Jim Klimov via Nut-upsdev writes:
> * https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/1994
> * https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/1995
>
> There are some wrinkles to iron out later (gotta run now), but
> generally I intend to move forward with merging this before long. What
> do you think?
I'm kind of meh, as I see inbound=outbound as representing this anyway,
but it doesn't upset me. However, it makes it less likely that I would
take other's code from the list and package it as PR. However that is
already not that likely.
I don't know what to make of "you are encouraged to pgp sign commits",
other than as a vague encouragement with no consequences for not doing
so and no plan to require it in the future. Which means that I don't
intend to pay attention to that part, unless I decided to start doing
that in general for git.
I totally get the point, though.
This would not stop me at all from submitting my own work to nut.
___
Nut-upsdev mailing list
Nut-upsdev@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
