Re: Yet more patches added to for-2.6.25/master branches
David Woodhouse writes: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=15192 ? Not my bailiwick. Send it to the RTC subsystem maintainer or Andrew Morton. You can put Acked-by me on it if you like. Paul. ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: Yet more patches added to for-2.6.25/master branches
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=15192 ? -- dwmw2 ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: Yet more patches added to for-2.6.25/master branches
Paulus,
Can you take the crash shutdown hook patches as well for 2.6.25?
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=414id=15546
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=414id=15547
Mikey
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Aegis Lin (1):
[POWERPC] spufs: Use separate timer for /proc/spu_loadavg calculation
Andre Detsch (1):
[POWERPC] spufs: DMA Restart after SIGSEGV
Arnd Bergmann (1):
[POWERPC] spufs: block fault handlers in spu_acquire_runnable
Benjamin Herrenschmidt (2):
[POWERPC] Fix for via-pmu based backlight control
[POWERPC] Fix possible NULL deref in ppc32 PCI
Christoph Hellwig (2):
[POWERPC] spufs: add enchanced simple attr macros
[POWERPC] spufs: make state_mutex interruptible
Emil Medve (1):
[POWERPC] Optimize counting distinct entries in the relocation sections
Jeremy Kerr (5):
[POWERPC] spufs: move fault, lscsa_alloc and switch code to spufs modul
e
[POWERPC] spufs: fix incorrect interrupt status clearing in backing mbo
x stat poll
[POWERPC] spufs: use #defines for SPU class [012] exception status
[POWERPC] spufs: rework class 0 and 1 interrupt handling
[POWERPC] spufs: Don't leak kernel stack through an empty {i,m}box_info
read
Julio M. Merino Vidal (1):
[POWERPC] spufs: fix typos in sched.c comments
Luke Browning (4):
[POWERPC] spufs: add backing ops for privcntl register
[POWERPC] spufs: reorganize spu_run_init
[POWERPC] spufs: spu_find_victim may choose wrong victim
[POWERPC] spufs: decouple spu scheduler from spufs_spu_run (asynchronou
s scheduling)
Masato Noguchi (2):
[POWERPC] cell: wrap master run control bit
[POWERPC] spufs: don't set reserved bits in spu interrupt status
Scott Wood (1):
[POWERPC] Implement arch disable/enable irq hooks.
Stephen Rothwell (5):
[POWERPC] Add EHEA and EHCA as modules in the ppc64_defconfig
[POWERPC] The builtin matches for ibmebus.c can be __initdata
[POWERPC] Constify the of_device_id passed to of_platform_bus_probe
[POWERPC] Pointers marked as __iomem do not need to be volatile
[POWERPC] Make non-PCI build work again
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: Yet more patches added to for-2.6.25/master branches
Any changes to add new 52xx targets: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14661 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14662 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14663 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14743 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14665 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14666 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14667 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14668 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14669 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14670 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14671 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14672 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14673 Those did not make it to 2.6.24, Grant Likely suggested to wait until 2.6.25 window opens. Thanks, Marian ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: Yet more patches added to for-2.6.25/master branches
On Dec 21, 2007, at 8:13 AM, Marian Balakowicz wrote: Any changes to add new 52xx targets: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14661 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14662 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14663 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14743 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14665 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14666 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14667 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14668 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14669 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14670 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14671 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14672 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14673 Those did not make it to 2.6.24, Grant Likely suggested to wait until 2.6.25 window opens. A few of these patches may need to get updated do to other changes. For example the i2c nodes in .dts. - k ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: Yet more patches added to for-2.6.25/master branches
On 12/21/07, Marian Balakowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any changes to add new 52xx targets: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14661 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14662 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14663 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14743 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14665 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14666 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14667 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14668 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14669 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14670 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14671 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14672 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14673 Those did not make it to 2.6.24, Grant Likely suggested to wait until 2.6.25 window opens. I'll be picking these up next week. I haven't had time to do it earlier. Cheers, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (403) 399-0195 ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: Yet more patches added to for-2.6.25/master branches
On 12/21/07, Marian Balakowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Grant Likely wrote: On 12/21/07, *Marian Balakowicz* [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any changes to add new 52xx targets: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14661 [...] Those did not make it to 2.6.24, Grant Likely suggested to wait until 2.6.25 window opens. I'll be picking these up next week. I haven't had time to do it earlier. Great, I'll retest the set with the latest vanilla next week. Actually, you should retest against Paulus' latest tree instead because that is what it will be merged against. Cheers, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (403) 399-0195 ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: Yet more patches added to for-2.6.25/master branches
Grant Likely wrote: On 12/21/07, *Marian Balakowicz* [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any changes to add new 52xx targets: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=988id=14661 [...] Those did not make it to 2.6.24, Grant Likely suggested to wait until 2.6.25 window opens. I'll be picking these up next week. I haven't had time to do it earlier. Great, I'll retest the set with the latest vanilla next week. Thanks, Marian ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
