used to do something like that, and I'm struggling to recall why we're not anymore. I also don't recall why, but I know that we rely on the status propagating back from submit_sync_cmd which won't happen because it converts the status into -ENODEV. The driver is not reporting non-response back for all cancelled requests, and that is probably not what we should be doing. I'd think that we should modify our callers to handle nvme status codes as well rather than rely on nvme_submit_sync_cmd to return a negative codes under some conditions.