[Bug 1294331] Review Request: erlang-oauth2 - An Oauth2 implementation for Erlang

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294331

Randy Barlow  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|jcl...@redhat.com   |jer...@jcline.org



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1303649] Review Request: perl-Tie-Sub - Tying a subroutine, function or method to a hash

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303649

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Tie-Sub-1.001-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0f36aa39cf

--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Tie-Sub-1.001-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0f36aa39cf

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1303649] Review Request: perl-Tie-Sub - Tying a subroutine, function or method to a hash

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303649



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Tie-Sub-1.001-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0f36aa39cf

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Tie-Sub-1.001-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0f36aa39cf

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305365] Review Request: concurrentunit - Toolkit for testing multi-threaded and asynchronous applications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305365
Bug 1305365 depends on bug 1305015, which changed state.

Bug 1305015 Summary: Missing groovy-all JAR and depmap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305015

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305237] Review Request: rome-parent - Parent for all ROME projects

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305237
Bug 1305237 depends on bug 1305015, which changed state.

Bug 1305015 Summary: Missing groovy-all JAR and depmap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305015

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1297411] Review Request: pdc-client - Client library and console client for Product Definition Center

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297411



--- Comment #8 from Stanislav Ochotnicky  ---
Good point, forgot to change the URL after the new PDC came up.

New spec/srpm (just applied your patch):
Spec URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/pdc-client.spec
SRPM URL:
http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/pdc-client-0.2.0.2-2.fc22.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305365] Review Request: concurrentunit - Toolkit for testing multi-threaded and asynchronous applications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305365

Raphael Groner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|Trivial |



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277478] Review Request: php-nette-deprecated - APIs and features removed from Nette Framework

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277478

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277478] Review Request: php-nette-deprecated - APIs and features removed from Nette Framework

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277478

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277478] Review Request: php-nette-deprecated - APIs and features removed from Nette Framework

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277478



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-nette-deprecated-2.3.2-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-93cf1ddbfb

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277478] Review Request: php-nette-deprecated - APIs and features removed from Nette Framework

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277478



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-nette-deprecated-2.3.2-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-93cf1ddbfb

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-nette-deprecated-2.3.2-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL
6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-54356eb14f

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277478] Review Request: php-nette-deprecated - APIs and features removed from Nette Framework

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277478



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-nette-deprecated-2.3.2-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL
7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-5163d91411

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277478] Review Request: php-nette-deprecated - APIs and features removed from Nette Framework

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277478



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-nette-deprecated-2.3.2-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL
7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-5163d91411

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-nette-deprecated-2.3.2-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b80cee8936

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305294] Review Request: perl-Parse-Gitignore - Parse .gitignore files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305294



--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
dfateyev's scratch build of perl-Parse-Gitignore-0.02-2.fc23.denf.src.rpm for
rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12903416

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305365] Review Request: concurrentunit - Toolkit for testing multi-threaded and asynchronous applications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305365



--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
raphgro's scratch build of concurrentunit-0.4.2-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12903946

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305263] Review Request: perl-Text-Fuzzy - Partial string matching using edit distances

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305263



--- Comment #5 from Denis Fateyev  ---
Ok, will do. Thanks for the review.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1303649] Review Request: perl-Tie-Sub - Tying a subroutine, function or method to a hash

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303649



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Tie-Sub-1.001-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-9fad327947

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1300698] Review Request: perl-Fuse - Write filesystems in Perl using FUSE

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300698

Petr Šabata  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #4 from Petr Šabata  ---
+# LGPLv2+: Reference from metadata 
+# (GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+): same license as fuse as mention in README
+License:LGPLv2+ and (GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+)

Eh, well, I guess this could be it until upstream responds to rt#111618.  Just
drop the first `+' and the trailing whitespace on the first comment line.

The rest was addressed, too.  Approving.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305294] Review Request: perl-Parse-Gitignore - Parse .gitignore files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305294



--- Comment #4 from Denis Fateyev  ---
(In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #1)
> * You could drop the findutils builddep by substituting `-exec rm -f {} \;'
>   with `-delete'.

I just keeping it for a while for package spec uniformity..
Seems, I need to adjust and improve my Perl spec template.

> * The actual required version of Test::More is 0.88 (as done_testing is
> called).
>   That's just nitpicking; upstream doesn't declare it either :)

Added. (the same comment applied here)

> * Require the versioned Path::Tiny and filter out the underspecified
>   autogenerated dependency.

Added. (also shouldn't be a problem with RHBZ bug 1305293)

Updated version:
Spec: http://www.fateyev.com/RPMS/Fedora22/perl-Parse-Gitignore.spec
SRPM:
http://www.fateyev.com/RPMS/Fedora22/perl-Parse-Gitignore-0.02-1.fc24.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305294] Review Request: perl-Parse-Gitignore - Parse .gitignore files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305294

Petr Šabata  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #5 from Petr Šabata  ---
All good.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1280422] Review Request: rpg - RPM Package Generator

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422



--- Comment #12 from Ranjan Maitra  ---
(In reply to Jan Silhan from comment #11)
> I am sorry for delay. Rawhide build fixed and I am providing new links. I am
> not sure whether the `-b` option in fedora-review will work. Link to spec in
> comment 2 cannot be invalidated.
> 
> Spec URL:
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rh-lab-q/rpg/
> 263cc773c25e7ff51271a7b6c4f921aa82de8279/rpg.spec
> 
> SRPM URL:
> https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/nightly/rpg/fedora-rawhide-
> x86_64/00157917-rpg/rpg-0.0.5-1.git.4.263cc77.fc24.src.rpm
> 

Does this even build? As per fedora-review, using command:

fedora-review -m  fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1280422

.
INFO: Downloading .spec and .srpm files
INFO: No upstream for (Source0): rpg-0.0.5.tar.gz
INFO: Running checks and generating report

ERROR:
Exception(/home/mock/Downloads/mock/1280422-rpg/srpm/rpg-0.0.5-1.git.4.263cc77.fc24.src.rpm)
Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 0 minutes 0 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /home/mock/Downloads/mock/1280422-rpg/results
ERROR: Command failed. See logs for output.

Please try fedora-review on your package before uploading to save everyone some
 time.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305263] Review Request: perl-Text-Fuzzy - Partial string matching using edit distances

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305263



--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
dfateyev's scratch build of perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.24-2.fc23.denf.src.rpm for
rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12903941

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1294331] Review Request: erlang-oauth2 - An Oauth2 implementation for Erlang

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294331

Randy Barlow  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|rbar...@redhat.com  |jcl...@redhat.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1303649] Review Request: perl-Tie-Sub - Tying a subroutine, function or method to a hash

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303649

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Tie-Sub-1.001-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0f36aa39cf

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1303649] Review Request: perl-Tie-Sub - Tying a subroutine, function or method to a hash

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303649



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Tie-Sub-1.001-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-9fad327947

--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Tie-Sub-1.001-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0f36aa39cf

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292412] Review Request: nodejs-es6-symbol - ECMAScript 6 Symbol polyfill

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292412



--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-es6-symbol-3.0.2-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1294852] Review Request: kf5-libksane - SANE Library interface for KDE

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294852

Pier Luigi Fiorini  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(pierluigi.fiorini |
   |@gmail.com) |



--- Comment #3 from Pier Luigi Fiorini  ---
Yes I will do it tonight. Sorry for the delay.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1270317] Review Request: lz4-java - LZ4 compression for Java

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317

Tomas Repik  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)



--- Comment #3 from Tomas Repik  ---
*** Bug 1303866 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1270317] Review Request: lz4-java - LZ4 compression for Java

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305501] Review Request: yarok - Lightweight, beautiful music player

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305501

Raphael Groner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||928937 (qt-reviews)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928937
[Bug 928937] Qt-related package review tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305294] Review Request: perl-Parse-Gitignore - Parse .gitignore files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305294

Petr Šabata  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||psab...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292295] Review Request: nodejs-is-windows - Returns true if the platform is windows

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292295



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-is-windows-0.1.0-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1286867] Review Request: python-novaclient-os-virtual-interfaces - Adds Virtual Interfaces support to python-novaclient

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286867



--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-novaclient-os-virtual-interfaces-0.19-1.fc22 has been pushed to the
Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1264653] Review Request: php-guzzlehttp-guzzle6 - PHP HTTP client

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264653



--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-guzzlehttp-guzzle6-6.1.1-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292232] Review Request: nodejs-delegates - Delegate methods and accessors to another property

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292232



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-delegates-1.0.0-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] New: Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496

Bug ID: 1305496
   Summary: Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range
Histogram
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: tre...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/HdrHistogram.spec
SRPM URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/HdrHistogram-2.1.8-1.fc23.src.rpm

Description: HdrHistogram supports the recording and analyzing sampled data
value counts across a configurable integer value range with configurable value
precision within the range. Value precision is expressed as the number of
significant digits in the value recording, and provides control over value
quantization behavior across the value range and the subsequent value
resolution at any given level.

Fedora Account System Username: trepik

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305261] Review Request: perl-Sereal - Fast, compact, powerful binary (de-)serialization

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305261

Petr Šabata  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||psab...@redhat.com
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Last Closed||2016-02-08 04:43:40



--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata  ---
This is already in Fedora.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1267198 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1267198] Review Request: perl-Sereal - Fast, compact, powerful binary (de-)serialization

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267198

Petr Šabata  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||de...@fateyev.com



--- Comment #5 from Petr Šabata  ---
*** Bug 1305261 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1304774] Review Request: perl-Function-Parameters - Subroutine definitions with parameter lists

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304774

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||jples...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305294] Review Request: perl-Parse-Gitignore - Parse .gitignore files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305294



--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata  ---
* You could drop the findutils builddep by substituting `-exec rm -f {} \;'
  with `-delete'.

* The actual required version of Test::More is 0.88 (as done_testing is
called).
  That's just nitpicking; upstream doesn't declare it either :)

* Require the versioned Path::Tiny and filter out the underspecified
  autogenerated dependency.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305294] Review Request: perl-Parse-Gitignore - Parse .gitignore files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305294



--- Comment #2 from Petr Šabata  ---
(In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #1)
> * You could drop the findutils builddep by substituting `-exec rm -f {} \;'
>   with `-delete'.

Erm, coreutils, of course.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1301129] Review Request: hstr - Suggest box like shell history completion

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301129

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|domi...@greysector.net
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #5 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  ---
Minor nitpicks:
1. Please use hstr instead of %{name}, it's shorter and more readable.
2. Drop 
   rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
   from %install

The above can be fixed upon import. Package APPROVED.

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Apache (v2.0)", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated",
 "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 26 files have unknown license.
 Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/rathann/build/review/1301129-hstr/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = 

[Bug 1305502] New: Review Request: python-adal - ADAL for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305502

Bug ID: 1305502
   Summary: Review Request: python-adal - ADAL for Python
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: pikachu.2...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-adal/python-adal.spec
SRPM URL:
https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-adal/python-adal-0.1.0-1.fc23.src.rpm
Description: The ADAL for Python library makes it easy for python applications
to authenticate to AAD in order to access AAD protected web resources.
Fedora Account System Username: melmorabity

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1304522] Review Request: python-pg8000 - Pure Python PostgreSQL Driver

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304522



--- Comment #7 from Christian Dersch  ---
Review done, already looks fine so far :) But I want to know why postgresql is
not a requirement but only an "Suggests". Is there any functionality without a
postgresql installation?


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "BSD (3 clause)", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated".
 36 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/review/1304522-python-pg8000/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages,
 /usr/lib/python3.5
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.5/site-
 packages, /usr/lib/python3.5
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[?]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.

===> Package suggests postgresql, not requiring it. Will package do anything
useful without postgresql?

[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 768000 bytes in 38 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[?]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).

===> See comment @postgresql above

[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
 python2-pg8000 , python3-pg8000 , python-pg8000-docs
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not 

[Bug 1304522] Review Request: python-pg8000 - Pure Python PostgreSQL Driver

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304522

Christian Dersch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305263] Review Request: perl-Text-Fuzzy - Partial string matching using edit distances

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305263



--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata  ---
* Missing builddeps: gcc, perl-devel

* I'm not sure $LDFLAGS contains anything; consider using %{?__global_ldflags}.

* Consider packaging the examples directory as %doc.

* Again, you could drop the coreutils build dep if you modify the find calls.

* And again, this module also technically requires Test::More 0.88+.  Don't
  worry about it; I'm just mentioning it for completeness :)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1300005] Review Request: fleet-commander-client - Profile data retriever for Fleet Commander client hosts

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=135



--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
aruiz's scratch build of fleet-commander-client-0.7.0-2.fc23.src.rpm for f24
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12901866

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1301129] Review Request: hstr - Suggest box like shell history completion

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301129

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |



--- Comment #6 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  ---
I am also sponsoring you into the packager group based on your contributions so
far. Welcome aboard and don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305501] New: Review Request: yarok - Lightweight, beautiful music player

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305501

Bug ID: 1305501
   Summary: Review Request: yarok - Lightweight, beautiful music
player
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: projects...@smart.ms
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/qt/yarok/yarock.spec
SRPM URL:
https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/qt/yarok/yarock-1.1.5-3.fc23.src.rpm
Description: Lightweight, beautiful music player 
Fedora Account System Username: raphgro

Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12901925

Note: This request is to unretire yarok in rawhide.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305263] Review Request: perl-Text-Fuzzy - Partial string matching using edit distances

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305263

Petr Šabata  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||psab...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305266] Review Request: perl-CBOR-XS - Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR, RFC7049)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305266

Petr Šabata  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||psab...@redhat.com
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Last Closed||2016-02-08 05:04:03



--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata  ---
This is already in Fedora.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1267179 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1267179] Review Request: perl-CBOR-XS - Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267179

Petr Šabata  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||de...@fateyev.com



--- Comment #6 from Petr Šabata  ---
*** Bug 1305266 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 988102] Review Request: perl-DBD-Sybase - An interface for perl to connect with Sybase and MSSQL databases

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988102

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?



--- Comment #24 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  ---
If anyone is still interested in having this in Fedora, please post current
spec and SRPM links.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1297852] Review Request: python-azure-sdk - Microsoft Azure SDK for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297852



--- Comment #1 from Mohamed El Morabity  ---
Update to 1.0.3:
Spec URL:
https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-azure-sdk/python-azure-sdk.spec
SRPM URL:
https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-azure-sdk/python-azure-sdk-1.0.3-1.fc23.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1159091] Review Request: openra - Libre/Free Real Time Strategy project [+Tracker to unbundle all dependencies]

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159091

Raphael Groner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1305303




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305303
[Bug 1305303] newtonsoft-json-8.0.2 is available
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1303866] Review Request: lz4-java - LZ4 compression for Java

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303866

Tomas Repik  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Last Closed||2016-02-08 04:39:58



--- Comment #3 from Tomas Repik  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1270317 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mic...@michel-slm.name
  Flags||needinfo?(michel@michel-slm
   ||.name)



--- Comment #31 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek  ---
Michel, what are your plans with this?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305726] New: Review Request: nodejs-is-extendable - True if a value is array, regexp, plain object, function or date

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305726

Bug ID: 1305726
   Summary: Review Request: nodejs-is-extendable - True if a value
is array, regexp, plain object, function or date
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-is-extendable/nodejs-is-extendable.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-is-extendable/nodejs-is-extendable-0.1.1-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: Returns true if a value is any of the object types: array, regexp,
plain object, function or date. This is useful for determining if a value can
be extended, e.g. "can the value have keys?"
Fedora Account System Username: jsmith

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305726] Review Request: nodejs-is-extendable - True if a value is array, regexp, plain object, function or date

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305726

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806
[Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305737] New: Review Request: reprepro - Tool to handle local repositories of Debian packages

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305737

Bug ID: 1305737
   Summary: Review Request: reprepro - Tool to handle local
repositories of Debian packages
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: ktdre...@ktdreyer.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/ktdreyer/public_git/reprepro.git/plain/reprepro.spec
SRPM URL:
https://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/reprepro-4.17.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: reprepro is a tool to manage a repository of Debian packages
(.deb). It stores files either being injected manually or downloaded from some
other repository (partially) mirrored into one pool/ hierarchy.  Managed
packages and files are stored in a Berkeley DB, so no database server is
needed. Checking signatures of mirrored repositories and creating signatures of
the generated Package indexes is supported.
Fedora Account System Username: ktdreyer

Rawhide (F24) scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12912136

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1289726] Review Request: apache-commons-weaver - Apache Commons Weaver

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289726



--- Comment #12 from Ville Skyttä  ---
I see the upstream issue report has not yet been amended with information that
the failures are caused by swap of the xbean stuff. Do you plan to let them
know and ask for help, or what's the plan with getting these things fixed?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1303569] Review Request: uflash - An utility to flash Python onto the BBC micro:bit

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303569



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
uflash-0.9.18b0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-4f2a8965bb

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1303569] Review Request: uflash - An utility to flash Python onto the BBC micro:bit

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303569

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1149176] Review Request: vdsm-jsonrpc-java - jsonrpc communication lib for ovirt

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176

Douglas Schilling Landgraf  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dougsl...@redhat.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305333] Review Request: R-highlight - R Syntax Highlighter

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305333

Mukundan Ragavan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nonamed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305336] Review Request: R-RInside - C++ Classes to Embed R in C++ Applications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305336

Mukundan Ragavan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nonamed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305335] Review Request: R-Rcpp - Seamless R and C++ Integration

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305335

Mukundan Ragavan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nonamed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305334] Review Request: R-inline - Functions to Inline C, C++, Fortran Function Calls from R

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334

Mukundan Ragavan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nonamed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305333] Review Request: R-highlight - R Syntax Highlighter

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305333

Mukundan Ragavan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1294852] Review Request: kf5-libksane - SANE Library interface for KDE

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294852

Mattia Verga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mattia.ve...@tiscali.it



--- Comment #5 from Mattia Verga  ---
Pier Luigi, I don't think this way of conducting reviews are acceptable. You do
them in a too simplified way.

You should follow the entire checklist on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines?rd=Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
or you can use fedora-review tool to automate that.

For example, in this review the .src.rpm file refers to libksane-15.12.0 while
the .spec file is for libksane-15.12.1 and using fedora-review the check fails.

I know Rex is a "trusted" packager, but for the future please make reviews with
better quality.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1297411] Review Request: pdc-client - Client library and console client for Product Definition Center

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297411



--- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
ralph's scratch build of pdc-client-0.2.0.2-2.fc23.src.rpm for epel7-candidate
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12902422

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1063039] Review Request: rubygem-em-http-request - EventMachine based, async HTTP Request client

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063039

Miroslav Suchý  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(niteshnarayan@fed |
   |oraproject.org) |



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1009742] Review Request: perl-Term-Menu - print an interactive menu

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009742

Miroslav Suchý  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
  Flags|needinfo?(chjoh...@gmail.co |
   |m)  |
Last Closed||2016-02-08 08:57:33



--- Comment #3 from Miroslav Suchý  ---
No response. Closing as dead review. If you ever want to continue, please
resubmit.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449
[Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter
response should be blocking this bug.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1010557] Review Request: numix-themes - Numix themes for Gnome, Xfce and Openbox

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010557

Miroslav Suchý  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
  Flags|needinfo?(satyajit.happy@gm |
   |ail.com)|
Last Closed||2016-02-08 08:57:09



--- Comment #25 from Miroslav Suchý  ---
No response. Closing as dead review. If you ever want to continue, please
resubmit.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449
[Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter
response should be blocking this bug.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 885357] Review Request: OpenShadingLanguage - Shader language libraries and compiler

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885357

Miroslav Suchý  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
  Flags|needinfo?(d...@trollwerks.or |
   |g)  |
Last Closed||2016-02-08 09:06:02



--- Comment #10 from Miroslav Suchý  ---
No response. Closing as dead review. If you ever want to continue, please
resubmit.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449
[Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter
response should be blocking this bug.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305266] Review Request: perl-CBOR-XS - Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR, RFC7049)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305266



--- Comment #3 from Petr Šabata  ---
Not me personally.  I suggest asking the primary maintainer, Petr Písař.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305261] Review Request: perl-Sereal - Fast, compact, powerful binary (de-)serialization

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305261

Denis Fateyev  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ppi...@redhat.com
  Flags||needinfo?(ppi...@redhat.com
   ||)



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1298165] Review Request: golang-github-hashicorp-go-memdb - Golang in-memory database built on immutable radix trees

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298165



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-hashicorp-go-memdb-0-0.2.git9ea975b.fc23 has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-4af61f63fd

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1298165] Review Request: golang-github-hashicorp-go-memdb - Golang in-memory database built on immutable radix trees

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298165



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-hashicorp-go-memdb-0-0.2.git9ea975b.fc23 has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-4af61f63fd

--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-hashicorp-go-memdb-0-0.2.git9ea975b.fc22 has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b5b9dcba62

--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-hashicorp-go-memdb-0-0.2.git9ea975b.fc23 has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-4af61f63fd

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1301129] Review Request: hstr - Suggest box like shell history completion

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301129

Filip Szymański  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also|https://bugzilla.redhat.com |
   |/show_bug.cgi?id=1281313|



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305263] Review Request: perl-Text-Fuzzy - Partial string matching using edit distances

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305263



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
dfateyev's scratch build of perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.24-2.fc23.denf.src.rpm for
rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12903164

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1167219] apachebuddy - Tool for make some recommendations on tuning your Apache

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167219

Miroslav Suchý  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449
[Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter
response should be blocking this bug.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1167219] apachebuddy - Tool for make some recommendations on tuning your Apache

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167219

Miroslav Suchý  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171624] Review Request: statismo - C++ Framework for building Statistical Image And Shape Models

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171624

Miroslav Suchý  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
  Flags|needinfo?(arnaudgelas@gmail |
   |.com)   |
Last Closed||2016-02-08 08:46:33



--- Comment #17 from Miroslav Suchý  ---
No response. Closing as dead review. If you ever want to continue, please
resubmit.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449
[Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter
response should be blocking this bug.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 951812] Review Request: canto-curses - Client portion of canto RSS reader.

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951812

Miroslav Suchý  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
  Flags|needinfo?(walsh...@gmail.co |
   |m)  |
   |needinfo?(walsh...@gmail.co |
   |m)  |
Last Closed||2016-02-08 09:05:24



--- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchý  ---
No response. Closing as dead review. If you ever want to continue, please
resubmit.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449
[Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter
response should be blocking this bug.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1304581] Review Request: nodejs-repeat-string - Repeat the given string n times

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304581



--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-repeat-string

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1304967] Review Request: perl-Tie-Hash-Method - Tied hash with specific methods overridden by callbacks

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304967

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||jples...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1304900] Review Request: nodejs-file-sync-cmp - Synchronous file comparison

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304900



--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-file-sync-cmp

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1294842] Review Request: kf5-libkdcraw - A C++ interface around LibRaw library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294842



--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/kf5-libkdcraw

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1294331] Review Request: erlang-oauth2 - An Oauth2 implementation for Erlang

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294331

Jeremy Cline  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|jer...@jcline.org   |rbar...@redhat.com
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+
   |needinfo?(jer...@jcline.org |
   |)   |



--- Comment #17 from Jeremy Cline  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 3 files have
 unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/jcline/devel
 /fedora-review/1294331-erlang-oauth2/licensecheck.txt
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
 justified.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: 

[Bug 1299146] Review Request: python-epub - Python library for reading EPUB files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299146

Filip Szymański  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also|https://bugzilla.redhat.com |
   |/show_bug.cgi?id=1301129|
 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |



--- Comment #2 from Filip Szymański  ---
My Fedora 'packager' membership has been sponsored.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1301129] Review Request: hstr - Suggest box like shell history completion

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301129

Filip Szymański  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also|https://bugzilla.redhat.com |
   |/show_bug.cgi?id=1299146|



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1303649] Review Request: perl-Tie-Sub - Tying a subroutine, function or method to a hash

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303649



--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Tie-Sub

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100



--- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/tarantool

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305263] Review Request: perl-Text-Fuzzy - Partial string matching using edit distances

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305263



--- Comment #3 from Denis Fateyev  ---
(In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #1)
> * Missing builddeps: gcc, perl-devel

Added.

> * I'm not sure $LDFLAGS contains anything; consider using
> %{?__global_ldflags}.

In RHEL7 it contains not much though:
  # rpm -E '%{?__global_ldflags}'
  -Wl,-z,relro

Although the changed version should fit everything:
  export LDFLAGS="%{?__global_ldflags} -Wl,-z,now -Wl,--as-needed"

> * Consider packaging the examples directory as %doc.

Added.

> * And again, this module also technically requires Test::More 0.88+.  Don't
>   worry about it; I'm just mentioning it for completeness :)

Well, since epel7 has 0.98 (and Fedoras even newer) I initially dropped it; but
returned back for now.

Updated version:
Spec: http://www.fateyev.com/RPMS/Fedora22/perl-Text-Fuzzy.spec
SRPM: http://www.fateyev.com/RPMS/Fedora22/perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.24-2.fc24.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1160671] Review Request: seafile - Cloud storage system

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671



--- Comment #6 from Nikos Roussos  ---
Update to 5.0.5

SPEC: https://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/specs/seafile.spec
SRPM: https://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/srpms/seafile-5.0.5-1.fc23.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1206879] Review Request: golang-github-eknkc-amber - Amber is an elegant templating engine for Go Programming Language It is inspired from HAML and Jade

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206879



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
jchaloup's scratch build of go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz for
cli-build/1454938967.533693.wYGVMBzT/go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz and f22-candidate
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12902531

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1246524] Review Request: golang-github-remyoudompheng-bigfft - Big integer multiplication library for Go using FFT

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246524



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
jchaloup's scratch build of go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz for
cli-build/1454938967.533693.wYGVMBzT/go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz and f22-candidate
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12902531

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1297537] Review Request: golang-github-google-go-github - Go library for accessing the GitHub API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297537



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
jchaloup's scratch build of go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz for
cli-build/1454938967.533693.wYGVMBzT/go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz and f22-candidate
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12902531

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1301565] Review Request: golang-github-jacobsa-oglematchers - Set of matchers for Go (inspired by Google Test for C++ and Google JS Test)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301565



--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
jchaloup's scratch build of go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz for
cli-build/1454938967.533693.wYGVMBzT/go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz and f22-candidate
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12902531

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review