[jira] [Updated] (OAK-8910) Improve OAK Lucene Index Documentation

[Amrit Verma (Jira)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Amrit Verma updated OAK-8910:
-
Attachment: OAK-8910.patch

> Improve OAK Lucene Index Documentation
> --
>
> Key: OAK-8910
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8910
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Amrit Verma
>Priority: Minor
>  Labels: amrit
> Attachments: OAK-8910.patch
>
>
> Improve [http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/query/lucene.html] with the 
> following:
>  * Extend the *analyzers* section including a reference on how to support 
> *stemming* ([http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/query/lucene.html])
>  * *supersedes* - does not seem to be documented**
>  * *functionName (string)* & *useIfExists (string)* are not listed in the 
> canonical *Index Definition* structure.
>  * *function (string)* is not listed in the canonical *Property Definitions* 
> structure
>  * *weight* - in the canonical structure the default value is -1, but the 
> actual default is 5



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8911) Build Jackrabbit Oak #2617 failed

[Hudson (Jira)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17040720#comment-17040720
 ] 

Hudson commented on OAK-8911:
-

Previously failing build now is OK.
 Passed run: [Jackrabbit Oak 
#2627|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2627/] [console 
log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2627/console]

> Build Jackrabbit Oak #2617 failed
> -
>
> Key: OAK-8911
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8911
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: continuous integration
>Reporter: Hudson
>Priority: Major
>
> No description is provided
> The build Jackrabbit Oak #2617 has failed.
> First failed run: [Jackrabbit Oak 
> #2617|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2617/] [console 
> log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2617/console]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-8903) Support for removing repository markers for transient repositories

[Amit Jain (Jira)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Amit Jain resolved OAK-8903.

Fix Version/s: (was: 1.2.32)
   1.26.0
   Resolution: Fixed

Done:
* trunk - [1874237|http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1874237=rev]

> Support for removing repository markers for transient repositories
> --
>
> Key: OAK-8903
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8903
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: blob-plugins
>Reporter: Amit Jain
>Assignee: Amit Jain
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.26.0
>
>
> To support shared DSGC (disparate repositories), there's a new repository 
> marker generated (also called clusterid)and stored in the node store and the 
> meta space of the DataStore.
> For transient repositories (designed to run one off jobs), it creates a 
> problem as these repository markers stick around in the DataStore and prevent 
> DSGC from sweeping.
> There should be a configuration which should allow deletion of these 
> repository markers on dispose. Transient repositories can then configure this 
> and won't leave these zombies.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8914) Throttle Revision GC

[Vinod Holani (Jira)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17040650#comment-17040650
 ] 

Vinod Holani commented on OAK-8914:
---

[~mreutegg] please review added patch. Relevant PR is 
[https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/185].

> Throttle Revision GC
> 
>
> Key: OAK-8914
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8914
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: documentmk
>Reporter: Vinod Holani
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OAK-8914.patch
>
>
> Currently the Revision GC is allowed to run at full speed. In some cases the 
> load caused by the Revision GC can be very high and potentially overwhelm the 
> MongoDB cluster. The high Revision GC activity tends to be higher than usual 
> when it was skipped for a longer period of time, e.g. because there is a 
> checkpoint that prevents it from collecting garbage.
> Consider throttling the Revision GC. The implementation already has some 
> support for throttling. See {{VersionGCOptions.delayFactor}}. However, there 
> is currently no configuration option in the DocumentNodeStoreService.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-8914) Throttle Revision GC

[Vinod Holani (Jira)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Vinod Holani updated OAK-8914:
--
Attachment: OAK-8914.patch

> Throttle Revision GC
> 
>
> Key: OAK-8914
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8914
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: documentmk
>Reporter: Vinod Holani
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OAK-8914.patch
>
>
> Currently the Revision GC is allowed to run at full speed. In some cases the 
> load caused by the Revision GC can be very high and potentially overwhelm the 
> MongoDB cluster. The high Revision GC activity tends to be higher than usual 
> when it was skipped for a longer period of time, e.g. because there is a 
> checkpoint that prevents it from collecting garbage.
> Consider throttling the Revision GC. The implementation already has some 
> support for throttling. See {{VersionGCOptions.delayFactor}}. However, there 
> is currently no configuration option in the DocumentNodeStoreService.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Created] (OAK-8914) Throttle Revision GC

[Vinod Holani (Jira)]

Vinod Holani created OAK-8914:
-

 Summary: Throttle Revision GC
 Key: OAK-8914
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8914
 Project: Jackrabbit Oak
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: documentmk
Reporter: Vinod Holani


Currently the Revision GC is allowed to run at full speed. In some cases the 
load caused by the Revision GC can be very high and potentially overwhelm the 
MongoDB cluster. The high Revision GC activity tends to be higher than usual 
when it was skipped for a longer period of time, e.g. because there is a 
checkpoint that prevents it from collecting garbage.

