Re: [PD] load abbreviated objects

2008-02-25 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner

Someone might have removed [shell] from flatspace.  ggee is the  
home of [shell],  [ggee/shell] will always work.

The abbreviations could be supported if someone does the work.

.hc

On Feb 24, 2008, at 10:19 AM, Jack wrote:

 I have the same problem with [s2l] and [l2s] objects, you must create
 first [symbol2list] and [list2symbol] objects.
 Here, [shell] can't create even with [import flatspace] (it is the
 right library ?).
 ++

 Jack


 Le 24 févr. 08 à 05:17, marius schebella a écrit :

 hi,
 what is the problem that (in pd-extended) abbreviated object classes
 like mtx_+ cannot be instantiated, I have to create mtx_add before.
 I think this is a known problem, but is there a solution to fix this?
 also, some of the objects can't be created, but I am not sure why for
 example mtx_add is one of these. is there a nameclash so that
 iemmatrix
 is not loaded by default?
 mtx_div seems to be an extra problem (can't be loaded).
 dumpOSC xx is another object that will not be created only with
 oscx/dumpOSC xx.
 what's the rule behind that? hans, do you want bugreports for that
 kind
 of stuff? are you planning to fix this at all or wait for 0.41?
 marius.

 ___
 PD-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/
 listinfo/pd-list


 ___
 PD-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/ 
 listinfo/pd-list





 


Free software means you control what your computer does. Non-free  
software means someone else controls that, and to some extent  
controls you. - Richard M. Stallman



___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


[PD] load abbreviated objects

2008-02-24 Thread marius schebella
hi,
what is the problem that (in pd-extended) abbreviated object classes 
like mtx_+ cannot be instantiated, I have to create mtx_add before.
I think this is a known problem, but is there a solution to fix this?
also, some of the objects can't be created, but I am not sure why for 
example mtx_add is one of these. is there a nameclash so that iemmatrix 
is not loaded by default?
mtx_div seems to be an extra problem (can't be loaded).
dumpOSC xx is another object that will not be created only with 
oscx/dumpOSC xx.
what's the rule behind that? hans, do you want bugreports for that kind 
of stuff? are you planning to fix this at all or wait for 0.41?
marius.

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] load abbreviated objects

2008-02-24 Thread Georg Holzmann
Hallo!

First: do you use the autobuilds or the stable pd-extended ?

 what is the problem that (in pd-extended) abbreviated object classes 
 like mtx_+ cannot be instantiated, I have to create mtx_add before.

Because the hexloader was broken - I don't know if this is already fixed 
in the autobuilds ...

 I think this is a known problem, but is there a solution to fix this?
 also, some of the objects can't be created, but I am not sure why for 
 example mtx_add is one of these. is there a nameclash so that iemmatrix 
 is not loaded by default?

I once included all the iemmatrix objects and also it's aliases. They 
should be in the nightly autobuild version, although I don't know if the 
hexloader works (at least it should work with mtx_add, mtx_div, ...).
However, I don't think that they should be loaded by default, but that's 
an other discussion ... ;)

LG
Georg

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] load abbreviated objects

2008-02-24 Thread Jack
I have the same problem with [s2l] and [l2s] objects, you must create  
first [symbol2list] and [list2symbol] objects.
Here, [shell] can't create even with [import flatspace] (it is the  
right library ?).
++

Jack


Le 24 févr. 08 à 05:17, marius schebella a écrit :

 hi,
 what is the problem that (in pd-extended) abbreviated object classes
 like mtx_+ cannot be instantiated, I have to create mtx_add before.
 I think this is a known problem, but is there a solution to fix this?
 also, some of the objects can't be created, but I am not sure why for
 example mtx_add is one of these. is there a nameclash so that  
 iemmatrix
 is not loaded by default?
 mtx_div seems to be an extra problem (can't be loaded).
 dumpOSC xx is another object that will not be created only with
 oscx/dumpOSC xx.
 what's the rule behind that? hans, do you want bugreports for that  
 kind
 of stuff? are you planning to fix this at all or wait for 0.41?
 marius.

 ___
 PD-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/ 
 listinfo/pd-list


___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list