Re: [pfSense] Report Errors
Didn't see anything related to squidguard in there. As expected a few minutes after I sent that email the websites were blocked again as they should be. Something very intermittent. Really appreciate the reply! Not sure if its related but squid in general has a very low to non existent hit ratio. I've been googling and searching forums to no avail. Every thing appears correct. I can sit there watching the real time monitor and watching it happen. Everything comes back as a miss even those sites I've been to just moments prior. I don't know if this will help much but: http://www.dlois.com/status.html Brian On 6/3/2014 9:10 AM, Ryan Coleman wrote: What do your logs say? On Jun 3, 2014, at 6:56, Brian Caouette wrote: That is true. It just seems like I get something working then it stops work a few hours later. I've seen packages not start up at on. This morning I can surf to porn sites despite them being blocked last night. With making any changes squidguard just stopped blocking. I've left all settings in place so it should still be blocking. Just getting frustrated is all. Sent from my iPad On Jun 2, 2014, at 8:57 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: On Jun 2, 2014, at 13:18, Brian Caouette wrote: As much as I like pfSense it and packages are really prone to glitches and over all bugs. PfSense has bugs, and packages have bugs, but it is a mistake to conflate the two. ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Re: [pfSense] Report Errors
What do your logs say? On Jun 3, 2014, at 6:56, Brian Caouette wrote: > That is true. It just seems like I get something working then it stops work a > few hours later. I've seen packages not start up at on. This morning I can > surf to porn sites despite them being blocked last night. With making any > changes squidguard just stopped blocking. I've left all settings in place so > it should still be blocking. Just getting frustrated is all. > > Sent from my iPad > >> On Jun 2, 2014, at 8:57 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: >> >> >>> On Jun 2, 2014, at 13:18, Brian Caouette wrote: >>> >>> As much as I like pfSense it >>> and packages are really prone to glitches and over all bugs. >> >> PfSense has bugs, and packages have bugs, but it is a mistake to conflate >> the two. >> ___ >> List mailing list >> List@lists.pfsense.org >> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >> > ___ > List mailing list > List@lists.pfsense.org > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Re: [pfSense] Report Errors
That is true. It just seems like I get something working then it stops work a few hours later. I've seen packages not start up at on. This morning I can surf to porn sites despite them being blocked last night. With making any changes squidguard just stopped blocking. I've left all settings in place so it should still be blocking. Just getting frustrated is all. Sent from my iPad > On Jun 2, 2014, at 8:57 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: > > >> On Jun 2, 2014, at 13:18, Brian Caouette wrote: >> >> As much as I like pfSense it >> and packages are really prone to glitches and over all bugs. > > PfSense has bugs, and packages have bugs, but it is a mistake to conflate the > two. > ___ > List mailing list > List@lists.pfsense.org > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Re: [pfSense] Report Errors
> On Jun 2, 2014, at 10:02 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote: > > It’s also a mistake to not report them to the maintainers. :) That’s true, and the maintainers for Squid, Snort and Silicata are very good about fixing said bugs. Jim ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Re: [pfSense] Report Errors
It’s also a mistake to not report them to the maintainers. :) On Jun 2, 2014, at 19:57, Jim Thompson wrote: > >> On Jun 2, 2014, at 13:18, Brian Caouette wrote: >> >> As much as I like pfSense it >> and packages are really prone to glitches and over all bugs. > > PfSense has bugs, and packages have bugs, but it is a mistake to conflate the > two. > ___ > List mailing list > List@lists.pfsense.org > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Re: [pfSense] Report Errors
> On Jun 2, 2014, at 13:18, Brian Caouette wrote: > > As much as I like pfSense it > and packages are really prone to glitches and over all bugs. PfSense has bugs, and packages have bugs, but it is a mistake to conflate the two. ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Re: [pfSense] Report Errors
On 2014-06-02 11:18, Brian Caouette wrote: This one shows a really low hit rate: http://bbs.dlois.com:/lightsquid/index.cgi I thought Squid was better than this. Suggestions? I'm only seeing 4 users one day, 8 the other, and a fairly low amount of data transferred, so a low hit rate is expected. Modern browsers do a fairly decent job of caching internally, so typically with a single user, squid's hit rate will be pretty close to 0%, it's only once you have multiple users accessing the same sites that you'll see any real degree of caching. With modern sites moving toward HTTPS for everything including static resources, proxies are likely to see lower hit rates than was typical even a handful of years ago due to the fact that proxies can (usually) only cache HTTP content, HTTPS content gets tunneled through the proxy. Can anyone point me in the right direction? As much as I like pfSense it and packages are really prone to glitches and over all bugs. I don't disagree. Packages don't get the same level of quality checking/testing that pfSense itself does, and are often very complicated pieces of software wrapped up under a set of "One size fits some" defaults, with only a handful of the most common options directly exposed to the user. -- Dave Warren http://www.hireahit.com/ http://ca.linkedin.com/in/davejwarren ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
[pfSense] Report Errors
I have a report page setup at: dlois.com/status.html This page doesn't seem to update: http://bbs.dlois.com:/bandwidthd/index.html This one shows a really low hit rate: http://bbs.dlois.com:/lightsquid/index.cgi I thought Squid was better than this. Suggestions? This page has errors: http://bbs.dlois.com:/phpsysinfo/ Can anyone point me in the right direction? As much as I like pfSense it and packages are really prone to glitches and over all bugs. -- Brian Caouette DJ-BrianC (207) 212-6560 www.djbrianc.us ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
