RE: repository_user.xml, reverse-db and field indexes
Hi, Ricardo, Currently I am still using 0.9.8. In 0.9.8 the first field id must start with "1" and no hole should be allowed in the numbering of the field id's. (i.e. must be "1, 2, 3, 4" instead of "0, 12, 23, 14"). The reverse-db currently cannot generating the field id in the proper way. If you are using 0.9.8 or before, you would have to manually edit the id. Regards, Anthony -Original Message- From: Ricardo Tercero Lozano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 1:45 AM To: OJB Users List Subject: RE: repository_user.xml, reverse-db and field indexes New information: Field descriptor indexes can begin with "0" (there's no complaints) but if I put a reference-descriptor with a foreign-key id = "6", OJB gets the bean for the previous field-id (as it starts counting with "1"). Ricardo. -Mensaje original- De: Ricardo Tercero Lozano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: lunes, 03 de marzo de 2003 18:24 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: repository_user.xml, reverse-db and field indexes I found than if list of field descriptors inside a class descriptor in repository_user.xml don't work properly if field indexes begin with "0" (as generated by reverse-db) and reference descriptors are defined for some fields. Key values were loaded right, but some associated beans are loaded and some not. This behavior was found for a table with 4 references to another table (4 types of users of class UserBean). I use OJB 0.9.9. Ricardo. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: repository_user.xml, reverse-db and field indexes
New information: Field descriptor indexes can begin with "0" (there's no complaints) but if I put a reference-descriptor with a foreign-key id = "6", OJB gets the bean for the previous field-id (as it starts counting with "1"). Ricardo. -Mensaje original- De: Ricardo Tercero Lozano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: lunes, 03 de marzo de 2003 18:24 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: repository_user.xml, reverse-db and field indexes I found than if list of field descriptors inside a class descriptor in repository_user.xml don't work properly if field indexes begin with "0" (as generated by reverse-db) and reference descriptors are defined for some fields. Key values were loaded right, but some associated beans are loaded and some not. This behavior was found for a table with 4 references to another table (4 types of users of class UserBean). I use OJB 0.9.9. Ricardo. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: repository_user.xml, reverse-db and field indexes
Hi Ricardo, field index are not needed for a while. Please just drop the id="..." attributes. cheers, Thomas Ricardo Tercero Lozano wrote: I found than if list of field descriptors inside a class descriptor in repository_user.xml don't work properly if field indexes begin with "0" (as generated by reverse-db) and reference descriptors are defined for some fields. Key values were loaded right, but some associated beans are loaded and some not. This behavior was found for a table with 4 references to another table (4 types of users of class UserBean). I use OJB 0.9.9. Ricardo. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
