Re: [PATCH 08/17] i2c: omap: switch over to do {} while loop

2012-06-14 Thread Felipe Balbi 
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 04:33:39PM +0530, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Felipe Balbi  wrote:
> > this will make sure that we execute at least once.
> > No functional changes otherwise.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi 
> > ---
> Executing at least once instead of never is
> still a functional change :-)

there's a check for spurious interrupts. The idea was mainly to
initialise stat and bits correctly at the beginning of the handler.

Besides that "otherwise" is telling you that: "except this, there are no
other functional changes" ;)

-- 
balbi


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: [PATCH 08/17] i2c: omap: switch over to do {} while loop

2012-06-14 Thread Shilimkar, Santosh 
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Felipe Balbi  wrote:
> this will make sure that we execute at least once.
> No functional changes otherwise.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi 
> ---
Executing at least once instead of never is
still a functional change :-)

Regards
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html