Re: [PATCH] kexec/ppc: Fix kernel program entry point while changing the load addr

2013-03-04 Thread Simon Horman
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:26:24AM +0530, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> On 03/04/2013 07:11 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> >[ Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org ]
> >
> >On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 01:06:00PM +0530, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> >>From: Suzuki K. Poulose 
> >>
> >>uImage probe fills the entry point (ep) based on the load_addr
> >>from the uImage headers. If we change the load_addr, we should
> >>accordingly update the entry point.
> >>
> >>For ELF, calculate the offset of e_entry from the virtual start
> >>address and add it to the physical start address to find the
> >>physical address of kernel entry.
> >>
> >>i.e,
> >>   pa (e_entry) = pa(phdr[0].p_vaddr) + (e_entry - phdr[0].p_vaddr)
> >>= kernel_addr + (e_entry - phdr[0].p_vaddr)
> >
> >Would it be possible for someone to provide a review of this change?
> To make it bit more clear :
> 
> The entry point of the kernel is usually at 0 offset from the first
> PT_LOAD section. The current code makes this assumption and uses the
> pa(phdr[0].p_vaddr) as the kernel entry.
> 
> But this *may* not be true always, in such a case the kexec would fail.
> While I fixed the uImage case, I thought it would be better to
> handle the same case in ELF.
> 
> Btw, this calculation is not specific to ppc32.

Thanks, I have applied the patch.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Re: [PATCH] kexec/ppc: Fix kernel program entry point while changing the load addr

2013-03-03 Thread Suzuki K. Poulose

On 03/04/2013 07:11 AM, Simon Horman wrote:

[ Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org ]

On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 01:06:00PM +0530, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:

From: Suzuki K. Poulose 

uImage probe fills the entry point (ep) based on the load_addr
from the uImage headers. If we change the load_addr, we should
accordingly update the entry point.

For ELF, calculate the offset of e_entry from the virtual start
address and add it to the physical start address to find the
physical address of kernel entry.

i.e,
   pa (e_entry) = pa(phdr[0].p_vaddr) + (e_entry - phdr[0].p_vaddr)
= kernel_addr + (e_entry - phdr[0].p_vaddr)


Would it be possible for someone to provide a review of this change?

To make it bit more clear :

The entry point of the kernel is usually at 0 offset from the first
PT_LOAD section. The current code makes this assumption and uses the 
pa(phdr[0].p_vaddr) as the kernel entry.


But this *may* not be true always, in such a case the kexec would fail.
While I fixed the uImage case, I thought it would be better to handle 
the same case in ELF.


Btw, this calculation is not specific to ppc32.

Thanks
Suzuki





Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose 
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 
Cc: Matthew McClintock 
---
  kexec/arch/ppc/kexec-elf-ppc.c|   12 
  kexec/arch/ppc/kexec-uImage-ppc.c |6 +-
  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kexec/arch/ppc/kexec-elf-ppc.c b/kexec/arch/ppc/kexec-elf-ppc.c
index 8e408cc..5f63a64 100644
--- a/kexec/arch/ppc/kexec-elf-ppc.c
+++ b/kexec/arch/ppc/kexec-elf-ppc.c
@@ -397,10 +397,14 @@ int elf_ppc_load(int argc, char **argv,   const char 
*buf, off_t len,
die("Error device tree not loadded to address it was expecting to be 
loaded too!\n");
}

-   /* set various variables for the purgatory  ehdr.e_entry is a
-* virtual address, we can use kernel_addr which
-* should be the physical start address of the kernel */
-   addr = kernel_addr;
+   /*
+* set various variables for the purgatory.
+* ehdr.e_entry is a virtual address. we know physical start
+* address of the kernel (kernel_addr). Find the offset of
+* e_entry from the virtual start address(e_phdr[0].p_vaddr)
+* and calculate the actual physical address of the 'kernel entry'.
+*/
+   addr = kernel_addr + (ehdr.e_entry - ehdr.e_phdr[0].p_vaddr);
elf_rel_set_symbol(&info->rhdr, "kernel", &addr, sizeof(addr));

addr = dtb_addr;
diff --git a/kexec/arch/ppc/kexec-uImage-ppc.c 
b/kexec/arch/ppc/kexec-uImage-ppc.c
index e0bc7bb..900cd16 100644
--- a/kexec/arch/ppc/kexec-uImage-ppc.c
+++ b/kexec/arch/ppc/kexec-uImage-ppc.c
@@ -159,15 +159,19 @@ static int ppc_load_bare_bits(int argc, char **argv, 
const char *buf,

