[Bug 567107] Review Request: perl-Net-SSLGlue - Add/extend SSL support for common perl modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567107 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Net-SSLGlue-0.2-1.fc13 |perl-Net-SSLGlue-0.2-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543917] Review Request: check_postgres - PostgreSQL monitoring script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543917 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|check_postgres-2.14.2-1.fc1 |check_postgres-2.14.2-1.fc1 |3 |1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543917] Review Request: check_postgres - PostgreSQL monitoring script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543917 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|check_postgres-2.14.2-1.fc1 |check_postgres-2.14.2-1.fc1 |2 |3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567107] Review Request: perl-Net-SSLGlue - Add/extend SSL support for common perl modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567107 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-10 01:53:10 EST --- perl-Net-SSLGlue-0.2-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543917] Review Request: check_postgres - PostgreSQL monitoring script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543917 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-10 01:51:11 EST --- check_postgres-2.14.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543917] Review Request: check_postgres - PostgreSQL monitoring script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543917 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-10 01:51:00 EST --- check_postgres-2.14.2-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543917] Review Request: check_postgres - PostgreSQL monitoring script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543917 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||check_postgres-2.14.2-1.fc1 ||2 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.1.90_20100122svn-1.fc11 |kde-plasma-translatoid-1.1. ||90_20100122svn-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571416] Review Request: GiGi-0.6.0 - C++ OpenGL GUI library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571416 --- Comment #2 from Karel Volný 2010-03-10 01:46:12 EST --- ok, I've managed to build on F13 successfully now: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2041817 I'll post the updated spec & srpm once I'll verify that FreeOrion compiles and runs with new version (may take a while ...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 546147] Merge Review: kasumi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546147 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||kasumi-2.5-3.fc13 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #63 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-10 01:47:21 EST --- kde-plasma-translatoid-1.1.90_20100122svn-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543917] Review Request: check_postgres - PostgreSQL monitoring script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543917 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-10 01:44:27 EST --- check_postgres-2.14.2-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 546147] Merge Review: kasumi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546147 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-10 01:46:23 EST --- kasumi-2.5-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569893] Review Request: - perl-Net-STOMP-Client - STOMP object oriented client module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569893 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-10 01:43:50 EST --- perl-Net-STOMP-Client-0.8-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Net-STOMP-Client'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Net-STOMP-Client-0.8-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569893] Review Request: - perl-Net-STOMP-Client - STOMP object oriented client module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569893 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-10 01:42:52 EST --- perl-Net-STOMP-Client-0.8-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Net-STOMP-Client'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Net-STOMP-Client-0.8-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567107] Review Request: perl-Net-SSLGlue - Add/extend SSL support for common perl modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567107 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Net-SSLGlue-0.2-1.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570111] Review Request: rubygem-right_http_connection - RightScale's HTTP/S module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570111 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-10 01:39:34 EST --- rubygem-right_aws-1.10.0-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-right_aws'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-right_aws-1.10.0-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570113] Review Request: rubygem-right_aws - Interface classes for Amazon EC2/EBS, SQS, S3, SDB and ACF
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570113 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-10 01:42:36 EST --- rubygem-right_aws-1.10.0-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-right_aws'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-right_aws-1.10.0-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561235] Review Request: phpesp - PHP-based survey web application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561235 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-10 01:41:18 EST --- phpesp-2.1.1-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update phpesp'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/phpesp-2.1.1-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561235] Review Request: phpesp - PHP-based survey web application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561235 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-10 01:40:52 EST --- phpesp-2.1.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update phpesp'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/phpesp-2.1.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567107] Review Request: perl-Net-SSLGlue - Add/extend SSL support for common perl modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567107 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-10 01:41:02 EST --- perl-Net-SSLGlue-0.2-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554234] Review Request: ibus-table-yinma - The phonetic tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554234 --- Comment #17 from Ding-Yi Chen 2010-03-10 01:34:33 EST --- rpmlint output that you should fixed: ./SRPMS/ibus-table-yinma-1.2.0.20100305-5.fc12.src.rpm ibus-table-yinma.src:15: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ibus-table-yong ibus-table-yinma.src:15: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ibus-table-erbi Use the similar fix that I use in ibus-table-xingma. ibus-table-yinma.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2.0.20100111-5 ['1.2.0.20100305-5.fc12', '1.2.0.20100305-5'] Update the change log version to: 1.2.0.20100305-5 ibus-table-yinma.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided ibus-table-yong ibus-table-yinma.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided ibus-table-erbi Use the similar fix that I use in ibus-table-xingma. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 546451] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Template-IT - Simple template API.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546451 --- Comment #9 from Remi Collet 2010-03-10 01:07:10 EST --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562366] Review request: zinnia - online handwriting recognition system with machine learning
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562366
--- Comment #20 from Chen Lei 2010-03-10 00:53:17 EST ---
rpmlint *
zinnia.src: W: summary-not-capitalized C online handwriting recognition system
with machine learning->
Online handwriting recognition system with machine learning
zinnia.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US customizable ->
customization, customize, customarily
zinnia.src: W: non-coherent-filename zinnia-0.05-3.fc14.src.rpm
zinnia-0.05-3.fc14.x86_64.rpm->
zinnia.src: W: strange-permission zinnia-0.05.tar.gz 0777L
zinnia.src: W: strange-permission zinnia-0.05-bindings.patch 0777L
zinnia.src: W: strange-permission zinnia.spec 0777L->
chmod 644
zinnia.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C online handwriting recognition
system with machine learning
zinnia.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US customizable ->
customization, customize, customarily
zinnia.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libzinnia.so.0.0.0
e...@glibc_2.2.5
zinnia.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/zinnia-0.05/ChangeLog
->
in %prep
find . -type f -name ChangeLog -size 0c -exec rm -f {} ';'
zinnia-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
zinnia-doc.noarch: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/zinnia-doc-0.05/doc/zinnia.css->
In %prep
sed -i 's/\r//' doc/zinnia.css
zinnia-perl.x86_64: W: no-documentation
zinnia-perl.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/perl5/auto/zinnia/zinnia.so 0555L->
chmod 755
zinnia-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation
zinnia-utils.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/zinnia
['/usr/lib64']
zinnia-utils.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/zinnia_convert
['/usr/lib64']
zinnia-utils.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/zinnia_learn
['/usr/lib64']
->
After %configure
sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool
sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool
zinnia-utils.x86_64: W: no-documentation
8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 14 warnings.
