spurious IRQ complaints
PCI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin A of device 01:00.0. Please try using pci=biosirq. 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage 128 RF (prog-if 00 [VGA]) Subsystem: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 0008 Flags: bus master, stepping, 66Mhz, medium devsel, latency 64 Memory at e400 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=64M] I/O ports at d000 [size=256] Memory at e900 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] Expansion ROM at e800 [disabled] [size=128K] Capabilities: [50] AGP version 2.0 Capabilities: [5c] Power Management version 1 Does it really need one? -d -- There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and talents. Thomas Jefferson The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. Andrew S. Tanenbaum - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: spurious IRQ complaints
David Ford wrote: > > PCI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin A of device 01:00.0. Please try > using pci=biosirq. > > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage 128 RF > (prog-if 00 [VGA]) > Subsystem: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 0008 > Flags: bus master, stepping, 66Mhz, medium devsel, latency 64 > Memory at e400 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=64M] > I/O ports at d000 [size=256] > Memory at e900 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] > Expansion ROM at e800 [disabled] [size=128K] > Capabilities: [50] AGP version 2.0 > Capabilities: [5c] Power Management version 1 > > Does it really need one? DRI versions of X seem to behave better if an IRQ is assigned to the VGA device via the BIOS. Didn't seem like a problem to let it have one, so I did. :o) John - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
