[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 --- Comment #139 from Priya Sharma --- Come to GlamAdults Escort Service and Get Heavenly Experiences with Glam Russian Call Girls Feel as you are on cloud nine! It is quite possible in Mumbai. Come to join us with the hot babes who will make your day. Get the best experiences of erotic sex acts and services in the most sensual way. Simply enjoy the things that you are fantasizing about. You will have some unforgettable experiences with hot Call Girls. It is not all about all feeling well with a gorgeous Glamadult partner but more than that. You’ll get some good moments to enjoy some incredible sensuous activities and relish the extreme sensuous satisfaction. You will surely get the utmost satisfaction from the females who are ready to come up with all the services you are looking for. Extremely hot and sensual GlamAdults Call girls will meet up to your desires with a number of services. https://www.glamadults.com/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 --- Comment #137 from Priya Sharma --- Independent Escorts in Mumbai - Young Professional Girls to Satisfy You with Seductive Services When it comes to satisfying the people with top-rated services and foreplay acts, our young and skilled independent Mumbai escorts will do their best by entertaining you with all those services and sex acts that excite you. Ultimate pleasure and satisfaction are always guaranteed if you hire our high-profile girls. They are well aware of the sexual fantasies that the people crave for in general. And it helps them provide very specific services so that your desires are fulfilled sexually. Browse our website, go through the profiles, and choose the one who seems to be promising. Additionally, some other sex acts would also be offered to stimulate your sex desires to the fullest. What you need to do is to reveal your sex desires so our sexy babes offer you all those services that you are looking for. Relish in a range of services like body to body massage, blowjob, deep French kiss, deep throat oral sex, CIM, or anal sex without a condom, and other services. Check out the Mumbai escorts photos and profile, and choose the one who can satisfy you sexually. https://www.ruhii.com/delhi-call-girls.html https://www.ruhii.com/gurgaon-call-girls.html https://www.ruhii.com/gurgaon-escorts.html https://www.ruhii.com/delhi-escorts.html https://www.ruhii.com/bangalore-escorts.html https://www.ruhii.com/hyderabad-escorts.html https://www.ruhii.com/kolkata-escorts.html https://www.ruhii.com/ https://www.ruhii.com/jaipur-escort-girls.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1265759] Review Request: mingw-drmingw - Just-in-Time (JIT) debugger for MinGW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265759 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Sailer --- Thanks for the review, Robert-André! I have addressed your points: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sailer/mingw/build/1546650/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 --- Comment #135 from Pune Call Girl --- Created attachment 1700676 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1700676=edit I will fulfill your erotic dream and provide you highest satisfaction. Hi Friends, How are you? I’m Srija Dutta - an independent model Mumbai escort with sultry looks, seductive figure and busty boobs. With a happy-go-lucky attitude living life on my terms, I fill the lives and senses with utmost delight and pleasure. Sleep with me, play with my juicy lips, drool-worthy boobs, and engage in the most cherished sex game of your choice. I will fulfill your erotic dream and provide you highest satisfaction. Let me soothe your senses and immerse you in the heavenly pleasure of a memorable GFE. https://www.hotsimi.com/ https://www.hotsimi.com/gallery.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 Pune Call Girl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nitush75...@gmail.com --- Comment #134 from Pune Call Girl --- Get Awesome Experience with Pune Independent Escort Services When you spend your quality time with our stylish and sexy Pune escorts, they will give the experiences that you would never forget. It is a good opportunity to unwind your anxiety with the best Call Girl in Pune. Make your one-night stand a memorable experience with a number of sex acts and services. With the 24/7 availability of our high-profile call girls, you can have the maximum pleasure and satisfaction without compromising on your desires. Browse the profiles of our fabulous escorts and book your most preferred escort now. They provide the updated details along with their photographs to attract more and more people for the services. Whatever the services you want to enjoy, find the escorts accordingly to hire the one who suits your requirements. contact: https://www.hotsimi.com/ https://www.hotsimi.com/gallery.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1812961] Review Request: openosc - Open Object Size Checking Library to detect buffer overflows with built-in metrics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #53 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-5f1c91eb01 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-5f1c91eb01 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-5f1c91eb01 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839503] Review Request: golang-github-valyala-fasthttp - Fast HTTP package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839503 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-a2a9eb0cb8 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-a2a9eb0cb8 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a2a9eb0cb8 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839503] Review Request: golang-github-valyala-fasthttp - Fast HTTP package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839503 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-dad23b44a2 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-dad23b44a2 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-dad23b44a2 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1752233] Review Request: mle - small, flexible, terminal-based text editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752233 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mle -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1173656] Review Request: jags - Just Another Gibbs Sampler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173656 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added CC||spo...@gmail.com Flags|needinfo?(tcallawa@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway --- 6-year-old unreviewed package submission? LET'S DO THIS. New Spec URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/jags.spec New SRPM URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/jags-4.3.0-1.fc33.src.rpm Koji (Rawhide) Scratch Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=46961181 Fedora Account Name: spot Who wants to be a necromancer and revive this from the dead? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1173656] Review Request: jags - Just Another Gibbs Sampler
