Re: Transitioning from Apache::Registry

2000-04-03 Thread Drew Taylor

Ahh yes, the  Sections... I've read briefly about them, but have
not used it yet. Looks like I'll be learning it soon. I have many sites
coming online in the near future that will have nearly identical setups
like this one.

Thanks Stas.

Stas Bekman wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Drew Taylor wrote:
> > > And I would need to setup a  directive for each function
> > > (Search, Cart, etc)?
> >
> > You probably want to set up one for each Apache::Registry script you have
> > right now, unless you don't like the way they're structured and want to
> > re-work it.
> 
> Look into  sections to generate all the required configurations to
> save you redundant typing and errors.
> 
> See http://perl.apache.org/guide/config.html#_Perl_Perl_Sections


-- 
Drew Taylor
Vialogix Communications, Inc.
501 N. College Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
704.370.0550
http://www.vialogix.com



Re: Transitioning from Apache::Registry

2000-04-03 Thread Stas Bekman

> On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Drew Taylor wrote:
> > So I just write a small handler which does the same thing as the .pl
> > script and add a  directive to use this
> > handler?
> 
> Yes, that should work fine.
> 
> > And I would need to setup a  directive for each function
> > (Search, Cart, etc)? 
> 
> You probably want to set up one for each Apache::Registry script you have
> right now, unless you don't like the way they're structured and want to
> re-work it.

Look into  sections to generate all the required configurations to
save you redundant typing and errors.

See http://perl.apache.org/guide/config.html#_Perl_Perl_Sections

__
Stas Bekman | JAm_pH--Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/  | mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide/ 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  | http://perl.orghttp://stason.org/TULARC/
http://singlesheaven.com| http://perlmonth.com http://sourcegarden.org
--




Re: Transitioning from Apache::Registry

2000-04-03 Thread Perrin Harkins

On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Drew Taylor wrote:
> So I just write a small handler which does the same thing as the .pl
> script and add a  directive to use this
> handler?

Yes, that should work fine.

> And I would need to setup a  directive for each function
> (Search, Cart, etc)? 

You probably want to set up one for each Apache::Registry script you have
right now, unless you don't like the way they're structured and want to
re-work it.

- Perrin




Re: Transitioning from Apache::Registry

2000-04-03 Thread Drew Taylor

Perrin Harkins wrote:
> 
> That should be pretty easy to convert, since you already have your main
> program logic off in a separate module.
So I just write a small handler which does the same thing as the .pl
script and add a  directive to use this
handler? That sounds very easy. :-) And I would need to setup a
 directive for each function (Search, Cart, etc)?

> Use Apache::Request and Apache::Cookie (both in the libapreq
> distribution).  I don't use the sticky forms stuff in CGI.pm, so I don't
> know if there's a handy replacement.  Check CPAN or just roll your own.
> Maybe you could make a subclass of Apache::Request that adds somemethods
> for this.
I'll look into the forms stuff. I'm sure there is some equivalent in
Apache::xxx modules. Thanks for the info. I've been writing perl for a
couple years now, but the complete mod_perl experience is still new to
me.

-- 
Drew Taylor
Vialogix Communications, Inc.
501 N. College Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
704.370.0550
http://www.vialogix.com



Re: Transitioning from Apache::Registry

2000-04-03 Thread Perrin Harkins

On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Drew Taylor wrote:
> In light of the recent "performance monger" thread, I am interested in
> information about transitioning from Registry scripts to Apache
> handlers. Here is my situation, which I'm guessing is pretty common.
[...]
> use Search; 
> use CGI;
> my $q = new CGI;
> my $action = $q->param('A');
> my $object = Search->($CGI);
> if ($action eq 'R') {
>   $object->searchResults;
> } elsif ($action eq 'S') {
>   $object->Search;
> }

That should be pretty easy to convert, since you already have your main
program logic off in a separate module.

> Should I just use Apache::Request instead of CGI.pm? (I do use the
> cookie & checkbox/pulldown functionality often). 

Use Apache::Request and Apache::Cookie (both in the libapreq
distribution).  I don't use the sticky forms stuff in CGI.pm, so I don't
know if there's a handy replacement.  Check CPAN or just roll your own.
Maybe you could make a subclass of Apache::Request that adds somemethods
for this.

> If there are any tutorials out there, I'd love some links. 

It really isn't difficult enough to merit a tutorial, in my opinion.  It's
just ordinary perl module stuff. 

- Perrin