[PATCH][sata_fsl] Defer non-ncq commands when ncq commands active

2009-07-29 Thread ashish kalra

From: Ashish Kalra 
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:15:49 +0530

Fix for non-ncq & ncq commands causing timeouts when both are issued 
simultaneously to the same device.


Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra 
---
 drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c |1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c b/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
index 5a88b44..a33f130 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
@@ -1262,6 +1262,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template sata_fsl_sht = {
 static struct ata_port_operations sata_fsl_ops = {
.inherits   = &sata_pmp_port_ops,

+   .qc_defer = ata_std_qc_defer;
.qc_prep = sata_fsl_qc_prep,
.qc_issue = sata_fsl_qc_issue,
.qc_fill_rtf = sata_fsl_qc_fill_rtf,
--
1.6.0


___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Re: [PATCH][sata_fsl] Defer non-ncq commands when ncq commands active

2009-07-29 Thread Robert Hancock

On 07/29/2009 10:03 AM, ashish kalra wrote:

From: Ashish Kalra 
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:15:49 +0530

Fix for non-ncq & ncq commands causing timeouts when both are issued
simultaneously to the same device.

Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra 
---
drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c b/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
index 5a88b44..a33f130 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
@@ -1262,6 +1262,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template sata_fsl_sht = {
static struct ata_port_operations sata_fsl_ops = {
.inherits = &sata_pmp_port_ops,

+ .qc_defer = ata_std_qc_defer;
.qc_prep = sata_fsl_qc_prep,
.qc_issue = sata_fsl_qc_issue,
.qc_fill_rtf = sata_fsl_qc_fill_rtf,


This doesn't look like it should change anything. sata_fsl_ops inherits 
from sata_pmp_port_ops, which inherits from sata_port_ops, which already 
sets qc_defer to ata_std_qc_defer.

___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


RE: [PATCH][sata_fsl] Defer non-ncq commands when ncq commands active

2009-07-30 Thread Kalra Ashish-B00888
Hello, 

>> Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra 
>> ---
>> drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c | 1 +
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c b/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
>> index 5a88b44..a33f130 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
>> @@ -1262,6 +1262,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template sata_fsl_sht = {
>> static struct ata_port_operations sata_fsl_ops = {
>> .inherits = &sata_pmp_port_ops,
>>
>> + .qc_defer = ata_std_qc_defer;
>> .qc_prep = sata_fsl_qc_prep,
>> .qc_issue = sata_fsl_qc_issue,
>> .qc_fill_rtf = sata_fsl_qc_fill_rtf,

> This doesn't look like it should change anything. sata_fsl_ops inherits
> from sata_pmp_port_ops, which inherits from sata_port_ops, which already
> sets qc_defer to ata_std_qc_defer.

Oh, yes. Actually this patch was for older kernels where there inheritence was 
not there. As you mentioned, this patch is not required now.

Thanks,

Ashish



___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: [PATCH][sata_fsl] Defer non-ncq commands when ncq commands active

2009-07-30 Thread Kumar Gala


On Jul 30, 2009, at 8:23 AM, Kalra Ashish-B00888 wrote:


Hello,

>> Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra 
>> ---
>> drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c | 1 +
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c b/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
>> index 5a88b44..a33f130 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
>> @@ -1262,6 +1262,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template  
sata_fsl_sht = {

>> static struct ata_port_operations sata_fsl_ops = {
>> .inherits = &sata_pmp_port_ops,
>>
>> + .qc_defer = ata_std_qc_defer;
>> .qc_prep = sata_fsl_qc_prep,
>> .qc_issue = sata_fsl_qc_issue,
>> .qc_fill_rtf = sata_fsl_qc_fill_rtf,

> This doesn't look like it should change anything. sata_fsl_ops  
inherits
> from sata_pmp_port_ops, which inherits from sata_port_ops, which  
already

> sets qc_defer to ata_std_qc_defer.
Oh, yes. Actually this patch was for older kernels where there  
inheritence was not there. As you mentioned, this patch is not  
required now.


How old?  Should we be asking for this to be applied to some of the  
stable kernel series?


- k
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


RE: [PATCH][sata_fsl] Defer non-ncq commands when ncq commands active

2009-07-30 Thread Kalra Ashish-B00888
Hello Kumar,

>> > This doesn't look like it should change anything. sata_fsl_ops 
>> inherits
>> > from sata_pmp_port_ops, which inherits from sata_port_ops, which 
>> already
>> > sets qc_defer to ata_std_qc_defer.
>> Oh, yes. Actually this patch was for older kernels where there 
>> inheritence was not there. As you mentioned, this patch is not 
>> required now.
>>
>How old?  Should we be asking for this to be applied to some of the 
>stable kernel series?

I believe that the inheritence stuff was added in 2.6.26, thus, this patch is
required for quite old kernels ( < 2.6.26 ).

Thanks,

Ashish

___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: [PATCH][sata_fsl] Defer non-ncq commands when ncq commands active

2009-07-30 Thread Kumar Gala


On Jul 30, 2009, at 8:58 AM, Kalra Ashish-B00888 wrote:


Hello Kumar,

>> > This doesn't look like it should change anything. sata_fsl_ops
>> inherits
>> > from sata_pmp_port_ops, which inherits from sata_port_ops, which
>> already
>> > sets qc_defer to ata_std_qc_defer.
>> Oh, yes. Actually this patch was for older kernels where there
>> inheritence was not there. As you mentioned, this patch is not
>> required now.
>>
>How old?  Should we be asking for this to be applied to some of the
>stable kernel series?

I believe that the inheritence stuff was added in 2.6.26, thus, this  
patch is

required for quite old kernels ( < 2.6.26 ).


Ok, than I'm not going to worry about it.

- k
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Re: [PATCH][sata_fsl] Defer non-ncq commands when ncq commands active

2009-09-08 Thread Jeff Garzik

On 07/29/2009 12:03 PM, ashish kalra wrote:

From: Ashish Kalra 
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:15:49 +0530

Fix for non-ncq & ncq commands causing timeouts when both are issued
simultaneously to the same device.

Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra 
---
drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c b/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
index 5a88b44..a33f130 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
@@ -1262,6 +1262,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template sata_fsl_sht = {
static struct ata_port_operations sata_fsl_ops = {
.inherits = &sata_pmp_port_ops,

+ .qc_defer = ata_std_qc_defer;


Applied version with obvious s/;/,/ fix...

Jeff




___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev