[Bug 858070] Review Request: mingw-qt5-qtmultimedia - Qt5 for Windows - QtMultimedia component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858070 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- Package mingw-qt5-qttools-5.2.0-2.fc20, mingw-qt5-qtdeclarative-5.2.0-3.fc20, mingw-qt5-qtbase-5.2.0-3.fc20, mingw-qt5-qtsystems-5.0.0-0.10.git20130911.5084080.fc20, mingw-qt5-qtsensors-5.2.0-2.fc20, mingw-qt5-qttranslations-5.2.0-1.fc20, mingw-qt5-qtscript-5.2.0-1.fc20, mingw-qt5-qtimageformats-5.2.0-1.fc20, mingw-qt5-qtgraphicaleffects-5.2.0-1.fc20, mingw-qt5-qtquick1-5.2.0-2.fc20, mingw-qt5-qtlocation-5.2.0-2.fc20, mingw-qt5-qt3d-5.0.0-0.9.git20130923.7433868.fc20, mingw-qt5-qtmultimedia-5.2.0-1.fc20, mingw-qt5-qtjsbackend-5.1.1-3.fc20: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing mingw-qt5-qttools-5.2.0-2.fc20 mingw-qt5-qtdeclarative-5.2.0-3.fc20 mingw-qt5-qtbase-5.2.0-3.fc20 mingw-qt5-qtsystems-5.0.0-0.10.git20130911.5084080.fc20 mingw-qt5-qtsensors-5.2.0-2.fc20 mingw-qt5-qttranslations-5.2.0-1.fc20 mingw-qt5-qtscript-5.2.0-1.fc20 mingw-qt5-qtimageformats-5.2.0-1.fc20 mingw-qt5-qtgraphicaleffects-5.2.0-1.fc20 mingw-qt5-qtquick1-5.2.0-2.fc20 mingw-qt5-qtlocation-5.2.0-2.fc20 mingw-qt5-qt3d-5.0.0-0.9.git20130923.7433868.fc20 mingw-qt5-qtmultimedia-5.2.0-1.fc20 mingw-qt5-qtjsbackend-5.1.1-3.fc20' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-0276/mingw-qt5-qttranslations-5.2.0-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qttools-5.2.0-2.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtsystems-5.0.0-0.9.git20130911.5084080.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtsensors-5.2.0-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtscript-5.2.0-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtquick1-5.2.0-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtlocation-5.2.0-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtimageformats-5.2.0-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtgraphicaleffects-5.2.0-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtdeclarative-5.2.0-3.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtbase-5.2.0-3.fc20,mingw-qt5-qt3d-5.0.0-0.8.git20130923.7433868.fc20 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858070] Review Request: mingw-qt5-qtmultimedia - Qt5 for Windows - QtMultimedia component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858070 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858070] Review Request: mingw-qt5-qtmultimedia - Qt5 for Windows - QtMultimedia component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858070 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- mingw-qt5-qttools-5.2.0-2.fc20, mingw-qt5-qtdeclarative-5.2.0-3.fc20, mingw-qt5-qtbase-5.2.0-3.fc20, mingw-qt5-qtsystems-5.0.0-0.10.git20130911.5084080.fc20, mingw-qt5-qtsensors-5.2.0-2.fc20, mingw-qt5-qttranslations-5.2.0-1.fc20, mingw-qt5-qtscript-5.2.0-1.fc20, mingw-qt5-qtimageformats-5.2.0-1.fc20, mingw-qt5-qtgraphicaleffects-5.2.0-1.fc20, mingw-qt5-qtquick1-5.2.0-2.fc20, mingw-qt5-qtlocation-5.2.0-2.fc20, mingw-qt5-qt3d-5.0.0-0.9.git20130923.7433868.fc20, mingw-qt5-qtmultimedia-5.2.0-1.fc20, mingw-qt5-qtjsbackend-5.1.1-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-0276/mingw-qt5-qttranslations-5.2.0-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qttools-5.2.0-2.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtsystems-5.0.0-0.10.git20130911.5084080.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtsensors-5.2.0-2.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtscript-5.2.0-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtquick1-5.2.0-2.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtlocation-5.2.0-2.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtimageformats-5.2.0-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtgraphicaleffects-5.2.0-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtdeclarative-5.2.0-3.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtbase-5.2.0-3.fc20,mingw-qt5-qt3d-5.0.0-0.9.git20130923.7433868.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtmultimedia-5.2.0-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtjsbackend-5.1.1-3.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1010741] Review Request: python-nikola - Static website and blog generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010741 --- Comment #32 from Pete Travis --- I've opened a separate review for the fonts, removed them from this package, put a symlink+dependency in their place, and implemented the macros suggested in Comment 30. Progress! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1045476] Review Request: dnf-plugins-core - Core Plugins for DNF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045476 Ales Kozumplik changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Ales Kozumplik --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: dnf-plugins-core Short Description: Core Plugins for DNF Owners: packaging-team Branches: f20 rawhide InitialCC: akozumpl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1010741] Review Request: python-nikola - Static website and blog generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010741 Pete Travis changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1050805 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050805 [Bug 1050805] Review Request: glyphicons-halflings-fonts - Precisely prepared monochromatic icons and symbols -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1050805] Review Request: glyphicons-halflings-fonts - Precisely prepared monochromatic icons and symbols
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050805 Pete Travis changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1010741 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010741 [Bug 1010741] Review Request: python-nikola - Static website and blog generator -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1050805] New: Review Request: glyphicons-halflings-fonts - Precisely prepared monochromatic icons and symbols
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050805 Bug ID: 1050805 Summary: Review Request: glyphicons-halflings-fonts - Precisely prepared monochromatic icons and symbols Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@petetravis.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://immanetize.fedorapeople.org/glyphicons-halflings-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://immanetize.fedorapeople.org/glyphicons-halflings-fonts-3.0.3-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: GLYPHICONS is a library of precisely prepared monochromatic icons and symbols, created with an emphasis on simplicity and easy orientation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047787] Review Request: rubygem-loofah - Manipulate and transform HTML/XML documents and fragments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047787 Mamoru TASAKA changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@fedoraproject.org Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru TASAKA --- Well, as rubygem-rugged was already in Fedora, taking this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048259] Review Request: qt5-qtconnectivity - Qt5 Connectivity component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048259 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- qt5-qtconnectivity-5.2.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048039] Review Request: qt5-qtsensors - Qt5 - Sensor components
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048039 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- qt5-qtsensors-5.2.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048040] Review Request: qt5-qtserialport - Qt5 Serialport component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048040 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- qt5-qtserialport-5.2.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048260] Review Request: qt5-qtlocation - Qt5 Location component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048260 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- qt5-qtlocation-5.2.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1050744] Review Request: belle-sip - Linphone SIP stack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050744 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||cicku...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cicku...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1050733] Review Request: perl-Test-Carp - Test your code for calls to Carp functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050733 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||cicku...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cicku...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1010557] Review Request: numix-gtk-theme - Numix GTK theme for Gnome, Xfce and Openbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010557
--- Comment #12 from Christopher Meng ---
Please find a sponsor, otherwise you may never be able to package anything to
Fedora...(Not taunt)
1. Remove Group tag as it's not used by Fedora as MUST.
2. You'd better use http://numixproject.org/ as URL of the RPM but not a URL
shortten service shortlink.
3. %install
%{__install} -d -m755 %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/themes/%{theme}
for file in gtk-2.0 gtk-3.0 metacity-1 openbox-3 unity xfce-notify-4.0 xfwm4
index.theme; do
%{__cp} -a ${file} %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/themes/%{theme}
done
- 1. First, %{__install} --> install
- 2. Second,
for file in gtk-2.0 gtk-3.0 metacity-1 openbox-3 unity xfce-notify-4.0 xfwm4
index.theme; do
%{__cp} -a ${file} %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/themes/%{theme}
done
Please use install command to copy them via install -pm644.
4. This package should be renamed to numix-themes, thus the dependencies looks
agreeable:
Requires:numix-common
Requires:numix-gtk2-theme
Requires:numix-gtk3-theme
Requires:numix-metacity-theme
Requires:numix-openbox-theme
Requires:numix-xfce-notify-theme
Requires:numix-xfwm4-theme
I first thought this package was this one:
https://github.com/numixproject/numix-icon-theme
But then I found I was wrong... So be careful on choosing names.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 965095] python-rsa - Pure-Python RSA implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965095 Yohan Graterol changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Yohan Graterol --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-rsa New Branches: el6 Owners: yograterol -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1050744] Review Request: belle-sip - Linphone SIP stack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050744 nucleo changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: belle-sip - |Review Request: belle-sip - |Linphone sip stack |Linphone SIP stack -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1050744] Review Request: belle-sip - Linphone sip stack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050744 --- Comment #2 from nucleo --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6376909 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1050744] Review Request: belle-sip - Linphone sip stack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050744 --- Comment #1 from nucleo --- $ rpmlint belle-sip-1.2.4-1.fc20.i686.rpm belle-sip-1.2.4-1.fc20.src.rpm belle-sip-debuginfo-1.2.4-1.fc20.i686.rpm belle-sip-devel-1.2.4-1.fc20.i686.rpm belle-sip.spec belle-sip.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Linphone -> Lin phone, Lin-phone belle-sip.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/belle-sip/COPYING belle-sip.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Linphone -> Lin phone, Lin-phone belle-sip-devel.i686: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1050744] New: Review Request: belle-sip - Linphone sip stack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050744 Bug ID: 1050744 Summary: Review Request: belle-sip - Linphone sip stack Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: alekc...@googlemail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/belle-sip/belle-sip.spec SRPM URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/belle-sip/belle-sip-1.2.4-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Belle-sip is an object oriented c written SIP stack used by Linphone. Fedora Account System Username: nucleo Required for Linphone 3.7.0. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1049207] Review Request: ghc-regex-posix - Haskell posix regex library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049207 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen --- Thanks again - built for f21 rawhide. I will backport before too long to F20. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1026432] Review Request: ghc-pcap - Haskell bindings for libpcap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026432 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen --- (In reply to Philip Withnall from comment #9) > My ‘packager’ group permissions e-mail came through 13 hours ago, but > apparently it hasn’t propagated to Bugzilla Hmm dunno - maybe try logging out of bugzilla and back in? You should be in the FAS fedorabugs groups at least. > Here’s the SCM request for ghc-pcap anyway. BTW there is no need to specify f21 until it branches from master (rawhide). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047478] Review Request: php-irodsphp - PHP client API for iRODS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047478 Adam Williamson changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047478] Review Request: php-irodsphp - PHP client API for iRODS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047478 --- Comment #13 from Adam Williamson --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: php-irodsphp Short Description: PHP client API for iRODS Owners: adamwill Branches: f20 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047785] Review Request: python-pyarabic - Arabic text tools for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047785 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- python-pyarabic-0.4-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pyarabic-0.4-4.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047785] Review Request: python-pyarabic - Arabic text tools for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047785 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-pyarabic-0.4-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pyarabic-0.4-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047785] Review Request: python-pyarabic - Arabic text tools for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047785 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047785] Review Request: python-pyarabic - Arabic text tools for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047785 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- python-pyarabic-0.4-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pyarabic-0.4-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996202] Review Request: nodejs-mongodb - A nodejs driver for MongoDB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996202 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-mongodb-1.3.19-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-mongodb-1.3.19-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1050733] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Carp - Test your code for calls to Carp functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050733 Bug ID: 1050733 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Carp - Test your code for calls to Carp functions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ktdre...@ktdreyer.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/perl-Test-Carp.spec SRPM URL: http://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/perl-Test-Carp-0.2-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Call given code (with given arguments) and tests whether the given Carp function (or their imported versions) are called (with a given value) or not. Fedora Account System Username: ktdreyer F21 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6377047 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1050729] New: Review Request: enunciate-core-annotations - Build-time enhancement tool for Java-based Web services projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050729 Bug ID: 1050729 Summary: Review Request: enunciate-core-annotations - Build-time enhancement tool for Java-based Web services projects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pahu...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pahuang/enunciate-core-annotations.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pahuang/enunciate-core-annotations-1.27-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Build-time enhancement tool for Java-based Web services projects. This package only builds the annotations which allow projects using enunciate to compile. Fedora Account System Username: pahuang -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1020942] Package Request: wxGTK3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020942 --- Comment #8 from Volker Fröhlich --- After replacing all occurences of wx-config with wx-config-3.0 saga built fine in Rawhide. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1010557] Review Request: numix-gtk-theme - Numix GTK theme for Gnome, Xfce and Openbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010557 --- Comment #11 from Satyajit Sahoo --- I updated the SPEC and SRPMs. Here are the new links. http://satya164.fedorapeople.org/numix-gtk-theme/numix-gtk-theme.spec http://satya164.fedorapeople.org/numix-gtk-theme/numix-gtk-theme-2.1-1.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1010557] Review Request: numix-gtk-theme - Numix GTK theme for Gnome, Xfce and Openbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010557 Satyajit Sahoo changed: What|Removed |Added Version|rawhide |20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001799] Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001799 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|anto.tra...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001799] Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001799
--- Comment #11 from Antonio Trande ---
- Compiler works on files with different licenses; in particular
src/barkode.cpp file is licensed with a LGPLv2+, all the others with a GPLv2+.
This is a "Mixed Source Licensing Scenario"
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Mixed_Source_Licensing_Scenario
- %build does not honor applicable compiler flags
- Don't mix the buildroot tags (${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/%{buildroot})
- Also fix these lines
%{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/kde4/apps/%{name}/barcode.ps
%{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/kde4/apps/%{name}/barcode.ps
${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/%{_datadir}/applications/kde4/%{name}.desktop
there are extra slashes.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"GPL (v2 or later)", "LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)",
"Unknown or generated". 8 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/sagitter/1001799-kbarcode/licensecheck.txt
[!]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: update-desktop-database is invoked in %post and %postun if package
contains desktop file(s) with a MimeType: entry.
Note: desktop file(s) with MimeType entry in kbarcode
[x]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package
contains icons.
Note: icons in kbarcode
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 4 files.
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-
file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-
[Bug 1001799] Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001799 --- Comment #10 from Mario Blättermann --- Spec URL: http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/kbarcode.spec SRPM URL: http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/kbarcode-3.0.0b3-4.fc20.src.rpm Sorry, this is a thing which comes from drag-and-drop without having a look at the result :( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001799] Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001799 --- Comment #9 from Antonio Trande --- (In reply to Mario Blättermann from comment #8) > I've removed barcode.ps and replaced it with a symlink from the > postscriptbarcode package. Moreover, I've dropped the -gnubarcode subpackage > again because it doesn't make much sense. > > Spec URL: http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/kbarcode.spec > SRPM URL: > http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/kbarcode-3.0.0b3-4.fc19.src.rpm The link to the SRPM is wrong. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001799] Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001799 --- Comment #8 from Mario Blättermann --- I've removed barcode.ps and replaced it with a symlink from the postscriptbarcode package. Moreover, I've dropped the -gnubarcode subpackage again because it doesn't make much sense. Spec URL: http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/kbarcode.spec SRPM URL: http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/kbarcode-3.0.0b3-4.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1024885] Review Request: python-openstackclient - OpenStack Command-line Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024885 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System --- python-openstackclient-0.3.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-openstackclient-0.3.0-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1050166] Review Request: hex-a-hop - Puzzle game based on hexagonal tiles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050166 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||hex-a-hop -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1050166] New: Review Request: hex-a-hop - Puzzle game based on hexagonal tiles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050166 Bug ID: 1050166 Summary: Review Request: hex-a-hop - Puzzle game based on hexagonal tiles Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/hex-a-hop.spec SRPM URL: http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/hex-a-hop-1.1.0-3.fc20.src.rpm Description: Hex-a-Hop is a hexagonal tile-based puzzle game with one simple goal: destroy all green tiles! There are infinite undos and no time limits -- you just have to find a way to destroy all the green tiles and step on a safe tile at the end. Fedora Account System Username: mariobl The source package bundles a font (liberation-serif) which I've removed and added a symlink to the appropriate system font. Moreover, there are some sound files which are licensed under CC Sampling Plus 1.0 which isn't allowed in Fedora. I've excluded the sound samples from the package, but it works without them anyway. See https://sourceforge.net/p/hexahop/tickets/1/ for more information. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048040] Review Request: qt5-qtserialport - Qt5 Serialport component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048040 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- qt5-qtserialport-5.2.0-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qt5-qtserialport-5.2.0-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048040] Review Request: qt5-qtserialport - Qt5 Serialport component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048040 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- qt5-qtserialport-5.2.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qt5-qtserialport-5.2.0-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048040] Review Request: qt5-qtserialport - Qt5 Serialport component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048040 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- qt5-qtserialport-5.2.0-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qt5-qtserialport-5.2.0-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048040] Review Request: qt5-qtserialport - Qt5 Serialport component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048040 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048039] Review Request: qt5-qtsensors - Qt5 - Sensor components
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048039 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- qt5-qtsensors-5.2.0-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qt5-qtsensors-5.2.0-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048039] Review Request: qt5-qtsensors - Qt5 - Sensor components
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048039 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- qt5-qtsensors-5.2.0-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qt5-qtsensors-5.2.0-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048039] Review Request: qt5-qtsensors - Qt5 - Sensor components
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048039 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- qt5-qtsensors-5.2.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qt5-qtsensors-5.2.0-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048039] Review Request: qt5-qtsensors - Qt5 - Sensor components
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048039 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048621] Review Request: zabbix22 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048621
--- Comment #10 from Orion Poplawski ---
(In reply to Volker Fröhlich from comment #8)
> (In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #5)
> > Some general comments:
> >
> > - Start with a fresh %changelog
> > - If this is really EPEL only, why keep all of the Fedora conditionals?
> >
>
> So far I tried to keep the version for latest EPEL and Zabbix in sync. My
> idea was to introduce the systemd macros on the EPEL7 file, drop the init
> script and keep that in sync with Fedora then. It's a bit of a mess, as they
> don't share a repository, but it worked for me so far. That's also why the
> changelog is still there. I've trimmed it down to 2.0 and up though.
>
Okay, but let's fix this then:
warning: bogus date in %changelog: Mon Jan 5 2014 Volker Fröhlich
- 2.2.1-1.1
warning: bogus date in %changelog: Tue Nov 3 2013 Volker Fröhlich
- 2.0.9-2
> > This isn't needed any more:
> >
> > # Logrotate's su option is currently only available in Fedora
> > %if 0%{?rhel}
> > sed -i '/su zabbix zabbix/d' %{SOURCE5}
> > %endif
>
> Are you sure about the logrotate stanza? Can you point me to where this was
> sorted out?
Ah, well I guess it is still needed but needs to be changed:
$ grep su zabbix-logrotate.in
su USER USER
# Install log rotation
sed -e 's|COMPONENT|agentd|g; s|USER|zabbix|g' %{SOURCE5} > \
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/zabbix-agent
sed -e 's|COMPONENT|server|g; s|USER|zabbixsrv|g' %{SOURCE5} > \
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/zabbix-server
sed -e 's|COMPONENT|proxy|g; s|USER|zabbixsrv|g' %{SOURCE5} > \
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/zabbix-proxy
Also, you have no business editng the source file in place.
So, perhaps:
%if 0%{?rhel}
sed -e 's|COMPONENT|agentd|g; /su USER USER/d' %{SOURCE5} > \
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/zabbix-agent
sed -e 's|COMPONENT|server|g; /su USER USER/d' %{SOURCE5} > \
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/zabbix-server
sed -e 's|COMPONENT|proxy|g; /su USER USER/d' %{SOURCE5} > \
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/zabbix-proxy
%else
...
%endif
> > - This has long been a bug in zabbix_agentd.conf:
> >
> > Hostname=Zabbix server
> >
> > This should be left unset.
>
> Leaving it unset would break active checks, I think but it's one of the
> better ideas I've heard so far.
No, setting Server= and ServerActive= is needed for that. Hostname is the
hostname of the machine the agent is running on.
> We discussed the Hostname matter on
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825833 and failed to come up
> with something useful.
Although the upstream bug basically says packagers should do what they need to
do to make it work.
> > - Upgrading to 2.2 from 2.0 triggered a whole slew of "OK" email messages
>
> I'd need more information on the triggers/events.
Sorry, not much. Perhaps others will see it and report upstream.
> > - Seeing:
> >
> > 8532:20140106:142129.396 /var/lib/zabbixsrv/tmp/zabbix_server_8532.pinger:
> > [13] Permission denied
> >
> > # ls -ld /var/lib/zabbixsrv/tmp
> > drwxr-x---. 2 root zabbixsrv 4096 Jan 6 14:01 /var/lib/zabbixsrv/tmp
>
> Good catch; changed.
Hmm:
@@ -761,7 +761,8 @@ fi
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/%{srcname}/alertscripts
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/zabbix-server
%ghost %{_sbindir}/zabbix_server
-%attr(0750,root,zabbixsrv) %{_sharedstatedir}/zabbixsrv
+%attr(0755,zabbixsrv,zabbixsrv) %dir %{_sharedstatedir}/zabbixsrv
+%attr(0755,zabbixsrv,zabbixsrv) %dir %{_sharedstatedir}/zabbixsrv/tmp
%if 0%{?fedora}
%ghost %{_unitdir}/zabbix-server.service
%else
@@ -797,7 +798,7 @@ fi
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/zabbix_agentd.conf
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/%{srcname}/zabbix_agentd.conf
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/zabbix-agent
-%attr(0750,zabbix,zabbix) %dir %{_sharedstatedir}/zabbix
+%attr(750,zabbix,zabbix) %dir %{_sharedstatedir}/zabbix
%if 0%{?fedora}
%{_unitdir}/zabbix-agent.service
%{_unitdir}/zabbix-agentd.service
@@ -823,7 +824,8 @@ fi
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/%{srcname}/externalscripts
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/zabbix-proxy
%ghost %{_sbindir}/zabbix_proxy
-%attr(0750,root,zabbixsrv) %{_sharedstatedir}/zabbixsrv
+%attr(0755,zabbixsrv,zabbixsrv) %dir %{_sharedstatedir}/zabbixsrv
+%attr(0755,zabbixsrv,zabbixsrv) %dir %{_sharedstatedir}/zabbixsrv/tmp
%if 0%{?fedora}
%ghost %{_unitdir}/zabbix-proxy.service
%else
I would keep each at 0750, just fix the owner as you did.
> The permission on remaining files should be in the domain of the
> administrator, I think. There's a note on the matter in the README.
>
> > - Not sure about this:
> > # rpm -V zabbix22
> > Unsatisfied dependencies for zabbix22-2.2.1-1.1.el6_4.x86_64:
> > zabbix conflicts with zabbix22-2.2.1-1.1.el6_4.x86_64
> > zabbix conflicts with zabbix22-2.2.1-1.1.el6_4.x86_64
> >
> > Perhaps a problem
[Bug 1048260] Review Request: qt5-qtlocation - Qt5 Location component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048260 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- qt5-qtlocation-5.2.0-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qt5-qtlocation-5.2.0-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048260] Review Request: qt5-qtlocation - Qt5 Location component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048260 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- qt5-qtlocation-5.2.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qt5-qtlocation-5.2.0-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048260] Review Request: qt5-qtlocation - Qt5 Location component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048260 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048260] Review Request: qt5-qtlocation - Qt5 Location component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048260 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- qt5-qtlocation-5.2.0-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qt5-qtlocation-5.2.0-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 469843] Review Request: unhide - Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469843 --- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048259] Review Request: qt5-qtconnectivity - Qt5 Connectivity component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048259 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- qt5-qtconnectivity-5.2.0-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qt5-qtconnectivity-5.2.0-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048259] Review Request: qt5-qtconnectivity - Qt5 Connectivity component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048259 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- qt5-qtconnectivity-5.2.0-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qt5-qtconnectivity-5.2.0-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048259] Review Request: qt5-qtconnectivity - Qt5 Connectivity component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048259 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- qt5-qtconnectivity-5.2.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qt5-qtconnectivity-5.2.0-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048259] Review Request: qt5-qtconnectivity - Qt5 Connectivity component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048259 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1026432] Review Request: ghc-pcap - Haskell bindings for libpcap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026432 --- Comment #9 from Philip Withnall --- My ‘packager’ group permissions e-mail came through 13 hours ago, but apparently it hasn’t propagated to Bugzilla, so I can’t set the fedora-cvs flag on this bug (as per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests). Here’s the SCM request for ghc-pcap anyway. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ghc-pcap Short Description: A system-independent interface for user-level packet capture Owners: pwithnall Branches: f19 f20 f21 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 469843] Review Request: unhide - Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469843 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885357] Review Request: OpenShadingLanguage - Shader language libraries and compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885357 --- Comment #7 from Dan Eicher --- Added BuildRequires: zlib-devel http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6374830 Partio would be nice but I don't know anyone who uses it to test it out, blender certainly doesn't (to the best of my knowledge). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1049551] Review Request: jpegoptim - Utility to optimize JPEG files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049551
--- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande ---
- Please, fix these directories
%{buildroot}/%{_bindir}/jpegoptim
%{buildroot}/%{_mandir}/man1/jpegoptim.1
there is an extra slash.
- I don't know if you already know that your package is not built in epel5
because of old MD5 used.
- "GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)" can be ignored because not
related to the compilation of binary file.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "Unknown or generated".
1 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/sagitter/1049551-jpegoptim/licensecheck.txt
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: %defattr present but not needed
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[-]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Buildroot is not present
Note: Buildroot: present but not needed
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: %clean present but not required
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-
[Bug 469843] Review Request: unhide - Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469843 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cicku...@gmail.com Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Christopher Meng --- Package Change Request == Package Name: unhide New Branches: el6 Owners: cicku -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1049551] Review Request: jpegoptim - Utility to optimize JPEG files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049551 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|anto.tra...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048493] Review Request: icecat - GNU version of Firefox browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande ---
Hi Denis.
(In reply to Denis Fateyev from comment #2)
> 5) "export PREFIX='%{_prefix}'" and "export LIBDIR='%{_libdir}'" - are they
>really needed? Haven't checked yet, just asking first.
Since %configure is not called, I think 'export' are necessary, even if I have
not tried without them yet.
Spec URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/Icecat/icecat.spec
SRPM URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/Icecat/icecat-24.0-2.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1049942] Review Request: nar-maven-plugin - Native ARchive plugin for Maven
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049942 --- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo --- (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #5) > These files should be consider under lgpl license ...(?) > from http://java.freehep.org/freehep-nar-plugin/license.html > http://java.freehep.org/freehep-nar-plugin/cpptasks.html > ./src/main/java/com/github/maven_nar/cpptasks/sun/ForteCCompiler.java > ./src/main/java/com/github/maven_nar/cpptasks/sun/ForteF77Compiler.java > ./src/main/java/com/github/maven_nar/cpptasks/intel/IntelLinux32Compiler.java > ./src/main/java/com/github/maven_nar/cpptasks/intel/IntelLinux64CLinker.java > ./src/main/java/com/github/maven_nar/cpptasks/intel/IntelLinux32CLinker.java > ./src/main/java/com/github/maven_nar/cpptasks/intel/ > IntelLinuxFortranCompiler.java > ./src/main/java/com/github/maven_nar/cpptasks/intel/IntelLinux64Compiler.java -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1049942] Review Request: nar-maven-plugin - Native ARchive plugin for Maven
