[OpenIndiana-discuss] Text Installer creates rpool1

2010-12-01 Thread Mark
I tried the OI Build147 text installer for the first time, and ended up 
with rpool1 instead of the expected rpool.


Is this normal ?

The disks had an existing pool, but I selected use whole disk and 
overwrite. I have done this many times with OpenSolaris versions and 
never encountered it before.
Overall the text install didn't help my problem, since it offeres no 
static network setup.


The other headache was getting static ip's setup.
The "old way" with hostname.intf etc. produced a interface to nowhere.

This is what triggered the reinstall.
The ipadm method did work, once I figured out what was needed.

The storage box has 6xGb and 2x10Gb nics, so plenty to configure.

One difference I found from dev-134 is it doesn't play well with an ip 
on the same subnet on two different interfaces.

If one is down, the other can't pass packets either.

Other than that, it has been stable and performing ok during testing 
with Intel SSD's for logs and 32x Seagate 2Tb SAS drives.


I have Fault Management working nicely with net-snmp, and even an old 
bmc driver from the last SE released talking to the IPMI card. It didn't 
seem to work through to FM though. I need to get a build/development 
environment before I can follow that up.
I will also have a poke around in SE2011 and see if it has any 
improvements in this area I can borrow.



___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Text Installer creates rpool1

2010-12-01 Thread Jeppe Toustrup
2010/12/1 Mark :
> I tried the OI Build147 text installer for the first time, and ended up with
> rpool1 instead of the expected rpool.
>
> Is this normal ?
>
> The disks had an existing pool, but I selected use whole disk and overwrite.
> I have done this many times with OpenSolaris versions and never encountered
> it before.

I have experienced this with OpenSolaris as well, the workaround would
be to go into the shell before launching the installer, import the old
'rpool' and then destroy it. After that the installation will create a
new 'rpool'.

--
Venlig hilsen / Kind regards
Jeppe Toustrup (aka. Tenzer)

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Text Installer creates rpool1

2010-12-01 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
> I tried the OI Build147 text installer for the first time, and ended
> up
> with rpool1 instead of the expected rpool.

As mentioned by Jeppe, destroying the old rpool will be a workaround for this. 
I guess what happens is that OI boots up, sees the rpool name in use and 
chooses rpool1.

> The other headache was getting static ip's setup.
> The "old way" with hostname.intf etc. produced a interface to nowhere.

Disable nwam and switch back to the old way:

# svcadm disable svc:/network/physical:nwam
# svcadm enable svc:/network/physical:default

The configure hostname.nicname as before

> Other than that, it has been stable and performing ok during testing
> with Intel SSD's for logs and 32x Seagate 2Tb SAS drives.

Out of curiosity, what controllers are you using? And what device naming are 
you getting? The old c0t0d0 or the newer c0tWWNd0? I get the latter on LSI 
9211-8i controllers, and there, the device order fails to mirror the chassis 
order, with supermicro chassis (and even with direct attach).

Vennlige hilsener / Best regards

roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
r...@karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er 
et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av 
idiomer med fremmed opprinnelse. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og 
relevante synonymer på norsk.

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] does this make any sense?

2010-12-01 Thread Apostolos Syropoulos


http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/archives/589

BTW, I have written ZFS independently ;-)

A.S.

--
Apostolos Syropoulos
Xanthi, Greece



  

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] does this make any sense?

2010-12-01 Thread Hillel Lubman
Off: Regarding ZFS - good news Debian will be shipping with Squeeze:
http://robertmh.wordpress.com/2010/11/27/about-zfs-in-squeeze-2/

Regards,

Hillel.

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Apostolos Syropoulos
wrote:

>
>
> http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/archives/589
>
> BTW, I have written ZFS independently ;-)
>
> A.S.
>
> --
> Apostolos Syropoulos
> Xanthi, Greece
>
>
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] livecd zpool import -fR /a xpool but no files

2010-12-01 Thread Guy Woolley

 Calum,
   Is your procedure:

 zpool import -f -R /a rpool

zfs set mountpoint=/b rpool/ROOT/openindiana

zfs mount rpool/ROOT/openindiana

cat /a/b/etc/passwd

equivalent to the following that works for me from live USB stick (with 
pfexec or root)


zpool import -f -R /a rpool

beadm list

Choose the installed BE name (which should appear in the list) and then

beadm mount  /a

Then

cat /a/a/etc/passwd

behaves as you describe (i.e. I can see my username at the end of the 
file), whereas


cat /etc/passwd

gives "jack" as the Default user.

Likewise I can see other folder/files in the installed filesystem from /a/a

When done,

beadm unmount 

Have I missed anything important ? When I reboot my installed OI seems 
fine.


I had to do this for real once when I started with OI in October because 
of issues with my Nvidia graphics card and the Solaris Nvidia driver 
(buggy).


Cheers
Guy







___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] livecd zpool import -fR /a xpool but no files

2010-12-01 Thread Calum Mackay

that sounds good, Guy,


zpool import -f -R /a rpool

beadm mount  /a


Yup, that seems like an easier to remember way to do the same thing, nice.

thanks,
calum.

Calum Mackay
Oracle Corporation

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] livecd zpool import -fR /a xpool but no files

2010-12-01 Thread Guy Woolley

 Thank Albert Lee who helped me out!

Cheers

Guy

On 12/ 1/10 06:57 PM, Calum Mackay wrote:

that sounds good, Guy,


zpool import -f -R /a rpool

beadm mount  /a


Yup, that seems like an easier to remember way to do the same thing, 
nice.


thanks,
calum.

Calum Mackay
Oracle Corporation



___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] The static network that never works

2010-12-01 Thread Harry Putnam
I wonder why it appears to be so difficult under openindiana and its
predecessors to simply and quickly setup a static network.

Virtually all other OS's I've tried, probably 10-12 or so, have had
provision to quickly and easily setup a static network and they
worked straigh away.

Installing from oi-b147... once installed the icon on right upper of
gnome window display has dialog for setting up a static network... but
when I follow it, I get a network that even says its connected... but
it goes no where... can't ping anything even on home lan.

Why can't I just simply ifconfig a network out of thin air as in linux
(long as loopback is already done).

ifconfig  nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn up

And have that device come up with that IP and work.

I don't understand why it is difficult... 

But would also like to see in steps... a tried and true method to get
a static IP.  DHCP is just a pain in the butt in  home lan.

Is there really no simple and quick method... if so, why is that?


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] The static network that never works

2010-12-01 Thread Patrick O'Sullivan
svcadm disable svc:/network/physical:nwam
svcadm enable svc:/network/physical:default

Configure as normal.

On Dec 1, 2010, at 15:58, Harry Putnam  wrote:

I wonder why it appears to be so difficult under openindiana and its
predecessors to simply and quickly setup a static network.

Virtually all other OS's I've tried, probably 10-12 or so, have had
provision to quickly and easily setup a static network and they
worked straigh away.

Installing from oi-b147... once installed the icon on right upper of
gnome window display has dialog for setting up a static network... but
when I follow it, I get a network that even says its connected... but
it goes no where... can't ping anything even on home lan.

Why can't I just simply ifconfig a network out of thin air as in linux
(long as loopback is already done).

ifconfig  nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn up

And have that device come up with that IP and work.

I don't understand why it is difficult...

But would also like to see in steps... a tried and true method to get
a static IP.  DHCP is just a pain in the butt in  home lan.

Is there really no simple and quick method... if so, why is that?


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] The static network that never works

2010-12-01 Thread Oscar del Rio

On 12/ 1/10 03:57 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:

I wonder why it appears to be so difficult under openindiana and its
predecessors to simply and quickly setup a static network.

Virtually all other OS's I've tried, probably 10-12 or so, have had
provision to quickly and easily setup a static network and they
worked straigh away.


I usually configure static IP the old fashion way, disabling nwam and 
editing files, but after reading your msg I decided to try the 
point-and-click way on a new oi-147 machine I'm setting up... it works 
for me!  :-)



Installing from oi-b147... once installed the icon on right upper of
gnome window display has dialog for setting up a static network... but
when I follow it, I get a network that even says its connected... but
it goes no where... can't ping anything even on home lan.


System - Administration - Network... type root password...

Show: Wired (bge0)
IPv4 IP: Manually assigned.
Default route: (gateway IP address)
Add: (IP address + subnet)

Show: Connection Status
Locations... Automatic - Edit
DNS: Manual domain: yourdomainname.com
Servers: 1.2.3.4, 1.2.3.5 (DNS servers)
Custom nsswitch file: none, Use Default (/etc/nsswitch.dns)
OK - OK - OK

Network works fine.


