[Bug 1079589] Review Request: piglit - Collection of automated tests for OpenGL implementations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079589 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- piglit-1-0.14.20140414GIT8775223.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/piglit-1-0.14.20140414GIT8775223.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1034413] Review Request: SDL2_ttf - TrueType font rendering library for SDL2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034413 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||SDL2_ttf-2.0.12-2.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-05-01 02:58:54 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- SDL2_ttf-2.0.12-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1090802] Review Request: ghc-streaming-commons - Common lower-level functions for streaming data libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090802 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-streaming-commons-0.1.2-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1089710] Review Request: python-gensim - Python framework for fast Vector Space Modelling
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089710 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-gensim-0.9.1-1.fc19 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-05-01 03:00:50 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-gensim-0.9.1-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894594] Review Request: coin-or-Bcp - Branch-Cut-Price Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894594 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||coin-or-Bcp-1.3.8-1.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-05-01 03:01:57 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- coin-or-Bcp-1.3.8-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069451] Review Request: ghc-fsnotify - Cross platform library for file change notification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069451 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-fsnotify-0.0.11-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894609] Review Request: coin-or-OS - Optimization Services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894609 Bug 894609 depends on bug 894594, which changed state. Bug 894594 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Bcp - Branch-Cut-Price Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894594 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1034413] Review Request: SDL2_ttf - TrueType font rendering library for SDL2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034413 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|SDL2_ttf-2.0.12-2.fc20 |SDL2_ttf-2.0.12-2.fc19 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- SDL2_ttf-2.0.12-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1089710] Review Request: python-gensim - Python framework for fast Vector Space Modelling
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089710 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-gensim-0.9.1-1.fc19 |python-gensim-0.9.1-1.fc20 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-gensim-0.9.1-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894599] Review Request: coin-or-CoinMP - C-API interface to CLP, CBC and CGL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894599 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||coin-or-CoinMP-1.7.6-1.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-05-01 03:06:38 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- coin-or-CoinMP-1.7.6-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1082193] Review Request: perl-Date-Easter - Calculates Easter for any given year
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082193 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Date-Easter-1.20-1.fc2 ||0 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed|2014-03-28 22:17:08 |2014-05-01 03:06:04 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Date-Easter-1.20-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1089178] Review Request: perl-Digest-Bcrypt - Perl interface to the bcrypt digest algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089178 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Digest-Bcrypt-1.0.1-1. ||fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-05-01 03:06:57 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Digest-Bcrypt-1.0.1-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 baurthefi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||baurthefi...@gmail.com --- Comment #16 from baurthefi...@gmail.com --- Hello, I tried to build on Fedora Copr and it requried to add BuildRequires: openspecfun-devel to spec file. Consider adding it, please. Thanks, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1090070] Review Request: gpaw-setups - GPAW setups
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090070 --- Comment #15 from marcindulak marcin.du...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Susi Lehtola from comment #14) (In reply to marcindulak from comment #13) From my perspective i would prefer to keep also the old changelog, for the purpose of showing the real origin of the spec. ... but that was originally your spec, just from many years ago.. so there are no author IIRC the Fedora policy is that if you import from another public repository for Fedora, you can keep the old changelog. Here, it doesn't seem relevant gpaw-setups are in a public repository: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/dtufys/Fedora_19/noarch/ I took the LICENSE from gpaw. We don't maintain a separate LICENSE file for setups. That's OK as well. ** The %description is not OK. Remove the \ character. OK You can do this change upon git import. This package has been APPROVED. thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1090070] Review Request: gpaw-setups - GPAW setups
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090070 --- Comment #16 from Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi --- (In reply to marcindulak from comment #15) (In reply to Susi Lehtola from comment #14) IIRC the Fedora policy is that if you import from another public repository for Fedora, you can keep the old changelog. Here, it doesn't seem relevant gpaw-setups are in a public repository: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/dtufys/Fedora_19/noarch/ Well, if you can call that a repository. It's mainly related to e.g. Dag Wieer's repo, or nowadays rpmfusion. Anyway, this is academic discussion; I just find it much clearer in this case to start the changelog from scratch. If you insist on keeping the old recors, just be sure it's crystal clear which version was packaged for inclusion in Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091755] Review Request: compat-vte036 - Compat package with vte 0.36 libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091755
David King amigad...@amigadave.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||amigad...@amigadave.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|amigad...@amigadave.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from David King amigad...@amigadave.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
I guess that once Rawhide composes later today (with the updated vte3) this
will disappear.
- Permissions on files are set properly.
Note: See rpmlint output
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FilePermissions
This is bogus, as the setgid bit on gnome-pty-helper is necessary.
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
GPL, LGPL (v2.1 or later), GPL (v2 or later), GPL (v3 or later),
Unknown or generated. 22 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/david/checkout/rpms/1091755-compat-
vte036/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib64/girepository-1.0
(gobject-introspection, libxklavier, GConf2, libgnome-keyring, gdk-
pixbuf2, libgtop2, libgee06, atk, gtk2, gtk3, vte3, gcr, libgee,
gfbgraph, libzapojit, gucharmap, libmash), /usr/lib64/vte-2.90(vte3)
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names
[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517
--- Comment #17 from baurthefi...@gmail.com ---
1. Builds on copr fail sometime due to failing test in file arpack.jl
2. After installing from copr, I got the following error message:
Target architecture mismatch. Please delete or regenerate sys.{so,dll,dylib}
So I deleted /usr/lib64/julia/sys.so as suggested.
After that I got the following message on julia's start:
Warning: error initializing module LinAlg:
ErrorException(error compiling __init__: error compiling check_blas: error
compiling blas_vendor: could not load module libopenblas.so: libopenblas.so:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory)
So I installed openblas-devel to resolve it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1057991] Review Request: the_silver_searcher - Super-fast text searching tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057991 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1057991] Review Request: the_silver_searcher - Super-fast text searching tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057991 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- the_silver_searcher-0.21.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/the_silver_searcher-0.21.0-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1057991] Review Request: the_silver_searcher - Super-fast text searching tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057991 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- the_silver_searcher-0.21.0-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/the_silver_searcher-0.21.0-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1090070] Review Request: gpaw-setups - GPAW setups
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090070 --- Comment #17 from marcindulak marcin.du...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Susi Lehtola from comment #16) (In reply to marcindulak from comment #15) (In reply to Susi Lehtola from comment #14) IIRC the Fedora policy is that if you import from another public repository for Fedora, you can keep the old changelog. Here, it doesn't seem relevant gpaw-setups are in a public repository: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/dtufys/Fedora_19/noarch/ it's the opensuse build system: https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:dtufys Well, if you can call that a repository. It's mainly related to e.g. Dag Wieer's repo, or nowadays rpmfusion. Anyway, this is academic discussion; I just find it much clearer in this case to start the changelog from scratch. If you insist on keeping the old recors, just be sure it's crystal clear which version was packaged for inclusion in Fedora. I'm OK with discarding the old changelog in this case because i think this is the only gpaw-setups.spec existing online (if we ignore your review request). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1090070] Review Request: gpaw-setups - GPAW setups
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090070 marcindulak marcin.du...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from marcindulak marcin.du...@gmail.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gpaw-setups Short Description: Atomic GPAW setups Owners: marcindulak Branches: f19 f20 el6 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092096] Review Request: jortho - A spell checker for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092096 Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com --- Thanks! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jortho Short Description: A spell checker for Java Owners: msimacek mizdebsk msrb Branches: f19 f20 InitialCC: java-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092629] Review Request: jmapviewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092629
--- Comment #3 from Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com ---
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
add %doc Gpl.txt to javadoc sub package
Done
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/share/java/jmapviewer
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/java/jmapviewer
add %dir %{_javadir}/%{name} to main package
Moved it to %{_javadir} with %mvn_file
jmapviewer.src: E: specfile-error mvn_install: invalid option -- 'J'
Didn't realize this isn't available on f19, corrected.
Spec URL: http://msimacek.fedorapeople.org/jmapviewer.spec
SRPM URL: http://msimacek.fedorapeople.org/jmapviewer-1.03-1.fc20.src.rpm
Koji scratch-build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6802082
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092629] Review Request: jmapviewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092629 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added CC||johannes.l...@googlemail.co ||m --- Comment #4 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at --- *** Bug 923960 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 923960] Review Request: JMapViewer - JMapViewer is a java component to integrate an OSM map view into your Java application.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923960 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #10 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1092629 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060419] Review Request: gwakeonlan - A GTK+ utility to awake machines using the Wake on LAN
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060419 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #2 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at --- They work, but fedora-review doesn't like them, due to the missing protocol, I suppose. Spec URL: http://rpm.bebosudo.tk/SPECS/gwakeonlan.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.bebosudo.tk/SRPMS/gwakeonlan-0.6-3.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087812] Review Request: gpaw - A grid-based real-space PAW method DFT code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087812
--- Comment #15 from Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[-]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[?]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
- I'm not sure about the openssh-clients buildrequire.
- You can drop BR: gcc, it's always included.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[!]: Permissions on files are set properly.
- The .so library needs 755 permissions.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane.
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
Rpmlint
---
gpaw.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multigrid - multitude
gpaw.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multigrid - multitude
gpaw.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/_gpaw.so
gpaw.x86_64: W: no-documentation
gpaw.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gpaw-setup
gpaw.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gpaw-mpisim
gpaw.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary
[Bug 1087812] Review Request: gpaw - A grid-based real-space PAW method DFT code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087812
--- Comment #16 from Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi ---
The MPI stuff is OK as well.
I'd ask you to be a little bit more verbose in %files, since free usage of
wildcards can have devastating results. I suggest
%files
%{_bindir}/%{name}*
%{python_sitearch}/%{name}/
%{python_sitearch}/%{name}-%{version}-py*.egg-info
This will also catch if the egg-info isn't produced.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060419] Review Request: gwakeonlan - A GTK+ utility to awake machines using the Wake on LAN
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060419 --- Comment #3 from Alberto Chiusole bebo.s...@gmail.com --- Do you mean the magic packet required by WOL? Here there are the requirements: http://www.muflone.com/gwakeonlan/english/wol_requirements.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060419] Review Request: gwakeonlan - A GTK+ utility to awake machines using the Wake on LAN
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060419
--- Comment #4 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
The build fails due to the xdg module missing.
You can remove -n %{name}-%{version}, because that's the default.
The changelog must hold your real name. You may obfuscate your e-mail address
in a human-readable way, but what you've got now I don't know how to decipher.
Icons placed in the hicolor dir require scriplets:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060419] Review Request: gwakeonlan - A GTK+ utility to awake machines using the Wake on LAN
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060419 --- Comment #5 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at --- No, http was missing in your URLs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1090070] Review Request: gpaw-setups - GPAW setups
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090070 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1090070] Review Request: gpaw-setups - GPAW setups
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090070 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092096] Review Request: jortho - A spell checker for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092096 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091636] Review Request: utf8cpp - A simple, portable and lightweight library for handling UTF-8 encoded strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091636 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091636] Review Request: utf8cpp - A simple, portable and lightweight library for handling UTF-8 encoded strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091636 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092096] Review Request: jortho - A spell checker for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092096 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070702] Review Request: lmdb - memory-mapped key-value database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070702 Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redhat-bugzilla@linuxnetz.d ||e --- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de --- From my point of view the package should be named lmdb as it is upstream name. Only libraries should be liblmdb. The l is for lightning, right? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091479] Review Request: pam-kwallet - PAM module for KWallet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091479 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: pam-kwallet Short Description: PAM module for KWallet Owners: rdieter Branches: f20 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1090070] Review Request: gpaw-setups - GPAW setups
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090070 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1090070] Review Request: gpaw-setups - GPAW setups
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090070 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- gpaw-setups-0.9.11271-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpaw-setups-0.9.11271-2.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1090070] Review Request: gpaw-setups - GPAW setups
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090070 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- gpaw-setups-0.9.11271-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpaw-setups-0.9.11271-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1090070] Review Request: gpaw-setups - GPAW setups
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090070 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- gpaw-setups-0.9.11271-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpaw-setups-0.9.11271-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091479] Review Request: pam-kwallet - PAM module for KWallet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091479 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091479] Review Request: pam-kwallet - PAM module for KWallet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091479 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070702] Review Request: lmdb - memory-mapped key-value database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070702 --- Comment #6 from Howard Chu h...@symas.com --- Right. The main significance is to prevent it getting confused with mdbtools, which is used to manipulate Microsoft Access DB files. As for the test suite - it's really only there for my use, as a developer of LMDB. It's not necessary or intended for anyone else to ever touch the test programs. It's main usefulness is in verifying basic functionality when porting to new CPU architectures, not as a regression test suite. Patches to add a proper regression test with e.g. gcov would certainly be welcome. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060419] Review Request: gwakeonlan - A GTK+ utility to awake machines using the Wake on LAN
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060419 --- Comment #6 from Alberto Chiusole bebo.s...@gmail.com --- Ok, thanks for your tips. I'll work on it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092096] Review Request: jortho - A spell checker for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092096 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- jortho-1.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jortho-1.0-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092096] Review Request: jortho - A spell checker for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092096 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091479] Review Request: pam-kwallet - PAM module for KWallet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091479 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-05-01 10:16:27 --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- imported, thanks. comps updated, pam configs updates submitted for kde-settings(kdm), lightdm, sddm so far. will hit others (like gdm) soon. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092629] Review Request: jmapviewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092629 --- Comment #5 from hannes johannes.l...@googlemail.com --- I just wanted to raise the issue of the bing image in the source. In my previous review request I took care of that by removing the image and the code needing it. I also contacted legal about this. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2012-May/001905.html Just so that you are also aware of the issue. The code I removed and all the steps could still be seen in the src.rpm. http://hannes.fedorapeople.org/JMapViewer-2013.03.22-2.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092096] Review Request: jortho - A spell checker for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092096 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- jortho-1.0-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jortho-1.0-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092629] Review Request: jmapviewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092629 --- Comment #6 from Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com --- Actually, I based the tarball generation script on yours, so there shouldn't be any references to Bing in the SRPM. Thank you for your work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092629] Review Request: jmapviewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092629 --- Comment #7 from hannes johannes.l...@googlemail.com --- Ok, great! Thanks again! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716299] Review Request: clipit - lightweight, fully featured GTK+ clipboard manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716299 Nikos Roussos comzer...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Nikos Roussos comzer...