[Pce] 答复: 请伟强总邮件支持PCECC文稿的WG adoption

[Weiqiang Cheng]

 

Yes/Support! 

The application scenario is valuable.

 

B.R.

Weiqiang Cheng

 

From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2018 10:47 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-control...@ietf.org;
pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for
draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08

 

This is the start of a two week poll on making
draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08 a PCE working group
document.

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-contr
oller/

 

Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating
“yes/support” or “no/do not support”.  If indicating no, please state
your reasons.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like
to see addressed once the document is a WG document.

 

The poll ends on Friday, October 26.

 

Many thanks,

 

Jon and Julien

 

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08

[Chengli (IP Technology Research)]

Yes/Support.

This draft is well written, and good to be adopted since it is the base of 
drafts of PCECC-SR and other use cases.

Thanks,
Cheng

From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2018 10:47 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-control...@ietf.org; 
pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for 
draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08

This is the start of a two week poll on making 
draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08 a PCE working group 
document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller/

Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating "yes/support" 
or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, 
please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the 
document is a WG document.

The poll ends on Friday, October 26.

Many thanks,

Jon and Julien

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08

[Lizhenbin]

Yes/support as the co-author.

Best Regards,
Zhenbin(Robin)


From: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2018 10:47 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-control...@ietf.org; 
pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: WG adoption poll for 
draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08

This is the start of a two week poll on making 
draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08 a PCE working group 
document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller/

Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating "yes/support" 
or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, 
please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the 
document is a WG document.

The poll ends on Friday, October 26.

Many thanks,

Jon and Julien

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] 撤回: 请伟强总邮件支持PCECC文稿的WG adoption

[Weiqiang Cheng]

Weiqiang Cheng 将撤回邮件“请伟强总邮件支持PCECC文稿的WG adoption”。
<>___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08

[Chao Zhou (czhou)]

Yes/Support.

-Chao

From: Pce  on behalf of Leeyoung 
Date: Monday, October 22, 2018 at 11:03 PM
To: Jonathan Hardwick , 
"pce@ietf.org" 
Cc: "draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-control...@ietf.org" 
, 
"pce-cha...@ietf.org" 
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for 
draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08

Yes/support.

Young

From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2018 9:47 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-control...@ietf.org; 
pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for 
draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08

This is the start of a two week poll on making 
draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08 a PCE working group 
document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller/

Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support” 
or “no/do not support”.  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, 
please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the 
document is a WG document.

The poll ends on Friday, October 26.

Many thanks,

Jon and Julien

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08

[Dongjie (Jimmy)]

Yes/support.

Best regards,
Jie

From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2018 10:47 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-control...@ietf.org; 
pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for 
draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08

This is the start of a two week poll on making 
draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08 a PCE working group 
document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller/

Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating "yes/support" 
or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, 
please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the 
document is a WG document.

The poll ends on Friday, October 26.

Many thanks,

Jon and Julien

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08

[Khasanov Boris]

Yes, support.

SY,
Boris

From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2018 5:47 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-control...@ietf.org; 
pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for 
draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08

This is the start of a two week poll on making 
draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08 a PCE working group 
document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller/

Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating "yes/support" 
or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, 
please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the 
document is a WG document.

The poll ends on Friday, October 26.

Many thanks,

Jon and Julien

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection-03.txt

[internet-drafts]

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF.

Title   : PCEP Extensions for Associating Working and 
Protection LSPs with Stateful PCE
Authors : Hariharan Ananthakrishnan
  Siva Sivabalan
  Colby Barth
  Raveendra Torvi
  Ina Minei
  Edward Crabbe
  Dhruv Dhody
Filename: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection-03.txt
Pages   : 16
Date: 2018-10-22

Abstract:
   A stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) is capable of computing as
   well as controlling via Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP)
   Multiprotocol Label Switching Traffic Engineering Label Switched
   Paths (MPLS LSP).  Furthermore, it is also possible for a stateful
   PCE to create, maintain, and delete LSPs.  This document describes
   PCEP extension to associate two or more LSPs to provide end-to-end
   path protection.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection-03
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection-03

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection-03


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08

[Eric Gray]

Support.

From: Pce  On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2018 10:47 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-control...@ietf.org; 
pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for 
draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08

This is the start of a two week poll on making 
draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08 a PCE working group 
document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller/

Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating "yes/support" 
or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, 
please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the 
document is a WG document.

The poll ends on Friday, October 26.

Many thanks,

Jon and Julien

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08

[Mahendra Singh Negi]

Yes/Support

Regards,
Mahendra

From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: 13 October 2018 20:17
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-control...@ietf.org; 
pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for 
draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08

This is the start of a two week poll on making 
draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08 a PCE working group 
document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller/

Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating "yes/support" 
or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, 
please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the 
document is a WG document.

The poll ends on Friday, October 26.

Many thanks,

Jon and Julien

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08

[Satish K]

Yes/Support

On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 8:27 PM Jonathan Hardwick  wrote:

> This is the start of a two week poll on making
> draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08 a PCE working group
> document.
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller/
>
>
>
> Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating
> “yes/support” or “no/do not support”.  If indicating no, please state your
> reasons.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to
> see addressed once the document is a WG document.
>
>
>
> The poll ends on Friday, October 26.
>
>
>
> Many thanks,
>
>
>
> Jon and Julien
>
>
> ___
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-06.txt

[internet-drafts]

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF.

Title   : Hierarchical Stateful Path Computation Element (PCE).
Authors : Dhruv Dhody
  Young Lee
  Daniele Ceccarelli
  Jongyoon Shin
  Daniel King
  Oscar Gonzalez de Dios
Filename: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-06.txt
Pages   : 20
Date: 2018-10-22

Abstract:
   A Stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) maintains information on
   the current network state, including: computed Label Switched Path
   (LSPs), reserved resources within the network, and pending path
   computation requests. This information may then be considered when
   computing new traffic engineered LSPs, and for associated
   and dependent LSPs, received from Path Computation Clients (PCCs).

   The Hierarchical Path Computation Element (H-PCE) architecture,
   provides an architecture to allow the optimum sequence of
   inter-connected domains to be selected, and network policy to be
   applied if applicable, via the use of a hierarchical relationship
   between PCEs.

   Combining the capabilities of Stateful PCE and the Hierarchical PCE
   would be advantageous. This document describes general considerations
   and use cases for the deployment of Stateful PCE(s) using the
   Hierarchical PCE architecture.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-06
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-06

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-06


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-applicability-actn-07.txt

[internet-drafts]

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF.

Title   : Applicability of Path Computation Element (PCE) for 
Abstraction and Control of TE Networks (ACTN)
Authors : Dhruv Dhody
  Young Lee
  Daniele Ceccarelli
Filename: draft-ietf-pce-applicability-actn-07.txt
Pages   : 20
Date: 2018-10-22

Abstract:
   Abstraction and Control of TE Networks (ACTN) refers to the set of
   virtual network (VN) operations needed to orchestrate, control and
   manage large-scale multi-domain TE networks so as to facilitate
   network programmability, automation, efficient resource sharing, and
   end-to-end virtual service aware connectivity and network function
   virtualization services.

   The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) provides
   mechanisms for Path Computation Elements (PCEs) to perform path
   computations in response to Path Computation Clients (PCCs) requests.

   This document examines the applicability of PCE to the ACTN
   framework.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-applicability-actn/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-applicability-actn-07
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-applicability-actn-07

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-applicability-actn-07


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] 答复: WG adoption poll for draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08

[Aijun Wang]

Hi, All:

 

Yes/Support.

 

One comments is that the author can also consider using the PCECC mechanism
to edit dynamically the LSP path that formed by the traditional LSP path
setup protocol.  Such coordination can leverage the advantages of the
central and distributed control protocol.

 

 

Best Regards.

 

Aijun Wang

Network R and Operation Support Department

China Telecom Corporation Limited Beijing Research Institute,Beijing, China.

 

发件人: Jonathan Hardwick
[mailto:Jonathan.Hardwick=40metaswitch@dmarc.ietf.org] 
发送时间: 2018年10月13日 22:47
收件人: pce@ietf.org
抄送: draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-control...@ietf.org;
pce-cha...@ietf.org
主题: [Pce] WG adoption poll for
draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08

 

This is the start of a two week poll on making
draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08 a PCE working group
document.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-contr
oller/

 

Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating
“yes/support” or “no/do not support”.  If indicating no, please state
your reasons.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like
to see addressed once the document is a WG document.

 

The poll ends on Friday, October 26.

 

Many thanks,

 

Jon and Julien

 

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] Rtgdir review: draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext-08

[Ravi Singh]

Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The 
Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as 
they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special 
request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. 
For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see 
​http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would 
be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call 
comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by 
updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext-08
Reviewer: Ravi Singh
Review Date: 10/22/2018
Intended Status: Standard Track

Summary:
This document is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be 
considered prior to publication.

Comments/Nits:
The draft is overall easy to understand.
However, there is a need to address some nits and make minor changes for better 
readability.

Specific details below:
1.   Section 3: The following text could elaborate the function/properties 
of a 3R regenerator in a little bit more detail.
"On the other hand, translucent networks include 3R regenerators that are 
sparsely placed." :
2.   Figure 1:  "SwCap": this could use some more info in the text 
somewhere.
3.   Section 4:
a.   " the PCEP extensions that are going to be specified in this document 
based on
   this architecture." ->
" the PCEP extensions that are going to be specified in this document are based 
on
   this architecture."
4.   Section 4.1:
a.text says that the WA object must be after the Endpoints object and 
does not say anything about ordering w.r.t. any following objects. It would be 
desirable to make an explicit statement either saying that ordering w.r.t. the 
other following objects is irrelevant, since the text is implying that that is 
the case.
b.  The term "explicit label control (ELC)" seems to have been coined in 
this draft and does not exist in RFC4003: while it logically follows from 
RFC4003, defining a new term in this doc should refer to lingo used in RFC4003 
to enable better readability.
5.   Section 4.3:
a.   "Note that the Action field can be set to 0 when unnumbered link 
identifier is used." : not clear. Please clarify and this sentences belongs in 
a paragraph of its own to avoid entanglement with "action bits" description.
b.  "See Section 4.2.1. for the encoding of the Link Identifiers Field." : 
4.2.1 -> 4.3.1
c.   "See Section 4.2.1. for Link Identifier encoding and Section 4.2.2. 
for the Wavelength Restriction Field encoding, respectively." -> 4.3.1 and 4.3.2
6.   Section 4.3.1:
a.   IPv4 address and IPv6 address as show in the figure do not align 
correctly as per the lengths: kindly fix.
b.  4.3.2: "section 2.6," hyperlink links to this draft rather than to 
RFC7579 as intended. Same for other sections referred in this section.
7.   Section 5:
a.   "Reply for wavelength allocation as discussed" -> "Reply for 
wavelength allocation request as discussed'
b.  4.2.1/4.2.2 -> 4.3.1/4.3.2
8.   Section 8.2/8.5/8.6: is this IANA request really necessary since an 
existing subTLV format is being re-used?


Regards
Ravi




___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-08.txt

[internet-drafts]

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF.

Title   : Path Computation Element (PCE) Protocol Extensions 
for Stateful PCE usage for Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Label 
Switched Paths
Authors : Udayasree Palle
  Dhruv Dhody
  Yosuke Tanaka
  Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Filename: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-08.txt
Pages   : 33
Date: 2018-10-22

Abstract:
   The Path Computation Element (PCE) has been identified as an
   appropriate technology for the determination of the paths of point-
   to-multipoint (P2MP) TE Label Switched Paths (LSPs).  This document
   provides extensions required for Path Computation Element
   Communication Protocol (PCEP) so as to enable the usage of a stateful
   PCE capability in supporting P2MP TE LSPs.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-08
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-08

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-08


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce