Re: [PATCH] mlx4: Change a warning message to debug
OK, I just got rid of the message entirely. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] mlx4: Change a warning message to debug
Not sure I agree ... surely the point of this message is for the user to see it and know to update firmware? Otherwise why print anything at all, since I'm sure you guys have already fixed the firmware and have a regression test so this bug doesn't reappear? Right :-) So what do you think -- remove the message entirely or leave it? - R. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[PATCH] mlx4: Change a warning message to debug
This workaround presented in 58d74bb is not something we should alert the user on. Debug level message is enough. Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen e...@mellanox.co.il --- drivers/net/mlx4/fw.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx4/fw.c b/drivers/net/mlx4/fw.c index 7a7e18b..9f415df 100644 --- a/drivers/net/mlx4/fw.c +++ b/drivers/net/mlx4/fw.c @@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ int mlx4_QUERY_DEV_CAP(struct mlx4_dev *dev, struct mlx4_dev_cap *dev_cap) dev_cap-bf_reg_size = 1 (field 0x1f); MLX4_GET(field, outbox, QUERY_DEV_CAP_LOG_MAX_BF_REGS_PER_PAGE_OFFSET); if ((1 (field 0x3f)) (PAGE_SIZE / dev_cap-bf_reg_size)) { - mlx4_warn(dev, firmware bug: log2 # of blue flame regs is invalid (%d), forcing 3\n, field 0x1f); + mlx4_dbg(dev, firmware bug: log2 # of blue flame regs is invalid (%d), forcing 3\n, field 0x1f); field = 3; } dev_cap-bf_regs_per_page = 1 (field 0x3f); -- 1.7.3.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] mlx4: Change a warning message to debug
This workaround presented in 58d74bb is not something we should alert the user on. Debug level message is enough. Not sure I agree ... surely the point of this message is for the user to see it and know to update firmware? Otherwise why print anything at all, since I'm sure you guys have already fixed the firmware and have a regression test so this bug doesn't reappear? - R. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html