Re: [Midnight Commander] #237: Why some removed and same added?
#237: Why some removed and same added? -+-- Reporter: slavazanko | Owner: styx Type: task| Status: testing Priority: major | Milestone: 4.7 Component: mc-core | Version: 4.6.2 Resolution: invalid |Keywords: Blocking: | Blockedby: -+-- Changes (by styx): * status: accepted => testing * resolution: => invalid -- Ticket URL: Midnight Commander Midnight Development Center ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: [Midnight Commander] #237: Why some removed and same added?
#237: Why some removed and same added? -+-- Reporter: slavazanko | Owner: styx Type: task| Status: accepted Priority: major | Milestone: 4.7 Component: mc-core | Version: 4.6.2 Resolution: |Keywords: Blocking: | Blockedby: -+-- Changes (by styx): * owner: => styx * status: new => accepted -- Ticket URL: Midnight Commander Midnight Development Center ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: [Midnight Commander] #237: Why some removed and same added?
#237: Why some removed and same added? -+-- Reporter: slavazanko | Owner: Type: task| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 4.7 Component: mc-core | Version: 4.6.2 Resolution: |Keywords: Blocking: | Blockedby: -+-- Comment(by andrew_b): Replying to [comment:7 metux]: > ATM we only use very few glib functions which aren't already provided by mhl (GTree, etc). But they're easy to replace. Why do you like make some work that is already made? -- Ticket URL: Midnight Commander Midnight Development Center ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: [Midnight Commander] #237: Why some removed and same added?
#237: Why some removed and same added? -+-- Reporter: slavazanko | Owner: Type: task| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 4.7 Component: mc-core | Version: 4.6.2 Resolution: |Keywords: Blocking: | Blockedby: -+-- Changes (by metux): * type: defect => task Comment: #1: glib: Most of the glib stuff we'd used actually does nothing by itself (g_malloc(), g_free(), ...) or things that easily fit into a few inlines. Some can even be harmful (easy to forget a trailing NULL parameter, don't handle NULL ptrs properly, ...). ATM we only use very few glib functions which aren't already provided by mhl (GTree, etc). But they're easy to replace. #2: ncurses vs. slang I've made some polls on several maillists, and the majority seem to prefer ncurses, but I know there're still some open issues for it. Perhaps we should table this decision for a while and look if we can get them solved in nearest future. -- Ticket URL: Midnight Commander Midnight Development Center ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: [Midnight Commander] #237: Why some removed and same added?
#237: Why some removed and same added? -+-- Reporter: slavazanko | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 4.7 Component: mc-core | Version: 4.6.2 Resolution: |Keywords: Blocking: | Blockedby: -+-- Comment(by Slava Zanko): -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 styx wrote: > in addition: I think at first we should aplly all the patches we already > have and only then starting cleanups +1. Otherwise, all existing patches can be incompatible with the head of development WBR, Slavaz. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJiBsUb3oGR6aVLpoRAvtxAJ4lBLwZKteLI4KMYfOZxJetrjJNegCfZe1M 5hS3UhFNo8YPPCCeV1YV/oY= =331s -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Ticket URL: Midnight Commander Midnight Development Center ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: [Midnight Commander] #237: Why some removed and same added?
#237: Why some removed and same added? -+-- Reporter: slavazanko | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 4.7 Component: mc-core | Version: 4.6.2 Resolution: |Keywords: Blocking: | Blockedby: -+-- Comment(by styx): in addition: I think at first we should aplly all the patches we already have and only then starting cleanups -- Ticket URL: Midnight Commander Midnight Development Center ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: [Midnight Commander] #237: Why some removed and same added?
#237: Why some removed and same added? -+-- Reporter: slavazanko | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 4.7 Component: mc-core | Version: 4.6.2 Resolution: |Keywords: Blocking: | Blockedby: -+-- Comment(by slavazanko): About removing ncurses and mcslang stuff - this added at the requests of mc-users and only users can decide to remove this functionality or not. I propose to initiate a votes by all planned to remove stuffs and make their votes the most well-known that a large number of users has been able to express their views. -- Ticket URL: Midnight Commander Midnight Development Center ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: [Midnight Commander] #237: Why some removed and same added?
#237: Why some removed and same added? -+-- Reporter: slavazanko | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 4.7 Component: mc-core | Version: 4.6.2 Resolution: |Keywords: Blocking: | Blockedby: -+-- Comment(by angel_il): ... and I would be very glad to see optional build with --without-glib -- Ticket URL: Midnight Commander Midnight Development Center ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: [Midnight Commander] #237: Why some removed and same added?
#237: Why some removed and same added? -+-- Reporter: slavazanko | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 4.7 Component: mc-core | Version: 4.6.2 Resolution: |Keywords: Blocking: | Blockedby: -+-- Comment(by angel_il): My MIPS embedded devices do not consider glib too big. I vote for stable. -- Ticket URL: Midnight Commander Midnight Development Center ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: [Midnight Commander] #237: Why some removed and same added?
#237: Why some removed and same added? -+-- Reporter: slavazanko | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 4.7 Component: mc-core | Version: 4.6.2 Resolution: |Keywords: Blocking: | Blockedby: -+-- Comment(by slavazanko): http://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc-devel/2009-February/msg00015.html I agree with man - we need to more use glib, but my propose: use via mhl (as wrapper). If someone want - they may write glib-replacement code (will use via ./configure --without-glib). As now, we use glib-functions very poor, but glib it's very powerful library. And my IMHO: need to use more functional of glib -- Ticket URL: Midnight Commander Midnight Development Center ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
[Midnight Commander] #237: Why some removed and same added?
#237: Why some removed and same added? +--- Reporter: slavazanko | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 4.7 Component: mc-core | Version: 4.6.2 Keywords: |Blocking: Blockedby: | +--- ticket:161 ticket:200 ticket:225 ticket:228 ticket:235 ticket:236 What wrong? Why do we need to completelly drop glib? Because someone hate glib but love other [unstable] code? Is reason "glib is too big"? Don't launght me. Big and stable - my choise stable. -- Ticket URL: Midnight Commander Midnight Development Center ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: [Midnight Commander] #237: Why some removed and same added?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 styx wrote: > in addition: I think at first we should aplly all the patches we already > have and only then starting cleanups +1. Otherwise, all existing patches can be incompatible with the head of development WBR, Slavaz. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJiBsUb3oGR6aVLpoRAvtxAJ4lBLwZKteLI4KMYfOZxJetrjJNegCfZe1M 5hS3UhFNo8YPPCCeV1YV/oY= =331s -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