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049942 --- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo --- These files should be consider under lgpl license ...(?) from http://java.freehep.org/freehep-nar-plugin/license.html ./src/main/java/com/github/maven_nar/cpptasks/sun/ForteCCompiler.java ./src/main/java/com/github/maven_nar/cpptasks/sun/ForteF77Compiler.java ./src/main/java/com/github/maven_nar/cpptasks/intel/IntelLinux32Compiler.java ./src/main/java/com/github/maven_nar/cpptasks/intel/IntelLinux64CLinker.java ./src/main/java/com/github/maven_nar/cpptasks/intel/IntelLinux32CLinker.java ./src/main/java/com/github/maven_nar/cpptasks/intel/IntelLinuxFortranCompiler.java ./src/main/java/com/github/maven_nar/cpptasks/intel/IntelLinux64Compiler.java -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1045556] Review Request: hbase - The Apache Hadoop database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045556 Robert Rati changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rr...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Robert Rati --- Spec URL: http://rrati.fedorapeople.org/hbase.spec SRPM URL: http://rrati.fedorapeople.org/hbase-0.96.1.1-1.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1049942] Review Request: nar-maven-plugin - Native ARchive plugin for Maven
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049942 --- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo --- http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4431/6374431/build.log http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4431/6374431/mock_output.log http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4431/6374431/root.log http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4431/6374431/state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1049942] Review Request: nar-maven-plugin - Native ARchive plugin for Maven
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049942 --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo --- Build fails on arm builder Running com.github.maven_nar.test.TestLinkerVersion Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.216 sec <<< FAILURE! - in com.github.maven_nar.test.TestLinkerVersion testVersion(com.github.maven_nar.test.TestLinkerVersion) Time elapsed: 0.096 sec <<< ERROR! org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoExecutionException: NAR: One of two things may be wrong here: 1. tag is missing inside the tag of your NAR configuration 2. no linker is defined in the aol.properties file for 'arm.Linux.linker' at com.github.maven_nar.Linker.getName(Linker.java:190) at com.github.maven_nar.test.TestLinkerVersion.setUp(TestLinkerVersion.java:49) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1049942] Review Request: nar-maven-plugin - Native ARchive plugin for Maven
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049942 --- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo --- please, must remove all prebuilt libraries ./src/it/it0006-jni-3rdparty/src/nar/resources/aol/x86-Windows-msvc/lib/it0003-jni-1.0-SNAPSHOT.dll ./src/it/it0006-jni-3rdparty/src/nar/resources/aol/amd64-Windows-msvc/lib/it0003-jni-1.0-SNAPSHOT.dll ./src/it/it0006-jni-3rdparty/src/nar/resources/aol/amd64-Windows-msvc/lib/it0003-jni-1.0-SNAPSHOT.dll.manifest ./src/it/it0016-layout/lib/x86_64-MacOSX-g++/shared/libit0016-lib-shared-1.0-SNAPSHOT.dylib ./src/it/it0020-lib-3rdparty/src/nar/resources/aol/x86_64-MacOSX-g++/lib/libit0007-lib-shared-1.0-SNAPSHOT.dylib ./src/it/it0006-jni-3rdparty/src/nar/resources/aol/x86-Windows-msvc/lib/it0003-jni-1.0-SNAPSHOT.exp ./src/it/it0006-jni-3rdparty/src/nar/resources/aol/amd64-Windows-msvc/lib/it0003-jni-1.0-SNAPSHOT.exp ./src/it/it0006-jni-3rdparty/src/nar/resources/aol/ppc-MacOSX-gpp/share/it0003-jni-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar ./src/it/it0006-jni-3rdparty/src/nar/resources/aol/x86-Windows-msvc/share/it0003-jni-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar ./src/it/it0006-jni-3rdparty/src/nar/resources/aol/i386-Linux-gpp/share/it0003-jni-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar ./src/it/it0006-jni-3rdparty/src/nar/resources/aol/amd64-Windows-msvc/share/it0003-jni-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar ./src/it/it0006-jni-3rdparty/src/nar/resources/aol/x86_64-MacOSX-gpp/share/it0003-jni-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar ./src/it/it0006-jni-3rdparty/src/nar/resources/aol/amd64-Linux-gpp/share/it0003-jni-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar ./src/it/it0006-jni-3rdparty/src/nar/resources/aol/ppc-MacOSX-gpp/lib/libit0003-jni-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jnilib ./src/it/it0006-jni-3rdparty/src/nar/resources/aol/x86_64-MacOSX-gpp/lib/libit0003-jni-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jnilib ./src/it/it0006-jni-3rdparty/src/nar/resources/aol/x86-Windows-msvc/lib/it0003-jni-1.0-SNAPSHOT.lib ./src/it/it0006-jni-3rdparty/src/nar/resources/aol/amd64-Windows-msvc/lib/it0003-jni-1.0-SNAPSHOT.lib ./src/it/it0006-jni-3rdparty/src/nar/resources/aol/i386-Linux-gpp/lib/libit0003-jni-1.0-SNAPSHOT.so ./src/it/it0006-jni-3rdparty/src/nar/resources/aol/amd64-Linux-gpp/lib/libit0003-jni-1.0-SNAPSHOT.so -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1049942] Review Request: nar-maven-plugin - Native ARchive plugin for Maven
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049942 --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo --- please, you should/must remove bundled https://github.com/maven-nar/cpptasks-parallel -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1049942] Review Request: nar-maven-plugin - Native ARchive plugin for Maven
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049942 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1049495] Review Request: perl-App-FatPacker - Pack dependencies onto a script file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049495 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-App-FatPacker-0.01 ||-1.fc21 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-01-08 09:51:50 --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar --- Thank you for the review and the repository. I fixed description in the git tree. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1049495] Review Request: perl-App-FatPacker - Pack dependencies onto a script file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049495 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1049942] Review Request: nar-maven-plugin - Native ARchive plugin for Maven
