Re: [PATCH 4/20] dmfe: fix misspelling of current function in string

2014-12-09 Thread David Miller
From: Julia Lawall 
Date: Sun,  7 Dec 2014 20:20:46 +0100

> The function name contains cleanup, not clean.
> 
> This was done using Coccinelle, including the use of Levenshtein distance,
> as proposed by Rasmus Villemoes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall 

Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 4/20] dmfe: fix misspelling of current function in string

2014-12-07 Thread Grant Grundler
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Julia Lawall  wrote:
> The function name contains cleanup, not clean.
>
> This was done using Coccinelle, including the use of Levenshtein distance,
> as proposed by Rasmus Villemoes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall 

Thanks - seems like a obvious mistake.

Acked-by: Grant Grundler 

>
> ---
> The semantic patch is difficult to summarize, but is available in the cover
> letter of this patch series.
>
>  drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/dmfe.c |2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/dmfe.c 
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/dmfe.c
> index c820560..50a0077 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/dmfe.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/dmfe.c
> @@ -2265,7 +2265,7 @@ static int __init dmfe_init_module(void)
>
>  static void __exit dmfe_cleanup_module(void)
>  {
> -   DMFE_DBUG(0, "dmfe_clean_module() ", debug);
> +   DMFE_DBUG(0, "dmfe_cleanup_module() ", debug);
> pci_unregister_driver(&dmfe_driver);
>  }
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/