[Bug 538057] Review Request: rhnmd - Red Hat Network Monitoring Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538057 --- Comment #7 from Jan Pazdziora 2011-03-10 02:28:25 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) > > On the other hand, because this package is new to Fedora, I question whether > you need to obsolete these at all -- how many Fedora machines are likely to > have the arch-specific versions of the packages installed on them? The package was shipped by Spacewalk project for Fedora in the past. So you may well have installations of old non-Fedora package and now upgrade with package that made it to Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683725] Review Request: marathi-typing-booster - Marathi Typing Booster Table IMEngine for ibus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683725 Pravin Satpute changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproje ||ct.org, panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683725] New: Review Request: marathi-typing-booster - Marathi Typing Booster Table IMEngine for ibus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: marathi-typing-booster - Marathi Typing Booster Table IMEngine for ibus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683725 Summary: Review Request: marathi-typing-booster - Marathi Typing Booster Table IMEngine for ibus Product: Fedora Version: 15 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: psatp...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/marathi-typing-booster.spec SRPM URL: http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/marathi-typing-booster-0.0.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Marathi Typing Booster Table IMEngine for Ibus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 538057] Review Request: rhnmd - Red Hat Network Monitoring Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538057 Ruediger Landmann changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(msu...@redhat.com ||) --- Comment #6 from Ruediger Landmann 2011-03-10 01:46:18 EST --- Thanks: looks good except for: rhnmd.spec:19: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes rhnmd.i386 rhnmd.spec:20: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes rhnmd.x86_64 rhnmd.spec:19: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 7, tab: line 19) rhnmd.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided rhnmd.i386 rhnmd.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided rhnmd.x86_64 If you're going to obsolete the arch-specific versions of the packages, you should also 1. specify the last version of the arch-specific packages 2. add corresponding "Provides:" for the arch-specific packages On the other hand, because this package is new to Fedora, I question whether you need to obsolete these at all -- how many Fedora machines are likely to have the arch-specific versions of the packages installed on them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682130] Review Request: ibus-indic-table - Indic Table engine for IBus platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682130 Naveen Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-03-10 01:47:26 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682130] Review Request: ibus-indic-table - Indic Table engine for IBus platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682130 --- Comment #11 from Naveen Kumar 2011-03-10 00:53:43 EST --- Thanks Jason :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678931] Review Request: perl-Math-Random-Secure - Cryptographically-secure, cross-platform replacement for rand()
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678931 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Math-Random-Secure-0.0 ||6-2.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-03-09 22:14:38 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678931] Review Request: perl-Math-Random-Secure - Cryptographically-secure, cross-platform replacement for rand()
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678931 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-09 22:14:33 EST --- perl-Math-Random-Secure-0.06-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680423] Review Request: drupal6-authfas - Drupal 6 module for authentication via a Fedora Account System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680423 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-09 20:47:43 EST --- drupal6-authfas-0.2.1-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683684] New: Review Request: dtrx - Intelligent archive extractor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dtrx - Intelligent archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683684 Summary: Review Request: dtrx - Intelligent archive extractor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: seb...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sebelk.fedorapeople.org/dtrx.spec SRPM URL: http://sebelk.fedorapeople.org/dtrx-7.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: dtrx is a simple but powerful python script that works as a front-end for a lot of archivers. It can do recursive extraction, for example extract tarballs from source rpms. dtrx extracts archives in a number of different formats; it currently supports tar, zip (including self-extracting .exe files), cpio, rpm, deb, gem, 7z, cab, rar (unrar is on a third party repository), and InstallShield files. It can also decompress files compressed with gzip, bzip2, lzma, xz, or compress. In addition to providing one command to handle many different archive types, dtrx also aids the user by extracting contents consistently. By default, everything will be written to a dedicated directory that's named after the archive. dtrx will also change the permissions to ensure that the owner can read and write all those files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683638] Review Request: pyes- Python library for connecting to and managing Elasticsearch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683638 Tavis Aitken changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Tavis Aitken 2011-03-09 17:06:47 EST --- SRPM URL: should be http://rpms.tavisto.net/fedora-rpms/pyes-0.14.1-1.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683638] New: Review Request: pyes- Python library for connecting to and managing Elasticsearch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pyes- Python library for connecting to and managing Elasticsearch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683638 Summary: Review Request: pyes- Python library for connecting to and managing Elasticsearch Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tavi...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://github.com/tavisto/rpm-specs/blob/master/pyes.spec SRPM URL: rpms.tavisto.net/fedora-rpms/pyes-0.14.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: pyes is a connector to use elasticsearch from python. This is my first package that I am trying to get into fedora and will need a sponsor. I appreciate any feedback anyone is willing to give me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683610] Review Request: hxtools - A collection of several tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683610 Till Maas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||opensou...@till.name --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2011-03-09 16:11:29 EST --- Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/hxtools.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/hxtools-20110308-2.tillf14.src.rpm Changelog: - Include license files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680308] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Schema - XML based database schema manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680308 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.5- |php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.5- |1.fc13 |1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 662257] Review Request: php-pear-CodeGen-PECL - Tool to generate PECL extensions from an XML description
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662257 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|php-pear-CodeGen-PECL-1.1.3 |php-pear-CodeGen-PECL-1.1.3 |-3.fc14 |-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 662257] Review Request: php-pear-CodeGen-PECL - Tool to generate PECL extensions from an XML description
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662257 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-09 15:55:50 EST --- php-pear-CodeGen-PECL-1.1.3-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680308] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Schema - XML based database schema manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680308 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-09 15:55:08 EST --- php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.5-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680308] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Schema - XML based database schema manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680308 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.5- |php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.5- |1.fc15 |1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 662257] Review Request: php-pear-CodeGen-PECL - Tool to generate PECL extensions from an XML description
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662257 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|php-pear-CodeGen-PECL-1.1.3 |php-pear-CodeGen-PECL-1.1.3 |-3.fc15 |-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683610] New: Review Request: hxtools - A collection of several tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hxtools - A collection of several tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683610 Summary: Review Request: hxtools - A collection of several tools Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: opensou...@till.name QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/hxtools.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/hxtools-20110308-1.tillf14.src.rpm Description: hxtools contains several tools for different tasks written by Jan Engelhardt. Currently only tools needed for pam_mount are included in this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650667] Review Request: hitori - Hitori game for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650667 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|hitori-0.2.6-3.fc15 |hitori-0.2.6-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 662257] Review Request: php-pear-CodeGen-PECL - Tool to generate PECL extensions from an XML description
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662257 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-09 15:51:32 EST --- php-pear-CodeGen-PECL-1.1.3-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680308] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Schema - XML based database schema manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680308 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-09 15:50:42 EST --- php-pear-MDB2-Schema-0.8.5-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650667] Review Request: hitori - Hitori game for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650667 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-09 15:52:17 EST --- hitori-0.2.6-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668204] Review Request: buzzbird - Twitter and identi.ca desktop client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668204 --- Comment #7 from Jan Klepek 2011-03-09 15:16:46 EST --- this does not apply to source tarball as far as I know, no bundled/pre-compiled binary file is present in final rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682545] Review Request: nutrika - Nutrient content calculator and intake analyzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682545 Pavel Zhukov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pa...@zhukoff.net --- Comment #8 from Pavel Zhukov 2011-03-09 14:37:20 EST --- I'll review it -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666572] Review Request: zyGrib - Visualization of meteo data from files in GRIB Format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666572 --- Comment #11 from Pavel Zhukov 2011-03-09 14:32:36 EST --- Fixed all. http://landgraf.fedorapeople.org/packages/requested/zygrib/zyGrib.spec http://landgraf.fedorapeople.org/packages/requested/zygrib/zyGrib-3.9.9-3.fc14.src.rpm -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683591] New: Review Request: tclap - Templatized Command Line Argument Parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tclap - Templatized Command Line Argument Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683591 Summary: Review Request: tclap - Templatized Command Line Argument Parser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: br...@postle.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bugbear.postle.net/~bruno/apt/SPECS/tclap.spec SRPM URL: http://bugbear.postle.net/~bruno/apt/fedora/linux/15/i386/SRPMS.panorama/tclap-1.2.0-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: This is a simple C++ library that facilitates parsing command line arguments in a type independent manner. It doesn't conform exactly to either the GNU or POSIX standards, although it is close. Note: I'm submitting this as I'm the maintainer of the hugin package which currently contains a copy of tclap as a bundled lib. This package will allow for this to be removed, yay. Note also that this library consists entirely of C++ templates, so it would be pointless having a separate tclap-devel, it only makes sense to have tclap and tclap-doc packages - The bogus warnings from rpmlint are a result of this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683587] New: Review Request: gsissh - An implementation of the SSH protocol with GSI authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gsissh - An implementation of the SSH protocol with GSI authentication https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683587 Summary: Review Request: gsissh - An implementation of the SSH protocol with GSI authentication Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/el5/gsissh.spec http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/el6/gsissh.spec http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/fc14/gsissh.spec http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/fc15/gsissh.spec http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/fc16/gsissh.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/gsissh-4.3p2-1.el5.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/gsissh-5.3p1-1.el6.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/gsissh-5.5p1-1.fc14.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/gsissh-5.6p1-1.fc15.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/gsissh-5.8p1-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: This is a modified version of openssh that supports GSI authentication. It is not possible to apply the patch to the normal openssh package without loosing functionality, since you can not compile openssh with support for GSI and kerberos at the same time, and the normal openssh package is compiled with kerberos support. Instead this parallel installable package can be used when GSI authentication is needed. The source RPMS are based on the normal openssh packages for each release, using the same versions and applying the same patches with the addition of the patch that implements the GSI support. This was done in order to ensure compatibility and minimize the risk of introducing security problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682905] Review Request: lio-utils - Utilities for Generic Target Infrastructure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682905 --- Comment #7 from Terje Røsten 2011-03-09 13:41:02 EST --- Would be simpler to follow if you add a real changelog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682905] Review Request: lio-utils - Utilities for Generic Target Infrastructure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682905 --- Comment #6 from Andy Grover 2011-03-09 13:37:26 EST --- Whups, added optflags and made disttag conditional. http://fedorapeople.org/~grover/lio-utils.spec3 http://fedorapeople.org/~grover/srpms/lio-utils-3.2-3.el6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673839] Review Request: boost141 - The free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673839 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-09 13:27:49 EST --- boost141-1.41.0-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682487] Review Request: drupal6-image - Allows uploading, resizing and viewing of images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682487 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-09 13:26:03 EST --- drupal6-image-6.x.1.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682488] Review Request: drupal6-filefield - Defines a file field type
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682488 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-09 13:27:15 EST --- drupal6-filefield-6.x.3.9-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682486] Review Request: drupal6-video - Allows Creation of CCK Video Fields
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682486 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-09 13:26:09 EST --- drupal6-video-6.x.4.2.beta2-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671884] Review Request: erlang-cluster_info - Cluster info/postmortem inspector for Erlang applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671884 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-09 13:26:48 EST --- erlang-cluster_info-0.1.0-0.3.20101229gitd077716.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 501101] Review Request: emacs-color-theme - elisp mode to customize emacs look and feel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501101 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-09 13:27:32 EST --- emacs-color-theme-6.6.0-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682479] Review Request: drupal6-yubikey - Provides YubiKey based strong two-factor user authentication capabilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682479 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-09 13:26:14 EST --- drupal6-yubikey-6.x.2.0.beta2-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671884] Review Request: erlang-cluster_info - Cluster info/postmortem inspector for Erlang applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671884 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|erlang-cluster_info-0.1.0-0 |erlang-cluster_info-0.1.0-0 |.3.20101229gitd077716.fc14 |.3.20101229gitd077716.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 501101] Review Request: emacs-color-theme - elisp mode to customize emacs look and feel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501101 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|emacs-color-theme-6.6.0-4.e |emacs-color-theme-6.6.0-4.e |l5 |l6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 523034] Review Request: python-setuptools_trial - Setuptools plugin that makes unit tests execute with trial instead of pyunit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523034 --- Comment #9 from Ruben Kerkhof 2011-03-09 13:14:45 EST --- New version here: SPEC: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/python-setuptools_trial.spec SRPM: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/python-setuptools_trial-0.5.12-1.fc16.src.rpm Darcs isn't used anymore and removed from the tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682905] Review Request: lio-utils - Utilities for Generic Target Infrastructure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682905
--- Comment #5 from Andy Grover 2011-03-09 13:08:55 EST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Some comments:
>
> a) no url tag, where is this project living?
> b) you might want to add the sha1 8ad98e3 to the tarball name?
> c) -n %{name}-%{version} in %setup is the default and can be dropped
>(however, consider b))
I decided to keep the tarball name, since future releases should have proper
tarballs.
> d) mixing of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}, pick one.
> e) use macros for /etc, /sbin and /etc/init.d/
> f) target is a very generic name, possible problem
True.. it's what upstream is using, so I'm hesitant to diverge.
> g) change %defattr(-,root,root) -> %defattr(-,root,root,-)
> h) the package seems to be free for docs and with no url tag, the user
> will have a hard time be able to use this utility.
Yeah, I'll be working with upstream to author some manpages.
> i) Release: 1, please add disttag here.
All the rest are done. Revised versions:
http://fedorapeople.org/~grover/lio-utils.spec(2)
http://fedorapeople.org/~grover/srpms/lio-utils-3.2-1.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683552] New: Review Request: mysql-connector-python - MySQL Connector/Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-python - MySQL Connector/Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683552 Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-python - MySQL Connector/Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fed...@famillecollet.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/raw/master/mysql-connector-python/mysql-connector-python.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/mysql-connector-python-0.3.2-1.remi.src.rpm Description: MySQL Connector/Python is implementing the MySQL Client/Server protocol completely in Python. No MySQL libraries are needed, and no compilation is necessary to run this Python DB API v2.0 compliant driver. -- This library is an new dependency of MySQL-Workbench (version >= 5.2.32) Koji : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2897886 Rpmlint is silent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683552] Review Request: mysql-connector-python - MySQL Connector/Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683552 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||683047 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683071] Review Request: libvirt-php - PHP bindings for libvirt virtualization toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683071 --- Comment #7 from Michal Novotny 2011-03-09 11:58:26 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #3) > > > The tarball at the source URL and in the .src.rpm differs. > > > > > > According to the > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP#Naming_scheme > > > the package should be named php-libvirt instead of libvirt-php. > > > > > > > > > Well, originally the project was named php-libvirt but it got renamed to > > comply > > with the names at http://libvirt.org/git . This was not my idea however I > > already got used to the libvirt-php name. > > Don't confuse the upstream name and the Fedora name. They can > be different if we need them to be. > Well, I maintain the upstream for libvirt-php. If the names can be different then I rename the project for Fedora. > > > Note that you have included the html doc in both main package and the -doc > > > subpackage. Also the %doc must be on the same line as the filename > > > specification. > > > > This is because rpmlint was complaining the main package was not having any > > documentation. Shouldn't be I having it in the main package then? > > You can ignore rpmlint if you think it is getting things wrong, > although it's often a good idea to add a small comment in the > spec file. Oh, ok. I won't be putting docs in the main package then. > > In this case, how about putting the README and license file (eg. COPYING) > into the main package, and the rest of the documentation in the > -doc subpackage. > > > > > > > The licensing is confusing/wrong - in the README you specify that the > > > license > > > is GPL (if so, there should be COPYING with the correct GPL version). In > > > the > > > .spec file there is License: PHP. The source files do not contain any > > > copyright > > > statements nor license names - these are not required but they are > > > recommended. > > > > > > Oh, I'll fix it. I guess this was done by multiple people contributing to > > this > > so it made some kind of mess there however for the PHP modules the licence > > should be a PHP licence, right? Or should be easily be GPL licence as well > > since it's just about the module/extension? > > You really need to be clear about licensing before anything > can be incorporated into Fedora. It's a legal requirement and > could get people into trouble. Maybe clarify this with upstream > on libvir-list? Well, upstream libvir-list has nothing to do with the binding since I maintain the PHP bindings. However I should ask about the licence. Michal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683463] Review Request: trafficserver - Apache Traffic Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683463 Ed Marshall changed: What|Removed |Added CC||esm+red...@logic.net --- Comment #1 from Ed Marshall 2011-03-09 11:54:12 EST --- Hi, this is a completely unofficial review, but I'd actually like to see trafficserver in Fedora. :) The first thing I noticed: you're packaging the unstable version of trafficserver (2.1.6) rather than the stable release from September (2.0.1). Upstream doesn't seem to have confidence that 2.1.6 is ready to be declared stable yet; should Fedora be overriding them? rpmlint on the SRPM reports a few errors: trafficserver.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C TrafficServer trafficserver.src: E: description-line-too-long C Apache Traffic Server is fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/1.1 compliant caching proxy server. trafficserver.src: E: description-line-too-long C Formerly a commercial product, Yahoo! donated it to the Apache Foundation, and is now an Apache TLP. trafficserver.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog trafficserver.src: W: invalid-license Apache-2.0 trafficserver.src:11: W: hardcoded-packager-tag Zhao trafficserver.src:30: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build echo $RPM_BUILD_ROOT trafficserver.src:52: W: macro-in-comment %attr trafficserver.src:17: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 17, tab: line 3) So, some simple changes I'd suggest to make it happier: - Make the summary more descriptive; Name: tells us what it is, Summary: tells us what it does (and Description: expands on that). See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Summary_and_description - Wrap the description field at 80 characters or less. Again, think about what the package does, rather than it's history. - Add the applicable package versions to the changelog "*" lines. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs - Change license field to "ASL 2.0". See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Documentation_Licenses - Remove the Packager: tag. (We get credit in the changelog. :) See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Rpmlint_Errors - Take out the "echo $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" from the spec; this looks like debugging leftovers? - Line 17 of the spec has tabs instead of spaces. rpmlint on the binary you built brings up a few more issues (I've trimmed out the repeats): trafficserver.x86_64: W: no-documentation trafficserver.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/lib64/trafficserver/plugins 0644L trafficserver.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ts/ts.h trafficserver.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/lib64/trafficserver 0644L trafficserver.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ts/experimental.h trafficserver.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/trafficserver/libtsmgmt.so trafficserver.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/include/ts 0644L trafficserver.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/trafficserver/libtsutil.so trafficserver.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/trafficserver/libtsutil.a trafficserver.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /etc/trafficserver/body_factory/default/.body_factory_info trafficserver.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/trafficserver/libtsmgmt.a trafficserver.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ts/mgmtapi.h trafficserver.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ts/remap.h trafficserver.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/trafficserver trafficserver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary traffic_shell trafficserver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tsxs trafficserver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary traffic_server trafficserver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary traffic_manager trafficserver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary traffic_line trafficserver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary traffic_sac trafficserver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary traffic_cop trafficserver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary traffic_logstats trafficserver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary traffic_logcat trafficserver.x86_64: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-postin /etc/init.d/trafficserver trafficserver.x86_64: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-preun /etc/init.d/trafficserver trafficserver.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/trafficserver trafficserver.x86_64: E: no-chkconfig-line /etc/init.d/trafficserver trafficserver.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/init.d/trafficserver There's quite a bit here, but the basics are: - no man pages or documentation; you'll really want to work out the conflicts with the man pages, and I'd suggest adding a %doc section for the README and other documentation files in the distribution. - file and directory
[Bug 480552] Review Request: poweradmin - A friendly web-based DNS administration tool for Bert Hubert's PowerDNS server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480552 --- Comment #9 from Ruben Kerkhof 2011-03-09 11:08:34 EST --- Yes, thanks a lot Jason! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646606] Rename review: drupal-workspace -> drupal6-workspace
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646606 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla 2011-03-09 10:47:59 EST --- This and service_links are all that block the drupal->drupal6 rename. Is all you're objecting to the Epoch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680423] Review Request: drupal6-authfas - Drupal 6 module for authentication via a Fedora Account System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680423 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-03-09 10:29:47 EST --- drupal6-authfas-0.2.1-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal6-authfas-0.2.1-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680205] Review Request: allegro5 - Allegro 5 is a game programming library.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680205 --- Comment #10 from Brandon McCaig 2011-03-09 10:21:03 EST --- Spec URL: http://castopulence.org/rpm/allegro5/5.0.0-3/allegro5.spec SRPM URL: http://castopulence.org/rpm/allegro5/5.0.0-3/allegro5-5.0.0-3.fc13.src.rpm As long as I didn't screw up merging I think I should have all existing concerns addressed. The rpmdev-diff looks good to me. I'm rather satisfied with the rpmlint output now too. :) It would be nice if you could do something like %doc(null) or something to suppress warnings in subpackages. The only thing that bothers me now is the "W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency" warnings when tested against the installed packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683487] Review Request: R-ACCLMA - R contrib package for ACC & LMA Graph Plotting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683487 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683487] Review Request: R-ACCLMA - R contrib package for ACC & LMA Graph Plotting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683487 Madhavprasad Pai changed: What|Removed |Added Platform|All |noarch --- Comment #1 from Madhavprasad Pai 2011-03-09 09:51:50 EST --- Need sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683487] New: Review Request: R-ACCLMA - R contrib package for ACC & LMA Graph Plotting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: R-ACCLMA - R contrib package for ACC & LMA Graph Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683487 Summary: Review Request: R-ACCLMA - R contrib package for ACC & LMA Graph Plotting Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mk...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://pai.fedorapeople.org/R-ACCLMA.spec SRPM URL: http://pai.fedorapeople.org/R-ACCLMA-1.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: This is a contrib package to the R software environment for statistical computing and graphics. The R package summary is [snip] The main function is plotLMA(sourcefile,header) that takes a data set and plots the appropriate LMA and ACC graphs. If no sourcefile (a string) was passed, a manual data entry window is opened. The header parameter indicates by TRUE/FALSE (false by default) if the source CSV file has a head row or not. The data set should contain only one independent variable (X) and one dependent varialbe (Y) and can contain a weight for each observation [/snip] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682130] Review Request: ibus-indic-table - Indic Table engine for IBus platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682130 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-03-09 09:28:47 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 464931] Review Request: appliance-os recipe for building the appliance operating system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464931 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-03-09 09:06:56 EST --- There does not seem to be an actual package to review here. I've no idea what to do with this ticket, but I'm going to mark it so that it does not clutter up the already cluttered package review queue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683071] Review Request: libvirt-php - PHP bindings for libvirt virtualization toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683071 Tomas Mraz changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(tm...@redhat.com) | --- Comment #6 from Tomas Mraz 2011-03-09 08:58:42 EST --- Basically everything was already answered by Richard. The licensing must be clear and the Fedora package name can be different from the upstream tarball name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683071] Review Request: libvirt-php - PHP bindings for libvirt virtualization toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683071 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2011-03-09 08:53:05 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > The tarball at the source URL and in the .src.rpm differs. > > > > According to the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP#Naming_scheme > > the package should be named php-libvirt instead of libvirt-php. > > > > > Well, originally the project was named php-libvirt but it got renamed to > comply > with the names at http://libvirt.org/git . This was not my idea however I > already got used to the libvirt-php name. Don't confuse the upstream name and the Fedora name. They can be different if we need them to be. > > Note that you have included the html doc in both main package and the -doc > > subpackage. Also the %doc must be on the same line as the filename > > specification. > > This is because rpmlint was complaining the main package was not having any > documentation. Shouldn't be I having it in the main package then? You can ignore rpmlint if you think it is getting things wrong, although it's often a good idea to add a small comment in the spec file. In this case, how about putting the README and license file (eg. COPYING) into the main package, and the rest of the documentation in the -doc subpackage. > > > > The licensing is confusing/wrong - in the README you specify that the > > license > > is GPL (if so, there should be COPYING with the correct GPL version). In the > > .spec file there is License: PHP. The source files do not contain any > > copyright > > statements nor license names - these are not required but they are > > recommended. > > > Oh, I'll fix it. I guess this was done by multiple people contributing to this > so it made some kind of mess there however for the PHP modules the licence > should be a PHP licence, right? Or should be easily be GPL licence as well > since it's just about the module/extension? You really need to be clear about licensing before anything can be incorporated into Fedora. It's a legal requirement and could get people into trouble. Maybe clarify this with upstream on libvir-list? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683071] Review Request: libvirt-php - PHP bindings for libvirt virtualization toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683071 Michal Novotny changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(minovotn@redhat.c |needinfo?(tm...@redhat.com) |om) | --- Comment #4 from Michal Novotny 2011-03-09 08:48:49 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) > The tarball at the source URL and in the .src.rpm differs. > > According to the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP#Naming_scheme > the package should be named php-libvirt instead of libvirt-php. > Well, originally the project was named php-libvirt but it got renamed to comply with the names at http://libvirt.org/git . This was not my idea however I already got used to the libvirt-php name. > Note that you have included the html doc in both main package and the -doc > subpackage. Also the %doc must be on the same line as the filename > specification. This is because rpmlint was complaining the main package was not having any documentation. Shouldn't be I having it in the main package then? > > The licensing is confusing/wrong - in the README you specify that the license > is GPL (if so, there should be COPYING with the correct GPL version). In the > .spec file there is License: PHP. The source files do not contain any > copyright > statements nor license names - these are not required but they are > recommended. Oh, I'll fix it. I guess this was done by multiple people contributing to this so it made some kind of mess there however for the PHP modules the licence should be a PHP licence, right? Or should be easily be GPL licence as well since it's just about the module/extension? Michal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 677943] Review Request: liblouis - Braille translation and back-translation library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677943 --- Comment #7 from Martin Gieseking 2011-03-09 08:44:11 EST --- Thank you for the review. Since you're now a member of the packager group, you are also allowed to approve this package if you can't find any packaging mistakes. (In reply to comment #6) > Of course, the other subpackages has set the correct dependencies. The "utils" > package could have this dependency optionally, but it's not really required. Yes, it's not necessary because the -utils package depends on liblouis.so.* provided by the base package: $ rpm -qp --requires liblouis-utils-2.2.0-2.fc14.i686.rpm ... liblouis.so.2 ... $ rpm -qp --provides liblouis-2.2.0-2.fc14.i686.rpm bundled(gnulib) = 2009 liblouis.so.2 liblouis = 2.2.0-2.fc14 liblouis(x86-32) = 2.2.0-2.fc14 Thus, the base package is automatically pulled in as a dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683463] New: Review Request: trafficserver - Apache Traffic Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: trafficserver - Apache Traffic Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683463 Summary: Review Request: trafficserver - Apache Traffic Server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ming@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://zymlinux.net/trafficserver/rpm/trafficserver.spec SRPM URL: http://zymlinux.net/trafficserver/rpm/trafficserver-2.1.6-1.src.rpm Description: Apache Traffic Server is fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/1.1 compliant caching proxy server. Formerly a commercial product, Yahoo! donated it to the Apache Foundation, and is now an Apache TLP. site: http://trafficserver.apache.org/ version 2.1.6 is the most stable+useable release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683463] Review Request: trafficserver - Apache Traffic Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683463 Zhao Yongming changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://trafficserver.apache ||.org/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683071] Review Request: libvirt-php - PHP bindings for libvirt virtualization toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683071 Tomas Mraz changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(minovotn@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #3 from Tomas Mraz 2011-03-09 08:33:25 EST --- The tarball at the source URL and in the .src.rpm differs. According to the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP#Naming_scheme the package should be named php-libvirt instead of libvirt-php. Note that you have included the html doc in both main package and the -doc subpackage. Also the %doc must be on the same line as the filename specification. The licensing is confusing/wrong - in the README you specify that the license is GPL (if so, there should be COPYING with the correct GPL version). In the .spec file there is License: PHP. The source files do not contain any copyright statements nor license names - these are not required but they are recommended. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683257] Review Request: perl-Test-Command - Test routines for external commands
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683257 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||emmanuel.seyman@club-intern ||et.fr AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|emmanuel.seyman@club-intern ||et.fr Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman 2011-03-09 08:16:27 EST --- Taking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683071] Review Request: libvirt-php - PHP bindings for libvirt virtualization toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683071 --- Comment #2 from Tomas Mraz 2011-03-09 07:52:21 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) > Here's the Koji build: > There was no arch-override and it compiled for i386 and x86_64 systems fine > so I guess the > other platforms don't have PHP support. Not really - Fedora primary architectures are i386 (i686) and x86_64 only. The other architectures are secondary and handled by a different koji instance and builds are initiated separately by the secondary arch builders. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683071] Review Request: libvirt-php - PHP bindings for libvirt virtualization toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683071 Tomas Mraz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tm...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tm...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681558] Review Request: libvirt-snmp - SNMP support for libvirt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681558 --- Comment #3 from Tomas Mraz 2011-03-09 06:14:24 EST --- The libvirt tarball from the .src.rpm is different from the one at the URL. Please correct that. If you update the .src.rpm and spec, please always bump the Release and add Changelog entry. I noted that the license is GPLv3 - only - is that intentional? The source files do not contain any copyright comment - it is not required however it is recommended that they contain it (at least the non-autogenerated ones). There is the COPYING file that contains GPLv3 (which by itself allows the code to be licensed under the later future GPL licenses). However README states that the license is GPLv3 which limits it. Why is the LIBVIRT-MIB.txt both in %doc and in the snmp/mibs data dir? I do not think it should be %doc - it is not in the net-snmp-libs package which contains most of the mib files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 681558] Review Request: libvirt-snmp - SNMP support for libvirt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681558 Tomas Mraz changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(mprivozn@redhat.c ||om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682130] Review Request: ibus-indic-table - Indic Table engine for IBus platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682130 Naveen Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666572] Review Request: zyGrib - Visualization of meteo data from files in GRIB Format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666572 --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov 2011-03-09 05:45:25 EST --- Koji scratchbuild for F-15: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2896842 Needs love: * Bundled libraries - bzip2, zlib, proj. I'm pretty sure that the main package is linked against system-wide copies, but I prefer bundled ones to be removed at the %prep stage. * Please, replace macros for sed, cp and rm invocation by real names of these utilities. * The package contains bundled font (liberation). I suspect that appropriate "Requires" should be added. Could you, please, investigate this? * The License tag should be GPLv3+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675914] Review Request: flush - GTK-based BitTorrent client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675914 --- Comment #11 from Oksana 2011-03-09 04:58:05 EST --- Thanks, will try.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682130] Review Request: ibus-indic-table - Indic Table engine for IBus platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682130 --- Comment #9 from Naveen Kumar 2011-03-09 04:24:37 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ibus-indic-table Short Description: Indic Table engine for IBus platform Owners: nkumar Branches: f14 f15 InitialCC: i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666572] Review Request: zyGrib - Visualization of meteo data from files in GRIB Format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666572 --- Comment #9 from Pavel Zhukov 2011-03-09 04:24:01 EST --- moved to fedorapeople SRPM: http://landgraf.fedorapeople.org/packages/requested/zygrib/zyGrib-3.9.9-2.fc14.src.rpm SPEC: http://landgraf.fedorapeople.org/packages/requested/zygrib/zyGrib.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675914] Review Request: flush - GTK-based BitTorrent client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675914 --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov 2011-03-09 04:10:02 EST --- FYI version 0.9.10 has been released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 682130] Review Request: ibus-indic-table - Indic Table engine for IBus platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682130
--- Comment #8 from Naveen Kumar 2011-03-09 03:58:47 EST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Suggestions:
> 1) --disable-static is not needed to %configure
> 2) preserve the timestamps of installed files.
> make DESTDIR=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} NO_INDEX=true \
> install pkgconfigdir=%{_datadir}/pkgconfig \
> INSTALL="install -p"
>
> APPROVED.
Thanks Parag :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 538057] Review Request: rhnmd - Red Hat Network Monitoring Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538057 Miroslav Suchý changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(msu...@redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchý 2011-03-09 03:05:06 EST --- There was only small change: Spec: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhnmd/rhnmd.spec src.rpm: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhnmd/rhnmd-5.3.7-1.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