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049942 Marek Goldmann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG), ||1043498 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043498 [Bug 1043498] hornetq: Upgrade to 2.4.0.Final -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1049495] Review Request: perl-App-FatPacker - Pack dependencies onto a script file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049495 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1049942] New: Review Request: nar-maven-plugin - Native ARchive plugin for Maven
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049942 Bug ID: 1049942 Summary: Review Request: nar-maven-plugin - Native ARchive plugin for Maven Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mgold...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/nar-maven-plugin/1/nar-maven-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/nar-maven-plugin/1/nar-maven-plugin-3.0.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: goldmann Description: The NAR plugin for Maven allows you to compile native code (C++, C and Fortran) on a number of different architectures (Linux, Windows, MacOSX, Solaris, ...) and with a number of different compilers/linkers (g++, Microsoft Visual C++, CC, ...) The output produced is wrapped up in Native ARchive files (.nar) some of which are machine independent (-noarch), while others are machine specific and thus depend on a combination of machine architecture(A), operating-system(O) and linker(L) identified as AOL. These nar files can be installed in the local Maven repository and deployed to a standard Maven (web) server, using the standard maven-install-plugin and maven-deploy-plugin. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6373908 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1049495] Review Request: perl-App-FatPacker - Pack dependencies onto a script file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049495 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-App-FatPacker Short Description: Pack dependencies onto a script file Owners: ppisar jplesnik psabata Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1049495] Review Request: perl-App-FatPacker - Pack dependencies onto a script file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049495 Petr Šabata changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata --- TODO: The description needs some corrections (e.g. s/do/does/). There's not much else to complain about. Approving. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1003089] Review Request: glusterfs-openstack-swift - Gluster for Swift
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003089 Kaleb KEITHLEY changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/show_bug.cgi?id=1049616 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1049495] Review Request: perl-App-FatPacker - Pack dependencies onto a script file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049495 Petr Šabata changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1049207] Review Request: ghc-regex-posix - Haskell posix regex library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049207 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1049207] Review Request: ghc-regex-posix - Haskell posix regex library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049207 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047785] Review Request: python-pyarabic - Arabic text tools for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047785 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047785] Review Request: python-pyarabic - Arabic text tools for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047785 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1045476] Review Request: dnf-plugins-core - Core Plugins for DNF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045476 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla --- No SCM request, clearing flag. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1045476] Review Request: dnf-plugins-core - Core Plugins for DNF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045476 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1038087] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Monadic parser combinators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038087 Shakthi Kannan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||shakthim...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|shakthim...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047851] Review Request: netty4 - An asynchronous event-driven network application framework and tools for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047851 Marek Goldmann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||netty4-4.0.14-1.fc20 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-01-08 08:22:18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1023848] Review Request: closure-compiler - JavaScript minifier and checker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023848 Bug 1023848 depends on bug 1023832, which changed state. Bug 1023832 Summary: guava: please package upstream version 1.15 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023832 What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 913254] Review Request: arm-none-eabi-newlib - C library intended for use on arm-none-eabi embedded systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913254 Michal Hlavinka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-01-08 07:51:32 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1004256] Review Request: pysysbot - A simple python jabber bot for getting system information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004256 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(mail@fabian-affol | |ter.ch) | --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1009842] Rename Request: ghc-highlighting-kate - Sourcecode syntax highlighting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009842 Shakthi Kannan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||shakthim...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|shakthim...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1011873] Review Request: ghc-byteable - Type class for sequence of bytes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011873 Shakthi Kannan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||shakthim...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|shakthim...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1035543] Review Request: ghc-async - Asynchronous IO operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035543 Shakthi Kannan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||shakthim...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|shakthim...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1009375] Review Request: ghc-hslua - Lua language interpreter embedding in Haskell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009375 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|unspecified |medium -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