@fedoraproject.org --- Package Change Request == Package Name: clipit New Branches: el6 Owners: comzeradd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #18 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- Orion: Yes, LLVM is going to be a problem. I've updated it manually to 3.4, but I don't know how to make it automatic, and more profoundly there's no guarantee that Julia will work with any newer versions without changes. So it may be better to retain the manual update solution. I'll also have a look at the network access issue. baurthefirst: Thanks, I didn't know about copr, and I wasn't able to use Koji since utf8proc and openlibm are not present there. I'll have a look. Since Julia opens libraries at run time, it may indeed try to acces libopenblas.so rather than libopenblas-r0.2.8.so or the equivalent, and therefore require opneblas-devel. This should probably be fixed uptsream. Meanwhile, I've filed a bundling exception request at https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/427 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093406] New: Review Request: python-junitxml - pyunit extension to output JUnit compatible XML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093406 Bug ID: 1093406 Summary: Review Request: python-junitxml - pyunit extension to output JUnit compatible XML Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: slina...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://slinabery.fedorapeople.org/python-junitxml.spec SRPM URL: http://slinabery.fedorapeople.org/python-junitxml-0.7-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: PyJUnitXML, a pyunit extension to output JUnit compatible XML Fedora Account System Username: slinabery -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093407] New: Review Request: vdr-epg-daemon - A client plugin which provides scraped metadata from EPGD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093407 Bug ID: 1093407 Summary: Review Request: vdr-epg-daemon - A client plugin which provides scraped metadata from EPGD Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mgans...@alice.de QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-epg-daemon.spec SRPM URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/vdr-epg-daemon-0.1.0-4.20140428giteb7f12a.fc20.src.rpm Description: epgd is part of the double team epgd+epg2vdr to effectively retrieve, store and import epg data to vdr. It is designed to handle large amount of data and pictures in a distributed environment with one epg-server and many possible vdr-clients - therefore it relays on mysql. Though it is possible to use epgd alone with mysql it only makes sense to use it as backend to the vdr-plugin epg2vdr. That being said you need to install, setup and configure mysql, epgd and epg2vdr in order to get a working environment. Fedora Account System Username: martinkg rpmlint vdr-epg-daemon-0.1.0-4.20140428giteb7f12a.fc20.x86_64.rpm vdr-epg-daemon.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) metadata - meta data, meta-data, metatarsal vdr-epg-daemon.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backend - backed, back end, back-end vdr-epg-daemon.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary epgd-tool vdr-epg-daemon.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary epgd-showmerge vdr-epg-daemon.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary epgd vdr-epg-daemon.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary epgd-dropall vdr-epg-daemon.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary epgd-ls-channelids 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517
--- Comment #19 from baurthefi...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #18)
Orion: Yes, LLVM is going to be a problem. I've updated it manually to 3.4,
but I don't know how to make it automatic, and more profoundly there's no
guarantee that Julia will work with any newer versions without changes. So
it may be better to retain the manual update solution.
I'll also have a look at the network access issue.
baurthefirst: Thanks, I didn't know about copr, and I wasn't able to use
Koji since utf8proc and openlibm are not present there. I'll have a look.
Since Julia opens libraries at run time, it may indeed try to acces
libopenblas.so rather than libopenblas-r0.2.8.so or the equivalent, and
therefore require opneblas-devel. This should probably be fixed uptsream.
Meanwhile, I've filed a bundling exception request at
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/427
Have you considered setting JULIA_CPU_TARGET to core2? By default it is set to
native, thus causing the issue as I wrote earlier:
Target architecture mismatch. Please delete or regenerate sys.{so,dll,dylib}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093408] New: Review Request: vdr-scraper2vdr - A client plugin which provides scraped metadata from EPGD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093408 Bug ID: 1093408 Summary: Review Request: vdr-scraper2vdr - A client plugin which provides scraped metadata from EPGD Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mgans...@alice.de QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-scraper2vdr.spec SRPM URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/vdr-scraper2vdr-0.1.1-3.20140428git30008b3.fc20.src.rpm Description: Scraper2VDR is a client plugin which provides scraped metadata from EPGD (like general information, posters, banners, fanarts, actor thumbs) to skins and other plugins which display EPG Information. Fedora Account System Username: martinkg rpmlint vdr-scraper2vdr-0.1.1-3.20140428git30008b3.fc20.x86_64.rpm vdr-scraper2vdr.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) metadata - meta data, meta-data, metatarsal vdr-scraper2vdr.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metadata - meta data, meta-data, metatarsal vdr-scraper2vdr.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fanarts - fan arts, fan-arts, farts vdr-scraper2vdr.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/vdr/libvdr-scraper2vdr.so.2.0.0 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #20 from baurthefi...@gmail.com --- I meant, when you compile julia on a newer CPU, its library file /usr/lib64/julia/sys.so may not work on older CPUs. See https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/julia-dev/Eqp0GhZWxME -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093410] New: Review Request: vdr-epg2vdr - A plugin to retrieve EPG data into the Video Disc Recorder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093410 Bug ID: 1093410 Summary: Review Request: vdr-epg2vdr - A plugin to retrieve EPG data into the Video Disc Recorder Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mgans...@alice.de QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-epg2vdr.spec SRPM URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/vdr-epg2vdr-0.1.0-1.20130322git324f392.fc20.src.rpm Description: This plugin is used to retrieve EPG data into the VDR. The EPG data was loaded from a mysql database. Fedora Account System Username: martinkg rpmlint vdr-epg2vdr-0.1.0-1.20130322git324f392.fc20.x86_64.rpm vdr-epg2vdr.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mysql - myself vdr-epg2vdr.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.6.0-1.20130322git324f392 ['0.1.0-1.20130322git324f392.fc20', '0.1.0-1.20130322git324f392'] vdr-epg2vdr.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/vdr/libvdr-epg2vdr.so.2.0.0 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093406] Review Request: python-junitxml - pyunit extension to output JUnit compatible XML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093406 --- Comment #1 from Steve Linabery slina...@redhat.com --- scratch build passes: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6803933 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093406] Review Request: python-junitxml - pyunit extension to output JUnit compatible XML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093406 Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||p...@draigbrady.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|p...@draigbrady.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716299] Review Request: clipit - lightweight, fully featured GTK+ clipboard manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716299 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716299] Review Request: clipit - lightweight, fully featured GTK+ clipboard manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716299 --- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093406] Review Request: python-junitxml - pyunit extension to output JUnit compatible XML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093406
--- Comment #2 from Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com ---
Please use the LGPLv3 licence tag
Please add COPYING file (LGPL3) to %doc
Please remove the Copyright section from the description
Please consider adding a python3 version of the package on Fedora
Please use the standard %{_python2} macros etc.
To support those on RHEL6 add:
# see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Macros
%if 0%{?rhel} 0%{?rhel} = 6
%{!?__python2: %global __python2 /usr/bin/python2}
%{!?python2_sitelib: %global python2_sitelib %(%{__python2} -c from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib()))}
%{!?python2_sitearch: %global python2_sitearch %(%{__python2} -c from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib(1)))}
%endif
Please consider adding a %check if easy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092149] Review Request: dib-utils - Standalone parts of diskimage-builder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092149 --- Comment #6 from Ben Nemec bne...@redhat.com --- Okay, I've updated the spec and srpm: http://fedorapeople.org/~bnemec/dib-utils-0.0.0-1.fc20.src.rpm http://fedorapeople.org/~bnemec/dib-utils.spec I believe that should address the comments so far. I also have a spec update for the diskimage-builder version referenced in the conflicts, but since it removes dib-run-parts it needs to wait for this to be available or diskimage-builder will be broken. That shouldn't be a problem though since the current diskimage-builder rpm works fine, it just can't be installed with dib-utils. Once dib-utils goes in I'll push the diskimage-builder update. os-refresh-config will also need a dep added on this new package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092149] Review Request: dib-utils - Standalone parts of diskimage-builder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092149 --- Comment #7 from Ben Nemec bne...@redhat.com --- For anyone interested in testing the split package, the diskimage-builder-0.1.15 build is available here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6804123 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1090070] Review Request: gpaw-setups - GPAW setups
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090070 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- gpaw-setups-0.9.11271-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1074129] Review Request: perl-Compress-LZF - Extremely light-weight Lempel-Ziv-Free compression
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074129 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Compress-LZF-3.7-1.fc2 |perl-Compress-LZF-3.7-1.el6 |0 | --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Compress-LZF-3.7-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1066029] Review Request: csmock - A mock wrapper for Static Analysis tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066029 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|csmock-1.0.7-1.fc20 |csmock-1.0.7-1.el6 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- csmock-1.0.7-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091636] Review Request: utf8cpp - A simple, portable and lightweight library for handling UTF-8 encoded strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091636 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- utf8cpp-2.3.4-4.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/utf8cpp-2.3.4-4.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091636] Review Request: utf8cpp - A simple, portable and lightweight library for handling UTF-8 encoded strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091636 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091636] Review Request: utf8cpp - A simple, portable and lightweight library for handling UTF-8 encoded strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091636 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- utf8cpp-2.3.4-4.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/utf8cpp-2.3.4-4.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091636] Review Request: utf8cpp - A simple, portable and lightweight library for handling UTF-8 encoded strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091636 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- utf8cpp-2.3.4-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/utf8cpp-2.3.4-4.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1057766] Review Request: clustal-omega - command line tool for multiple sequence alignment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057766 --- Comment #19 from Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com --- Ping! :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093410] Review Request: vdr-epg2vdr - A plugin to retrieve EPG data into the Video Disc Recorder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093410 --- Comment #1 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de --- Spec URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-epg2vdr.spec SRPM URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/vdr-epg2vdr-0.1.0-2.20130322git324f392.fc20.src.rpm don't know how to solve the rpmlint isssue: vdr-epg2vdr.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/vdr/libvdr-epg2vdr.so.2.0.0 %changelog * Fri Apr 25 2014 Martin Gansser marti...@fedoraproject.org - 0.1.0-2.20130322git324f392 - corrected version numbering in %%changelog - added CXXFLAGS - added openssl-devel as requirement - added mariadb-devel as requirement - added libuuid-devel as requirement -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #21 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com --- (In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #18) Orion: Yes, LLVM is going to be a problem. I've updated it manually to 3.4, but I don't know how to make it automatic, and more profoundly there's no guarantee that Julia will work with any newer versions without changes. So it may be better to retain the manual update solution. Well, you're just to going to have to address whatever issues might come up with new LLVM version, so you might as just set it by adding: LLVM_VER=$(llvm-config --version) to commonopts. I wish they would just use cmake or some other build system rather than trying to hack up their own. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093410] Review Request: vdr-epg2vdr - A plugin to retrieve EPG data into the Video Disc Recorder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093410 --- Comment #2 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de --- Spec URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-epg2vdr.spec SRPM URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/vdr-epg2vdr-0.1.0-3.20130322git324f392.fc20.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Apr 25 2014 Martin Gansser marti...@fedoraproject.org - 0.1.0-3.20130322git324f392 - added permission fix to solve unstripped-binary-or-object warning # rpmlint vdr-epg2vdr-0.1.0-3.20130322git324f392.fc20.x86_64.rpm vdr-epg2vdr.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mysql - myself 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. # rpmlint vdr-epg2vdr-debuginfo-0.1.0-3.20130322git324f392.fc20.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093408] Review Request: vdr-scraper2vdr - A client plugin which provides scraped metadata from EPGD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093408 --- Comment #1 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de --- Spec URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-scraper2vdr.spec SRPM URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/vdr-scraper2vdr-0.1.1-4.20140428git30008b3.fc20.src.rpm %changelog * Fri May 01 2014 Martin Gansser marti...@fedoraproject.org - 0.1.1-4.20140428git30008b3 - added permission fix to solve unstripped-binary-or-object warning # rpmlint vdr-scraper2vdr-0.1.1-4.20140428git30008b3.fc20.x86_64.rpm vdr-scraper2vdr.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) metadata - meta data, meta-data, metatarsal vdr-scraper2vdr.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metadata - meta data, meta-data, metatarsal vdr-scraper2vdr.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fanarts - fan arts, fan-arts, farts 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. # rpmlint vdr-scraper2vdr-debuginfo-0.1.1-4.20140428git30008b3.fc20.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1062901] Review Request: openspecfun - Library providing a collection of special mathematical functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062901 --- Comment #10 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- Actually, after fixing openspecfun to build with system openlibm, I realized we can indeed build it without openlibm at all, and only set USE_OPENLIBM=1 when building Julia: since Julia loads openlibm, it's enough to use it even in openspecfun. So I'd say the package is ready, I've uploaded 0.3 to rawhide and I'm going to push the F20 and F19 updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517
--- Comment #22 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
(In reply to baurthefirst from comment #19)
Have you considered setting JULIA_CPU_TARGET to core2? By default it is set
to native, thus causing the issue as I wrote earlier:
Target architecture mismatch. Please delete or regenerate sys.{so,dll,dylib}
Hmm, how does this play with other architectures? 32-bit?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1089500] Review Request: openlibm - High quality system independent, open source libm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089500 Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|1062901 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062901 [Bug 1062901] Review Request: openspecfun - Library providing a collection of special mathematical functions -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1062901] Review Request: openspecfun - Library providing a collection of special mathematical functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062901 Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On|1089500 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089500 [Bug 1089500] Review Request: openlibm - High quality system independent, open source libm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1057766] Review Request: clustal-omega - command line tool for multiple sequence alignment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057766 --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com --- I'm about to head out on vacation, but can do the review when I get back. I'm perfectly happy for anyone else to review sooner if they like. Ping me again late next week? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1057766] Review Request: clustal-omega - command line tool for multiple sequence alignment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057766 --- Comment #21 from Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com --- Hey Kevin, Absolutely no problems either ways. I am in no hurry. I just remembered about this package when I used the clustal yesterday - that's all! :) If some takes it up for review, great. If not, I will ping again next week. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1062901] Review Request: openspecfun - Library providing a collection of special mathematical functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062901 Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- Package Change Request == Package Name: openspecfun New Branches: f19 f20 Owners: nalimilan InitialCC: It seems that the f19 and f20 branches have not been created. From the documentation, I understand I'm not supposed to create them manually from git (I guess they wouldn't be registered correctly then). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #23 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- baurthefirst: Right, I'll fix that too. Orion: Thanks for the LLVM hint. I just have to hope that the situation where Julia does not support a new version of LLVM which is pushed to the current release happens... Regarding the CPU target, indeed core2 is a relatively high requirement. I've filed and issue: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/6715 Do you think it would be reasonable to still require some recent instruction sets, like SSE (I guess this one is OK), SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3?... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1089500] Review Request: openlibm - High quality system independent, open source libm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089500 Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1062901 --- Comment #10 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- Interesting. The float test fails on my 64-bit machine, but also on Koji. But I can actually enable the double test, which is way better than nothing. Spec URL: http://nalimilan.perso.neuf.fr/transfert/openlibm.spec SRPM URL: http://nalimilan.perso.neuf.fr/transfert/openlibm-0.3-5.fc20.src.rpm Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062901 [Bug 1062901] Review Request: openspecfun - Library providing a collection of special mathematical functions -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1062901] Review Request: openspecfun - Library providing a collection of special mathematical functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062901 Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1089500 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089500 [Bug 1089500] Review Request: openlibm - High quality system independent, open source libm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092629] Review Request: jmapviewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092629 --- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- Spec URL: http://msimacek.fedorapeople.org/jmapviewer.spec SRPM URL: http://msimacek.fedorapeople.org/jmapviewer-1.03-1.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092629] Review Request: jmapviewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092629 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #9 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at --- Please bump release numbers on changes and write a changelog entry. It makes reviewing easier. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092629] Review Request: jmapviewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092629 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- a template pom file could be gained by https://adams.cms.waikato.ac.nz/nexus/content/groups/public/org/openstreetmap/jmapviewer/1.0.2/jmapviewer-1.0.2.pom APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #24 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- Orion: How do you reproduce the ENETUNREACH tests failure? Do you need to disable the loopback interface? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #25 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com --- linux-user-chroot --unshare-net / rpmbuild copr builds should reproduce as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092096] Review Request: jortho - A spell checker for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092096 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- jortho-1.0-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058198] Review Request: ghc-rfc5051 - Simple unicode collation as per RFC5051
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058198 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-rfc5051-0.1.0.3-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1057991] Review Request: the_silver_searcher - Super-fast text searching tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057991 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- the_silver_searcher-0.21.0-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
