Re: [MlMt] Rule Condition to Limit to a Source Mailbox

2016-02-19 Thread Gary Hull

On 19 Feb 2016, at 13:24, Fredrik Jonsson wrote:


Gary Hull 2016-02-19 12:52 wrote:

there are two cases that I'd like to automate with a rule to mark 
them as seen:


1. Stuff that I've glanced at for a fraction of a second and then 
clicked the Archive button. The time viewed is not sufficient to mark 
them as Seen


2. Junk mail marked as junk by one of the mail providers I use, but 
which SpamSieve hasn't marked as junk.


I have a rule attached to the "Junk" folder that sets the tag "Seen" 
on all mail that comes in to Junk. You can do this on the "Archive" 
folder as well of course.


O.K., I tried this on the Archive folder.

In looking closer at the junk problem I realize that my problem is that 
Runbox creates a Spam folder and MailMate/SpamSieve use a Junk folder, 
so all Runbox accounts have two folders for spam, and the default Junk 
folder doesn't pick up Runboxes Spam folders. Runbox must not be marking 
these mails with whatever spam header that MailMate is looking at. 
Looking at the Edit Mailbox dialog for Junk I don't see any conditions, 
so I'm assuming that Junk is hardwired somehow. If I knew what the 
problem was, I could contact Runbox and maybe get a fix from their end.


For now I went to all the Runbox Spam folders and set a rule to mark as 
seen.

___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


[MlMt] Correct default contextual from behavior

2016-02-19 Thread temjeito
In a few (unfortunately very common) cases, MailMate has learned the 
wrong “From” address to use with certain contacts.


I email cli...@example.com 10-20 times/day. emails to cli...@example.com 
should always come from m...@thismail.com, but whenever I add 
cli...@example.com to the “To” field, it changes the “From” to 
h...@thatmail.com.


Is there any way to reprogram the default sender for a particular To 
address?


Thanks,

Michael
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] Rules on Inbox - Generic

2016-02-19 Thread Marc ARC

On 16 Feb 2016, at 11:15, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:


On 12 Feb 2016, at 17:59, Marc DR wrote:


example:

[From] [is in] [Info ▸ Marketing_Confirmed] [From]
[Move to Mailbox] [Info ▸ Marketing_Auto]
Please do note that I do not move to the Mailbox_Source because this 
allows me to see what has been add recently.
I think I could achieve an identical result by tagging the "fresh" 
mails before moving and untagging them after verification ( or vice 
versa ), which is "easier" for you to implement. :-))


I think that would also be a nicer way to handle that.


I think GUI-wise the "new-move" version could look like this

[From] [is in] [Mailbox/SmartMailbox] [From]

	[Generic Move to first matched Source Mailbox of]  
[Mailbox/SmartMailbox]

or
[Dynamic Move to first matched Source of]  [Mailbox/SmartMailbox]
or
[Fuzzy Move to Source of]  [Mailbox/SmartMailbox]

Just some ideas and have a nice WE,


I think this illustrates that it's hard to make such a feature 
intuitive. A better (and cleaner) approach would be to make the action 
independent of the conditions. The action could then be something 
like:


Move to Related Mailbox based on [Header] in [Mailbox]


Benny,

When [Header] means the actual functionality we have for filtering on 
“header contained info” then this will be a great feature.




The “Mailbox” could be any smart or IMAP mailbox/account. It would 
trigger MailMate to look for the first message in Mailbox with the 
same header value. When found, the new message would be moved to the 
same IMAP mailbox as the found message. It would be like an IMAP 
mailbox variant of the Submailboxes feature for smart mailboxes.


This would allow a worst case near-linear running time if a large 
number of messages are “moved” (linear in terms of the size of the 
mailbox used in the action).


Note that in this case there would be no need for a condition for the 
rule except for maybe limiting the messages triggering the action.


A somewhat related feature would allow simply creating IMAP mailboxes 
based on a header value:


Move to Submailbox of [IMAP Mailbox/Account] based on [Header]


This would be a nice to have, and I already see some use for it.
From a “what I like to have first” point-of-view this is last on my 
list.


Thanks

Marc
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate


Re: [MlMt] Export attachments to folder?

2016-02-19 Thread Benny Kjær Nielsen

On 16 Feb 2016, at 21:26, Phill Coxon wrote:

In the Smart Mailbox configuration screen there is an option to 
“Export to Folder”.


Is someone able to confirm that this will only export an email to the 
folder? It can’t be used to export attachments?


That's not quite true.

I would like to process incoming emails and if they have attachments 
which meet a certain criteria (name, subject contains…, from email 
address etc) have the attachments automatically saved in Dropbox.


The strange “All Message Subparts” mailbox (under “All 
Messages”) can be used to do this, but it's tricky. You'll need to 
first create a smart mailbox matching the emails you need. Then create 
another smart mailbox based on “All Messages Subparts” which matches 
any parts for which the root part is in the first smart mailbox. It 
looks like this:


![](cid:DEB39F8F-5E9C-46E7-A331-49A7B061F864@freron.com 
"PastedImage.png")


You can add other conditions here, especially with regard to the 
Content-Type, e.g., only those matching `image` or `application/pdf`.


Finally, add a rule to export to the second smart mailbox.

I think you need the latest beta in order to get proper filenames for 
these files.


If the “Export to Folder” is only for email can anyone advise 
another way to achieve this?


I'm afraid there is no easier way to do this now.

--
Benny
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate