Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Sendmail on oi 151_a9
I have to agree with Predrag, postfix is really easy to set up, and is the default on most Linux systems nowadays. I don't personally use it, for our systems at work, but that is mostly to do with how it handles aliases. alias1: buddy, helen alias2: buddy, alias1 sending mail to alias2 will send 2 copies to buddy, and one to helen. also /usr/lib/sendmail -bv alias doesn't show the expansion of aliases, but emails a test message to that alias. other than that postfix is very powerful, and has the ability to forward outgoing as well as incoming messages to a specific mailbox. Jon On 14 October 2014 06:02, Predrag Zecevic predrag.zece...@2e-systems.com wrote: Am 13.10.2014 um 23:03 schrieb Harry Putnam: Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us writes: On Mon, 13 Oct 2014, Harry Putnam wrote: I have yet to find much that is helpful in creating a sendmail.mc. I have not found a single example of a sendmail.mc in those docs. There are piles of information about how to test, what to do once you have a working sendmail.mc... but precious little about actually creating one. Apparently it was felt the reader should already know the nuts and bolts of creating sendmail.cf Oracle documentation is almost the last place you would want to go to learn about configuring sendmail. Thank you, yes, I agree. The best information available may be found on your system in the file /etc/mail/cf/README, which is provided by the sendmail package. I've used that file many times to look up what one or another stanza in a sample *.mc was supposed to do. So, I agree. Its good to know about. However, in 4311 lines there is not one concrete example of a sendmail.mc that user can take apart rearrange and etc. It turns out on oi, oi-hipster the setup is all rigged up in /etc/mail/cf/cf with makefiles that pull out the m4 tools for you. You just say `make sendmail.cf' after editing sendmail.mc ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss Hi, did you considered postfix (as sendmail replacement)? It is much easier to configure and is present in OI and almost up to date: http://pkg.openindiana.org/sfe/en/catalog.shtml. If you still want to use sendmail, please ignore me. Regards. -- Predrag Zečević, Technical Support Analyst, 2e Systems GmbH Telephone: +49 6196 9505 815, Facsimile: +49 6196 9505 894 Mobile:+49 174 3109 288, Skype: predrag.zecevic E-mail:predrag.zece...@2e-systems.com Headquarter: 2e Systems GmbH, Königsteiner Str. 87, 65812 Bad Soden am Taunus, Germany Company registration: Amtsgericht Königstein (Germany), HRB 7303 Managing director:Phil Douglas http://www.2e-systems.com/ - Making your business fly! ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Bash bug issue
Thanks, Jon! This makes me really happy with OI. Actually this small advancement in OI /dev a9 makes me happier than all great advancements in /hipster. Regards, Dmitry. Jon Tibble has just pushed updated bash package with recent security fixes to OI /dev a9. ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Bash bug issue
Thanks from me too! Thanks to all who keep OI alive! -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Dmitry Kozhinov [mailto:d...@desktopfay.com] Verzonden: dinsdag 14 oktober 2014 17:52 Aan: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org Onderwerp: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Bash bug issue Thanks, Jon! This makes me really happy with OI. Actually this small advancement in OI /dev a9 makes me happier than all great advancements in /hipster. Regards, Dmitry. Jon Tibble has just pushed updated bash package with recent security fixes to OI /dev a9. ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Sendmail on oi 151_a9
Gary Mills gary_mi...@fastmail.fm writes: [...] You don't actually need the authinfo feature to use authinfo. You can put the same data in the access database instead. The README file describes how to do that. These are my access files: -rw-r- 1 root root 172 Jul 3 2011 /etc/mail/access -rw-r- 1 root root 32768 Jul 3 2011 /etc/mail/access.db The contents are like this: AuthInfo:[mail.messagingengine.com] U:user@domain P:password M:PLAIN AuthInfo:mail.messagingengine.com U:user@domain P:password M:PLAIN Thank you. trying to do it that way, after setting up what I think is what you suggested. It appears the auth is not working... or at least that what it appears is happening in smtp output from sending mail with mailx -v... it gets to the part where data in injected and just stops. If I then restart sendmail the message gets deferred here apparently and never sent. Sort of seems like access.db is not being consulted. cat: /etc/mail/access: No such file or directory (uid and passwd munged) Authinfo:mail.messagingengine.com U:MYUID P:MYPASSWD M:LOGIN PLAIN Seems to get to the injection part and stop... apparently auth is not working? (It actually appears that auth did work... to my eyes, but I think not) No EHLO from the smarthost harry rea...