Re: mod_perl 1.99 on Win2k with Apache2
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm +1 on using a preset 'Reply-to:' header. httpd-dev seems to use it > solely for the reason you describe. I'm all for helping people to > reply back to the list. Ask, can we please have this header set? Can we please *not*? -- David Dyer-Bennet, [EMAIL PROTECTED] / New TMDA anti-spam in test John Dyer-Bennet 1915-2002 Memorial Site http://john.dyer-bennet.net Book log: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/Ouroboros/booknotes/ New Dragaera mailing lists, see http://dragaera.info
Re: mod_perl 1.99 on Win2k with Apache2
Alessandro Forghieri wrote: > Greetings. > > >>Nigel Peck wrote: >> >>>Thanks for the help. When did I reply to you privately? >> >>This was just to reiterate for everybody to keep the threads on the >>list. Since many times those who respond to the questions, suffer >>afterwards because people decide that the person answering >>the question, >>is a free help desk that you can ask about anything, not >>talking about > > [...] > > Stas, as one that has been guilty of the same "offence", let me point out > that 99.9% of the time, seemingly private responses emerge from the list > manager's policy of not munging the Reply-to: header - so the poor schmuck > (me) hits reply and fires off a private reply to the poster. > > I know all about "Reply-to: munging considered harmful" and attending flame > wars and I do not wish to delve into the relative pros and cons of the > diveded camps (I'll just say that the lists I administer do the munging - > period). What I wish to do is pointing out that - on non-munging lists - > most standard clients require a conscious decision if they want to reply to > the list, despite the fact that this would be the actual intention most of > the times (so it makes for a poor interface). People stuck - like me - in > Outlook-land have it even worse than most. I'm +1 on using a preset 'Reply-to:' header. httpd-dev seems to use it solely for the reason you describe. I'm all for helping people to reply back to the list. Ask, can we please have this header set? -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH --> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
RE: mod_perl 1.99 on Win2k with Apache2
Greetings. > > Nigel Peck wrote: > > Thanks for the help. When did I reply to you privately? > > This was just to reiterate for everybody to keep the threads on the > list. Since many times those who respond to the questions, suffer > afterwards because people decide that the person answering > the question, > is a free help desk that you can ask about anything, not > talking about [...] Stas, as one that has been guilty of the same "offence", let me point out that 99.9% of the time, seemingly private responses emerge from the list manager's policy of not munging the Reply-to: header - so the poor schmuck (me) hits reply and fires off a private reply to the poster. I know all about "Reply-to: munging considered harmful" and attending flame wars and I do not wish to delve into the relative pros and cons of the diveded camps (I'll just say that the lists I administer do the munging - period). What I wish to do is pointing out that - on non-munging lists - most standard clients require a conscious decision if they want to reply to the list, despite the fact that this would be the actual intention most of the times (so it makes for a poor interface). People stuck - like me - in Outlook-land have it even worse than most. Just my 0.02 & cheers, alf
Re: mod_perl 1.99 on Win2k with Apache2
Nigel Peck wrote: > Would someone please tell me where I can find instructions for > installing the above? http://perl.apache.org/release/docs/2.0/os/win32/index.html Nigel, remember that you should reply back to the list if you have any further questions. Do *not* reply to me in private!!! __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH --> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
mod_perl 1.99 on Win2k with Apache2
Would someone please tell me where I can find instructions for installing the above? Thanks Nigel ITM Business Solutions Unit 4 Nine Trees Trading Estate Morthen Road Rotherham S66 9JG Reception Tel: 01709 703288 Fax: 01709 701549 Help Desk Tel:01709 530424 Fax: 01709 702159 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
