Re: [PATCH] changes: LColor

2003-02-11 Thread Allan Rae
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, José  Matos wrote:

> On Tuesday 11 February 2003 08:54, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Allan Rae wrote:
> > > What I'd like to know is how did Angus know I have purple on my
> > > desktop (as icon backgrounds and title bars as it happens) as well as
> > > black and gold?
> >
> > Let's just call it an educated guess based on the evidence available. AKA,
> > a shot in the dark ;-)
>
>   You hited the gold spot on the darkness. Ok, I'm starting to see a pattern
> here. ;-)

Please tell all.  I might have got a colour wrong somewhere.

Allan. (ARRae)




Re: [PATCH] changes: LColor

2003-02-11 Thread José Matos
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 08:54, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Allan Rae wrote:
> > What I'd like to know is how did Angus know I have purple on my
> > desktop (as icon backgrounds and title bars as it happens) as well as
> > black and gold?
>
> Let's just call it an educated guess based on the evidence available. AKA,
> a shot in the dark ;-)

  You hited the gold spot on the darkness. Ok, I'm starting to see a pattern 
here. ;-)

-- 
José Abílio



Re: [PATCH] changes: LColor

2003-02-11 Thread Angus Leeming
Allan Rae wrote:
> What I'd like to know is how did Angus know I have purple on my
> desktop (as icon backgrounds and title bars as it happens) as well as
> black and gold?

Let's just call it an educated guess based on the evidence available. AKA, a 
shot in the dark ;-)

-- 
Angus




Re: [PATCH] changes: LColor

2003-02-10 Thread Allan Rae
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:

> John Levon wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 12:28:42AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >
> >> Anyway, they're configurable aren't they, so if Martin wants gold with
> >> purple linings he can have that too.
> >
> > Hey, how about you leave Allan alone now !

Thank you John for sticking up for me.

> (Comes over all innocent) what dod I say?

What I'd like to know is how did Angus know I have purple on my
desktop (as icon backgrounds and title bars as it happens) as well as
black and gold?

Allan. (ARRae)




Re: [PATCH] changes: LColor

2003-02-08 Thread John Levon
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 01:33:14AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:

> John Levon wrote:
> > I'm drunk and I'm still making more sense than you !
> But to whom, that is the question.

A fair point, perhaps ;)

john



Re: [PATCH] changes: LColor

2003-02-07 Thread Angus Leeming
John Levon wrote:
> I'm drunk and I'm still making more sense than you !
But to whom, that is the question.
-- 
Angus




Re: [PATCH] changes: LColor

2003-02-07 Thread John Levon
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 12:54:53AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:

> >> Anyway, they're configurable aren't they, so if Martin wants gold with
> >> purple linings he can have that too.
> 
> (Comes over all innocent) what dod I say?

What dod indeed ! 

I'm drunk and I'm still making more sense than you !

john



Re: [PATCH] changes: LColor

2003-02-07 Thread Angus Leeming
John Levon wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 12:28:42AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> 
>> Anyway, they're configurable aren't they, so if Martin wants gold with
>> purple linings he can have that too.
> 
> Hey, how about you leave Allan alone now !

(Comes over all innocent) what dod I say?

-- 
Angus




Re: [PATCH] changes: LColor

2003-02-07 Thread John Levon
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 12:28:42AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:

> Anyway, they're configurable aren't they, so if Martin wants gold with 
> purple linings he can have that too.

Hey, how about you leave Allan alone now !

john



Re: [PATCH] changes: LColor

2003-02-07 Thread Angus Leeming
John Levon wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 09:02:26PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> 
>> Does this mean strikeout is red, newly inserted is blue? And changebar
>> (blue) is used to tag both?
> 
> Yes.
> 
>> Would it be very hard to have a real strikeout (line through the
>> middle)
> 
> this already happens.
> 
>> and have new text underlined and red? More like Word :-(
> 
> Red for new text is just bizarre if you ask me. Red means deleted.
> 
> john

Anyway, they're configurable aren't they, so if Martin wants gold with 
purple linings he can have that too.

-- 
Angus




Re: [PATCH] changes: LColor

2003-02-07 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 09:02:26PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:

> Does this mean strikeout is red, newly inserted is blue? And changebar
> (blue) is used to tag both?

Yes.

> Would it be very hard to have a real strikeout (line through the
> middle)

this already happens.

> and have new text underlined and red? More like Word :-(

Red for new text is just bizarre if you ask me. Red means deleted.

john




Re: [PATCH] changes: LColor

2003-02-07 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:55:17PM +, John Levon spake thusly:
 
> 
> Add GUI colors for added/deleted text, and the changebars
> 
> 
> diff -u -r1.35 LColor.C
> --- src/LColor.C  6 Jan 2003 14:02:20 -   1.35
> +++ src/LColor.C  7 Feb 2003 11:31:43 -
> @@ -84,6 +84,9 @@
>   { error, N_("LaTeX error"), "error", "Red", "error" },
>   { eolmarker, N_("end-of-line marker"), "eolmarker", "Brown", "eolmarker" },
>   { appendixline, N_("appendix line"), "appendixline", "Brown", "appendixline" },
> + { changebar, N_("change bar"), "changebar", "Blue", "changebar" },
> + { strikeout, N_("Deleted text"), "strikeout", "Red", "strikeout" },
> + { newtext, N_("Added text"), "newtext", "Blue", "newtext" },
>   { added_space, N_("added space markers"), "added_space", "Brown", 
>"added_space" },
>   { topline, N_("top/bottom line"), "topline", "Brown", "topline" },
>   { tabularline, N_("tabular line"), "tabularline", "black",
> Index: src/LColor.h
> ===
> RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/LColor.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.24
> diff -u -r1.24 LColor.h
> --- src/LColor.h  5 Jul 2002 21:24:12 -   1.24
> +++ src/LColor.h  7 Feb 2003 11:31:44 -
> @@ -137,6 +137,12 @@
>   added_space,
>   /// Appendix line color
>   appendixline,
> + /// changebar color
> + changebar,
> + /// strike-out color
> + strikeout,
> + /// added text color
> + newtext,
>   /// Top and bottom line color
>   topline,
>   /// Table line color
> 

Does this mean strikeout is red, newly inserted is blue? And changebar
(blue) is used to tag both?

Would it be very hard to have a real strikeout (line through the
middle) and have new text underlined and red? More like Word :-(

Ah well, get this to work first... this is going to be a selling point, I
know.

Martin




msg52561/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[PATCH] changes: LColor

2003-02-07 Thread John Levon

Add GUI colors for added/deleted text, and the changebars


diff -u -r1.35 LColor.C
--- src/LColor.C6 Jan 2003 14:02:20 -   1.35
+++ src/LColor.C7 Feb 2003 11:31:43 -
@@ -84,6 +84,9 @@
{ error, N_("LaTeX error"), "error", "Red", "error" },
{ eolmarker, N_("end-of-line marker"), "eolmarker", "Brown", "eolmarker" },
{ appendixline, N_("appendix line"), "appendixline", "Brown", "appendixline" },
+   { changebar, N_("change bar"), "changebar", "Blue", "changebar" },
+   { strikeout, N_("Deleted text"), "strikeout", "Red", "strikeout" },
+   { newtext, N_("Added text"), "newtext", "Blue", "newtext" },
{ added_space, N_("added space markers"), "added_space", "Brown", 
"added_space" },
{ topline, N_("top/bottom line"), "topline", "Brown", "topline" },
{ tabularline, N_("tabular line"), "tabularline", "black",
Index: src/LColor.h
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/LColor.h,v
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -r1.24 LColor.h
--- src/LColor.h5 Jul 2002 21:24:12 -   1.24
+++ src/LColor.h7 Feb 2003 11:31:44 -
@@ -137,6 +137,12 @@
added_space,
/// Appendix line color
appendixline,
+   /// changebar color
+   changebar,
+   /// strike-out color
+   strikeout,
+   /// added text color
+   newtext,
/// Top and bottom line color
topline,
/// Table line color