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] The static network that never works

2010-12-01 Thread Harry Putnam
Oscar del Rio  writes:

>> Installing from oi-b147... once installed the icon on right upper of
>> gnome window display has dialog for setting up a static network... but
>> when I follow it, I get a network that even says its connected... but
>> it goes no where... can't ping anything even on home lan.
>
> System - Administration - Network... type root password...
>
> Show: Wired (bge0)
> IPv4 IP: Manually assigned.
> Default route: (gateway IP address)
> Add: (IP address + subnet)
>
> Show: Connection Status
> Locations... Automatic - Edit
> DNS: Manual domain: yourdomainname.com
> Servers: 1.2.3.4, 1.2.3.5 (DNS servers)
> Custom nsswitch file: none, Use Default (/etc/nsswitch.dns)
> OK - OK - OK
>
> Network works fine.

Good to know it can work...

Walking thru it again I see I've forgotten about /etc/resolv.conf

I guess I thougt the gui was taking care of it.

But once /etc/resolv.conf is edited accordingly... that gui tool does
work.   Thanks for making me look a little harder.


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] does this make any sense?

2010-12-01 Thread Allan E. Registos
I received the news yesterday and thinking playing with it until OI is stable. 
I am confuse of what kernel it uses? BSD kernel? 




- Original Message -
From: "Hillel Lubman"  
To: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana"  
Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:05:48 AM 
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] does this make any sense? 

Off: Regarding ZFS - good news Debian will be shipping with Squeeze: 
http://robertmh.wordpress.com/2010/11/27/about-zfs-in-squeeze-2/ 

Regards, 

Hillel. 

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Apostolos Syropoulos 
wrote: 

> 
> 
> http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/archives/589 
> 
> BTW, I have written ZFS independently ;-) 
> 
> A.S. 
> 
> -- 
> Apostolos Syropoulos 
> Xanthi, Greece 
> 
> 
___ 
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list 
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org 
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss 
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] does this make any sense?

2010-12-01 Thread Allan E. Registos
I think it makes sense. ;-) 


- Original Message -
From: "Allan E. Registos"  
To: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana"  
Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:45:35 AM 
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] does this make any sense? 

I received the news yesterday and thinking playing with it until OI is stable. 
I am confuse of what kernel it uses? BSD kernel? 




- Original Message - 
From: "Hillel Lubman"  
To: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana"  
Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:05:48 AM 
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] does this make any sense? 

Off: Regarding ZFS - good news Debian will be shipping with Squeeze: 
http://robertmh.wordpress.com/2010/11/27/about-zfs-in-squeeze-2/ 

Regards, 

Hillel. 

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Apostolos Syropoulos 
wrote: 

> 
> 
> http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/archives/589 
> 
> BTW, I have written ZFS independently ;-) 
> 
> A.S. 
> 
> -- 
> Apostolos Syropoulos 
> Xanthi, Greece 
> 
> 
___ 
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list 
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org 
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss 
___ 
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list 
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org 
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss 
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] does this make any sense?

2010-12-01 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Allan E. Registos wrote:
> I received the news yesterday and thinking playing with it until OI is 
> stable. I am confuse of what kernel it uses? BSD kernel? 

It's the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD variant, so Debian userland with
FreeBSD kernel:

http://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/kFreeBSD_FAQ

-- 
-Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
 Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] does this make any sense?

2010-12-01 Thread Allan E. Registos
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 16:00 -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Allan E. Registos wrote:
> > I received the news yesterday and thinking playing with it until OI is 
> > stable. I am confuse of what kernel it uses? BSD kernel? 
> 
> It's the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD variant, so Debian userland with
> FreeBSD kernel:
> 
>   http://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/kFreeBSD_FAQ
> 

Thanks, last time I heard, the FreeBSD kernel is experimentally included
in Debian.

Cheers,
Allan E. Registos



___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] cifs under oi

2010-12-01 Thread Harry Putnam
When setting up the cifs server under oi (b147) is it still necessary
to edit /etc/pam.conf when expecting to share files with windows OS.

Adding a line like:

  other password required pam_smb_passwd.so.1 nowarn

At the end?   


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] cifs under oi

2010-12-01 Thread Lou Picciano
Yes, having just worked through this, we did edit the pam.conf file to make use 
of 'local' authentication. 


We are having some other issues - hey, it's a learning process - but the 
authentication via PAM works great now. 


Lou Picciano 

- Original Message - 
From: "Harry Putnam"  
To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org 
Sent: Wednesday, December 1, 2010 8:49:05 PM 
Subject: [OpenIndiana-discuss] cifs under oi 

When setting up the cifs server under oi (b147) is it still necessary 
to edit /etc/pam.conf when expecting to share files with windows OS. 

Adding a line like: 

other password required pam_smb_passwd.so.1 nowarn 

At the end? 


___ 
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list 
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org 
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss 
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss