Is
replication faster than a standby database. As I understand it, the standby
database will be receive arch logs at preset intervals. Does replication
have the same functionality and about how much data is sent to the replicated
site.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin LangeSent:
Monday, March 04, 2002 10:44 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-LSubject: RE: replication question
The
way I see it . the question comes down to whether or not you need
two way replication or just one way. If both databases can update
those tables and you need them synced between the databases then Advanced
Replication would be the route. If all you need are data changes
from 1 database to be replicated to another database then simple replication
is all you need.
-Original Message-From: Rahul Dandekar
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 6:43
AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: Re:
replication question
Depends on your need.
You can have read only snapshots, updatable
snapshots
or multimaster...
Again if you think of multimaster... then you
would need to make decision
based on your application requirements about
sync or async
I donot have any expereince of snapshot
replication.
But, if you are planning multimaster
replication, then better
spend a couple of months studying it and
testing on test boxes...
Make 100% sure that your
application really needs the replication
and there is no other simpler
option...
Just 2 cents...
+Rahul
- Original Message -
From:
Bunyamin K. Karadeniz
To: Multiple
recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:33
AM
Subject: replication question
Dear Gurus,
The clients will enter records to a database
all day and I will update the other database .
I need to replicate 10 tables in a database
to other database at a specific time.
Do I need Advanced replication or basic
replication . ?
How can I understand that replication is
supported in my both databases. ?
Bunyamin
