Re: [GIT PULL] Borderline fixes for v3.2-rc6
* Olof Johansson [111222 08:42]: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Hi Olof, > > > > * Olof Johansson [111220 09:29]: > >> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >> > > >> > I've branched it out into fixes-hwmod-regression with just that > >> > same commit in it. The second patch in this series will be pulled in > >> > with fixes-non-critical-part2. Updated pull request below. > >> > >> Thanks, I pulled fixes-hwmod-regression into fixes and fixes-hwmod > >> into next/fixes-non-critical. > > > > Just checking.. Looks like you pulled fixes-hwmod into a new branch > > named fixes-non-critical-part2, but did not pull the same name branch > > fixes-non-critical-part2 that I posted? > > > > That's this pull request: > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg62050.html > > Grmbl, thanks for catching that. I'll sort it out at this end. OK thanks! Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [GIT PULL] Borderline fixes for v3.2-rc6
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Hi Olof, > > * Olof Johansson [111220 09:29]: >> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >> > >> > I've branched it out into fixes-hwmod-regression with just that >> > same commit in it. The second patch in this series will be pulled in >> > with fixes-non-critical-part2. Updated pull request below. >> >> Thanks, I pulled fixes-hwmod-regression into fixes and fixes-hwmod >> into next/fixes-non-critical. > > Just checking.. Looks like you pulled fixes-hwmod into a new branch > named fixes-non-critical-part2, but did not pull the same name branch > fixes-non-critical-part2 that I posted? > > That's this pull request: > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg62050.html Grmbl, thanks for catching that. I'll sort it out at this end. -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [GIT PULL] Borderline fixes for v3.2-rc6
Hi Olof, * Olof Johansson [111220 09:29]: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > I've branched it out into fixes-hwmod-regression with just that > > same commit in it. The second patch in this series will be pulled in > > with fixes-non-critical-part2. Updated pull request below. > > Thanks, I pulled fixes-hwmod-regression into fixes and fixes-hwmod > into next/fixes-non-critical. Just checking.. Looks like you pulled fixes-hwmod into a new branch named fixes-non-critical-part2, but did not pull the same name branch fixes-non-critical-part2 that I posted? That's this pull request: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg62050.html Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [GIT PULL] Borderline fixes for v3.2-rc6
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Olof Johansson [111219 20:20]: >> Hi Tony, >> >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >> > Hi Arnd & Olof, >> > >> > Here are two fixes that could potentially go into v3.2 -rc cycle. >> > >> > One fixes a harmless but annoying warning that happens on omap 34xx >> > processors during boot. The other one fixes booting on pretty rare >> > secure mode development board, but that's fixed in "features that >> > never worked earlier either" style. >> > >> > We can surely wait on these fixes, but if you have something going >> > upstream anyways, then these might be worth considering too. >> >> The hwmod patch is a regression so that one I'll take, the other one >> is a little less obvious that it should go in now. Also, shouldn't it >> be cc:d stable in that case? > > Yes let's not worry about the second one, it adds new functionality and > it's for a currently rare case. > >> Let me know what you prefer (rebase with a cc: stable) or take out the >> secure mode patch. I'm collecting a small series of fixes so I'll pull >> it in tomorrow for that. > > I've branched it out into fixes-hwmod-regression with just that > same commit in it. The second patch in this series will be pulled in > with fixes-non-critical-part2. Updated pull request below. Thanks, I pulled fixes-hwmod-regression into fixes and fixes-hwmod into next/fixes-non-critical. -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [GIT PULL] Borderline fixes for v3.2-rc6
* Olof Johansson [111219 20:20]: > Hi Tony, > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Hi Arnd & Olof, > > > > Here are two fixes that could potentially go into v3.2 -rc cycle. > > > > One fixes a harmless but annoying warning that happens on omap 34xx > > processors during boot. The other one fixes booting on pretty rare > > secure mode development board, but that's fixed in "features that > > never worked earlier either" style. > > > > We can surely wait on these fixes, but if you have something going > > upstream anyways, then these might be worth considering too. > > The hwmod patch is a regression so that one I'll take, the other one > is a little less obvious that it should go in now. Also, shouldn't it > be cc:d stable in that case? Yes let's not worry about the second one, it adds new functionality and it's for a currently rare case. > Let me know what you prefer (rebase with a cc: stable) or take out the > secure mode patch. I'm collecting a small series of fixes so I'll pull > it in tomorrow for that. I've branched it out into fixes-hwmod-regression with just that same commit in it. The second patch in this series will be pulled in with fixes-non-critical-part2. Updated pull request below. Regards, Tony The following changes since commit e5fe29c7198a1f6616286dfc8602a69da165cb3f: Felipe Contreras (1): ARM: OMAP: rx51: fix USB are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap fixes-hwmod-regression Felipe Contreras (1): ARM: OMAP: hwmod data: fix iva and mailbox hwmods for OMAP 3 arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c |4 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [GIT PULL] Borderline fixes for v3.2-rc6
Hi Tony, On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Hi Arnd & Olof, > > Here are two fixes that could potentially go into v3.2 -rc cycle. > > One fixes a harmless but annoying warning that happens on omap 34xx > processors during boot. The other one fixes booting on pretty rare > secure mode development board, but that's fixed in "features that > never worked earlier either" style. > > We can surely wait on these fixes, but if you have something going > upstream anyways, then these might be worth considering too. The hwmod patch is a regression so that one I'll take, the other one is a little less obvious that it should go in now. Also, shouldn't it be cc:d stable in that case? Let me know what you prefer (rebase with a cc: stable) or take out the secure mode patch. I'm collecting a small series of fixes so I'll pull it in tomorrow for that. -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
