Re: [Opensim-dev] Coming up: region access control

2012-03-23 Thread Drew Hart
I think this is great.  I don't know as much about OpenSim programming, so
forgive me if this is a complicated request, but as a web developer,
permissions is a huge thing.  For years, I used Drupal because they allowed
detailed permissions - who can write articles, who can comment, who can do
nothing, who can do everything, etc.  When Joomla finally added these (I
believe in version 1.6 or so), it was huge - so people/developers love
permissions.  I would take your idea and take it a step further.  Rather
than having a couple of groups and access levels, why not a completely
customizable solution.  Allow the grid owner to setup rules for residents
to create access groups - like those over 18/age verified (I know this
isn't an option now, but in the future), residents younger than 30 days,
admins, foreigners, and whatever.  You would need an interface to set this
up, need a way to automatically and/or manually assign residents and then I
would assume a one-column code in the database could be used to represent
the different categories and people in multiple categories.  So say
0=everyone, 1=over 18, 2=over 30 days old, etc., and then you could set
access to individual regions based on the code, say groups 1 and 2, or
whatever are allowed access to a particular sim.  I am oversimplifying and
this would probably be a pain, but it is an important thing that I think
would be of great use.

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:01 AM, James Stallings II 
james.stalli...@gmail.com wrote:

 Excellent Diva, Thanks :)


 On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 4:28 PM, BlueWall jam...@bluewallgroup.comwrote:

 Nice. Also testing the email lists :)

 On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 14:26 -0700, Diva Canto wrote:
  Unless you implemented your own authorization service, the
  RemoteAuthorizationServicesConnector does absolutely nothing.
 
  On 3/17/2012 11:12 AM, Argus wrote:
   Hi Diva
  
Interessting new settings which i could use
  
I see in the GridCommon.ini that you added AuthorizationServices =
   LocalAuthorizationServicesConnector. I am already using the
   RemoteAuthorizationServicesConnector in a few other projects. Taking
   a glance at the code both will not work together, right?
  
   Michelle
  
  
   Am 17.03.2012 18:15, schrieb Diva Canto:
   Hi all,
  
   I just committed a piece of code that performs access control in more
   ways than what is currently expressable by viewers. Specifically, it
   allows region operators to specify things like
   DisallowForeigners -- what it says
   DisallowResidents -- only admins and managers allowed in the region
  
   This is on a per-region basis, so you can have a simulator with
   several regions, each one ruled by a different policy.
  
   If there are other policies that make sense, please let me know.
   Also, DisallowResidents may be redundant with groups in place. But as
   far as I can see, without a groups service in place, there is no way
   to express that kind of access control, and I think that kind of
   control is important.
  
   This is the beginning of supporting rich access control policies in a
   federation scenario.
  
  
 http://opensimulator.org/viewgit/?a=commitp=opensimh=33c14cb107ecb67a3e971d6adaab17d173d52747
  
  
   Feedback welcome.
  
   Diva
  
   ___
   Opensim-dev mailing list
   Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
   https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
  
  
   ___
   Opensim-dev mailing list
   Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
   https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
  
  
 
  ___
  Opensim-dev mailing list
  Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
  https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev


 ___
 Opensim-dev mailing list
 Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
 https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev




 --
 ===
 http://simhost.com
 http://twitter.com/jstallings2
 http://www.linkedin.com/pub/5/770/a49

 ___
 Opensim-dev mailing list
 Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
 https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev

___
Opensim-dev mailing list
Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev

Re: [Opensim-dev] ReactionGrid Inc. files for US Patent

2011-02-02 Thread Drew Hart
I don't understand the importance of first or invented.  It is my
understanding (though I am NOT a lawyer) that you don't have to be first or
invent something to patent it.  Though the first person(s) or inventors
could probably fight a patent, but that requires expensive attorneys, etc.
And, I wish the U.S. did not allow process patents.  It's like someone could
patent addition/subtraction or something ridiculous.

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Mark Malewski mark.malew...@gmail.comwrote:

 Does anyone actually have the Patent number?




 On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Mark Malewski mark.malew...@gmail.comwrote:

 Regardless, it's just another false claim.  Just like the silly IBM patent
 claim about using LDAP with OpenSim.

 This is just another false patent claim, attempting to make a false claim
 that they invented using virtualization with OpenSim.

 Completely absurd...

 Mark


 On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Melanie mela...@t-data.com wrote:

 It really contains no useful information. However, it looks like
 this is a Business method patent which will not be recognized
 outside the US even if granted.

 Melanie

 Marcus Alexander Link wrote:
  Sorry, that was the wrong link. Here ist the correct one:
 
 
 http://reactiongrid.blogspot.com/2011/02/reactiongrid-inc-files-for-us-patent.html
 
  Regards, Marcus
 
  On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Michael Cerquoni 
 nebadon2...@gmail.com wrote:
  This article seems to make no mention of a Patent filing.  The word
 Patent
  is not mentioned even once.
 
  On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Marcus Alexander Link 
 manup...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
  Hi everyone,
 
  just saw this posting. Thx to Pathfinder.
 
 
 http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=404150
 
  Regards,
  Marcus
  ___
  Opensim-dev mailing list
  Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
  https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
 
 
 
  --
  Michael Emory Cerquoni - Nebadon Izumi @ http://osgrid.org
 
  ___
  Opensim-dev mailing list
  Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
  https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Opensim-dev mailing list
 Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
 https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev




 ___
 Opensim-dev mailing list
 Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
 https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev


___
Opensim-dev mailing list
Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev


Re: [Opensim-dev] OpenSim - What's Taking so long

2010-07-08 Thread Drew Hart
I will contact you offlist Wordfromthe Wise.  And what was said makes
sense.  I guess my only concern, and I am serious about doing some serious
fundraising, is the use of the name Open Simulator.  I guess if I raised
money and laid out my position, that I am an independent third party
interested in hiring coders to contribute to OpenSim, that should make using
the name okay (people would know I am not officially conected)?  Also, we
would need some independent observer/accountant to make sure everything is
cool and the money spent wisely, but I know several that would volunteer
their time to do that (attorneys/accountants).  So if anyone else wants to
work on fundraising, etc., contact me at dreweh...@gmail.com.  Or if anyone
has other ideas on how non-programmers can help the code move along, I am
open to anything.  Even if some of the experts want to hold some training
sessions so we can learn coding - though I am not sure if that is
practicable.  Thanks,

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Michael Cerquoni nebadon2...@gmail.comwrote:

 One of the problems with OpenSimulator project doing this, is it is not an
 established company.  There is no central office or managers for this
 project.  That aside if you wanted to try to raise funds to hire programmers
 who will submit their code you could certainly do that, you do not need
 OpenSimulator project to do this for you.  You could also ask some of the
 OpenSim developers directly if they are interested in working for bounty if
 you can raise the funds.  Another problem right now is most of the
 developers are way to busy to organize fund raising events, and from my
 experience Money doesnt always solve problems, and can tend to complicate
 things to the point they never actually get done, because once the funds run
 out work just flat out stops and is very difficult to get going again.   One
 thing you do not mention is what you would like to see finished or what you
 feel is missing or incomplete.  OpenSimulator is a very open ended project
 and will likely always be morphing and changing, there will likely never be
 an end to its development, unlike a facebook website which has very limited
 purpose to its goals.  I am going to assume you mean Second Life
 compatibility, this is really just a small piece of opensimulator and I will
 think that you will find that most of the people directly involved in
 OpenSimulator are not that interested in recreating second life, there are
 many avenues being pursued right now that look nothing like Second Life, one
 of the major factors really holding this project back is the lack of a
 Open-Source viewer that the OpenSimulator developers can work on that is in
 a usable state, the Second Life viewer source code is off limits to
 OpenSimulator developers and because of this making OpenSimulator be second
 life compatible is not always easy or even possible at all in some cases.  I
 think once we see viewers like Realxtend Naali and others become more usable
 you will see OpenSimulator move even further from trying to be a second life
 clone.  But these are just some of the reasons that I see OpenSimulator is
 taking as long as it has, and it will likely continue to take just as long
 no matter how much money you throw at it, but like i said, anyone who has
 the desire can raise funds and hire developers to get involved and
 contribute the code to this project, so please do not wait for the
 OpenSimulator developers to do this for you, as some of the developers that
 work for Intel Corp and IBM Corp, and others like Melanie and Justin have
 been paid to develop and create patches as well as for profit grids like
 Reaction Grid, so its not like this is really something that is not
 currently happening.  Hope this helps to explain atleast a little of why
 things are the way they are.

   On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Drew Hart dreweh...@gmail.com wrote:

   Okay, that was my catchy title that in no way means any disrespect.  I
 love OpenSim, have used it for years, tell everyone I meet about it and am a
 huge fan and supporter.  Recently a question was asked about a roadmap and
 progress.  I would like to expand on that.  OpenSim has now been around for
 a while - like years.  Yet I can't really use it for clients.  So here is my
 question.  As a non-coder, how can others help.  For example, I would gladly
 donate some decent money if there were a coordinated fundraising event and a
 plan to hire a couple of full-time, very qualified developers to really move
 this along.

 Please, please, please don't take this the wrong way.  This is NOT a
 criticism.  I know this is done by volunteers and I know that this is more
 ambitious than Second Life, but have we looked at other solutions to move
 the process along.  I think there are a lot of people like me who would
 contribute.  But, and I stress this.  Me donating say $1,000 by myself isn't
 going to do anything.  We would need a serious fundraising drive, and
 specific