[Bug 1428202] Review Request: sirikali - GUI front end to encfs,cryfs, gocryptfs and securefs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1428202 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||BuildBlocker Depends On||1384023 --- Comment #3 from Raphael Groner --- This request is stalled for now. ecryptfs-utils (dependency of ecryptfs-simple) is currently FTBFS. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384023 [Bug 1384023] ecryptfs-utils-111-2.fc25 FTBFS: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type 'EVP_PKEY {aka struct evp_pkey_st}' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1178673] Please package ecryptfs-utils for EPEL7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178673 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1384023 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384023 [Bug 1384023] ecryptfs-utils-111-2.fc25 FTBFS: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type 'EVP_PKEY {aka struct evp_pkey_st}' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1427185] Review Request: zypper - Command line package manager from SUSE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427185 --- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa --- I think I've fixed up this... Spec URL: http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/zypper.spec SRPM URL: http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/zypper-1.13.21-1.fc25.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1427182] Review Request: libzypp - A package management library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427182 --- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa --- I think I've fixed up this: Spec URL: http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/libzypp.spec SRPM URL: http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/libzypp-16.6.1-1.fc25.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1437036] Review Request: apache-logging-parent - Parent pom for Apache Logging Services projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437036 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: === - Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink) Note: No javadoc subpackage present See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Javadoc_installation IGNORE - Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc subpackage Note: No javadoc subpackage present. Note: Javadocs are optional for Fedora versions >= 21 See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Javadoc_installation IGNORE = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 2 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1437036-apache-logging-parent/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Java: [x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build [x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It is pulled in by maven-local Maven: [x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including metadata) even when building with ant [x]: POM files have correct Maven mapping [x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging [x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used [x]: Packages DO NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage- utils for %update_maven_depmap macro [x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun [x]: Packages use .mfiles file list instead o
[Bug 1437036] Review Request: apache-logging-parent - Parent pom for Apache Logging Services projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437036 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1402445] Review Request: myman - text mode videogame
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402445 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- myman-0.7.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1428926] Review Request: php-justinrainbow-json-schema5 - A library to validate a json schema
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1428926 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- php-justinrainbow-json-schema5-5.2.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1402445] Review Request: myman - text mode videogame
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402445 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- myman-0.7.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1428926] Review Request: php-justinrainbow-json-schema5 - A library to validate a json schema
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1428926 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2017-03-31 19:47:50 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- php-justinrainbow-json-schema5-5.2.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1438090] Review Request: GetIt - Application to send HTTP requests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438090 Bart Kessels changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1438090] New: Review Request: GetIt - Application to send HTTP requests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438090 Bug ID: 1438090 Summary: Review Request: GetIt - Application to send HTTP requests Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: bartkess...@outlook.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bartkessels/getit/master/getit.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/bartkessels/getit/blob/master/GetIt-1.1-1.fc25.src.rpm?raw=true SRPM URL: https://github.com/bartkessels/getit/blob/master/GetIt-1.1-1.fc26.src.rpm?raw=true Description: Application to send HTTP requests to API's. Has the ability to send form-data, files, headers and authentication (basic auth and digest auth) Fedora Account System Username: bartkessels This the first package I've ever created, so if anyone wants to help improve please feel free to do so! Since I'm also the developer of the application the bugs reported will be fixed as fast as possible. The source of the application: https://github.com/bartkessels/getit The application has been tested on the koji build system (for both Fedora 25 and Fedora 26) and the results can be found here: Fedora 25: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18703853 Fedora 26: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18703954 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1437471] Review Request: golang-github-klauspost-reedsolomon - Reed-Solomon Erasure Coding in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437471 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1438089 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438089 [Bug 1438089] Review Request: golang-github-xtaci-kcp-go - Production-Grade Reliable-UDP Library for golang -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1438089] Review Request: golang-github-xtaci-kcp-go - Production-Grade Reliable-UDP Library for golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438089 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1427634 Depends On||1437471 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427634 [Bug 1427634] Review Request: syncthing - Continuous File Synchronization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437471 [Bug 1437471] Review Request: golang-github-klauspost-reedsolomon - Reed-Solomon Erasure Coding in Go -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1427634] Review Request: syncthing - Continuous File Synchronization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427634 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1438089 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438089 [Bug 1438089] Review Request: golang-github-xtaci-kcp-go - Production-Grade Reliable-UDP Library for golang -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1438089] New: Review Request: golang-github-xtaci-kcp-go - Production-Grade Reliable-UDP Library for golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438089 Bug ID: 1438089 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-xtaci-kcp-go - Production-Grade Reliable-UDP Library for golang Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/golang-github-xtaci-kcp-go.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/golang-github-xtaci-kcp-go-3.13-1.fc25.src.rpm Description: Production-Grade Reliable-UDP Library for golang Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe I can't provide a koji scratch build yet, since some dependencies are not yet available on fedora (marked as blocker bugs). With local builds (present dependencies) I had to disable tests, since they hit "too many open files" errors in mock chroots, where I can't set "ulimit -n 102400" - or something like that. This go package is one of the new dependencies of syncthing 0.14.25. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1432955] Review Request: lld - The LLVM linker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432955 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Igor Gnatenko --- > %{_libdir}/*.so > %{_libdir}/*.so.* Be more precise :) Anyway, nothing I can complain about ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1367825] Review Request: snapd - The snapd and snap tools enable systems to work with .snap files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367825 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System --- snapd-glib-1.9-2.fc24 snapd-2.23.6-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ce0fdd87a4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1390616] Review Request: snapd-glib - Library providing a GLib interface to snapd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390616 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- snapd-glib-1.9-2.fc24 snapd-2.23.6-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ce0fdd87a4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1390616] Review Request: snapd-glib - Library providing a GLib interface to snapd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390616 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- snapd-glib-1.9-2.fc25 snapd-2.23.6-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-37a7331620 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 878188] Review Request: qt5-qtbase - Qt5 - QtBase components
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188 Kevin Kofler changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||qt5-qtbase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1051152] Review Request: python-qt5 - Python bindings for Qt5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051152 Kevin Kofler changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||python-qt5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1367825] Review Request: snapd - The snapd and snap tools enable systems to work with .snap files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367825 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System --- snapd-glib-1.9-2.fc25 snapd-2.23.6-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-37a7331620 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1367825] Review Request: snapd - The snapd and snap tools enable systems to work with .snap files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367825 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1367825] Review Request: snapd - The snapd and snap tools enable systems to work with .snap files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367825 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System --- snapd-2.23.6-1.fc26 snapd-glib-1.9-2.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-261aa8c9f4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1390616] Review Request: snapd-glib - Library providing a GLib interface to snapd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390616 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- snapd-2.23.6-1.fc26 snapd-glib-1.9-2.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-261aa8c9f4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1369560] Review Request: snapd-xdg-open - Bridge allowing (untrusted) snap applications to use xdg-open
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369560 --- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa --- @Simon: Please open a new review request and close this one as a duplicate of it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 878188] Review Request: qt5-qtbase - Qt5 - QtBase components
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||qt5-qtbase-review --- Comment #62 from Rex Dieter --- It is possible, but not in some circumstances. That said, I prefer for the packages I maintain to keep these aliases in place, it is how *I* find their original reviews. I'll consider a different workflow in the future, maybe adopting something like alias "pkg_review" (assuming alias length limits allow). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 878188] Review Request: qt5-qtbase - Qt5 - QtBase components
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||projects...@smart.ms Alias|qt5-qtbase | --- Comment #61 from Raphael Groner --- Removing alias, otherwise it's not possible to search for bugs related to this component. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1051152] Review Request: python-qt5 - Python bindings for Qt5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051152 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||projects...@smart.ms Alias|python-qt5 | --- Comment #20 from Raphael Groner --- Removing alias, otherwise it's not possible to search for bugs related to this component. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1369560] Review Request: snapd-xdg-open - Bridge allowing (untrusted) snap applications to use xdg-open
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369560 Simon Fels changed: What|Removed |Added CC||morp...@gravedo.de --- Comment #4 from Simon Fels --- I've updated the spec file and produced a new SRPM with all necessary changes to fit Neals review comments. You can find the new files at * https://mm.gravedo.de/files/snapd-xdg-open.spec * https://mm.gravedo.de/files/snapd-xdg-open-0.0.0-0.1.git6fed357.fc25.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1369560] Review Request: snapd-xdg-open - Bridge allowing (untrusted) snap applications to use xdg-open
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369560 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Assignee|ngomp...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa --- No response in months, marking as DEADREVIEW. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1437986] New: Review Request: python-pyaes - Pure-Python implementation of AES block-cipher and common modes of operation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437986 Bug ID: 1437986 Summary: Review Request: python-pyaes - Pure-Python implementation of AES block-cipher and common modes of operation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: lemen...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://peter.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-pyaes.spec SRPM URL: https://peter.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-pyaes-1.6.0-1.fc25.src.rpm Description: A pure-Python implmentation of the AES block cipher algorithm and the common modes of operation (CBC, CFB, CTR, ECB and OFB). Fedora Account System Username: peter Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18698657 This package is a requirement for Electrum 2.8.0 and later and Electrum-LTC (not yet packaged). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1437937] Review Request: libva-utils - Tools for VAAPI ( including vainfo)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437937 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1437885 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437885 [Bug 1437885] libva-1.8.0 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1437937] Review Request: libva-utils - Tools for VAAPI ( including vainfo)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437937 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- This package is a split from upstream libva source archive. The matching libva version is already commited in git, but not built. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1437937] New: Review Request: libva-utils - Tools for VAAPI ( including vainfo)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437937 Bug ID: 1437937 Summary: Review Request: libva-utils - Tools for VAAPI (including vainfo) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: kwiz...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/libva-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/libva-utils-1.8.0-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: Tools for VAAPI (including vainfo) Fedora Account System Username: kwizart Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18697594 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1411239] Review Request: python-sphinx-issues - Sphinx extension for linking to your project' s issue tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411239 Pavel Cahyna changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? ||needinfo?(ignatenko@redhat. ||com) --- Comment #1 from Pavel Cahyna --- List of issues == Minor issues only. - According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios : "In addition, the package must contain a comment explaining the multiple licensing breakdown. The actual implementation of this is left to the maintainer. (...)" NOTICE says "sphinx-issues includes code adapted from other libraries. Their licenses are included here." but does not say to which code it applies. Please document it. - There is already a 0.3.1 release available. - In my understanding, the %{py2_dist} and %{py3_dist} macros could be optionally used for dependencies, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Requires_and_BuildRequires_with_standardized_names Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "BSD (2 clause)", "Unknown or generated". 10 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/pcahyna/fedora-packaging/reviews/1411239-python-sphinx- issues/licensecheck.txt [-]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [-]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via
[Bug 1437851] Review Request: modularity-testing-framework - Framework for writing tests for modules and containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437851 --- Comment #2 from Petr Hracek --- Spec URL: https://phracek.fedorapeople.org/modularity-testing-framework.spec SRPM URL: https://phracek.fedorapeople.org/modularity-testing-framework-0.2.3-1.fc25.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1437851] Review Request: modularity-testing-framework - Framework for writing tests for modules and containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437851 Jan Ščotka changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1437851] Review Request: modularity-testing-framework - Framework for writing tests for modules and containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437851 --- Comment #1 from Jan Ščotka --- This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla: - Add issues you find to the list of issues on top. If there isn't such a list, create one. - Add your own remarks to the template checks. - Add new lines marked [!] or [?] when you discover new things not listed by fedora-review. - Change or remove any text in the template which is plain wrong. In this case you could also file a bug against fedora-review - Remove the "[ ] Manual check required", you will not have any such lines in what you paste. - Remove attachments which you deem not really useful (the rpmlint ones are mandatory, though) - Remove this text Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 72 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/jscotka/review/1437851-modularity-testing- framework/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [?]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [-]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep = SHOULD items = Generic: [!]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag Note: Could not download Source0: https://pagure.io/modularity- testing-framework/modularity-testing-framework/0.2.1.tar.gz See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Tags [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the pac
[Bug 1375986] Review Request: golang-github-klauspost-cpuid - CPU feature identification for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375986 --- Comment #8 from Fabio Valentini --- Additionally, a koji scratch build for rawhide would be nice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1375986] Review Request: golang-github-klauspost-cpuid - CPU feature identification for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375986 --- Comment #7 from Fabio Valentini --- It works now, thanks. Suggestions for improvements: 1) Since you are packaging version 1.0, you should set > Version: 1.0 > Release: 1%{?dist} and correct it the changelog entry too (1.0-1). 2) You can drop the empty %if-endif blocks at lines 94, 86 and 68. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1437851] Review Request: modularity-testing-framework - Framework for writing tests for modules and containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437851 Jan Ščotka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsco...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1437851] New: Review Request: modularity-testing-framework - Framework for writing tests for modules and containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437851 Bug ID: 1437851 Summary: Review Request: modularity-testing-framework - Framework for writing tests for modules and containers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: phra...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://phracek.fedorapeople.org/modularity-testing-framework.spec SRPM URL: https://phracek.fedorapeople.org/modularity-testing-framework-0.2.1-1.fc25.src.rpm Description: Framework for writing tests for modules and containers. Fedora Account System Username: phracek -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1424851] Review Request: xplayer-plparser - Xplayer playlist parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424851 leigh scott changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|1424871 (xplayer) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424871 [Bug 1424871] Review Request: xplayer - A generic Media Player -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1424871] Review Request: xplayer - A generic Media Player
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424871 leigh scott changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On|1424851 (xplayer-plparser) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424851 [Bug 1424851] Review Request: xplayer-plparser - Xplayer playlist parser -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1375986] Review Request: golang-github-klauspost-cpuid - CPU feature identification for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375986 --- Comment #6 from Matthias Runge --- The revision is the same created from the spec file. But apparently I had to modify the spec to fill in the summary and license. The commit fits together with the last commit on https://github.com/klauspost/cpuid I updated the linked files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1132661] Review Request: atom - Atom editor from github
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661 --- Comment #41 from Paulo Fidalgo --- More info about Atom is present on this wiki page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Atom Also don't use helber copr, use the mosquito one. I've been using it and so far so good! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1375986] Review Request: golang-github-klauspost-cpuid - CPU feature identification for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375986 --- Comment #5 from Fabio Valentini --- It looks like you made a copy-paste error, because this link is now pointing at the old version again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org