[Bug 1505945] Review Request: rubygem-elasticsearch-api - Ruby API for Elasticsearch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505945 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2017-11-10 22:05:01 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- rubygem-elasticsearch-api-2.0.2-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1505945] Review Request: rubygem-elasticsearch-api - Ruby API for Elasticsearch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505945 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- rubygem-elasticsearch-api-2.0.2-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a7cd29700e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1505945] Review Request: rubygem-elasticsearch-api - Ruby API for Elasticsearch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505945 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- rubygem-elasticsearch-api-2.0.2-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a7cd29700e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1505945] Review Request: rubygem-elasticsearch-api - Ruby API for Elasticsearch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505945 Sandro Bonazzola changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||rubygem-elasticsearch-api-2 ||.0.2-1.fc28 --- Comment #6 from Sandro Bonazzola --- rubygem-elasticsearch-api-2.0.2-1.fc28 built in koji -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1505945] Review Request: rubygem-elasticsearch-api - Ruby API for Elasticsearch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505945 --- Comment #5 from Sandro Bonazzola --- f27 releng ticket: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/2438 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1505945] Review Request: rubygem-elasticsearch-api - Ruby API for Elasticsearch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505945 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-elasticsearch-api -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1505945] Review Request: rubygem-elasticsearch-api - Ruby API for Elasticsearch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505945 --- Comment #3 from Sandro Bonazzola --- Releng tickets: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/2433 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/2434 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1505945] Review Request: rubygem-elasticsearch-api - Ruby API for Elasticsearch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505945
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Runge ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %license.
Note: License file LICENSE_txt.html is not marked as %license
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 289 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/mrunge/review/1505945-rubygem-elasticsearch-api/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gems,
/usr/share/gems/doc
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Ruby:
[x]: Platform dependent files must all go under %{gem_extdir_mri}, platform
independent under %{gem_dir}.
[x]: Gem package must not define a non-gem subpackage
[x]: Macro %{gem_extdir} is deprecated.
[x]: Gem package is named rubygem-%{gem_name}
[x]: Package contains BuildRequires: rubygems-devel.
[x]: Gem package must define %{gem_name} macro.
[x]: Pure Ruby package must be built as noarch
[x]: Package does not contain Requires: ruby(abi).
[x]: Package contains Requires: ruby(release).
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
Note: Package contains font files
False positive
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned depe
[Bug 1505945] Review Request: rubygem-elasticsearch-api - Ruby API for Elasticsearch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505945 --- Comment #1 from Sandro Bonazzola --- copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sbonazzo/ovirt-fluentd/build/651441/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1505945] Review Request: rubygem-elasticsearch-api - Ruby API for Elasticsearch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505945 Sandro Bonazzola changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1505843 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505843 [Bug 1505843] Build rubygem-elasticsearch-api 2.0.2 for CentOS OpsTools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1505945] Review Request: rubygem-elasticsearch-api - Ruby API for Elasticsearch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505945 Sandro Bonazzola changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mru...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