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Tom "spot" Callaway has canceled Package Review 's request for Tom "spot" Callaway 's needinfo: Bug 1173656: Review Request: jags - Just Another Gibbs Sampler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173656 --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway --- 6-year-old unreviewed package submission? LET'S DO THIS. New Spec URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/jags.spec New SRPM URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/jags-4.3.0-1.fc33.src.rpm Koji (Rawhide) Scratch Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=46961181 Fedora Account Name: spot Who wants to be a necromancer and revive this from the dead? ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849287] Review Request: golang-github-aalpar-deheap - Doubly ended heap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849287 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-ef56f0cdcc has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849296] Review Request: golang-github-calebcase-tmpfile - Cross Platform Temporary Files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849296 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-8bc1fe7b5a has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849301] Review Request: golang-github-zeebo-float16 - 16 bit "floats" that can store numbers like 1.02e12 for exponents in [-15, 15]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849301 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-70bd5b4d03 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849457] Review Request: python-aiohue - Python module to talk to Philips Hue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849457 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-1bdf41bc87 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849293] Review Request: golang-github-spacemonkeygo-monkit - Flexible process data collection, instrumentation, and tracing client library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849293 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-0564e2c1b8 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849294] Review Request: golang-github-vivint-infectious - Reed-Solomon forward error correcting library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849294 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-9e61d967c4 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849295] Review Request: golang-github-zeebo-errs - Package for making errors friendly and easy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849295 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-8eb02421f0 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1823376] Review Request: golang-github-gin-contrib-static - Static middleware
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823376 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-11 01:08:25 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-c78479a154 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1838306] Review Request: golang-github-graph-gophers-graphql - GraphQL server with a focus on ease of use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838306 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-11 01:08:21 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-3a3f6ac104 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849296] Review Request: golang-github-calebcase-tmpfile - Cross Platform Temporary Files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849296 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-e8bb15ea1b has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849294] Review Request: golang-github-vivint-infectious - Reed-Solomon forward error correcting library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849294 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-0dbf64fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849295] Review Request: golang-github-zeebo-errs - Package for making errors friendly and easy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849295 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-a6cf3f6de0 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849301] Review Request: golang-github-zeebo-float16 - 16 bit "floats" that can store numbers like 1.02e12 for exponents in [-15, 15]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849301 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-07cc6c7424 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849457] Review Request: python-aiohue - Python module to talk to Philips Hue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849457 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-11 01:04:04 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-2081091d02 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849293] Review Request: golang-github-spacemonkeygo-monkit - Flexible process data collection, instrumentation, and tracing client library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849293 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-0422142f4d has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849287] Review Request: golang-github-aalpar-deheap - Doubly ended heap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849287 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-810db625aa has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1823381] Review Request: golang-github-gin-contrib-cors - CORS gin's middleware
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823381 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-11 01:03:16 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-8ffc12f360 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1812961] Review Request: openosc - Open Object Size Checking Library to detect buffer overflows with built-in metrics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961 --- Comment #52 from yon...@cisco.com --- hi Mattia, Robert-Andre, Thank you very much for the instructions and guidance! Today I switched to a new VM without the firewall restriction and successfully fedpkg-cloned the openosc via SSH. And all the instructions now work for me on this new VM. I have pushed and built openosc for f33/f32/f31. one quick question: I have run "fedpkg update --type newpackage --bugs 1812961" for the f31 branch. Do I need to run "fedpkg update --type newpackage --bugs 1812961" for f32/f33 too? Thanks, Yongkui -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1812961] Review Request: openosc - Open Object Size Checking Library to detect buffer overflows with built-in metrics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-5f1c91eb01 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-5f1c91eb01 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1265759] Review Request: mingw-drmingw - Just-in-Time (JIT) debugger for MinGW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265759