Consider throttling the Revision GC. The implementation already has some 
support for throttling. See {{VersionGCOptions.delayFactor}}. However, there is 
currently no configuration option in the DocumentNodeStoreService.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-8902) Add support in oak-run to list down blob ids for lucene indexes

[Amit Jain (Jira)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17040601#comment-17040601
 ] 

Amit Jain edited comment on OAK-8902 at 2/20/20 3:46 AM:
-

[~ngupta]
{quote}I haven't removed DataStoreCheckCommand for now as I am not sure if that 
is being used by any teams in skyline
{quote}
There should anyways be a separate task for that and I think there already 
exists but that is later 
 - OAK-7671

I have added my comments to the PR


was (Author: amitjain):
[~ngupta]
{quote}I haven't removed DataStoreCheckCommand for now as I am not sure if that 
is being used by any teams in skyline
{quote}
There should anyways be a separate task for that and I think there already 
exists but that is later

I have added my comments to the PR

> Add support in oak-run to list down blob ids for lucene indexes
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-8902
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8902
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Nitin Gupta
>Assignee: Nitin Gupta
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.26.0
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8902) Add support in oak-run to list down blob ids for lucene indexes

[Amit Jain (Jira)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17040601#comment-17040601
 ] 

Amit Jain commented on OAK-8902:


[~ngupta]
{quote}I haven't removed DataStoreCheckCommand for now as I am not sure if that 
is being used by any teams in skyline
{quote}
There should anyways be a separate task for that and I think there already 
exists but that is later

I have added my comments to the PR

> Add support in oak-run to list down blob ids for lucene indexes
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-8902
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8902
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Nitin Gupta
>Assignee: Nitin Gupta
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.26.0
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8911) Build Jackrabbit Oak #2617 failed

[Hudson (Jira)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17040297#comment-17040297
 ] 

Hudson commented on OAK-8911:
-

Previously failing build now is OK.
 Passed run: [Jackrabbit Oak 
#2626|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2626/] [console 
log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2626/console]

> Build Jackrabbit Oak #2617 failed
> -
>
> Key: OAK-8911
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8911
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: continuous integration
>Reporter: Hudson
>Priority: Major
>
> No description is provided
> The build Jackrabbit Oak #2617 has failed.
> First failed run: [Jackrabbit Oak 
> #2617|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2617/] [console 
> log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2617/console]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8911) Build Jackrabbit Oak #2617 failed

[Hudson (Jira)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17040210#comment-17040210
 ] 

Hudson commented on OAK-8911:
-

Previously failing build now is OK.
 Passed run: [Jackrabbit Oak 
#2625|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2625/] [console 
log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2625/console]

> Build Jackrabbit Oak #2617 failed
> -
>
> Key: OAK-8911
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8911
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: continuous integration
>Reporter: Hudson
>Priority: Major
>
> No description is provided
> The build Jackrabbit Oak #2617 has failed.
> First failed run: [Jackrabbit Oak 
> #2617|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2617/] [console 
> log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2617/console]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8783) Merge index definitions

[Thomas Mueller (Jira)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17040129#comment-17040129
 ] 

Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-8783:
-

http://svn.apache.org/r1874198 (trunk)

> Merge index definitions
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-8783
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8783
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: indexing
>Reporter: Thomas Mueller
>Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: OAK-8783-json-1.patch, OAK-8783-v1.patch, 
> OAK-8783-v2.patch
>
>
> If there are multiple versions of an index, e.g. asset-2-custom-2 and 
> asset-3, then oak-run should be able to merge them to asset-3-custom-1.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-8908) RDB*Store on SQL Server: bad performance when default collation is of type SQL*

[Julian Reschke (Jira)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Julian Reschke updated OAK-8908:

Attachment: OAK-8908-1.6.diff

> RDB*Store on SQL Server: bad performance when default collation is of type 
> SQL*
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-8908
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8908
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Technical task
>  Components: rdbmk
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.26.0
>
> Attachments: OAK-8908-1.6.diff, OAK-8908.diff
>
>
> RDBBlobStore uses a 64-char primary key (digest in hex).
> Unfortunately, this causes performance issues on MS SQL Server, when the 
> collation for that column is of type "SQL*" (see links). These types of 
> collations are deprecated, but still the default for installations on the 
> "EN_US" locale.
> The performance loss can be observed by changing the collation on an existing 
> install, and then enable performance logging on RDBBlobStore.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-8892) Add javadoc to package-info files

