[Bug 1476434] Review Request: bstrlib - Better String Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434

Mattia Verga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
  Flags|needinfo?(18969068329@163.c |
   |om) |
Last Closed||2020-07-26 13:46:13



--- Comment #19 from Mattia Verga  ---
No reply from submitter, closing as DEADREVIEW



Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449
[Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response
should be blocking this bug.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1476434] Review Request: bstrlib - Better String Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434

Mattia Verga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mattia.ve...@protonmail.com
  Flags||needinfo?(18969068329@163.c
   ||om)



--- Comment #18 from Mattia Verga  ---
This package was approved some years ago, but never imported. Are you still
interested in getting it into Fedora repositories?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1476434] Review Request: bstrlib - Better String Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1476434] Review Request: bstrlib - Better String Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434



--- Comment #17 from Ye Cheng <18969068...@163.com> ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #16)
Thanks.
SONAME changed to 
libbstr.so.1()(64bit)
libbstrc++.so.1()(64bit)
libbstrsafe.so.1()(64bit)


New spec
file:http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/yecheng/bstrlib/bstrlib.git/tree/bstrlib.spec

New srpm file:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/yecheng/bstrlib/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00610322-bstrlib/bstrlib-1.0.0-2.fc28.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1476434] Review Request: bstrlib - Better String Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434



--- Comment #16 from Michael Schwendt  ---
> libbstrsafe.so.1.0.0 -> libbstrsafe.so.1.0.0

That is evidence of a wrong and highly problematic SONAME. Let's see:

 eu-readelf -d libbstrsafe.so.1.0.0 |grep SONAME
  SONAMELibrary soname: [libbstrsafe.so.1.0.0]

Indeed. It contains the full version, and the symlinks you create are
superfluous and will be useless, because nothing will use them. Programs linked
with bstrlib will depend on the exact SONAME.

You can query the automatic RPM SONAME Provides by examining the built
packages, too:

  $ rpm -qp --provides bstrlib-1.0.0-1.fc27.2.x86_64.rpm |grep ^lib
  libbstr.so.1.0.0()(64bit)
  libbstrc++.so.1.0.0()(64bit)
  libbstrsafe.so.1.0.0()(64bit)

Any time there would be a minor version upgrade, all programs would need to be
rebuilt to relink them. That is bad for a lib that is declared as "stable". The
SONAMEs ought to end with just the major version.

This is an example of a package, which seems to be simple, but even a library
package can be full of pitfalls.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1476434] Review Request: bstrlib - Better String Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434



--- Comment #15 from Ye Cheng <18969068...@163.com> ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #14)
Thanks.

New srpm
URL:https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/yecheng/bstrlib/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00609529-bstrlib/bstrlib-1.0.0-1.fc28.src.rpm

New spec file:$git clone
http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/git/yecheng/bstrlib/bstrlib.git
Sorry, I haven't yet figure out how to access the spec file in new copr.

> Superfluous and potentially dangerous to clean the build results during
> %install.
Thanks, this is removed.  

> The cleaner and more convenient solution to that is to run ldconfig on the
> buildroot libdir with the right options to make it create the symlinks
> without updating runtime linker's cache.
Sorry, I don't know how to let ldconfig create unversioned symbolic links for
linker. 
I tried ldconfig -n ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_libdir} -v
and it returns:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/bstrlib-1.0.0-1.fc26.x86_64/usr/lib64:
libbstrsafe.so.1.0.0 -> libbstrsafe.so.1.0.0
libbstr.so.1.0.0 -> libbstr.so.1.0.0
libbstrc++.so.1.0.0 -> libbstrc++.so.1.0.0
Ldconfig probably only make symbolic link with the name of the soname, when the
soname and the filename are different.

> Not really. Without RPATH you would simply point $LD_LIBRARY_PATH at the
> buildroot libdir when running the testsuite.
Sorry, export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=%{buildroot}%{_libdir} worked for rpmbuild, but
doesn't work in mock,but LD_PRELOAD is used  when running the tests in makefile
instead of -rpath.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1476434] Review Request: bstrlib - Better String Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434



--- Comment #14 from Michael Schwendt  ---
> %install
> ...
> make clean

Superfluous and potentially dangerous to clean the build results during
%install.


> cd ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_libdir}
> ln -sf libbstr.so.%{version} libbstr.so
> ln -sf libbstr.so.%{version} libbstr.so.%{majorver}
> ln -sf libbstr.so.%{version} libbstr.so.%{minorver}
> ln -sf libbstrsafe.so.%{version} libbstrsafe.so
> ln -sf libbstrsafe.so.%{version} libbstrsafe.so.%{majorver}
> ln -sf libbstrsafe.so.%{version} libbstrsafe.so.%{minorver}
> ln -sf libbstrc++.so.%{version} libbstrc++.so
> ln -sf libbstrc++.so.%{version} libbstrc++.so.%{majorver}
> ln -sf libbstrc++.so.%{version} libbstrc++.so.%{minorver}

The cleaner and more convenient solution to that is to run ldconfig on the
buildroot libdir with the right options to make it create the symlinks without
updating runtime linker's cache.


> %check  #rpath is necessay for the compiled tests (which will not appear
> in the built package) to run here because ldconfig haven't run yet.

Not really. Without RPATH you would simply point $LD_LIBRARY_PATH at the
buildroot libdir when running the testsuite.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1476434] Review Request: bstrlib - Better String Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl



--- Comment #13 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek  ---
FTR:
spec:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/yecheng/bstrlib/fedora-rawhide-i386/00594066-bstrlib/bstrlib.spec
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/yecheng/bstrlib/fedora-rawhide-i386/00594066-bstrlib/bstrlib-1.0.0-1.fc28.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1476434] Review Request: bstrlib - Better String Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434

Michael Schwendt  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bugs.mich...@gmx.net



--- Comment #12 from Michael Schwendt  ---
Once again, if people approve packages prior to sponsorship and also change
bugzilla status, that hides these tickets from the tracker:
http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEEDSPONSOR.html

Jason, is that something you could fix in the tracker?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1476434] Review Request: bstrlib - Better String Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ti...@math.uh.edu



--- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts  ---
If you are still waiting for a sponsor, please open a ticket at
https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors and let someone know.  Be sure to link back
to this review.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1476434] Review Request: bstrlib - Better String Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434



--- Comment #10 from Ye Cheng <18969068...@163.com> ---
I added pkg-config file, so it could be easier for user to link the file.
This should be in devel file list, I will fix this in the next build.

spec:https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/yecheng/bstrlib/fedora-rawhide-i386/00594093-bstrlib/bstrlib.spec

srpm:https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/yecheng/bstrlib/fedora-rawhide-i386/00594093-bstrlib/bstrlib-1.0.0-1.fc28.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1476434] Review Request: bstrlib - Better String Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434

Robin Lee  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review Request: Bstrlib -   |Review Request: bstrlib -
   |Better String Library   |Better String Library



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1476434] Review Request: Bstrlib - Better String Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434

Robin Lee  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #9 from Robin Lee  ---
This package is approved by cheeselee.

Though you may still have to find a sponsor to support you before you can
import this package.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1476434] Review Request: Bstrlib - Better String Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434



--- Comment #8 from Ye Cheng <18969068...@163.com> ---
(In reply to Robin Lee from comment #7)
Thank you very much for the review. 
New spec
URL:https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/yecheng/bstrlib/fedora-rawhide-i386/00586525-bstrlib/bstrlib.spec

New srpm URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/yecheng/bstrlib/fedora-rawhide-i386/00586525-bstrlib/bstrlib-1.0.0-1.fc27.src.rpm

> [!]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
>  Note: Test programs should also honor global flags
Tests is now built and executed with make with global flags. Compiler complains
about various harmless type mismatches and there is already one pull request
(https://github.com/websnarf/bstrlib/pull/16/files) that could fix them but it
was not merged into the newest release.

> [?]: Cleaning test directory is not necessary.
Tests are now built in place and not removed.

> [?]: Why separating packages for bstrlib-safe? Since the library is small in
>  size.
Bstrlib-safe package is no longer separated as user can still decide whether to
use the safe moduli by simply deciding whether to include its header and link
the separately built bstrsafe library.

> [?]: Where does SOURCE1 come from? You should add a comment at least.
A comment indicating the makefile is packager supplied is added.

> [!]: Use tar.gz format instead of zip. Since tar.gz file usually has better
>  compression radio.
Changed to tar.gz file.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1476434] Review Request: Bstrlib - Better String Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434



--- Comment #7 from Robin Lee  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "BSD (3 clause)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* BSD
 (unspecified)". 20 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
 licensecheck in /home/cheese/Public/1476434-bstrlib/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
 must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/include/bstrlib
[!]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
 Note: Test programs should also honor global flags.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 215040 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
 

[Bug 1476434] Review Request: Bstrlib - Better String Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434

Robin Lee  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|robinlee.s...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1476434] Review Request: Bstrlib - Better String Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434



--- Comment #6 from Ye Cheng <18969068...@163.com> ---
(In reply to Ye Cheng from comment #0)
Sorry, yet another build to make it honour %__global_ldflags
 Spec URL: 
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/yecheng/bstrlib/fedora-rawhide-i386/00585367-bstrlib/bstrlib.spec
 SRPM URL: 
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/yecheng/bstrlib/fedora-rawhide-i386/00585367-bstrlib/bstrlib-1.0.0-1.fc27.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1476434] Review Request: Bstrlib - Better String Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434



--- Comment #5 from Ye Cheng <18969068...@163.com> ---
(In reply to Ye Cheng from comment #0)
 Spec URL: 
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/yecheng/bstrlib/fedora-rawhide-i386/00585360-bstrlib/bstrlib.spec
 SRPM URL: 
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/yecheng/bstrlib/fedora-rawhide-i386/00585360-bstrlib/bstrlib-1.0.0-1.fc27.src.rpm

Adding a dedicated %check section

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1476434] Review Request: Bstrlib - Better String Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434



--- Comment #4 from Ye Cheng <18969068...@163.com> ---
(In reply to Ye Cheng from comment #0)
Sorry for changing URLs again

Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/yecheng/bstrlib/fedora-rawhide-i386/00585332-bstrlib/bstrlib.spec

SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/yecheng/bstrlib/fedora-rawhide-i386/00585332-bstrlib/bstrlib-1.0.0-1.fc27.src.rpm

Rpmlint may complain about "shared-lib-calls-exit
/usr/lib64/libbstrsafe.so.1.0.0 exit@GLIBC_2.2.5" The exit call is necessary
for the safe moduli to function as it can terminate execution while returning
an error code -1 when the standard string library was accidentally called.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1476434] Review Request: Bstrlib - Better String Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434



--- Comment #3 from Ye Cheng <18969068...@163.com> ---
(In reply to Ye Cheng from comment #0)
Sorry for the inconvenience of switching URLs
> Spec URL: 
No longer valid 
New Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/yecheng/bstrlib/fedora-rawhide-i386/00584721-bstrlib/bstrlib.spec
> SRPM URL: 
No longer valid
New spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/yecheng/bstrlib/fedora-rawhide-i386/00584721-bstrlib/bstrlib.spec

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1476434] Review Request: Bstrlib - Better String Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434



--- Comment #2 from Ye Cheng <18969068...@163.com> ---
(In reply to Iwicki Artur from comment #1)
> >Release: 0%{?dist}
> The Release: tag should start at 1.
Fixed as Release: 1%{?dist} in release tag nd changelog

> The Group: tag should not be used. 
Group tags are removed
> >Source0: https://github.com/websnarf/bstrlib/archive/master.zip
> Refer to a git tag or commit instead.
Fixed as Source0: https://github.com/websnarf/bstrlib/archive/v%{updatever}.zip

> >%{_libdir}/bstrlib/
> >%{_includedir}/bstrlib/
Fixed by adding %dir %{_libdir}/bstrlib/, %dir %{_includedir}/bstrlib/

> Also, I believe that the use of both %{buildroot} and ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} is
> discouraged; it should be one or the other.

Fixed mix use of %{buildroot} and ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} 
(described in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS)
by replacing %{buildroot} with ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}

Built in copr rawhide, sorry for the inconvenience of changing URLs.
New srpm URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/yecheng/bstrlib/fedora-rawhide-i386/00584721-bstrlib/bstrlib-1.0.0-1.fc27.src.rpm

New spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/yecheng/bstrlib/fedora-rawhide-i386/00584721-bstrlib/bstrlib.spec

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1476434] Review Request: Bstrlib - Better String Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434

Iwicki Artur  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fed...@svgames.pl



--- Comment #1 from Iwicki Artur  ---
>Release: 0%{?dist}
The Release: tag should start at 1.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Versioning#Simple_versioning

>Group: System Environment/Libraries
>Group: Development/Libraries
The Group: tag should not be used. 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Tags_and_Sections

>Source0: https://github.com/websnarf/bstrlib/archive/master.zip
This will always fetch the latest snapshot of the master branch, which
introduces a risk of the RPM version not matching the software version. Refer
to a git tag or commit instead.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Git_Hosting_Services

>%{_libdir}/bstrlib/
>%{_includedir}/bstrlib/
These directories are unowned. You may want to use the %dir macro to mark a
directory as owned, without auto-owning all the files inside.

Also, I believe that the use of both %{buildroot} and ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} is
discouraged; it should be one or the other.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1476434] Review Request: Bstrlib - Better String Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434

Ye Cheng <18969068...@163.com> changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||18969068...@163.com
 Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org