@jtan.com... Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay... 220 oih.local.lan ESMTP Sendmail 8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:06:01 -0400 (EDT) EHLO oih.local.lan 250-oih.local.lan Hello oih [127.0.0.1], pleased to meet you 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-PIPELINING 250-EXPN 250-VERB 250-8BITMIME 250-SIZE 250-DSN 250-ETRN 250-AUTH GSSAPI DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 250-DELIVERBY 250 HELP VERB 250 2.0.0 Verbose mode MAIL From:ha...@oih.local.lan SIZE=309 AUTH=ha...@oih.local.lan 250 2.1.0 ha...@oih.local.lan... Sender ok RCPT To:rea...@jtan.com DATA 250 2.1.5 rea...@jtan.com... Recipient ok 354 Enter mail, end with . on a line by itself . ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Sendmail on oi 151_a9
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes: Sorry forget to include the *.mc (attached below) [...] No EHLO from the smarthost harry rea...@jtan.com... Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay... 220 oih.local.lan ESMTP Sendmail 8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:06:01 -0400 (EDT) EHLO oih.local.lan 250-oih.local.lan Hello oih [127.0.0.1], pleased to meet you 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-PIPELINING 250-EXPN 250-VERB 250-8BITMIME 250-SIZE 250-DSN 250-ETRN 250-AUTH GSSAPI DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 250-DELIVERBY 250 HELP VERB 250 2.0.0 Verbose mode MAIL From:ha...@oih.local.lan SIZE=309 AUTH=ha...@oih.local.lan 250 2.1.0 ha...@oih.local.lan... Sender ok RCPT To:rea...@jtan.com DATA 250 2.1.5 rea...@jtan.com... Recipient ok 354 Enter mail, end with . on a line by itself . divert(-1) divert(0)dnl VERSIONID(`sendmail.mc (Sun)') OSTYPE(`solaris8')dnl DOMAIN(`solaris-generic')dnl define(`SMART_host', `[mail.messagingengine.com]')dnl dnl define(`confFALLBACK_SMARTHOST', `mailhost$?m.$m$.')dnl FEATURE(`access_db',`hash -TTMPF /etc/mail/access.db') define(`PROCMAIL_MAILER_PATH', `/usr/bin/procmail')dnl define(`RELAY_MAILER_ARGS', `TCP $h 587')dnl define(`confAUTH_MECHANISMS', `EXTERNAL GSSAPI DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 LOGIN PLAIN')dnl dnl FEATURE(`authinfo',`hash /etc/mail/auth/authinfo')dnl dnl FEATURE(`authinfo', `hash /etc/mail/auth/smtp-auth')dnl define(`confAUTH_OPTIONS', `A p y')dnl MAILER(`local')dnl MAILER(`smtp')dnl MAILER(`procmail')dnl LOCAL_NET_CONFIG R$* @ $* .$m. $*$#esmtp $@ $2.$m $: $1 @ $2.$m. $3 ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Sendmail on oi 151_a9
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 03:19:04PM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote: Gary Mills gary_mi...@fastmail.fm writes: The contents are like this: AuthInfo:[mail.messagingengine.com] U:user@domain P:password M:PLAIN AuthInfo:mail.messagingengine.com U:user@domain P:password M:PLAIN trying to do it that way, after setting up what I think is what you suggested. It appears the auth is not working... or at least that what it appears is happening in smtp output from sending mail with mailx -v... it gets to the part where data in injected and just stops. cat: /etc/mail/access: No such file or directory (uid and passwd munged) Authinfo:mail.messagingengine.com U:MYUID P:MYPASSWD M:LOGIN PLAIN That's my mail server! Are you using it too? You have to create the database by hand, from the file you created. The /etc/mail/cf/README describes this: makemap hash /etc/mail/access /etc/mail/access -- -Gary Mills--refurb--Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada- ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Sendmail on oi 151_a9
Gary Mills gary_mi...@fastmail.fm writes: [...] That's my mail server! Are you using it too? Hehe. When I saw you sample *mc, I thought you had inserted it for me so I wouldn't foul it up. It occurred to me that it might also be your server but I thought nah... to unlikely. Yes, fastmail is my server. I've been using it for a couple of years now. Just a sort of ineresting aside: I also have mail accounts at newsguy since about '96.. back when it was still called zippo news.. (Before the famous Zippo cigarette lighter com. Sued them and made them quit using the `zippo' name). Most of us users thought the name they came up with was almost too silly (newsguy) You have to create the database by hand, from the file you created. The /etc/mail/cf/README describes this: Yes, I knew that part... and have tried a few things now with access. Still not working though. It runs up to the point where data is to be injected and stops... apparently auth is not working yet... here is the smtp output posted again for your convenience. You've seen the *.mc the access and smtp output..: Can you make a guess out of it. harry rea...@jtan.com... Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay... 220 oih.local.lan ESMTP Sendmail 8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:06:01 -0400 (EDT) EHLO oih.local.lan 250-oih.local.lan Hello oih [127.0.0.1], pleased to meet you 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-PIPELINING 250-EXPN 250-VERB 250-8BITMIME 250-SIZE 250-DSN 250-ETRN 250-AUTH GSSAPI DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 250-DELIVERBY 250 HELP VERB 250 2.0.0 Verbose mode MAIL From:ha...@oih.local.lan SIZE=309 AUTH=ha...@oih.local.lan 250 2.1.0 ha...@oih.local.lan... Sender ok RCPT To:rea...@jtan.com DATA 250 2.1.5 rea...@jtan.com... Recipient ok 354 Enter mail, end with . on a line by itself . ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
[OpenIndiana-discuss] [hipster] about the sendmail install
I've found that one of the macro *,m4 files normally found at (/etc/mail/cf/feature/authinfo.m4). Is not present in my hipster installation nor is it present on an oi 151_a9 installation I have. There has probably been some reason posted but I have not seen it. Wondering if anyone can tell me why that is missing? `pkg contents' clearly shows there is no authinfo.m4 present. However downloading the sources of sendmail I see it does contain that file. ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
[OpenIndiana-discuss] firefox 31.2.0esr broken?
Greetings, Today I installed the 31.2.0esr release of firefox, obtained here: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/31.2.0esr/contrib/solar is_pkgadd/firefox-31.2.0esr.en-US.opensolaris-i386-pkg.bz2 The system in question is running OpenIndiana oi151a7 (because it can still play flash videos), 64-bit. This version of firefox does not allow me to save downloaded files. The symptoms are that every download, or Save As action returns immediately, and the Download window just shows Failed for the item. I found via truss of the firefox process that it's logging some error messages in my ~/.mozilla/firefox/*/downloads.json file: UnixFile.read is not a function When I start firefox in safe mode from the command line, the failed download attempts log more details: * A coding exception was thrown and uncaught in a Task. Full message: TypeError: UnixFile.read is not a function Full stack: EXCEPTION_CONSTRUCTORS.TypeError@resource://gre/modules/osfile/osfi le_async_front.jsm:87:5 post/@resource://gre/modules/osfile/osfile_async_front.jsm:453:11 TaskImpl_run@resource://gre/modules/Task.jsm:283:1 Handler.prototype.process@resource://gre/modules/Promise.jsm - resource://gre/modules/Promise-backend.js:866:9 this.PromiseWalker.walkerLoop@resource://gre/modules/Promise.jsm - resource://gre/modules/Promise-backend.js:742:7 * I've reverted to the firefox-31.1.0esr build, and downloads are working fine with that version. Regards, Marion ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
[OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox and newcomers
Hi, I'm jumping in as the activity seems to increase after the bash bug lately and there's a will to organise things. I see a lot of people requesting Firefox and other Mozilla softwares, just to to make sure everyone is aware that Mozilla still provides binaries for Solaris platforms : ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/latest-esr/contrib/ And they work very well with a9 (except the limited amount of plugins available especially the ad blockers). Now as I've been using more and more a9 as a base I would like to know what is/would be the process to get involve in testing as you guys want to test things and to publish newer version of packages for various applications. As I'm a console user, I have elinks, mutt and other standard tools like these in recent version recompiled with Sunstudio 12.3 as much as I can and I started to play with gcc 4.9.1 to some extend. So yes... to sum up : 1 - If I want to provide some application in packaged form and submit them to OI, how should I do that ? 2 - If I want to help for testing things without moving to hipster how should I do that ? (vbox, zones) As soon as there are clear process for these 2 things, it should be easier for people to jump in and contribute. Best regards. Ben ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] About moving to hipster
On 10/12/14 09:29 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: Is there a newer version of firefox in hipster compared oi 151_a9? We have 24.8.1. Good, that's a lot closer to current (32.4) than the 10.0.12 running on OI 151_a9 ESR Mozilla releases are more important and thare is also working contributed build in /contribute dir under releases on ftp.mozilla.org, contributed by Oracle, that works (I put them into /opt/sfw/lib and ln -s program it to /opt/sfw/bin) I do not recommend installing from clean install from Hipster ISO for any kind of semi-production or any use, but testing new freshly made packages, because it also breaks /dev updating from Openindiana and Hipster ISOs serves no purpose but designating snapshot in Hipster, from lack of 'entire' releases. Hipster also still does not have updatemanager and packagemanager GUI, and that is needed to be able to update and show updates to user automatically, as in /dev. You actually need to include yourself in contribution on making sure /dev is exactly updatable to Hipster, and vice versa, because otherwise it could be never production ready, because Hipster is not meant to be so in the first place. ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] About moving to hipster
On 10/12/14 09:38 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: Harry Putnam писал 12.10.2014 23:29: That wiki really needs changing. So, is there an iso for clean install... I did not find one googling.t ISOs are available here: http://dlc.openindiana.org/isos/hipster/ 20140701 is the latest one. 20141010 should be available really soon (don't know when exactly, but I expect to see it tomorrow :)). These ISOs are out of line with OI /dev releases and telling people to do fresh install from them is breaking Openindiana distribution it two parts! Fresh install Hipster, that is not production ready, already leads to death quality spiral, I witnessed in Hipster for a year of using it. ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] About moving to hipster
On 10/13/14 05:42 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: Can any of you tell me how one navigates the pkgs. In my install there seems to be no pkg manager. I'm familiar with the pkg cmdline but digging out specific stuff without the name is a bit primitive. And time consuming. Hi Harry, GUI packagemanager and update manager were removed from upstream Oracle codebase and need maintaining to be included back. Hipster pulled upstream changes and lost GUI tools this year, without actions on fixing issue or getting to maintain it. (and it was broken in Hipster from Hipster's day1, anyway) Someone (aurelien larcher) posted it on Github: https://github.com/alarcher/packagemanager It is just a repository with EOLed files but at least it is somewhere. So it could be first thing to do , Getting back Packagemanager and update manager back to working state. But maybe even better then that, it would be better to make connection between tested /dev releases and Hipster - in a way you exactly needed, and that is updating from /dev with a chance of using new /dev in the future in line with existing ones. Getting back update manager and Package manager is required for new /dev anyway. See if you can include yourself on oi-dev mailing list. ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Sendmail on oi 151_a9
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 04:49:19PM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote: Gary Mills gary_mi...@fastmail.fm writes: You have to create the database by hand, from the file you created. The /etc/mail/cf/README describes this: The username and password for authentication have to be the same ones that you use to connect to ftp.messagingengine.com . In particular, the username has to include the domain part. Still not working though. It runs up to the point where data is to be injected and stops... apparently auth is not working yet... here is the smtp output posted again for your convenience. You've seen the *.mc the access and smtp output..: Can you make a guess out of it. harry rea...@jtan.com... Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay... It's connecting to your own SMTP server. That's not going to work. 220 oih.local.lan ESMTP Sendmail 8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:06:01 -0400 (EDT) EHLO oih.local.lan 250-oih.local.lan Hello oih [127.0.0.1], pleased to meet you 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-PIPELINING 250-EXPN 250-VERB 250-8BITMIME 250-SIZE 250-DSN 250-ETRN 250-AUTH GSSAPI DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 250-DELIVERBY 250 HELP VERB 250 2.0.0 Verbose mode MAIL From:ha...@oih.local.lan SIZE=309 AUTH=ha...@oih.local.lan 250 2.1.0 ha...@oih.local.lan... Sender ok RCPT To:rea...@jtan.com DATA 250 2.1.5 rea...@jtan.com... Recipient ok 354 Enter mail, end with . on a line by itself . Here's one that worked for me. I've obscured the destination e-mail address and the password. The message I'm testing was already in the mail queue: # /usr/lib/sendmail -q -v Running /var/spool/mqueue/pBEMOL4K013733 (sequence 1 of 1) mi...@dest.domain.ca... Connecting to mail.messagingengine.com. port 587 via relay... 220 mail.messagingengine.com ESMTP . No UCE permitted. EHLO ati.local 250-mail.messagingengine.com 250-PIPELINING 250-SIZE 7100 250-STARTTLS 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN 250-AUTH=LOGIN PLAIN 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250 8BITMIME STARTTLS 220 2.0.0 Ready to start TLS EHLO ati.local 250-mail.messagingengine.com 250-PIPELINING 250-SIZE 7100 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN 250-AUTH=LOGIN PLAIN 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250 8BITMIME AUTH PLAIN XX== 235 2.7.0 Authentication successful MAIL From:mills@ati.local SIZE=585 250 2.1.0 Ok RCPT To:mi...@dest.domain.ca DATA 250 2.1.5 Ok 354 End data with CRLF.CRLF . 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 034998E01DB mi...@dest.domain.ca... Sent (Ok: queued as 034998E01DB) Closing connection to mail.messagingengine.com. QUIT 221 2.0.0 Bye -- -Gary Mills--refurb--Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada- ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox and newcomers
On 10/15/14 04:27 AM, benta...@chez.com wrote: Hi, I'm jumping in as the activity seems to increase after the bash bug lately and there's a will to organise things. I see a lot of people requesting Firefox and other Mozilla softwares, just to to make sure everyone is aware that Mozilla still provides binaries for Solaris platforms : ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/latest-esr/contrib/ Those are actually Oracle-contributed builds to Mozilla, for Opensolaris and S10 that are working on Openindiana, but yes. I am using those and they are OK. And they work very well with a9 (except the limited amount of plugins available especially the ad blockers). Now as I've been using more and more a9 as a base I would like to know what is/would be the process to get involve in testing as you guys want to test things and to publish newer version of packages for various applications. Currently there is a process of making sense of a development model and new developers are needed. 2 tasks to resolve first are making sense of Hipster wild and crazy update model in line with tested and released model of /dev: Making update from /dev to numbered versions of Hipster 'entire' to work (requires that Hipster soon get numbered entire versions) Making updatemanager and packagemanager work (required to release next /dev out of it) See if you can describe yourself on oi-NewDevs mailing list and also on [oi-dev] list. As I'm a console user, I have elinks, mutt and other standard tools like these in recent version recompiled with Sunstudio 12.3 as much as I can and I started to play with gcc 4.9.1 to some extend. So yes... to sum up : 1 - If I want to provide some application in packaged form and submit them to OI, how should I do that ? 2 - If I want to help for testing things without moving to hipster how should I do that ? (vbox, zones) As soon as there are clear process for these 2 things, it should be easier for people to jump in and contribute. OI currently has split-brain problem where some people are forcing rolling release model, without versioning updates to it and no testing at all and no releases, but snapshots in form of Hipster ISO. Other way around is to put your effort in making new /dev release that is stalled for a long time. It requires aether changing Hipster to be more in line with updating from /dev and making new /dev out of it, or cherry picking and/or making new project for making new /dev like Hipster project is, only with more sane goals of actually have /dev releases. You can _not_ move to Hipster anymore. It is locked by constant updates and for not caring to fix things in Hipster, that block updating. An for not caring of Hipster regarding any release cycle and creating distribution-making rules etc... Yes, you are right, not having answers to those 2 question could be messy. I suggest you take a look at the Openindiana Wiki, take a look where sources are , see what hardware capabilities you have and start building things yourself. And then you can come back with more sane answer and put it in the wiki if you haven't already found it :) I personally was under impression that someone else would pick up Hipster changes to make new /dev and that was why I was using Hipster for a year and was reporting bugs and showstoppers on IRC. It proved that no one's there who can pick it up and make a new /dev by cherry-picking from it and my testing effort was almost in vain, since there was no exact bug reporting and fixing procedure for Hipster. As I understand now, insisting on Hipster model as it is now is almost complete waste of time. Try to build package and publish it locally. Once you tested it, announce it on oi-dev mailing list and see from there. There is also SFE (Spec Files Extra) project with a lot of packages, too. ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] firefox 31.2.0esr broken?
On 10/15/14 04:06 AM, Marion Hakanson wrote: Greetings, Today I installed the 31.2.0esr release of firefox, obtained here: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/31.2.0esr/contrib/solar is_pkgadd/firefox-31.2.0esr.en-US.opensolaris-i386-pkg.bz2 I used Firefox 31.1.1 ESR till now (ad 28 ESR before) and it worked for me. Haven't tried 31.2 yet, but will. The system in question is running OpenIndiana oi151a7 (because it can still play flash videos), 64-bit. 151a7 is still best OI release ever. 151a8 broke playing flash amongst other things and so on. It is said OpenSXCE developer Martin Bochnig (mar...@martux.org) foud solution for Flash in it's latest distro release, but was unwilling to describe solution nor release the source, without money compensation and someone _stupidly_ removed Martin's acces to this OI mailing list(s), without asking anyone but one pan asking him to, due to political reasons, so we are all at loss here. Flash could be used if first you go to: http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ and then flash would temporarily work in a browser. This version of firefox does not allow me to save downloaded files. The symptoms are that every download, or Save As action returns immediately, and the Download window just shows Failed for the item. You can try reporting bug to Ginn Chen (ginn.c...@oracle.com), that as I know is contributing Mozilla products builds, including Lightning calendar. You can also try to ask for releasing source patches used. Contributed builds used to require newest OracleStudio, that required paying support to get newest updates for compiler. I am not sure but talked about moving to GCC for C++ issues, so you might see it GCC is used now. Not having /dev updates does not help the issue, because it is hard (yet not impossible) to contribute external packages to moving target as Hipster, it is much easier with /dev that is not moving in between releases. I found via truss of the firefox process that it's logging some error messages in my ~/.mozilla/firefox/*/downloads.json file: UnixFile.read is not a function When I start firefox in safe mode from the command line, the failed download attempts log more details: * A coding exception was thrown and uncaught in a Task. Full message: TypeError: UnixFile.read is not a function Full stack: EXCEPTION_CONSTRUCTORS.TypeError@resource://gre/modules/osfile/osfi le_async_front.jsm:87:5 post/@resource://gre/modules/osfile/osfile_async_front.jsm:453:11 TaskImpl_run@resource://gre/modules/Task.jsm:283:1 Handler.prototype.process@resource://gre/modules/Promise.jsm - resource://gre/modules/Promise-backend.js:866:9 this.PromiseWalker.walkerLoop@resource://gre/modules/Promise.jsm - resource://gre/modules/Promise-backend.js:742:7 * I've reverted to the firefox-31.1.0esr build, and downloads are working fine with that version. ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Sendmail on oi 151_a9
On 10/13/14 07:05 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: On 10/13/14 08:30 AM, Harry Putnam wrote: You mentioned docs for solaris 11. How do I know when I'm looking at solaris 11 and not something a bit older? Solaris 11 docs have a new style with Oracle Solaris 11 Information Library And licensing for Oracle docs is also changed from Opensolaris days? Like they are owned and controlled by Oracle and non- contributable and non-redistributable? ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Sendmail on oi 151_a9
On 10/14/14 09:47 PM, Nikola M. wrote: On 10/13/14 07:05 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: On 10/13/14 08:30 AM, Harry Putnam wrote: You mentioned docs for solaris 11. How do I know when I'm looking at solaris 11 and not something a bit older? Solaris 11 docs have a new style with Oracle Solaris 11 Information Library And licensing for Oracle docs is also changed from Opensolaris days? Like they are owned and controlled by Oracle and non- contributable and non-redistributable? Yes, just like for most other IP Oracle owns in Solaris. -alan- ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