[Thomas Mueller (Jira)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Thomas Mueller updated OAK-8892:

Labels: amrit  (was: )

> Add javadoc to package-info files
> -
>
> Key: OAK-8892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8892
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Amrit Verma
>Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>Priority: Minor
>  Labels: amrit
> Fix For: 1.26.0
>
> Attachments: OAK-8892.patch
>
>
> Add javadoc to package-info files in all packages of {{oak-lucene}} , 
> {{oak-query-spi}} and {{oak-search}} .



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Assigned] (OAK-8892) Add javadoc to package-info files

[Thomas Mueller (Jira)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Thomas Mueller reassigned OAK-8892:
---

Assignee: Thomas Mueller

> Add javadoc to package-info files
> -
>
> Key: OAK-8892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8892
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Amrit Verma
>Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.26.0
>
> Attachments: OAK-8892.patch
>
>
> Add javadoc to package-info files in all packages of {{oak-lucene}} , 
> {{oak-query-spi}} and {{oak-search}} .



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-8892) Add javadoc to package-info files

[Thomas Mueller (Jira)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Thomas Mueller resolved OAK-8892.
-
Resolution: Fixed

> Add javadoc to package-info files
> -
>
> Key: OAK-8892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8892
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Amrit Verma
>Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>Priority: Minor
>  Labels: amrit
> Fix For: 1.26.0
>
> Attachments: OAK-8892.patch
>
>
> Add javadoc to package-info files in all packages of {{oak-lucene}} , 
> {{oak-query-spi}} and {{oak-search}} .



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8892) Add javadoc to package-info files

[Thomas Mueller (Jira)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17040100#comment-17040100
 ] 

Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-8892:
-

Thanks [~reschke]! "svn patch" didn't work as expected... Now hopefully it's 
better:

http://svn.apache.org/r1874197 (trunk)



> Add javadoc to package-info files
> -
>
> Key: OAK-8892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8892
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Amrit Verma
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.26.0
>
> Attachments: OAK-8892.patch
>
>
> Add javadoc to package-info files in all packages of {{oak-lucene}} , 
> {{oak-query-spi}} and {{oak-search}} .



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-8908) RDB*Store on SQL Server: bad performance when default collation is of type SQL*

[Julian Reschke (Jira)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17040091#comment-17040091
 ] 

Julian Reschke edited comment on OAK-8908 at 2/19/20 2:25 PM:
--

One way to fix this is to set a property in the SQLServer JDBC URL; see 
"sendStringParametersAsUnicode" in 
.

The downside is that this will break RDBDocumentStore's use of the DATA column; 
will try to address that with a patch.

Update: see  [^OAK-8908.diff] 


was (Author: reschke):
One way to fix this is to set a property in the SQLServer JDBC URL; see 
"sendStringParametersAsUnicode" in 
.

The downside is that this will break RDBDocumentStore's use of the DATA column; 
will try to address that with a patch.

> RDB*Store on SQL Server: bad performance when default collation is of type 
> SQL*
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-8908
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8908
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Technical task
>  Components: rdbmk
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.26.0
>
> Attachments: OAK-8908.diff
>
>
> RDBBlobStore uses a 64-char primary key (digest in hex).
> Unfortunately, this causes performance issues on MS SQL Server, when the 
> collation for that column is of type "SQL*" (see links). These types of 
> collations are deprecated, but still the default for installations on the 
> "EN_US" locale.
> The performance loss can be observed by changing the collation on an existing 
> install, and then enable performance logging on RDBBlobStore.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-8908) RDB*Store on SQL Server: bad performance when default collation is of type SQL*

[Julian Reschke (Jira)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Julian Reschke updated OAK-8908:

Attachment: OAK-8908.diff

> RDB*Store on SQL Server: bad performance when default collation is of type 
> SQL*
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-8908
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8908
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Technical task
>  Components: rdbmk
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.26.0
>
> Attachments: OAK-8908.diff
>
>
> RDBBlobStore uses a 64-char primary key (digest in hex).
> Unfortunately, this causes performance issues on MS SQL Server, when the 
> collation for that column is of type "SQL*" (see links). These types of 
> collations are deprecated, but still the default for installations on the 
> "EN_US" locale.
> The performance loss can be observed by changing the collation on an existing 
> install, and then enable performance logging on RDBBlobStore.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8908) RDB*Store on SQL Server: bad performance when default collation is of type SQL*

[Julian Reschke (Jira)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17040091#comment-17040091
 ] 

Julian Reschke commented on OAK-8908:
-

One way to fix this is to set a property in the SQLServer JDBC URL; see 
"sendStringParametersAsUnicode" in 
.

