Re: [PATCH] parisc: Remove FIXME comment

2014-07-18 Thread Nick Krause
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 1:20 AM, James Bottomley
 wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 22:25 -0400, Nick Krause wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:03 PM, James Bottomley
>>  wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 16:37 -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>> >> The comment for size of frame not being needed is incorrect , the
>> >> function called needs this parameter.
>> >
>> > Actually, that's not correct.  The point of the FIXME is that fram_size
>> > is only used in a debug print and could be eliminated since the
>> > internals of the function excluding the debugging statements don't use
>> > it.
>> >
>> > James
>> >
>> >
>>
>> So I need to need a patch removing the parameter from the  function
>> and this part of the code?
>
> Well, no, I'm not sure there's any action to take.  The FIXME reminds us
> that there's no actual use of the frame size in the function body except
> for the debugging prints.  The parameter could be removed if everyone
> who debugs the kernel agrees either to remove the debug code or remove
> the frame pointer from the prints, but it's probably not worth bothering
> about, which is why it's still there.
>
> James
>
>
Ok then , seems its going through I can however write some comments to
explain this
if needed.
Cheers Nick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] parisc: Remove FIXME comment

2014-07-18 Thread James Bottomley
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 22:25 -0400, Nick Krause wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:03 PM, James Bottomley
>  wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 16:37 -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> >> The comment for size of frame not being needed is incorrect , the
> >> function called needs this parameter.
> >
> > Actually, that's not correct.  The point of the FIXME is that fram_size
> > is only used in a debug print and could be eliminated since the
> > internals of the function excluding the debugging statements don't use
> > it.
> >
> > James
> >
> >
> 
> So I need to need a patch removing the parameter from the  function
> and this part of the code?

Well, no, I'm not sure there's any action to take.  The FIXME reminds us
that there's no actual use of the frame size in the function body except
for the debugging prints.  The parameter could be removed if everyone
who debugs the kernel agrees either to remove the debug code or remove
the frame pointer from the prints, but it's probably not worth bothering
about, which is why it's still there.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] parisc: Remove FIXME comment

2014-07-18 Thread Nick Krause
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:03 PM, James Bottomley
 wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 16:37 -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>> The comment for size of frame not being needed is incorrect , the
>> function called needs this parameter.
>
> Actually, that's not correct.  The point of the FIXME is that fram_size
> is only used in a debug print and could be eliminated since the
> internals of the function excluding the debugging statements don't use
> it.
>
> James
>
>

So I need to need a patch removing the parameter from the  function
and this part of the code?
Cheers Nick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] parisc: Remove FIXME comment

2014-07-18 Thread James Bottomley
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 16:37 -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> The comment for size of frame not being needed is incorrect , the
> function called needs this parameter.

Actually, that's not correct.  The point of the FIXME is that fram_size
is only used in a debug print and could be eliminated since the
internals of the function excluding the debugging statements don't use
it.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] parisc: Remove FIXME comment

2014-07-18 Thread Helge Deller
On 07/18/2014 10:37 PM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> The comment for size of frame not being needed is incorrect , the
> function called needs this parameter.

Thanks for the patch Nicholas.

It has been queued up:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4587631/
and
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4486231/

I will apply it at some point, but not yet.
There are other (more important) patches upcoming regarding the 
signal handling,  and I don't want to break those at the moment.

Helge

> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause 
> ---
>  arch/parisc/kernel/signal.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/signal.c b/arch/parisc/kernel/signal.c
> index 1cba8f2..1d550b5 100644
> --- a/arch/parisc/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -240,7 +240,6 @@ setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t 
> *info,
>  #endif
>   
>   usp = (regs->gr[30] & ~(0x01UL));
> - /*FIXME: frame_size parameter is unused, remove it. */
>   frame = get_sigframe(ka, usp, sizeof(*frame));
>  
>   DBG(1,"SETUP_RT_FRAME: START\n");
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/