Re: linux-next: Tree for July 16
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:56:45AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 05:17:09PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Changes since 20120713:
> >>>
> >>> The ext4 tree lost its build failure.
> >>>
> >>> The vfs tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
> >>> next-20120713.
> >>
> >> Details, please?
> >
> > [1] http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1107.2/00046.html
> >
>
> Grr right subject - wrong email, Stephen's mail seems to be not in the
> offline mail-archives, so I am quoting:
>
> "Hi Al,
>
> After merging the vfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> fs/ext2/super.c: In function 'ext2_sync_fs':
> fs/ext2/super.c:1191:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'dquot_writeback_dquots' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> fs/ext3/super.c: In function 'ext3_sync_fs':
> fs/ext3/super.c:2534:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'dquot_writeback_dquots' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> fs/ext4/super.c: In function 'ext4_sync_fs':
> fs/ext4/super.c:4493:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'dquot_writeback_dquots' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>
> Caused by commits 05566b558a47 ("quota: Move quota syncing to ->sync_fs
> method") and ad04033e79d2 ("quota: Split dquot_quota_sync() to writeback
> and cache flushing part"). Please do build testing with and without
> CONFIG QUOTA for quota changes ...
Fixed, folded and pushed...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 16
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Al Viro wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 05:17:09PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20120713:
>>>
>>> The ext4 tree lost its build failure.
>>>
>>> The vfs tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
>>> next-20120713.
>>
>> Details, please?
>
> [1] http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1107.2/00046.html
>
Grr right subject - wrong email, Stephen's mail seems to be not in the
offline mail-archives, so I am quoting:
"Hi Al,
After merging the vfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
fs/ext2/super.c: In function 'ext2_sync_fs':
fs/ext2/super.c:1191:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'dquot_writeback_dquots' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
fs/ext3/super.c: In function 'ext3_sync_fs':
fs/ext3/super.c:2534:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'dquot_writeback_dquots' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
fs/ext4/super.c: In function 'ext4_sync_fs':
fs/ext4/super.c:4493:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'dquot_writeback_dquots' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Caused by commits 05566b558a47 ("quota: Move quota syncing to ->sync_fs
method") and ad04033e79d2 ("quota: Split dquot_quota_sync() to writeback
and cache flushing part"). Please do build testing with and without
CONFIG QUOTA for quota changes ...
I have used the vfs tree from next-20120713 for today."
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
>> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 16
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Al Viro wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 05:17:09PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20120713: >> >> The ext4 tree lost its build failure. >> >> The vfs tree gained a build failure so I used the version from >> next-20120713. > > Details, please? [1] http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1107.2/00046.html > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 16
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 05:17:09PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20120713: > > The ext4 tree lost its build failure. > > The vfs tree gained a build failure so I used the version from > next-20120713. Details, please? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 16
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 05:17:09PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20120713: The ext4 tree lost its build failure. The vfs tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20120713. Details, please? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 16
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk wrote: On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 05:17:09PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20120713: The ext4 tree lost its build failure. The vfs tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20120713. Details, please? [1] http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1107.2/00046.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-next in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 16
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk wrote: On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 05:17:09PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20120713: The ext4 tree lost its build failure. The vfs tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20120713. Details, please? [1] http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1107.2/00046.html Grr right subject - wrong email, Stephen's mail seems to be not in the offline mail-archives, so I am quoting: Hi Al, After merging the vfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: fs/ext2/super.c: In function 'ext2_sync_fs': fs/ext2/super.c:1191:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'dquot_writeback_dquots' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] fs/ext3/super.c: In function 'ext3_sync_fs': fs/ext3/super.c:2534:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'dquot_writeback_dquots' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] fs/ext4/super.c: In function 'ext4_sync_fs': fs/ext4/super.c:4493:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'dquot_writeback_dquots' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Caused by commits 05566b558a47 (quota: Move quota syncing to -sync_fs method) and ad04033e79d2 (quota: Split dquot_quota_sync() to writeback and cache flushing part). Please do build testing with and without CONFIG QUOTA for quota changes ... I have used the vfs tree from next-20120713 for today. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-next in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 16
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:56:45AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk wrote: On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 05:17:09PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20120713: The ext4 tree lost its build failure. The vfs tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20120713. Details, please? [1] http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1107.2/00046.html Grr right subject - wrong email, Stephen's mail seems to be not in the offline mail-archives, so I am quoting: Hi Al, After merging the vfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: fs/ext2/super.c: In function 'ext2_sync_fs': fs/ext2/super.c:1191:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'dquot_writeback_dquots' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] fs/ext3/super.c: In function 'ext3_sync_fs': fs/ext3/super.c:2534:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'dquot_writeback_dquots' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] fs/ext4/super.c: In function 'ext4_sync_fs': fs/ext4/super.c:4493:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'dquot_writeback_dquots' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Caused by commits 05566b558a47 (quota: Move quota syncing to -sync_fs method) and ad04033e79d2 (quota: Split dquot_quota_sync() to writeback and cache flushing part). Please do build testing with and without CONFIG QUOTA for quota changes ... Fixed, folded and pushed... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