The downside is that this will break RDBDocumentStore's use of the DATA column; 
will try to address that with a patch.

> RDB*Store on SQL Server: bad performance when default collation is of type 
> SQL*
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-8908
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8908
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Technical task
>  Components: rdbmk
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.26.0
>
>
> RDBBlobStore uses a 64-char primary key (digest in hex).
> Unfortunately, this causes performance issues on MS SQL Server, when the 
> collation for that column is of type "SQL*" (see links). These types of 
> collations are deprecated, but still the default for installations on the 
> "EN_US" locale.
> The performance loss can be observed by changing the collation on an existing 
> install, and then enable performance logging on RDBBlobStore.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-8902) Add support in oak-run to list down blob ids for lucene indexes

[Nitin Gupta (Jira)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17039987#comment-17039987
 ] 

Nitin Gupta edited comment on OAK-8902 at 2/19/20 1:05 PM:
---

A couple of tests are failing, probably because I made both the marked- as well 
as gccand- files list backend friendly blobids if verbose option is present 
(initially only the blobids in gccand- file (missing blobids) were transformed 
into backend friendly format)

 

I think here, fixing the tests to change their expectation would be ok. I am 
not exactly sure though if there was any specific reason as to why the blobs in 
the marked file were not encoded while using the verbose option. 


was (Author: nitigup):
A couple of tests are failing, probably because I made both the marked- as well 
as gccand- files list backend friendly blobids if verbose option is present 
(initially only the blobids in gccand- file (missing blobids) were transformed 
into backend friendly format)

 

I think here, fixing the tests to change their expectation would be ok.

> Add support in oak-run to list down blob ids for lucene indexes
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-8902
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8902
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Nitin Gupta
>Assignee: Nitin Gupta
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.26.0
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8902) Add support in oak-run to list down blob ids for lucene indexes

[Nitin Gupta (Jira)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17040002#comment-17040002
 ] 

Nitin Gupta commented on OAK-8902:
--

Fixed the test in the PR - [https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/188] .

 

> Add support in oak-run to list down blob ids for lucene indexes
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-8902
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8902
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Nitin Gupta
>Assignee: Nitin Gupta
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.26.0
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8902) Add support in oak-run to list down blob ids for lucene indexes

[Nitin Gupta (Jira)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17039987#comment-17039987
 ] 

Nitin Gupta commented on OAK-8902:
--

A couple of tests are failing, probably because I made both the marked- as well 
as gccand- files list backend friendly blobids if verbose option is present 
(initially only the blobids in gccand- file (missing blobids) were transformed 
into backend friendly format)

 

I think here, fixing the tests to change their expectation would be ok.

> Add support in oak-run to list down blob ids for lucene indexes
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-8902
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8902
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Nitin Gupta
>Assignee: Nitin Gupta
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.26.0
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8902) Add support in oak-run to list down blob ids for lucene indexes

[Nitin Gupta (Jira)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17039970#comment-17039970
 ] 

Nitin Gupta commented on OAK-8902:
--

[~amitjain] - I have made the changes needed to support this is 
DataStoreCommand here - [https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/188] . 
Can you please have a look ?

 

I haven't removed DataStoreCheckCommand for now as I am not sure if that is 
being used by any teams in skyline

 

cc : [~thomasm]

> Add support in oak-run to list down blob ids for lucene indexes
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-8902
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8902
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Nitin Gupta
>Assignee: Nitin Gupta
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.26.0
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8911) Build Jackrabbit Oak #2617 failed

[Hudson (Jira)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17039794#comment-17039794
 ] 

Hudson commented on OAK-8911:
-

Previously failing build now is OK.
 Passed run: [Jackrabbit Oak 
#2624|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2624/] [console 
log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2624/console]

> Build Jackrabbit Oak #2617 failed
> -
>
> Key: OAK-8911
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8911
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: continuous integration
>Reporter: Hudson
>Priority: Major
>
> No description is provided
> The build Jackrabbit Oak #2617 has failed.
> First failed run: [Jackrabbit Oak 
> #2617|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2617/] [console 
> log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2617/console]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)