I recommend the following changes:
#%{!?python_sitelib: %global python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")}
#%{!?python_sitearch: %global python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")}
%if ! (0%{?fedora} > 12 || 0%{?rhel} > 5)
%{!?python_sitelib: %global python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib())")}
%{!?python_sitearch: %global python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib(1))")}
%endif
->
%if ! (0%{?fedora} > 12 || 0%{?rhel} > 5)
%{!?python_sitelib: %global python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib())")}
%{!?python_sitearch: %global python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib(1))")}
%endif
rm -f python/%{name}.pyc
->
find . -type f -name "*.pyc" -exec rm -f {} ';'
rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/lib%{name}.la
rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{perl_vendorarch}/auto/%{name}/%{name}.bs
rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{perl_vendorarch}/auto/%{name}/.packlist
->
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name "*.la" -exec rm -f {} ';'
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name "*.bs" -size 0c -exec rm -f {} ';'
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
Note:.bs file is useful if it's not a empty file
%description utils
The %{name}-utils package provide utils for zinnia library that
use %{name}.
->
%description utils
The %{name}-utils package provides utilities for zinnia library that
use %{name}.
python setup.py install --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
->
%{__python} setup.py install --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Note: Choose %{__python} or python, not use both
CFLAGS="%{optflags}"
->
CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS"
Note: Choose %{optflags} or $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, not use both
%doc doc
->%doc doc/*
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556346] Review Request: stage - A 2.5D multi-robot simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556346 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #14 from Ralf Corsepius 2010-03-10 00:22:49 EST --- MUSTFIX: Building doesn't honor CFLAGS: >From build.log: ... cd /builddir/build/BUILD/Stage-3.2.2-Source/libstage && /usr/lib64/ccache/c++ -Dstage_EXPORTS -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -O3 -DNDEBUG -Wall -fPIC -I/builddir/build/BUILD/Stage-3.2.2-Source/. -I/builddir/build/BUILD/Stage-3.2.2-Source/libstage -I/builddir/build/BUILD/Stage-3.2.2-Source/replace -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/builddir/build/BUILD/Stage-3.2.2-Source -I/usr/include/freetype2 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_REENTRANT -o CMakeFiles/stage.dir/block.o -c /builddir/build/BUILD/Stage-3.2.2-Source/libstage/block.cc Note there is a -O3 overriding the -O2 from RPM_OPT_FLAGS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556346] Review Request: stage - A 2.5D multi-robot simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556346 --- Comment #13 from Rich Mattes 2010-03-09 23:33:41 EST --- I tested all of the included .world files, the uoa_robotics_lab.world file is the only one that exhibits this particular behavior. There are a few other .world files that don't work as well, but for the most part none of them are causing segfaults. I've removed the offending world files for now, while the bug is tracked down. Here's the new SRPM and spec reflecting the changes: Spec URL: http://www.richmattes.com/rpms/stage/stage.spec SRPM URL: http://www.richmattes.com/rpms/stage/stage-3.2.2-5.fc12.src.rpm koji dist-f13: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2043084 rpmlint: $ rpmlint stage.spec ../RPMS/i686/stage* ../RPMS/noarch/stage* ../SRPMS/stage* stage.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) multi -> mulch, mufti stage.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable, scalawag, scalar stage.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libstage.so.3.2.2 e...@glibc_2.0 stage-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libstage -> lib stage, lib-stage, multistage stage-devel.i686: W: no-documentation stage-playerplugin.i686: W: no-documentation stage.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) multi -> mulch, mufti stage.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable, scalawag, scalar 6 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554239] Review Request: ibus-table-latin - The Latin tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554239 --- Comment #5 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-03-09 22:57:39 EST --- Spec URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ibus-table-latin.spec SRPM URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ibus-table-latin-1.2.0.20100305-2.fc12.src.rpm Description: The Latin tables for IBus-Table -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||i18n CC||ccha...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554234] Review Request: ibus-table-yinma - The phonetic tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554234 --- Comment #16 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-03-09 22:38:42 EST --- Spec URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ibus-table-yinma.spec SRPM URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ibus-table-yinma-1.2.0.20100305-5.fc12.src.rpm Description: The phonetic tables for IBus-Table -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553533] Review Request: ibus-table-code - The code tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553533 --- Comment #9 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-03-09 22:35:31 EST --- Spec URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ibus-table-code.spec SRPM URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ibus-table-code-1.2.0.20100305-6.fc12.src.rpm Description: The code tables for IBus-Table -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553231] Review Request: ibus-table-cyrillic - Cyrillics tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553231 --- Comment #5 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-03-09 22:29:12 EST --- Spec URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ibus-table-cyrillic.spec SRPM URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ibus-table-cyrillic-1.2.0.20100305-3.fc12.src.rpm Description: The Cyrillic tables for IBus-Table -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Luke Macken changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(lmac...@redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #49 from Luke Macken 2010-03-09 22:23:11 EST --- The TG2 stack has been in Fedora & EPEL for a while now. I was just being lazy and letting bodhi close this bug for me, the the stack is still in epel-testing. It should be good to go though, and I'll coordinate a push of all of the right pieces to stable shortly. We're at TurboGears2 2.0.x, but I plan on bringing us up to speed with the 2.1 release that is happening soon, which is *much* faster due to a dispatcher re-write. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 526041] Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526041 Bug 526041 depends on bug 468230, which changed state. Bug 468230 Summary: Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 468804] Review Request: python-tg-devtools - Development tools and templates for TurboGears2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468804 Bug 468804 depends on bug 468230, which changed state. Bug 468230 Summary: Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 523877] Review Request: CBFlib - crystallography binary format library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877 --- Comment #14 from Tim Fenn 2010-03-09 21:11:46 EST --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > Here's the updated 0.9.0 version: > > Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/CBFlib.spec > > SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/CBFlib-0.9.0-1.fc12.src.rpm > > I also included some of the bin programs, but I'm wondering if it would be > > best > > to prepend "cbf" to them, as names like "convert_image" are a bit ambiguous > > and > > potentially conflicting. > > I didn't split off -doc and -utils, I'd like to get some feedback from > > fedora > > review people on that. > > Please do not add utils to main package, it'll lead to multilib conflict. How will it lead to a multilib conflict? Its fine to install both the 32 and 64 bit binaries and libraries and run/use either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567348] Review Request: dreampie - A graphical cross-platform interactive Python shell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567348 Mads Kiilerich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@kiilerich.com, ||methe...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Mads Kiilerich 2010-03-09 20:40:26 EST --- I was working on a package too, but didn't consider it ready for Fedora yet. I was working with upstream while this was submitted without contacting or following upstream. That's a stupid waste of work. Some of my work and review got upstreamed, but please take what you can use from the spec at http://bitbucket.org/kiilerix/dreampie-rpm/src/tip/dreampie.spec - though there isn't much to take except these comments: I would say that one file as LGPLv2+ (which is compatible with and thus relicensable to GPLv3) isn't worth mentioning in the license field. And there are other files with other compatible licenses. Group: It is not a lib but more like Development/Tools The package requires pygtk2-libglade, not just pygtk2 Man pages should be %doc And finally and the reason I got stalled: I think the use of zip files is a show-stopper. It is a ugly hack and doesn't give the transparency we like in Fedora packaging. The py2 files should be installed as plain py files, and the py3 files moved to a py3 subpackage on the archs where it is available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557969] Review Request: sugar-socialcalc - A spreadsheet activity for the Sugar environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557969 --- Comment #8 from Eric Smith 2010-03-09 20:30:18 EST --- Sorry to keep you waiting. I'll have time to check it out tomorrow or Wednesday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 --- Comment #29 from Matej Cepl 2010-03-09 18:56:53 EST --- (In reply to comment #28) > gdb/osf-share/HP800/cma_thread_io.h is apparently BSD-ish license. Actually, this is the same license for all files in gdb/osf-share directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 Matej Cepl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(mc...@redhat.com) | --- Comment #28 from Matej Cepl 2010-03-09 18:46:30 EST --- (In reply to comment #27) > (a) There is duplicate "GPLv3+". I wrote in PkgWrangler also "GPLv3" > but I cannot find any such licensed file now. I haven't found GPLv3 myself and I am dimly remember it might not be possible to have one ... I think GPLv3 made + finally mandatory, but I would have to check on this. > (b) Where have you found "GPL+"? some header files in include/opcode/ directory. johanka:gdb-7.0.90.20100306$ grep -ril 'either version 1, or' include/opcode/* include/opcode/arm.h include/opcode/hppa.h include/opcode/i860.h include/opcode/np1.h include/opcode/ns32k.h include/opcode/pdp11.h include/opcode/pn.h include/opcode/vax.h johanka:gdb-7.0.90.20100306$ However, while looking for it I found this pearl: gdb/osf-share/HP800/cma_thread_io.h is apparently BSD-ish license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542292] Review Request: mintmenu - gnome-panel menu from LinuxMint
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542292 --- Comment #18 from William Witt 2010-03-09 18:39:02 EST --- Thanks, I'll do some informal reviews over the next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #96 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-03-09 18:23:42 EST --- (In reply to comment #91) > jogl.i686: W: no-documentation > jogl-debuginfo.i686: E: debuginfo-without-sources It seems that this error can be ignored https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563001 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554234] Review Request: ibus-table-yinma - The phonetic tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554234 Ding-Yi Chen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dc...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #95 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-03-09 18:17:09 EST --- (In reply to comment #93) > rpmlint -a | grep "debuginfo-without-sources" > > returns nothing (and I do have quite a number of debuginfo packages > installed), > so I suspect that one is a problem. Should it be the same case? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545039#c9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630
--- Comment #94 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior
2010-03-09 18:06:26 EST ---
(In reply to comment #92)
> rm -rf %{buildroot} (in install)
I put this because of a rpmlint error: jogl.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot
%install
> don't use -p in install param
>
> if you use
> mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_javadir}
> why use a few lines later
> install -dm 755 %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/%{name}
> some place use install some place use cp...
> try to be consequent.
I have some recycled code here.
> don't use "\" line break so much. a 80 chars long lines is not too long, so
> most lines shouldn't have to break.
Just for aesthetic reasons, or is there any consequences for rpm's generation?
(In reply to comment #93)
> rpmlint -a | grep "debuginfo-without-sources"
>
> returns nothing (and I do have quite a number of debuginfo packages
> installed),
> so I suspect that one is a problem.
Thank you so much, James, I guess that is time to some googleing and ask for
help in the lists.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571993] New: Review Request: non-sequencer - A powerful, real-time, pattern-based MIDI sequencer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: non-sequencer - A powerful, real-time, pattern-based MIDI sequencer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571993 Summary: Review Request: non-sequencer - A powerful, real-time, pattern-based MIDI sequencer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bl...@verdurin.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://verdurin.fedorapeople.org/reviews/non-sequencer/non-sequencer.spec SRPM URL: http://verdurin.fedorapeople.org/reviews/non-sequencer/non-sequencer-0.0-1.20100131gitba94d2c354145.fc12.src.rpm Description: The Non Sequencer is a powerful real-time, pattern-based MIDI sequencer for Linux-released under the GPL. Filling the void left by countless DAWs, piano-roll editors, and other purely performance based solutions, it is a composition tool-one that transforms MIDI music-making on Linux from a complex nightmare into a pleasurable, efficient, and streamlined process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #93 from James Heather 2010-03-09 17:26:43 EST --- Is the no-documentation problematic? Obviously the javadoc is in a separate package, but maybe you are supposed to put in a README? Not sure. I have run rpmlint -a | grep no-doc and it did seem that there were quite a lot of installed packages on my machine that have that warning, so you're in good company. You'd think that an error would be a fatal problem, wouldn't you? Well, rpmlint -a | grep " E: " returns plenty of stuff. But rpmlint -a | grep "debuginfo-without-sources" returns nothing (and I do have quite a number of debuginfo packages installed), so I suspect that one is a problem. James -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630
--- Comment #92 from Levente Farkas 2010-03-09 17:12:58
EST ---
not required:
cd ..
rm -rf %{buildroot} (in install)
don't use -p in install param
if you use
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_javadir}
why use a few lines later
install -dm 755 %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/%{name}
some place use install some place use cp...
try to be consequent.
don't use "\" line break so much. a 80 chars long lines is not too long, so
most lines shouldn't have to break.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #91 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-03-09 16:41:42 EST --- Here is an update: spec: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/jogl/1.1.1/4/jogl.spec srpm: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/jogl/1.1.1/4/jogl-1.1.1-4.fc12.src.rpm rpmlint is a bit more happy: [lon...@localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i686/jogl-* jogl.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Microsystems -> Micro systems, Micro-systems, Ecosystems jogl.i686: W: no-documentation jogl-debuginfo.i686: E: debuginfo-without-sources 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. (In reply to comment #87) > About the debuginfo without sources, I am not familiar with fedora but I am > pretty sure you should copy the native source (C) into a dedicated package > into > a directory where gdb can find them. It is a mystery to me too, Sylvestre -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #90 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-03-09 16:32:47 EST --- Absolutely right. It should be /usr/lib64/jogl (my fault). I'm uploading a fix right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 Stephen R. Saucier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ssau...@umbc.edu --- Comment #89 from Stephen R. Saucier 2010-03-09 16:23:35 EST --- Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior: rpm -q --filesbypkg jogl jogl /usr/lib64jogl/libjogl.so jogl /usr/lib64jogl/libjogl_awt.so jogl /usr/share/java/jogl-1.1.1.jar jogl /usr/share/java/jogl.jar Granted, I have no idea what I am talking about, however: that /usr/lib64jogl/ seems suspect to me, shouldn't that be /usr/lib64/java? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225622] Merge Review: boost
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225622
Jan Kratochvil changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jan.kratoch...@redhat.com
--- Comment #38 from Jan Kratochvil 2010-03-09
15:17:01 EST ---
obsoleted:
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
Missing %{?_isa} tags for multilib installations:
{,Build}Requires: *-devel -> {,Build}Requires: *-devel%{?_isa}
(sure gettext flex bison etc. dependencies should be without %{?_isa})
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ArchSpecificRequires
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562847] Review Request: bfa-firmware - Brocade Fibre Channel HBA Firmware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562847 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-09 15:10:08 EST --- bfa-firmware-2.1.2.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bfa-firmware-2.1.2.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562847] Review Request: bfa-firmware - Brocade Fibre Channel HBA Firmware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562847 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-09 15:09:58 EST --- bfa-firmware-2.1.2.1-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bfa-firmware-2.1.2.1-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562847] Review Request: bfa-firmware - Brocade Fibre Channel HBA Firmware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562847 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-09 15:10:03 EST --- bfa-firmware-2.1.2.1-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bfa-firmware-2.1.2.1-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 536718] Review Request: tlomt-sniglet-fonts - A rounded, sans-serif font useful for headlines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536718 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-09 14:40:06 EST --- tlomt-sniglet-fonts-1.000-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tlomt-sniglet-fonts-1.000-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 536718] Review Request: tlomt-sniglet-fonts - A rounded, sans-serif font useful for headlines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536718 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-09 14:40:00 EST --- tlomt-sniglet-fonts-1.000-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tlomt-sniglet-fonts-1.000-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 536718] Review Request: tlomt-sniglet-fonts - A rounded, sans-serif font useful for headlines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536718 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-09 14:40:11 EST --- tlomt-sniglet-fonts-1.000-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tlomt-sniglet-fonts-1.000-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561448] Review Request: jffi - Java Foreign Function Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561448
--- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-03-09
14:26:53 EST ---
I will review your newest srpm later, however just a note
(In reply to comment #7)
> I'm having trouble getting it to build in a ppc mock / koji environment in the
> first place. The link to your koji build doesn't seem available
- koji scratch build results will be deleted in about one week...
> and when I goto run either
> koji build --scratch --arch-override ppc64 dist-f14 jffi-0.6.5-3.fc12.src.rpm
> or
> su - build -c "mock -r fedora-devel-ppc /tmp/jffi-0.6.5-3.fc12.src.rpm "
> Neither is successful. In the case of Koji, I get
>
> "BuildError: No matching arches were found"
- ppc{,64} is available only on F-12/11 (not on F-13/14)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-03-09 14:13:30 EST --- You need not reopen the bug for CVS request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630
--- Comment #88 from James Heather 2010-03-09 13:42:01
EST ---
(In reply to comment #86)
> jogl.i686: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libjogl_awt.so
> jogl.i686: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libjogl.so
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Packaging_JAR_files_that_use_JNI
Looks like the .so files need to go into %{_libdir}/%{name}. I suspect that
will get rid of the warning; but it needs doing either way.
Good work--this looks like it's coming along nicely.
James
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #87 from Sylvestre Ledru 2010-03-09 13:24:11 EST --- I don't think the soname missing is really an issue since .so should never be called directly. Only called through Java. About the debuginfo without sources, I am not familiar with fedora but I am pretty sure you should copy the native source (C) into a dedicated package into a directory where gdb can find them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(mc...@redhat.com) --- Comment #27 from Jan Kratochvil 2010-03-09 13:21:03 EST --- (In reply to comment #26) > suggested fix for License: field +License: GPLv3+ and GFDL and GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ and GPLv3+ with exceptions and LGPLv2+ and GPL+ and Public Domain (a) There is duplicate "GPLv3+". I wrote in PkgWrangler also "GPLv3" but I cannot find any such licensed file now. (b) Where have you found "GPL+"? Thanks for all the work! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 546020] Review Request: php-swift-Swift - Free Feature-rich PHP Mailer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546020 Bug 546020 depends on bug 544660, which changed state. Bug 544660 Summary: Review Request: php-channel-swift - Adds swift mailer project channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544660 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA --- Comment #2 from Nick Bebout 2010-03-09 12:57:37 EST --- I apologize, I forgot about this review, I will try to get this done today or tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563844] Review Request: zim - A Desktop Wiki Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563844 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-03-09 12:49:47 EST --- Well, ./zim/_lib/xdot.py is actually under LGPLv3+, not under GPLv3+, sorry... For -3: * Scriptlets https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets - Please fix scriptlets for update-desktop-database, update-mime-database ( currently with Fedora guidelines, only gtk-update-icon-cache has 3 sections for scriptlets ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #86 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-03-09 12:52:01 EST --- Solved. I'm able to build now: spec: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/jogl/1.1.1/3/jogl.spec srpm: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/jogl/1.1.1/3/jogl-1.1.1-3.fc12.src.rpm rpmlint has 5 complains: [lon...@localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i686/jogl-* jogl.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Microsystems -> Micro systems, Micro-systems, Ecosystems jogl.i686: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libjogl_awt.so jogl.i686: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libjogl.so jogl.i686: W: no-documentation jogl-debuginfo.i686: E: debuginfo-without-sources 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. I guess we should ignore this "jogl.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Microsystems -> Micro systems, Micro-systems, Ecosystems" end this "jogl.i686: W: no-documentation", but I don't know hot to fix the others. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551651] Review Request: ArpON - Arp handler inspection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551651 Arun SAG changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Arun SAG 2010-03-09 12:23:34 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ArpON Short Description: ARP handler inspection Owners:sagarun Branches: F-12,F-13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563844] Review Request: zim - A Desktop Wiki Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563844 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: pyzim - |Review Request: zim - A |Python reimplementation of |Desktop Wiki Editor |Zim by the author | --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-03-09 12:26:54 EST --- (In reply to comment #9) > Hi Mamoru, > Please take a look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560967 > Regards I have read the bug, however as Jussi and I already said on this bug, the new package is "zim" software with language being changed from perl to python, not more or less ( I know some other applications which changes the language they use, like C -> python, ruby -> perl, etc...) Also "pyzim" or "python-zim" is just wrong because this naming usually means that this package is some module of python (like pygtk2), while is actually one "application". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225877] Merge Review: guile
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225877 --- Comment #3 from Ondrej Vasik 2010-03-09 11:55:41 EST --- Ok, fine, thanks for explanation ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 568428] Review Request: libldb - A schema-less, ldap like, API and database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568428 Stephen Gallagher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Flag|needinfo? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225877] Merge Review: guile
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225877 --- Comment #2 from Miroslav Lichvar 2010-03-09 11:39:35 EST --- Thanks for the review. I'll fix the License tag in the next commit. The .so files are actually modules used by guile, moving them to -devel package would break guile. The ghosts for slibcat and slib symlink were used to ensure that the files will be correctly removed when guile is upgraded to another major version (the location will change). They are created only when slib is installed, so it should always point to an existing directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 --- Comment #7 from Jerry James 2010-03-09 11:41:40 EST --- I sent a query off to Josh Boyer and then forgot about it. If it will help, I'll ping him again. It sounds like you have what you need, though. Do you know why ccl needs mmap_zero on PPC? That's kind of an odd thing to do. Since it doesn't seem to be needed on x86 platforms, perhaps it can be coded around somehow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551651] Review Request: ArpON - Arp handler inspection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551651 Terje Røsten changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Terje Røsten 2010-03-09 11:35:25 EST --- o rpmlint clean o spec file looks fine o naming is fine o ownership/perms is correct o sha is good: $ sha1sum ArpON-1.90.tar.gz* 0a0dbfa6e7571892b39bcd25b91f14c840b01315 ArpON-1.90.tar.gz 0a0dbfa6e7571892b39bcd25b91f14c840b01315 ArpON-1.90.tar.gz.spec ! please download with e.g. wget -N to get correct time stamp on tarball. o license is BSD and set correct. o builds with correct flags: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2041933&name=build.log o builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2041927 o man page included -> Fix the time stamp when importing. The package ArpON is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 544295] Review Request: upower - Power management service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544295 --- Comment #17 from Terje Røsten 2010-03-09 11:37:32 EST --- Please set fedora-cvs flags to continue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551651] Review Request: ArpON - Arp handler inspection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551651 Terje Røsten changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|terje...@phys.ntnu.no Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kahl 2010-03-09 11:20:24 EST --- Bingo: I've managed to acquire an old PowerBook G4 at work and figured out it's SELinux ruining ccl's day on PPC machines ever since the default policy was changed to disallow "mmap_zero" by default. Either we wait for PPC support to vanish in Fedora Land, exclude PPC or I'll have to create ccl-selinux with a new type for the ccl kernel on PPC systems that allows for this specific access.. your opinion? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #85 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-03-09 11:23:42 EST --- Created an attachment (id=398837) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=398837) patch to correctly point build.xml This is a patch to correctly point build.xml -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #84 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-03-09 11:14:01 EST --- Hi, sorry for the delay, but I'm a little sick this days. As you can see, I've updated gluegen to build a package named gluegen-source. By doing this, I'm, now, able to build jogl without gluegen side by side and my spec now BuildRequires: gluegen-source. I've made a patch to point my build.xml to the correc (and new) location of gluegen. Despite the fact that my local copy of jogl builds ok, I'm having problems with my rpmbuild version: BUILD FAILED /home/lonely/rpmbuild/BUILD/jogl/make/build.xml:1562: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/lonely/rpmbuild/BUILD/jogl/make/build.xml:487: The following error occurred while executing this line: /usr/share/gluegen-source/gluegen/make/build.xml:458: The following error occurred while executing this line: /usr/share/gluegen-source/gluegen/make/build.xml:378: The following error occurred while executing this line: /usr/share/gluegen-source/gluegen/make/gluegen-cpptasks.xml:394: Problem: failed to create task or type compiler Cause: The name is undefined. Action: Check the spelling. Action: Check that any custom tasks/types have been declared. Action: Check that any / declarations have taken place. Total time: 4 seconds erro: Status de saída de /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.lV0Zq0 inválido (%build) That is weird... one version builds and another not. spec: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/jogl/1.1.1/2/jogl.spec srpm: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/jogl/1.1.1/2/fix-buildxml.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565502] Review Request: python-recaptcha-client - A plugin for reCAPTCHA and reCAPTCHA Mailhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565502 Stephen Gallagher changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo? --- Comment #4 from Stephen Gallagher 2010-03-09 11:18:46 EST --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~sgallagh/packagereview/python-recaptcha-client.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~sgallagh/packagereview/python-recaptcha-client-1.0.5-0.fc12.src.rpm Koji scratch builds completed successfully: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2041826 (Fedora 13) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2041845 (EPEL 5) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571816] New: Review Request: clamav-unofficial-sigs - Scripts to download unoffical clamav signatures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: clamav-unofficial-sigs - Scripts to download unoffical clamav signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571816 Summary: Review Request: clamav-unofficial-sigs - Scripts to download unoffical clamav signatures Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: and...@topdog.za.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/clamav-unofficial-sigs/clamav-unofficial-sigs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/clamav-unofficial-sigs/clamav-unofficial-sigs-3.7-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This package contains scripts and configuration files that provide the capability to download, test, and update the 3rd-party signature databases provide by Sanesecurity, SecuriteInfo, MalwarePatrol, OITC, INetMsg and ScamNailer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439627] Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 --- Comment #42 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-03-09 11:04:44 EST --- Here we go with a little update. This version makes, also, a package named gluegen-source, used by JOGL. spec: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/gluegen/1.0.20102502svn/3/gluegen.spec srpm: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/gluegen/1.0.20102502svn/3/gluegen-1.0.20102502svn-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 Bug 451189 depends on bug 455713, which changed state. Bug 455713 Summary: remove suid from ping https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455713 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225783
Matej Cepl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|needinfo?(nob...@fedoraproj |
|ect.org)|
--- Comment #25 from Matej Cepl 2010-03-09 10:51:20 EST ---
+ MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review
Sources used when checking (from Fedora CVS for F-13):
johanka:F-13$ md5sum gdb.spec gdb-7.0.90.20100306.tar.bz2
b0dadd6e0bf07f2d73ce87c53538edcc gdb.spec
9d52988c5b2a2085e0ee5df89393e5a0 gdb-7.0.90.20100306.tar.bz2
(plus 117 patches for which I haven't calculated md5sums)
johanka:F-13$ rpmlint -i gdb-7.0.90.20100306-20.fc13.src.rpm x86_64/gdb-*.rpm
gdb.src: W: strange-permission gdb-6.8-bz457187-largefile-test.patch 0775L
A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions.
Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions.
gdb.src: W: invalid-url Source4: libstdc++-v3-python-r155978.tar.bz2
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
gdb.src: W: invalid-url Source0: gdb-7.0.90.20100306.tar.bz2
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
gdb.x86_64: E: postin-without-ldconfig
/usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.13-gdb.pyo
This package contains a library and its %post scriptlet doesn't call ldconfig.
gdb.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun
/usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.13-gdb.pyo
This package contains a library and provides no %postun scriptlet containing a
call to ldconfig.
gdb.x86_64: E: postin-without-ldconfig
/usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.13-gdb.pyc
This package contains a library and its %post scriptlet doesn't call ldconfig.
gdb.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun
/usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.13-gdb.pyc
This package contains a library and provides no %postun scriptlet containing a
call to ldconfig.
gdb.x86_64: E: postin-without-ldconfig
/usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.13-gdb.pyo
This package contains a library and its %post scriptlet doesn't call ldconfig.
gdb.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun
/usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.13-gdb.pyo
This package contains a library and provides no %postun scriptlet containing a
call to ldconfig.
gdb.x86_64: E: postin-without-ldconfig
/usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.13-gdb.pyc
This package contains a library and its %post scriptlet doesn't call ldconfig.
gdb.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun
/usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.13-gdb.pyc
This package contains a library and provides no %postun scriptlet containing a
call to ldconfig.
gdb.x86_64: E: postin-without-ldconfig
/usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.13-gdb.py
This package contains a library and its %post scriptlet doesn't call ldconfig.
gdb.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun
/usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.13-gdb.py
This package contains a library and provides no %postun scriptlet containing a
call to ldconfig.
gdb.x86_64: E: postin-without-ldconfig
/usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.13-gdb.py
This package contains a library and its %post scriptlet doesn't call ldconfig.
gdb.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun
/usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.13-gdb.py
This package contains a library and provides no %postun scriptlet containing a
call to ldconfig.
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 12 errors, 3 warnings.
johanka:F-13$
(for explanation of the above warnings see the previous comments here)
NO PROBLEM HERE
+ MUST: package named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
+ MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
+ MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
Package far exceeds level of the Packaging Guidelines. (I would probably make
pearls like
! find -name "*.rej" # Should not happen.
more readable, but certainly whole spec is very correct).
+ MUST: The package licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines
- MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual
license
I went through whole gdb and found it to be incredible collection of all
possible licenses, so that my proposed License tag is
License: GPLv3+ and GFDL and GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ and GPLv3+ with exceptions and
LGPLv2+ and and GPL+ and Public Domain
(all on one line)
+ MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.
+ MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
+ MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
+ MUST:
[Bug 562366] Review request: zinnia - online handwriting recognition system with machine learning
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562366 --- Comment #19 from Liang Suilong 2010-03-09 10:49:35 EST --- Koji result: f12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2041631 devel: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2041689 the latest SPEC file and SRPM file: SPEC: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1352061/zinnia.spec SRPM: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1352061/zinnia-0.05-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225783] Merge Review: gdb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 --- Comment #26 from Matej Cepl 2010-03-09 10:52:12 EST --- Created an attachment (id=398830) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=398830) suggested fix for License: field -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-03-09 10:39:48 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: ferm New Branches: EL-5 Owners: hubbitus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551258] Review Request: libgcal - A library to access google calendar events and contacts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551258 --- Comment #9 from Mario Ceresa 2010-03-09 09:25:58 EST --- Contacted upstream about libgcal.pc include path (Comment 6) http://code.google.com/p/libgcal/issues/detail?id=59 I'll wait for their answer before going on with the review. With best regards, Mario -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 Bug 451189 depends on bug 455713, which changed state. Bug 455713 Summary: remove suid from ping https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455713 What|Old Value |New Value Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 545405] Review Request: goldendict - A feature-rich dictionary lookup program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545405 --- Comment #17 from Liberty 2010-03-09 10:30:26 EST --- Koji build of the new package: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2038695 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551651] Review Request: ArpON - Arp handler inspection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551651 --- Comment #17 from Arun SAG 2010-03-09 09:47:17 EST --- Fixed issues in #comment 16 SPEC URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/ArpON.spec SRPM URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ArpON-1.90-5.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554239] Review Request: ibus-table-latin - The Latin tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554239 Michael Schwendt changed: What|Removed |Added CC|mschwe...@gmail.com | --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt 2010-03-09 08:36:03 EST --- Please do read https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Conflicts in its entirety. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566729] Review Request: CharLS - An optimized implementation of the JPEG-LS standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566729 --- Comment #9 from Mario Ceresa 2010-03-09 08:49:04 EST --- Ok I keep forgetting about the F-13 branch: (thanks Peter for noticing!) New Package CVS Request === Package Name: CharLS Short Description: An optimized implementation of the JPEG-LS standard Owners: mrceresa Branches: F-11 F-12 F-13 EL-5 InitialCC: peter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226484] Merge Review: telnet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226484
Ondrej Vasik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Ondrej Vasik 2010-03-09 08:15:48 EST ---
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable
+ MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review
[re...@localhost devel]$ rpmlint telnet.spec telnet*.rpm i386/*.rpm
telnet.spec: W: invalid-url Source2: telnet-client.tar.gz
telnet.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) login -> loin, logic, lo gin
telnet.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Telnet
telnet.src: W: no-url-tag
telnet.src: W: invalid-url Source2: telnet-client.tar.gz
telnet-debuginfo.i386: W: no-url-tag
telnet-server.i386: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) login -> loin, logic, lo
gin
telnet-server.i386: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US logins -> losing,
loins, lo gins
telnet-server.i386: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xinetd -> dinette,
ninety, kinetic
telnet-server.i386: W: no-url-tag
telnet.i386: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) login -> loin, logic, lo gin
telnet.i386: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Telnet
telnet.i386: W: no-url-tag
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 13 warnings.
[re...@localhost devel]$ rpmlint --version
rpmlint version 0.94 Copyright (C) 1999-2007 Frederic Lepied, Mandriva
All W/E discussed previously, I'm ok with them.
Confirmed that URL is no longer available, could be probably
http://web.archive.org/web/20070819111735/www.hcs.harvard.edu/~dholland/computers/old-netkit.html
+ MUST: package named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
Name doesn't match upstream tarball(netkit-telnet), but it's done this way for
a
long time and for consistency I would say it is better to keep it as it is.
Same is done in other distros as well.
+ MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
+ MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
+ MUST: The package licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines
+ MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual
license
0 MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.
No such file in package.
+ MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
+ MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
+ MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task
>From sources:
$ md5sum netkit-telnet-0.17.tar.gz
d6beabaaf53fe6e382c42ce3faa05a36 netkit-telnet-0.17.tar.gz
>From upstream ftp:
$ md5sum netkit-telnet-0.17.tar.gz
d6beabaaf53fe6e382c42ce3faa05a36 netkit-telnet-0.17.tar.gz
= MATCHES
+ MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture
- tested on i686, no problems
0 MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch
+ MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines
0 MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro
0 MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
0 MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries
0 MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker
+ MUST: Package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create
a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create
that directory
+ MUST: Package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings
+ MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Every %files section must
include a %defattr(...) line.
+ MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ MUST: Each package must consistently use macros
+ MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content
0 MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage
+ MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application
0 MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package
0 MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package
0 MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) fi
[Bug 554234] Review Request: ibus-table-yinma - The phonetic tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554234 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||supercy...@163.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553231] Review Request: ibus-table-cyrillic - Cyrillics tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553231 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||supercy...@163.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|supercy...@163.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554234] Review Request: ibus-table-yinma - The phonetic tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554234 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|supercy...@163.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516312] Review Request: ueagle-atm4-firmware - Firmware for USB ADSL Modems based on Eagle IV Chipset
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516312 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-09 07:59:19 EST --- ueagle-atm4-firmware-1.0-4.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ueagle-atm4-firmware-1.0-4.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553231] Review Request: ibus-table-cyrillic - Cyrillics tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553231 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Chen Lei 2010-03-09 08:21:31 EST --- Empty %post should be removed from spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554239] Review Request: ibus-table-latin - The Latin tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554239 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||supercy...@163.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|supercy...@163.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571790] Review Request: liboping - C library to generate ICMP echo requests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571790 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||541744 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