--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Not needed:
%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[!]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: %clean present but not required
- Not used in Fedora:
Group: Development/Libraries
- Buildroot should not be used
[!]: Buildroot is not present
Note: Buildroot: present but not needed
- Use %global instead of %define
%global name1 drmingw
[!]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
Note: %define requiring justification: %define name1 drmingw
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License
(v2.1)", "Expat License", "BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License", "BSD
3-clause "New" or "Revised" License", "GNU Lesser General Public
License (v2.1 or later)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "GNU Lesser General
Public License (v2 or later)", "zlib/libpng license". 273 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/mingw-drmingw/review-mingw-
drmingw/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: Buildroot is not present
Note: Buildroot: present but not needed
[!]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: %clean present but not required
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
mingw32-drmingw , mingw32-drmingw-devel , mingw64-drmingw ,
mingw64-drmingw-devel
[?]:
[Bug 851819] Review Request: mingw-sparsehash - MinGW Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851819
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #15 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised"
License", "FSF All Permissive License", "Expat License", "NTP
License". 53 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/mingw-sparsehash/review-
mingw-sparsehash/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
root/mingw/include/google(mingw32-protobuf),
/usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-
root/mingw/include/google(mingw64-protobuf)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 8 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
mingw32-sparsehash , mingw64-sparsehash
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
Note: mingw32-sparsehash : /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/libsparsehash.pc mingw64-sparsehash :
/usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/libsparsehash.pc
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
[Bug 1855769] Review Request: libva-v4l2-request - VA-API Backend using v4l2-request API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855769 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libva-v4l2-request -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1350884] Review Request: mspgcc - Rebase of GCC for the MSP430 to TI / Red Hat upstream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350884 Brandon Nielsen changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(nielsenb@jetfuse. | |net)| --- Comment #19 from Brandon Nielsen --- I am still interested in packaging this software, though the upstream support situation certainly hasn't changed much, with other parts of the toolchain moving back to closed source... Anyway, I've started work on getting the latest version to build in my copr[0], I will report back with an updated spec and SRPM once I have that working. 0 - https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nielsenb/msp430-development-tools/build/1545336/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1350884] Review Request: mspgcc - Rebase of GCC for the MSP430 to TI / Red Hat upstream
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Brandon Nielsen has canceled Package Review 's request for Brandon Nielsen 's needinfo: Bug 1350884: Review Request: mspgcc - Rebase of GCC for the MSP430 to TI / Red Hat upstream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350884 --- Comment #19 from Brandon Nielsen --- I am still interested in packaging this software, though the upstream support situation certainly hasn't changed much, with other parts of the toolchain moving back to closed source... Anyway, I've started work on getting the latest version to build in my copr[0], I will report back with an updated spec and SRPM once I have that working. 0 - https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nielsenb/msp430-development-tools/build /1545336/ ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855769] Review Request: libva-v4l2-request - VA-API Backend using v4l2-request API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855769 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- Thanks for the review and comments. I will import after this extended week-end. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855456] Review Request: rust-pretty-hex - Pretty hex dump of bytes slice in the common style
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855456 Josh Stone changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-10 19:36:00 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1149524] Review Request: perl-Digest-Whirlpool - Interface to Whirlpool hash algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149524 --- Comment #4 from Denis Fateyev --- Well, I still use "perl-Digest-Whirlpool" in several legacy projects, so I believe we could complete and finish this package review. I need to prepare a patch that would allow to unbundle Whirlpool code. BTW, I have prepared and packaged "libwhirlpool" library many years ago. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419032] Review Request: mingw-jimtcl - MinGW small embeddable Tcl interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419032 Thomas Sailer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-10 18:57:42 --- Comment #12 from Thomas Sailer --- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=46951805 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419032] Review Request: mingw-jimtcl - MinGW small embeddable Tcl interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419032 --- Comment #11 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-jimtcl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 851819] Review Request: mingw-sparsehash - MinGW Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851819 --- Comment #14 from Thomas Sailer --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #10) I should have addressed all of your comments. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sailer/mingw/build/1545170/ Thanks a lot Robert-André for your review comments! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 851819] Review Request: mingw-sparsehash - MinGW Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851819 --- Comment #13 from Thomas Sailer --- > Find an official mirror? I don't think there's one anymore, ubuntu also uses the github.com version -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1265759] Review Request: mingw-drmingw - Just-in-Time (JIT) debugger for MinGW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265759 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Sailer --- https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sailer/mingw/build/1545139/ I should have fixed all of the above. The non-installability was caused because a bundled zlib sneaked in - I have replaced it with system zlib -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 851819] Review Request: mingw-sparsehash - MinGW Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851819
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Sailer ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #11)
> Add %{?mingw_debug_package} before %prep too
This does not work, as sparsehash is a header-only library, there are no
binaries in the package, so debug file lists will be empty and debug package
generation fails
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855459] Review Request: rust-glib-macros - Rust bindings for the GLib library, proc macros crate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855459 Josh Stone changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-10 18:15:46 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855458] Review Request: rust-proc-macro-crate - Replacement for crate in proc-macros
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855458 Josh Stone changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-10 17:51:31 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855459] Review Request: rust-glib-macros - Rust bindings for the GLib library, proc macros crate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855459 Bug 1855459 depends on bug 1855458, which changed state. Bug 1855458 Summary: Review Request: rust-proc-macro-crate - Replacement for crate in proc-macros https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855458 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1256046] Review Request: eventd - A simple daemon to track remote or local events and do actions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256046 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zebo...@gmail.com --- Comment #17 from Robert-André Mauchin --- CC me for review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855769] Review Request: libva-v4l2-request - VA-API Backend using v4l2-request API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855769 --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Disregard, it's the entire project that is dual licensed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855769] Review Request: libva-v4l2-request - VA-API Backend using v4l2-request API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855769
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Please explain the license breakdown in a comment
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License
(v2.1 or later)". 50 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/libva-v4l2-request/review-
libva-v4l2-request/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[Bug 1265759] Review Request: mingw-drmingw - Just-in-Time (JIT) debugger for MinGW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265759
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Group: is not used in Fedora
- Not needed: %defattr(-,root,root,-)
- Not needed:
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[…]
%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
- Do not use %{__install} or %{__chmod} Macros starting with __ are reserved
for rpm private use.
- Use install -p to keep timestamps.
- Package is not installable:
DEBUG util.py:621: Error:
DEBUG util.py:621: Problem 1: conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:621:- nothing provides mingw32(libz.dll) needed by
mingw32-drmingw-0.9.2-1.fc33.noarch
DEBUG util.py:621: Problem 2: conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:621:- nothing provides mingw64(libz.dll) needed by
mingw64-drmingw-0.9.2-1.fc33.noarch
DEBUG util.py:621: Problem 3: package
mingw64-drmingw-devel-0.9.2-1.fc33.noarch requires mingw64-drmingw =
0.9.2-1.fc33, but none of the providers can be installed
DEBUG util.py:621:- conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:621:- nothing provides mingw64(libz.dll) needed by
mingw64-drmingw-0.9.2-1.fc33.noarch
DEBUG util.py:621: Problem 4: package
mingw32-drmingw-devel-0.9.2-1.fc33.noarch requires mingw32-drmingw =
0.9.2-1.fc33, but none of the providers can be installed
DEBUG util.py:621:- conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:621:- nothing provides mingw32(libz.dll) needed by
mingw32-drmingw-0.9.2-1.fc33.noarch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855409] Review Request: rust-system-deps - Declarative dependencies in Cargo.toml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855409 Josh Stone changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-10 17:25:19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854268] Review Request: opencsd - ARM coresight debug and trace decoder library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854268 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/opencsd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 851819] Review Request: mingw-sparsehash - MinGW Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851819
--- Comment #11 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Add %{?mingw_debug_package} before %prep too
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 851819] Review Request: mingw-sparsehash - MinGW Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851819
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #10 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
URL:http://code.google.com/p/sparsehash
Source0:
http://sparsehash.googlecode.com/files/sparsehash-%{version}.tar.gz
- Both 404. Find an official mirror?
URL:https://github.com/sparsehash/sparsehash
Source0:%url/archive/sparsehash-%{version}.tar.gz
- Group: is not used in Fedora
- License must be included with %license, not %doc:
%files -n mingw32-%{mingw_pkg_name}
%license COPYING
%doc AUTHORS NEWS README TODO
%{mingw32_includedir}/google/
%{mingw32_includedir}/sparsehash/
%{mingw32_libdir}/pkgconfig/libsparsehash.pc
%files -n mingw64-%{mingw_pkg_name}
%license COPYING
%doc AUTHORS NEWS README TODO
%{mingw64_includedir}/google/
%{mingw64_includedir}/sparsehash/
%{mingw64_libdir}/pkgconfig/libsparsehash.pc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 533763] Review Request: tex-cjw - LaTeX class for writing resumes and cover letters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533763
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #10 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Not needed anymore
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
rm -rf %{buildroot}
Group:
- Both sources and url seems defunct, there's a mirror here:
https://ctan.math.utah.edu/ctan/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/cjw.zip
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419032] Review Request: mingw-jimtcl - MinGW small embeddable Tcl interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419032 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Sailer --- https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sailer/mingw/build/1544791/ Removed Group. Added comments about what each patch does. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1834731] Review Request: bitcoin - Peer to Peer Cryptographic Currency
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834731
--- Comment #29 from Oleg Girko ---
(In reply to Björn Persson from comment #28)
> (In reply to Oleg Girko from comment #27)
> > I think, the main PGP public key's checksum should be embedded into spec
> > file and checked against to make sure all re-downloaded sources are correct.
>
> That wouldn't hurt. You would want a GnuPG command – or a series of commands
> – to verify that the given keyring contains a key with the given
> fingerprint, and also that it doesn't contain any other keys. Can you
> propose such a command? Don't forget to ensure that GnuPG will look only in
> the specified keyring even if the user has a default keyring.
Something like this in %prep section:
echo 123456789abcdef... %{SOURCE12} | sha256sum -c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855459] Review Request: rust-glib-macros - Rust bindings for the GLib library, proc macros crate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855459 --- Comment #1 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-glib-macros -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855456] Review Request: rust-pretty-hex - Pretty hex dump of bytes slice in the common style
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855456 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-pretty-hex -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855458] Review Request: rust-proc-macro-crate - Replacement for crate in proc-macros
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855458 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-proc-macro-crate -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855459] Review Request: rust-glib-macros - Rust bindings for the GLib library, proc macros crate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855459 Igor Raits changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||igor.ra...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|igor.ra...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855458] Review Request: rust-proc-macro-crate - Replacement for crate in proc-macros
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855458 Igor Raits changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||igor.ra...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|igor.ra...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855456] Review Request: rust-pretty-hex - Pretty hex dump of bytes slice in the common style
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855456 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1752233] Review Request: mle - small, flexible, terminal-based text editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752233 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Refreshing flag. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1752233] Review Request: mle - small, flexible, terminal-based text editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752233 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Sponsored. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1752233] Review Request: mle - small, flexible, terminal-based text editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752233 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854268] Review Request: opencsd - ARM coresight debug and trace decoder library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854268 --- Comment #5 from Jeremy Linton --- Thanks Paul, as a general FYI, it should be noted that there were a few updates along the way. The current .spec is https://pagure.io/opencsd/blob/master/f/opencsd.spec with a srpm build here: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jlinton/opencsd/fedora-32-aarch64/01544450-opencsd/opencsd-0.14.1-1.fc32.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1834731] Review Request: bitcoin - Peer to Peer Cryptographic Currency
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834731 --- Comment #28 from Björn Persson --- (In reply to Oleg Girko from comment #27) > What about those who want to re-build the package from the spec file I would recommend rebuilding from the source RPM package. Rebuilding from only a spec isn't possible in the general case. Many packages have patches, and sometimes there is no working URL to a source. Those will be missing if you try to rebuild from only the spec. > I think, the main PGP public key's checksum should be embedded into spec > file and checked against to make sure all re-downloaded sources are correct. That wouldn't hurt. You would want a GnuPG command – or a series of commands – to verify that the given keyring contains a key with the given fingerprint, and also that it doesn't contain any other keys. Can you propose such a command? Don't forget to ensure that GnuPG will look only in the specified keyring even if the user has a default keyring. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854268] Review Request: opencsd - ARM coresight debug and trace decoder library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854268
Paul Whalen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Paul Whalen ---
Latest version looks good, approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 358400 bytes in 9 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check
[Bug 1855328] Review Request: golang-github-magefile-mage - A Make/rake-like dev tool using Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855328 Andreas Gerstmayr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-10 15:29:41 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Gerstmayr --- Thank you both! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855308] Review Request: golang-github-timberio-datemath - Go library for parsing Elasticsearch datemath expressions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855308 Andreas Gerstmayr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-10 15:29:44 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Gerstmayr --- Thank you both! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855328] Review Request: golang-github-magefile-mage - A Make/rake-like dev tool using Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855328 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-magefile-mage -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855308] Review Request: golang-github-timberio-datemath - Go library for parsing Elasticsearch datemath expressions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855308 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-timberio-datemath -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1847058] Review Request: mod_authn_otp - One-time password authentication for apache
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847058 Dan Horák changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@danny.cz --- Comment #14 from Dan Horák --- configure:3979: checking for EVP_sha1 in -lcrypto configure:4004: gcc -o conftest -O3 -Wall -Waggregate-return -Wcast-align -Wchar-subscripts -Wcomment -Wformat -Wimplicit -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wno-long-long -Wparentheses -Wpointer-arith -Wredundant-decls -Wreturn-type -Wswitch -Wtrigraphs -Wuninitialized -Wunused -Wwrite-strings -Wshadow -Wstrict-prototypes -Wcast-qual -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld conftest.c -lcrypto >&5 conftest.c:18:1: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes] 18 | char EVP_sha1 (); | ^~~~ conftest.c:20:1: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes] 20 | main () | ^~~~ /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccamYXmz.o: `EVP_sha1@@OPENSSL_1_1_0' non-PLT reloc for symbol defined in shared library and accessed from executable (rebuild file with -fPIC ?) /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: bad value collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status ^^^ is the reason for build failing on s390x, the project's build-system doesn't use the distro-wide compiler flags, thus -fPIC is missing and the check fails -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855219] Review Request: perl-Test2-Plugin-Cover - Collect a minimal file coverage data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855219 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Test2-Plugin-Cover-0.0 ||.7-1.fc33 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-10 13:36:27 --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855769] Review Request: libva-v4l2-request - VA-API Backend using v4l2-request API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855769 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- koji scratch build for f33 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=46924922 FYI, this package will help to transition to in-kernel v4l2-request API currently supported on few arm(aarch64?) devices. That until most applications (and devices) will gain native v4l2-request API support. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855219] Review Request: perl-Test2-Plugin-Cover - Collect a minimal file coverage data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855219 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Plugin-Cover -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855409] Review Request: rust-system-deps - Declarative dependencies in Cargo.toml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855409 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-system-deps -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855769] New: Review Request: libva-v4l2-request - VA-API Backend using v4l2-request API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855769 Bug ID: 1855769 Summary: Review Request: libva-v4l2-request - VA-API Backend using v4l2-request API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: kwiz...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/libva-v4l2-request.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/libva-v4l2-request-1.0.0-1.20190517gita3c2476.fc31.src.rpm Description: VA-API Backend using v4l2-request API Fedora Account System Username: kwizart -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1013039] Review Request: java-diffutils - diff utils for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013039 --- Comment #16 from Oliver Kopp --- Update: All code is Apache-2.0 now. Rewrote parts with unclear license. https://github.com/java-diff-utils/java-diff-utils -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855219] Review Request: perl-Test2-Plugin-Cover - Collect a minimal file coverage data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855219 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/26968 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1256046] Review Request: eventd - A simple daemon to track remote or local events and do actions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256046 Ben Boeckel changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(fedora@me.benboec | |kel.net)| --- Comment #16 from Ben Boeckel --- I've been keeping this up-to-date with some irregularity on a copr: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mathstuf/eventd/ I'll update this next time I need to spin that repo. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1256046] Review Request: eventd - A simple daemon to track remote or local events and do actions
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Ben Boeckel has canceled Package Review 's request for Ben Boeckel 's needinfo: Bug 1256046: Review Request: eventd - A simple daemon to track remote or local events and do actions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256046 --- Comment #16 from Ben Boeckel --- I've been keeping this up-to-date with some irregularity on a copr: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mathstuf/eventd/ I'll update this next time I need to spin that repo. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 716384] Review Request: filo - Useful FILe and stream Operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716384 Ben Boeckel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|fed...@me.benboeckel.net|nob...@fedoraproject.org Flags|needinfo?(fedora@me.benboec | |kel.net)| --- Comment #8 from Ben Boeckel --- No progress here. Unassigning myself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 716384] Review Request: filo - Useful FILe and stream Operations
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Ben Boeckel has canceled Package Review 's request for Ben Boeckel 's needinfo: Bug 716384: Review Request: filo - Useful FILe and stream Operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716384 --- Comment #8 from Ben Boeckel --- No progress here. Unassigning myself. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419032] Review Request: mingw-jimtcl - MinGW small embeddable Tcl interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419032 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Hi Thomas A few notes: - Group: is not used in Fedora - Please add comments above each patch to explain why they are needed Package is approved otherwise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1149176] Review Request: vdsm-jsonrpc-java - jsonrpc communication lib for ovirt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176 Martin Perina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DEFERRED Flags|needinfo?(mper...@redhat.co | |m) | Last Closed||2020-07-10 11:14:35 --- Comment #22 from Martin Perina --- No, we don't have resources to included oVirt packages into Fedora, closing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1249473] Review Request: txr - An original, new programming language for convenient data munging
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Nikola Forró has canceled Package Review 's request for Nikola Forró 's needinfo: Bug 1249473: Review Request: txr - An original, new programming language for convenient data munging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249473 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1249473] Review Request: txr - An original, new programming language for convenient data munging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249473 Nikola Forró changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nfo...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flags|fedora-review? | |needinfo?(nfo...@redhat.com | |) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1654670] Review Request: perl-Crypt-U2F-Server - Low level wrapper around the U2F C library (server side)
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Xavier Bachelot has canceled Package Review 's request for Xavier Bachelot 's needinfo: Bug 1654670: Review Request: perl-Crypt-U2F-Server - Low level wrapper around the U2F C library (server side) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654670 --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot --- This is ultimately blocked by libtomcrypt which did not had a release with ECC support yet although the support has been added to their develop branch. perl-CryptX upstream ships with a bundled copy of libtomcrypt, which is unbundled from Fedora's perl-CryptX in favor of the system libtomcrypt, hence the need for a libtomcrypt release. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654710 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1654670] Review Request: perl-Crypt-U2F-Server - Low level wrapper around the U2F C library (server side)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654670 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(xavier@bachelot.o | |rg) | --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot --- This is ultimately blocked by libtomcrypt which did not had a release with ECC support yet although the support has been added to their develop branch. perl-CryptX upstream ships with a bundled copy of libtomcrypt, which is unbundled from Fedora's perl-CryptX in favor of the system libtomcrypt, hence the need for a libtomcrypt release. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654710 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1149176] Review Request: vdsm-jsonrpc-java - jsonrpc communication lib for ovirt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176 Piotr Kliczewski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mper...@redhat.com Flags|needinfo?(pkliczew@redhat.c |needinfo?(mper...@redhat.co |om) |m) --- Comment #21 from Piotr Kliczewski --- @Martin, do we still want to package it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1149176] Review Request: vdsm-jsonrpc-java - jsonrpc communication lib for ovirt
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Piotr Kliczewski has canceled Package Review 's request for Piotr Kliczewski 's needinfo: Bug 1149176: Review Request: vdsm-jsonrpc-java - jsonrpc communication lib for ovirt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176 --- Comment #21 from Piotr Kliczewski --- @Martin, do we still want to package it? ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1467716] Review Request: reactfx - Reactive event streams for JavaFX
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467716 Jonny Heggheim changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-07-10 09:59:44 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1293043] Review Request: python-epac - Machine learning workflow builder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293043 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Flags|needinfo?(igor.raits@gmail. | |com)| Last Closed||2020-07-10 09:58:31 --- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Closing this now. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1293043] Review Request: python-epac - Machine learning workflow builder
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) has canceled Package Review 's request for Igor Raits 's needinfo: Bug 1293043: Review Request: python-epac - Machine learning workflow builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293043 --- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Closing this now. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1150105] Review Request: python-pynn - Simulator-independent specification of neuronal network models
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150105 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|NOTREADY|NotReady Flags|needinfo?(sanjay.ankur@gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #6 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Hrm, well, it's marked "not ready". Perhaps that's case sensitive? The review is still valid. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1150105] Review Request: python-pynn - Simulator-independent specification of neuronal network models
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) has canceled Package Review 's request for Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 's needinfo: Bug 1150105: Review Request: python-pynn - Simulator-independent specification of neuronal network models https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150105 --- Comment #6 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Hrm, well, it's marked "not ready". Perhaps that's case sensitive? The review is still valid. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666545] Review Request: python-qdarkstyle - A dark stylesheet for Qt applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666545 --- Comment #5 from Jonny Heggheim --- Sorry, this package was forgotten since it was optional by Electrum and Electron Cash. Would like to include it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