/*
 * If the provided load_addr cannot be allocated, find a new
-* area.
+* area. Rebase the entry point based on the new load_addr.
 */
if (!valid_memory_range(info, load_addr, load_addr + (len + _1MiB))) {
+   int ep_offset = ep - load_addr;
+
load_addr = locate_hole(info, len + _1MiB, 0, 0, max_addr, 1);
if (load_addr == ULONG_MAX) {
printf("Can't allocate memory for kernel of len %ld\n",
len + _1MiB);
return -1;
}
+
+   ep = load_addr + ep_offset;
}

add_segment(info, buf, len, load_addr, len + _1MiB);


___
kexec mailing list
ke...@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec


___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev



___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Re: [PATCH] kexec/ppc: Fix kernel program entry point while changing the load addr

2013-03-03 Thread Simon Horman
[ Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org ]

On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 01:06:00PM +0530, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> From: Suzuki K. Poulose 
> 
> uImage probe fills the entry point (ep) based on the load_addr
> from the uImage headers. If we change the load_addr, we should
> accordingly update the entry point.
> 
> For ELF, calculate the offset of e_entry from the virtual start
> address and add it to the physical start address to find the
> physical address of kernel entry.
> 
> i.e,
>   pa (e_entry) = pa(phdr[0].p_vaddr) + (e_entry - phdr[0].p_vaddr)
>= kernel_addr + (e_entry - phdr[0].p_vaddr)

Would it be possible for someone to provide a review of this change?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose 
> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 
> Cc: Matthew McClintock 
> ---
>  kexec/arch/ppc/kexec-elf-ppc.c|   12 
>  kexec/arch/ppc/kexec-uImage-ppc.c |6 +-
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kexec/arch/ppc/kexec-elf-ppc.c b/kexec/arch/ppc/kexec-elf-ppc.c
> index 8e408cc..5f63a64 100644
> --- a/kexec/arch/ppc/kexec-elf-ppc.c
> +++ b/kexec/arch/ppc/kexec-elf-ppc.c
> @@ -397,10 +397,14 @@ int elf_ppc_load(int argc, char **argv, const char 
> *buf, off_t len,
>   die("Error device tree not loadded to address it was expecting 
> to be loaded too!\n");
>   }
>  
> - /* set various variables for the purgatory  ehdr.e_entry is a
> -  * virtual address, we can use kernel_addr which
> -  * should be the physical start address of the kernel */
> - addr = kernel_addr;
> + /* 
> +  * set various variables for the purgatory.
> +  * ehdr.e_entry is a virtual address. we know physical start
> +  * address of the kernel (kernel_addr). Find the offset of
> +  * e_entry from the virtual start address(e_phdr[0].p_vaddr)
> +  * and calculate the actual physical address of the 'kernel entry'.
> +  */
> + addr = kernel_addr + (ehdr.e_entry - ehdr.e_phdr[0].p_vaddr);
>   elf_rel_set_symbol(&info->rhdr, "kernel", &addr, sizeof(addr));
>  
>   addr = dtb_addr;
> diff --git a/kexec/arch/ppc/kexec-uImage-ppc.c 
> b/kexec/arch/ppc/kexec-uImage-ppc.c
> index e0bc7bb..900cd16 100644
> --- a/kexec/arch/ppc/kexec-uImage-ppc.c
> +++ b/kexec/arch/ppc/kexec-uImage-ppc.c
> @@ -159,15 +159,19 @@ static int ppc_load_bare_bits(int argc, char **argv, 
> const char *buf,
>  
>   /*
>* If the provided load_addr cannot be allocated, find a new
> -  * area.
> +  * area. Rebase the entry point based on the new load_addr.
>*/
>   if (!valid_memory_range(info, load_addr, load_addr + (len + _1MiB))) {
> + int ep_offset = ep - load_addr;
> +
>   load_addr = locate_hole(info, len + _1MiB, 0, 0, max_addr, 1);
>   if (load_addr == ULONG_MAX) {
>   printf("Can't allocate memory for kernel of len %ld\n",
>   len + _1MiB);
>   return -1;
>   }
> +
> + ep = load_addr + ep_offset;
>   }
>  
>   add_segment(info, buf, len, load_addr, len + _1MiB);
> 
> 
> ___
> kexec mailing list
> ke...@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
> 
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev