[Lubuntu-desktop] Experiment: Merge LXSession/LXSessionEdit/LXPolkit and make them a single package.

2011-08-20 Thread PCMan
Hi all,
To simpify LXDE, I did some experiment last night.
Since LXSession and LXSession Edit actually are used together, I merged them
and make them the same package.
Though LXSession Edit is originally designed to be desktop independent and
can work under other DEs, I found no real use case of this.
To ease the maintaince, I moved LXSession Edit into LXsession so they will
have concurrent update and there will no longer be any version mismatch
between these two.

For LXPolkit, since udisks and other services requires a proper PolicyKit
agent, a Polkit agent is a must-have for modern desktop environment. The
authentication agent runs on session startup and terminates when the session
terminates. It has the same lifespan as the desktop session. So to avoid
unnecessary daemons, I merged PolicyKit with LXSession. Now the PolicyKit
agent is built-into LXSession and runs in the same process. So no additional
authentication agents, such as policykit-gnome or lxpolkit need to be
installed. This decreased number of daemons and packages.

Some may argue that session manager should not be mixed with other stuff.
This is true most of the times. However the rationale behind this move is
quite simple. These daemons are all essential parts of the DE. They have
completely the same lifespan and they should work together. They are all
small and simple. So putting them in one single daemon should be better than
running many separate daemons in terms of resource usage and efficiency. In
addition, it will be easier for upstream developer and packager to maintain.

To sum up, these three packages became one single LXSession package now and
the policykit agent runs in the process of lxsession rather than as a
separate daemon. For those who still missed policykit-gnome and want to use
it, try lxsession --disable-polkit to disable the built-in policykit agent
and to run your own instead.

It's not the final decision and it's put in a branch called "integration".
git://lxde.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/lxde/lxsession
branch "integration"

Please test and give some comments. Thanks.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Lubuntu-Desktop] Integrate Catfish?

2011-08-20 Thread Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset
>
> What is the resource usage? What is the installed size of it + it's deps?

Suggested : strigi-daemon doodle tracker beagle
Recommended : slocate
Will be installed: catfish (32,3 ko)
Installed, is 393 ko.

For me catfish requires 22MB Ram to run (+- while it's searching). I think
that is a little elevated BUT Lubuntu doesn't have anything that can search
files and IMHO it's something needed, and besides it's not an app that will
run forever: people will search and find and that's it for catfish.
The app it's behaving well here on a pentium 3 (1000mhz).
Plus, since Xubuntu uses it too, maybe in the near future a team
"l+x*ubuntu" could help to improve it... just ideas!

-- 
jpxsat
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Lubuntu-desktop] [Lubuntu-Desktop] Integrate Catfish?

2011-08-20 Thread Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset
Been trying catfish for some days, it's not fully operational (opening
folders with "go to") but lubuntu needs an app like this. Xubuntu use this:
why not Lubuntu too?

-- 
jpxsat
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] About GPicView

2011-08-20 Thread 魏銘廷
A Debian Developer (Kanru Chen) said that viewnior uses modified
gtkimageview which he wants to get rid of and depend on
libgtkimageview0 package instead. Currently, I am claiming this
package in Debian and struggle to put it on Debian.

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:00 PM, PCMan  wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> As the original author and prior maintainer of GPicView, I'd like to ask for
> some comments from users and other developers. Since I no longer have the
> time to maintain GPicView and it still has many problems. I consider
> dropping GPicView in LXDE and replace it with a better one.
> Viewnior is a lightweight and feature-rich image viewer which I think is
> better than gpicview and it also meets the goals of LXDE.
> http://xsisqox.github.com/Viewnior/
> It has very good balance between resource usage and feature set. Please give
> it some tests and gave me some feedback.
> I'd suggest replacing GPicView with Viewnior in LXDE. Any objections?
>
> ___
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
> Post to     : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>



-- 
Yao Wei

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp