[Bug 1566880] New: Review Request: gnome-themes-extra - GNOME Extra Themes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566880 Bug ID: 1566880 Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extra - GNOME Extra Themes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: walter.p...@yandex.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://pwalter.fedorapeople.org/gnome-themes-extra.spec SRPM URL: https://pwalter.fedorapeople.org/gnome-themes-extra-3.28-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: Rename of gnome-themes-standard package to gnome-themes-extra to follow upstream rename. Fedora Account System Username: pwalter Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26337789 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566433] Review Request: git-cinnabar - Git remote helper to interact with mercurial repositories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566433 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- git-cinnabar-0.5.0-0.1.b2.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-8cc6cceeb5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566433] Review Request: git-cinnabar - Git remote helper to interact with mercurial repositories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566433 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566433] Review Request: git-cinnabar - Git remote helper to interact with mercurial repositories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566433 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- git-cinnabar-0.5.0-0.1.b2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c6fb02b03f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566358] Review Request: ghc-with-location - Use ImplicitParams-based source locations in a backward compatible way
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566358 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566358] Review Request: ghc-with-location - Use ImplicitParams-based source locations in a backward compatible way
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566358 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-with-location-0.1.0-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-4693cf9bc2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566343] Review Request: ghc-stringbuilder - A writer monad for multi-line string literals
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566343 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-stringbuilder-0.5.1-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-86b9a52b82 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566343] Review Request: ghc-stringbuilder - A writer monad for multi-line string literals
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566343 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566340] Review Request: ghc-logging-facade - Simple logging abstraction that allows multiple back-ends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566340 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566340] Review Request: ghc-logging-facade - Simple logging abstraction that allows multiple back-ends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566340 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-logging-facade-0.3.0-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-33bb565861 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1085612] Review Request: voxelands - The Fun-Focused Free Software Voxel World Game (was: minetest-classic)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085612 --- Comment #22 from Andrew Toskin --- Any updates on this package, Maverick Kaung? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566433] Review Request: git-cinnabar - Git remote helper to interact with mercurial repositories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566433 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/git-cinnabar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1551402] Review Request: falkon - Modern web browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551402 --- Comment #18 from Kevin Kofler --- Maybe with 3.0.1, when the configuration migration will be in place. For 3.0.0, no, because it does not migrate configuration from QupZilla. What I want to do is to push QupZilla 2.2.6, the final release of QupZilla, which has the features from Falkon 3.0.0 backported. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566358] Review Request: ghc-with-location - Use ImplicitParams-based source locations in a backward compatible way
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566358 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-with-location -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566343] Review Request: ghc-stringbuilder - A writer monad for multi-line string literals
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566343 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-stringbuilder -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566340] Review Request: ghc-logging-facade - Simple logging abstraction that allows multiple back-ends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566340 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-logging-facade -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566332] Review Request: ghc-doctest - Test interactive Haskell examples
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566332 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-doctest -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566702] Review Request: python-transitions - A lightweight, object-oriented finite state machine implementation in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566702 Brian Stinson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||br...@bstinson.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566718] New: Review Request: quasselgrep - Tool for searching quassel logs from the commandline
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566718 Bug ID: 1566718 Summary: Review Request: quasselgrep - Tool for searching quassel logs from the commandline Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rosser@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/quassel/quasselgrep/quasselgrep.spec SRPM URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/quassel/quasselgrep/quasselgrep-0.1-0.2.20170411git502c88b.fc27.src.rpm Description: quasselgrep is a tool for searching quassel logs from the commandline. It can run against both SQLite and PostgreSQL databases, and also supports running in a client/server mode. Fedora Account System Username: tc01 This should hopefully be a pretty simple Python application. (As it is an application, the package is named "quasselgrep" and not "python-quasselgrep"). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1563680] Package Review: libocxl - library for OpenCAPI accelerator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2018-04-12 16:24:06 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- libocxl-1.0.0-0.1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1562947] Review Request: python-neomodel - A Python OGM for Neo4j
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562947 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- python-neomodel-3.2.5-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566702] Review Request: python-transitions - A lightweight, object-oriented finite state machine implementation in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566702 Randy Barlow changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|br...@bstinson.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566702] New: Review Request: python-transitions - A lightweight, object-oriented finite state machine implementation in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566702 Bug ID: 1566702 Summary: Review Request: python-transitions - A lightweight, object-oriented finite state machine implementation in Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rbar...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://bowlofeggs.fedorapeople.org/python-transitions.spec SRPM URL: https://bowlofeggs.fedorapeople.org/python-transitions-0.6.4-1.fc28.src.rpm Description: A lightweight, object-oriented state machine implementation in 2 Python. Compatible with Python 2.7+ and 3.0+. Fedora Account System Username: bowlofeggs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1551402] Review Request: falkon - Modern web browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551402 Luke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lu...@wp.pl --- Comment #17 from Luke --- Is there a chance to package Falkon for Fedora 27 as well? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1561575] Review Request: golang-github-neelance-astrewrite - Go tool to write AST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561575 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jared Smith --- I have reviewed this package. It conforms to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines. It is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1561580] Review Request: golang-github-neelance-sourcemap - JavaScript source map reader & writer for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561580 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jared Smith --- I have reviewed this package, and it is APPROVED. It conforms to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1561590] Review Request: golang-github-peterbourgon-diskv - A disk-backed key-value store
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561590 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jared Smith --- I have reviewed this package. It conforms to the packaging guidelines, and is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1561596] Review Request: golang-github-marstr-goalias - Generates a Go package that acts as a ghost of another
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561596 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jared Smith --- I have reviewed this package. It is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1562947] Review Request: python-neomodel - A Python OGM for Neo4j
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562947 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed|2018-04-04 13:10:11 |2018-04-12 14:03:00 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- python-neomodel-3.2.5-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1561597] Review Request: golang-github-marstr-guid - Generates a Go package that acts as a ghost of another
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561597 --- Comment #2 from Jared Smith --- Also, just as a heads-up -- I think you pasted the wrong description into this package review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1561597] Review Request: golang-github-marstr-guid - Generates a Go package that acts as a ghost of another
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561597 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jared Smith --- I have reviewed this package, it conforms to the packaging guidelines, and is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1561601] Review Request: golang-github-marstr-randname - A Go package which creates random names
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561601 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jared Smith --- I have reviewed this package, and it conforms with the packaging guidelines, and it is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1561595] Review Request: golang-github-marstr-collection - Golang Implementation of a few basic data structures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561595 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jared Smith --- I have reviewed this pacakge, it conforms to the packaging guidelines, and is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1561605] Review Request: golang-github-okzk-sdnotify - sd_notify utility for golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561605 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jared Smith --- I have reviewed this package, and it is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1561608] Review Request: golang-github-satori-uuid - UUID package for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561608 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jared Smith --- I have reviewed this package, and it conforms to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines, and it is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1561610] Review Request: golang-github-sevlyar-daemon - A library for writing system daemons in golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561610 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jared Smith --- I have reviewed this package, and it is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566159] Review Request: borgmatic - a simple Python wrapper script for the Borg backup software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566159 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- borgmatic-1.1.15-2.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-62788c91a5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1561612] Review Request: golang-github-shopspring-decimal - Arbitrary-precision fixed-point decimal numbers in go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561612 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jared Smith --- I have reviewed this package, and it conforms to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines. It is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566159] Review Request: borgmatic - a simple Python wrapper script for the Borg backup software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566159 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566159] Review Request: borgmatic - a simple Python wrapper script for the Borg backup software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566159 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- borgmatic-1.1.15-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-edb3fd0810 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1561620] Review Request: golang-gopkg-pipe-2 - Unix-like pipelines for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561620 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jared Smith --- I have reviewed this package, and it is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1561602] Review Request: golang-github-microcosm-cc-bluemonday - Fast golang HTML sanitizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561602 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jared Smith --- This package conforms to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines, and is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1561623] Review Request: golang-github-shurcool-highlight-diff - Syntax highlighter for diff format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561623 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jared Smith --- I have reviewed this package, and it conforms to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines. It is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1561626] Review Request: golang-github-sourcegraph-syntaxhighlight - Syntax highlighting of code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561626 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jared Smith --- I hae reviewed this package, and it is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1561624] Review Request: golang-github-sourcegraph-annotate - Apply multiple sets of annotations to a region of text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561624 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jared Smith --- I have reviewed this package, and it is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566159] Review Request: borgmatic - a simple Python wrapper script for the Borg backup software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566159 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/borgmatic -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1564206] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy-collectd - Collect SQLAlchemy connection statistics for collectd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564206 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-sqlalchemy-collectd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566433] Review Request: git-cinnabar - Git remote helper to interact with mercurial repositories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566433 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Package approved. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL", "BSL", "GPL (v2.1) LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "*No copyright* BSL", "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "BSD (unspecified)", "GPL (v2.0)", "Perl", "BSD (3 clause)", "ISC", "Apache (v2.0)", "GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "GPL (with incorrect FSF address)", "LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "*No copyright* Public domain", "GPL (v2)", "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 3030 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/git-cinnabar/review-git- cinnabar/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x
[Bug 1566358] Review Request: ghc-with-location - Use ImplicitParams-based source locations in a backward compatible way
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566358 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Package approved. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 5 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/ghc-with-location/review-ghc-with- location/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 71680 bytes in 13 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local = SHOULD items = Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-En
[Bug 1566159] Review Request: borgmatic - a simple Python wrapper script for the Borg backup software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566159 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566343] Review Request: ghc-stringbuilder - A writer monad for multi-line string literals
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566343 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Package approved. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 4 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/ghc-stringbuilder/review-ghc- stringbuilder/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 71680 bytes in 13 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local = SHOULD items = Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-Eng
[Bug 1566159] Review Request: borgmatic - a simple Python wrapper script for the Borg backup software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566159 --- Comment #4 from Benjamin Pereto --- my bad, updated spec and srpm: - inserted the SystemD scriplets -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1564500] Review Request: pipenv - The higher level Python packaging tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564500 --- Comment #5 from Miro Hrončok --- Upstream issue https://github.com/pypa/pipenv/issues/1961 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566340] Review Request: ghc-logging-facade - Simple logging abstraction that allows multiple back-ends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566340 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Package approved. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 10 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/ghc-logging-facade/review-ghc-logging- facade/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 225280 bytes in 20 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local = SHOULD items = Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported No
[Bug 1566332] Review Request: ghc-doctest - Test interactive Haskell examples
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566332 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Package approved. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 24 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/ghc-doctest/review-ghc- doctest/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 430080 bytes in 31 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local = SHOULD items = Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English langu
[Bug 1565603] Review Request: python-microfs - CLI and Python module to work with BBC micro: bit filesystem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565603 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- python-nudatus-0.0.2-1.fc28 python-microfs-1.2.2-1.fc28 uflash-1.1.2-2.fc28 mu-0.9.13-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-368e017dd6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1565603] Review Request: python-microfs - CLI and Python module to work with BBC micro: bit filesystem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565603 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1565626] Review Request: python-nudatus - Strip comments from Python scripts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565626 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1565626] Review Request: python-nudatus - Strip comments from Python scripts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565626 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- python-nudatus-0.0.2-1.fc28 python-microfs-1.2.2-1.fc28 uflash-1.1.2-2.fc28 mu-0.9.13-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-368e017dd6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566433] Review Request: git-cinnabar - Git remote helper to interact with mercurial repositories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566433 --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26321845 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566433] New: Review Request: git-cinnabar - Git remote helper to interact with mercurial repositories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566433 Bug ID: 1566433 Summary: Review Request: git-cinnabar - Git remote helper to interact with mercurial repositories Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//git-cinnabar.spec SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//git-cinnabar-0.5.0-0.1.b2.fc27.src.rpm Description: git-cinnabar is a git remote helper to interact with mercurial repositories. Contrary to other such helpers, it doesn't use a local mercurial clone under the hood, although it currently does require mercurial to be installed for some of its libraries. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1558473] Review Request: xtl - QuantStack tools library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558473 --- Comment #4 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- Ping? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1561759] Review Request: golang-github-mholt-archiver - Easily create and extract archive files with Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561759 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-04-12 03:52:13 --- Comment #4 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Imported and built for rawhide, thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1561757] Review Request: golang-github-dsnet-compress - Collection of compression related Go packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561757 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-04-12 03:51:37 --- Comment #6 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Imported and built for rawhide. Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1561759] Review Request: golang-github-mholt-archiver - Easily create and extract archive files with Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561759 Bug 1561759 depends on bug 1561757, which changed state. Bug 1561757 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-dsnet-compress - Collection of compression related Go packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561757 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566358] Review Request: ghc-with-location - Use ImplicitParams-based source locations in a backward compatible way
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566358 --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26319063 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566358] New: Review Request: ghc-with-location - Use ImplicitParams-based source locations in a backward compatible way
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566358 Bug ID: 1566358 Summary: Review Request: ghc-with-location - Use ImplicitParams-based source locations in a backward compatible way Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-with-location.spec SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-with-location-0.1.0-1.fc27.src.rpm Description: Use ImplicitParams-based source locations in a backward compatible way. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org