Re: ftp-proxy man page out of date?
On 01/05/2016 04:35 PM, Sonic wrote: > > Divert-to is the proper way to send the packets to the proxy, but the > dynamic rules that the proxy creates use rdr-to which is why the man > page may appear a bit confusing at first reading. > I see, my mistake. Thanx very much for your support. Harri
Re: ftp-proxy man page out of date?
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Jason McIntyrewrote: > these are dynamically inserted rules. and they must be > redirects. so you don't have to change them. divert-to > would be incorrect. Divert-to is the proper way to send the packets to the proxy, but the dynamic rules that the proxy creates use rdr-to which is why the man page may appear a bit confusing at first reading.
ftp-proxy man page out of date?
Hi folks, Would it be possible to update ftp-proxy(8) wrt "divert-to"? I had the impression that rdr-to is out of date in this context; see http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade50.html. Thanx very much. Best season's greetings Harri
Re: ftp-proxy man page out of date?
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 02:35:43PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Hi folks, > > Would it be possible to update ftp-proxy(8) wrt "divert-to"? > I had the impression that rdr-to is out of date in this > context; see http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade50.html. > > Thanx very much. Best season's greetings > Harri > hi. i'll quote mikeb: these are dynamically inserted rules. and they must be redirects. so you don't have to change them. divert-to would be incorrect. so no change needed. jmc