[BUG] monotone merge leads to irrecoverable db (was: [Monotone-devel] invariant violation)
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 15:19, Rene Wagner wrote: > I'm not exactly sure how to go about this, so I'll just paste the output > of monotone for a start. Let me know what additional information is > necessary to make sense of this. Replying to myself here... It seems I'm not the only one running into this bug. I did the same as described in [1] before running into it. I'd be happy to provide the monotone db in question as requested in [2]. However, Justin has already provided a copy of a db exposing the bug in [3]. I'd appreciate any type of feedback from a core developer as this type of random breakage along with no reaction to bug reports certainly doesn't speak for using monotone [4]. Note that in contrast to the statement in [4] this isn't restricted to monotone 0.21. The first time I ran into it was with 0.20. Thanks, Rene [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/monotone-devel/2005-07/msg00129.html [2] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/monotone-devel/2005-07/msg00130.html [3] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/monotone-devel/2005-07/msg00130.html [4] http://www.vanille.de/temp/monotone-mails.txt -- Rene Wagner rw at handhelds dot org 4F33 7FD7 93B3 166B BADA D6F8 71A1 FEA8 58B4 36D0 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Re: [BUG] monotone merge leads to irrecoverable db (was: [Monotone-devel] invariant violation)
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 15:40 +0200, Rene Wagner wrote: > I'd be happy to provide the monotone db in question as requested in > [2]. However, Justin has already provided a copy of a db exposing > the bug in [3]. > > I'd appreciate any type of feedback from a core developer as this > type of random breakage along with no reaction to bug reports certainly > doesn't speak for using monotone [4]. "Invisible reaction", rather than "no reaction". There seems to have been some discussion of it on IRC, and they've at least partly figured it out. /me thinks people who discuss bug reports on IRC should report back to the mailing list, at least if they get anywhere... Tim ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Re: [BUG] monotone merge leads to irrecoverable db (was: [Monotone-devel] invariant violation)
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 20:03, Timothy Brownawell wrote: > > I'd appreciate any type of feedback from a core developer as this > > type of random breakage along with no reaction to bug reports certainly > > doesn't speak for using monotone [4]. > > "Invisible reaction", rather than "no reaction". There seems to have > been some discussion of it on IRC, and they've at least partly figured > it out. Ah, I wasn't aware of that. This is the short ACK I've missed so far. I'm glad to hear someone's looking into it and sorry for being a bit on the impatient side. Now that we've switched to using monotone exclusively with OpenEmbedded it's somewhat hard to get work done when running into errors you can't make a clue of as a non monotone developer ;) Thanks, Rene -- Rene Wagner rw at handhelds dot org 4F33 7FD7 93B3 166B BADA D6F8 71A1 FEA8 58B4 36D0 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
